Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Qiling Yiqi Tablets Plus Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV Immune Non-responders With Lung-Spleen Qi Deficiency (QLYQ-INR-pRCT)

7 juillet 2026 mis à jour par: Mei Han, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine

A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of Qiling Yiqi Tablets Combined With Antiretroviral Therapy for Immune Reconstitution Failure in People With HIV and Lung-Spleen Qi Deficiency Syndrome

This pragmatic randomized controlled trial evaluates whether Qiling Yiqi Tablets combined with antiretroviral therapy (ART) improves immune reconstitution in people with HIV who meet criteria for immune reconstitution failure and lung-spleen qi deficiency syndrome. Eligible participants are adults aged 18 to 60 years with HIV-1 infection, long-term viral suppression on ART, and persistently low CD4+ T-cell counts. A total of 240 participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive Qiling Yiqi Tablets plus ART or ART alone. Treatment lasts 48 weeks, followed by 48 weeks of follow-up. The primary outcomes are absolute CD4+ T-cell count and immune reconstitution response rate. Secondary outcomes include immune homeostasis markers, T-cell activation and Treg proportion, thymic output and inflammation-related markers, HIV RNA viral load, quality of life, clinical symptom scores, all-cause mortality, and safety.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Statut

Indique le statut de recrutement actuel ou le statut d'accès étendu.
Pas encore de recrutement

Les conditions

Les conditions

La maladie, le trouble, le syndrome, la maladie ou la blessure à l'étude. Sur ClinicalTrials.gov, les conditions peuvent également inclure d'autres problèmes liés à la santé, tels que la durée de vie, la qualité de vie et les risques pour la santé.

Intervention / Traitement

Intervention / Traitement

Processus ou action faisant l'objet d'une étude clinique. Les interventions comprennent les médicaments, les dispositifs médicaux, les procédures, les vaccins et d'autres produits expérimentaux ou déjà disponibles. Les interventions peuvent également inclure des approches non invasives, telles que l'éducation ou la modification du régime alimentaire et de l'exercice.

Description détaillée

This is a prospective, multicenter, pragmatic, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Participants will be recruited from three HIV treatment-designated hospitals in high-prevalence regions in China. Eligible participants will be randomized by center-stratified block randomization at a 1:1 ratio to the experimental arm or control arm. Randomization codes will be generated using SAS by personnel independent from the clinical trial. The ART regimen is not restricted and follows applicable domestic and international ART guidelines. Clinical data will be collected using a unified CRF/eCRF and managed through an EDC platform with de-identified study codes and access controls.

Type d'étude

Type d'étude

Décrit la nature d'une étude clinique. Les types d'études comprennent les études interventionnelles (également appelées essais cliniques), les études observationnelles (y compris les registres de patients) et l'accès élargi.
Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

Inscription

Le nombre de participants à une étude clinique. L'inscription "prévue" est le nombre cible de participants dont les chercheurs ont besoin pour l'étude.
240

Phase

Phase

L'étape d'un essai clinique étudiant un médicament ou un produit biologique, basée sur les définitions élaborées par la Food and Drug Administration (FDA) des États-Unis. La phase est basée sur l'objectif de l'étude, le nombre de participants et d'autres caractéristiques. Il y a cinq phases : phase précoce 1 (anciennement répertoriée comme phase 0), phase 1, phase 2, phase 3 et phase 4. Non applicable est utilisé pour décrire les essais sans phases définies par la FDA, y compris les essais de dispositifs ou d'interventions comportementales.
  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Coordonnées de l'étude

Le nom et les coordonnées de la personne qui peut répondre aux questions d'inscription à une étude clinique. Chaque lieu où l'étude est menée peut également avoir un contact spécifique, qui peut être mieux à même de répondre à ces questions.

Lieux d'étude

  • Chine
    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, Chine, 100029
        • Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
        • Contact:

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Critère d'éligibilité

Les principales exigences que doivent remplir les personnes qui souhaitent participer à une étude clinique ou les caractéristiques qu'elles doivent avoir. Les critères d'éligibilité comprennent à la fois des critères d'inclusion (qui sont requis pour qu'une personne participe à l'étude) et des critères d'exclusion (qui empêchent une personne de participer). Les types de critères d'éligibilité incluent si une étude accepte des volontaires sains, a des exigences d'âge ou de groupe d'âge, ou est limitée par le sexe.

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:Aged 18 to 60 years, male or female. CD4+ T lymphocyte count <350 cells/uL. Meets diagnostic criteria for HIV-1 infection according to the Chinese Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of HIV/AIDS (2024 edition).

Meets diagnostic criteria for incomplete immune reconstitution: ART for more than 4 years; peripheral blood viral load below the lower limit of detection (<50 copies/mL) for more than 3 years; persistent CD4+ T-cell count <350 cells/uL; and exclusion of other causes of long-term low CD4+ T-cell count.

Meets the Traditional Chinese Medicine diagnostic criteria for lung-spleen qi deficiency syndrome, supported by the designated four-diagnostic instrument (model SZY-ZM-1) where applicable.

Voluntarily agrees to participate and signs informed consent. -

Exclusion Criteria:Uncontrolled acute or chronic physical or mental illness. Poor adherence to ART. WBC <2 x 10^9/L, neutrophils <1.0 x 10^9/L, hemoglobin <90 g/L, platelets <75 x 10^9/L, or abnormal hepatic/renal function. Hepatic abnormality is defined as AST, ALT, or total bilirubin >=2 times the upper limit of normal; renal abnormality is defined as creatinine clearance below the normal value.

Other serious comorbid disease, such as tumor, cirrhosis, or cardiovascular/cerebrovascular disease.

Pregnancy, lactation, or recent plan for pregnancy/childbearing. Use of immunosuppressants or immunomodulators within 6 months before screening. Any other condition judged by the investigator to make the participant unsuitable for the study.

-

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras

Groupe de participants / Bras

Un groupe ou un sous-groupe de participants à un essai clinique qui reçoit une intervention/un traitement spécifique, ou aucune intervention, selon le protocole de l'essai.
Intervention / Traitement

Intervention / Traitement

Processus ou action faisant l'objet d'une étude clinique. Les interventions comprennent les médicaments, les dispositifs médicaux, les procédures, les vaccins et d'autres produits expérimentaux ou déjà disponibles. Les interventions peuvent également inclure des approches non invasives, telles que l'éducation ou la modification du régime alimentaire et de l'exercice.
Expérimental: Qiling Yiqi Tablets plus ART
Participants receive Qiling Yiqi Tablets orally in addition to their background ART regimen for 48 weeks.
Médicament: Qiling Yiqi Tablets plus ART
Qiling Yiqi Tablets: Qiling Yiqi Tablets are a marketed Chinese patent medicine (NMPA approval No. Z20050483; Sichuan Enwei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.). The formula includes Astragalus, Codonopsis, Atractylodes macrocephala, Poria, and related components. Dose: 6 tablets orally three times daily after meals with warm water for 48 weeks.Participants receive Qiling Yiqi Tablets orally in addition to their background ART regimen for 48 weeks.
Comparateur actif: ART alone
Participants continue ART according to applicable domestic and international ART guidelines
Médicament: Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Background ART regimen according to applicable domestic and international ART guidelines.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Principaux critères de jugement

Dans le protocole d'une étude clinique, la mesure de résultat prévue qui est la plus importante pour évaluer l'effet d'une intervention/d'un traitement. La plupart des études cliniques ont un critère de jugement principal, mais certaines en ont plus d'un.
Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Absolute CD4+ T-cell count
Délai: Week 48
Change in absolute CD4+ T-cell count, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Week 48
Immune reconstitution response rate
Délai: Week 48
Response is defined as CD4+ T-cell count >350 cells/uL or a >=30% increase from baseline; non-response is defined as a <30% increase from baseline.
Week 48

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Dans le protocole d'une étude clinique, mesure de résultat planifiée qui n'est pas aussi importante que la mesure de résultat principale pour évaluer l'effet d'une intervention, mais qui reste intéressante. La plupart des études cliniques ont plus d'un critère de jugement secondaire.
Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Absolute CD4+ T-cell count
Délai: Week 96.
Change in absolute CD4+ T-cell count, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Week 96.
Immune reconstitution response rate
Délai: Week 96.
Response is defined as CD4+ T-cell count >350 cells/uL or a >=30% increase from baseline; non-response is defined as a <30% increase from baseline.
Week 96.
CD4+ T-cell proportion
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD4+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
CD4+/CD8+ ratio
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD4+/CD8+ ratio, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
CD8+ T-cell proportion
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD8+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
CD45RA+ T-cell proportion
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD45RA+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
CD45RO+ T-cell proportion
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD45RO+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
CD4+CD28+ T-cell proportion
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD4+CD28+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
CD8+CD38+ T-cell proportion
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD8+CD38+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
CD4+CD38+ T-cell proportion
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD4+CD38+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
CD38+/HLA-DR+ T-cell activation marker
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD38+/HLA-DR+ T-cell activation marker, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Treg proportion
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in regulatory T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
TRECs level
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in T-cell receptor excision circles level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
CD3+ T-cell level
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD3+ T-cell level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
CD31+ T-cell level
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD31+ T-cell level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
IL-2 level
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in interleukin-2 level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
IL-4 level
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in interleukin-4 level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
IL-6 level
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in interleukin-6 level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
IL-10 level
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in interleukin-10 level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
IL-17A level
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in interleukin-17A level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
TNF-alpha level
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in tumor necrosis factor-alpha level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
IFN-gamma level
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in interferon-gamma level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
HIV RNA viral load
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 48 and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in HIV RNA viral load, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 48 and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Quality of life score
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 48, 60, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in quality of life score assessed using the WHOQOL-HIV-BREF questionnaire, compared between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 48, 60, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
TCM syndrome response rate
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Response is defined as a >=30% decrease in TCM syndrome score from baseline; non-response is defined as a <30% decrease from baseline.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
All-cause mortality rate
Délai: From randomization through Week 96.
Death from any cause during the study period, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
From randomization through Week 96.
Red blood cell count
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in red blood cell count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
White blood cell count
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in white blood cell count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Hemoglobin level
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in hemoglobin level as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Platelet count
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in platelet count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Absolute neutrophil count
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in absolute neutrophil count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Absolute lymphocyte count
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in absolute lymphocyte count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Aspartate aminotransferase level
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in aspartate aminotransferase level as a liver function safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Alanine aminotransferase level
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in alanine aminotransferase level as a liver function safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Gamma-glutamyl transferase level
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in gamma-glutamyl transferase level as a liver function safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Blood urea nitrogen level
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in blood urea nitrogen level as a renal function safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Serum creatinine level
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in serum creatinine level as a renal function safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Urinary red blood cell result
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in urinary red blood cell result as a urinalysis safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Urinary protein result
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in urinary protein result as a urinalysis safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Urinary white blood cell result
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in urinary white blood cell result as a urinalysis safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Urinary glucose result
Délai: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in urinary glucose result as a urinalysis safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Incidence of adverse events
Délai: Adverse events were monitored from randomization through Week 96.
Incidence of adverse events during the 48-week treatment period and the post-treatment follow-up period, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Adverse events were monitored from randomization through Week 96.
Incidence of serious adverse events
Délai: Serious adverse events were monitored from randomization through Week 96.
Incidence of serious adverse events during the 48-week treatment period and the post-treatment follow-up period, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Serious adverse events were monitored from randomization through Week 96.
Treatment interruption rate
Délai: Treatment interruption was monitored from randomization through Week 48.
Proportion of participants with interruption of the assigned study treatment during the 48-week treatment period, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Treatment interruption was monitored from randomization through Week 48.
Concomitant medication use
Délai: Concomitant medication use was recorded from randomization through Week 96.
Use of concomitant medications during the study period, including medication name, reason for use, dosage form, dose, route, frequency, start date, and end date.
Concomitant medication use was recorded from randomization through Week 96.

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Parrainer

L'organisation ou la personne qui lance l'étude et qui a autorité et contrôle sur l'étude.
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine

Collaborateurs

Collaborateurs

Une organisation autre que le promoteur qui apporte son soutien à une étude clinique. Ce soutien peut inclure des activités liées au financement, à la conception, à la mise en œuvre, à l'analyse des données ou à la production de rapports.
Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Publications générales

  • 中华中医药学会防治艾滋病分会, 刘颖, 梁碧颜. 艾滋病中医诊疗专家共识[J]. 中国艾滋病性病, 2025, 31(9): 1029-1034. DOI: 10.13419/j.cnki.aids.2025.09.18.
  • 中华医学会感染病学分会艾滋病丙型肝炎学组. 艾滋病免疫功能重建不全者临床诊疗专家共识（2023版）[J]. 中华传染病杂志, 2024, 42(1): 3-13. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn311365-20230927-00098.
  • 中华医学会感染病学分会艾滋病学组, 中国疾病预防控制中心. 中国艾滋病诊疗指南（2024版）[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2024, 15(6): 1261-1288. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0766.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

Début de l'étude

La date réelle à laquelle le premier participant a été inscrit à une étude clinique. La date de début "prévue" de l'étude est la date qui, selon les chercheurs, sera la date de début de l'étude.
1 août 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

Achèvement primaire

La date à laquelle le dernier participant à une étude clinique a été examiné ou a reçu une intervention pour recueillir les données finales pour le critère de jugement principal. Que l'étude clinique se soit terminée conformément au protocole ou qu'elle ait été terminée n'affecte pas cette date. Pour les études cliniques avec plus d'un critère de jugement principal avec des dates d'achèvement différentes, ce terme fait référence à la date à laquelle la collecte de données est terminée pour tous les critères de jugement principaux. La date d'achèvement primaire "prévue" est la date qui, selon les chercheurs, sera la date d'achèvement primaire de l'étude.
1 février 2028

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

Achèvement de l'étude

La date à laquelle le dernier participant à une étude clinique a été examiné ou a reçu une intervention/un traitement pour recueillir les données finales pour les mesures de résultats primaires, les mesures de résultats secondaires et les événements indésirables (c'est-à-dire la dernière visite du dernier participant). La date d'achèvement de l'étude "prévue" est la date qui, selon les chercheurs, sera la date d'achèvement de l'étude.
1 février 2029

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

Première soumission

La date à laquelle le promoteur de l'étude ou l'investigateur a soumis pour la première fois un dossier d'étude à ClinicalTrials.gov. Il y a généralement un délai de quelques jours entre la première date de soumission et la disponibilité du dossier sur ClinicalTrials.gov (la première date publiée).
7 juillet 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

La date à laquelle le promoteur de l'étude ou l'investigateur soumet pour la première fois un dossier d'étude conforme aux critères d'examen du contrôle qualité (CQ) de la National Library of Medicine (NLM). Le promoteur ou l'investigateur peut avoir besoin de réviser et de soumettre un dossier d'étude une ou plusieurs fois avant que les critères d'examen du CQ du NLM soient remplis. Il incombe au promoteur ou à l'investigateur de s'assurer que le dossier de l'étude est conforme aux critères d'examen du NLM QC.
7 juillet 2026

Première publication (Réel)

Première publication

La date à laquelle le dossier d'étude a été disponible pour la première fois sur ClinicalTrials.gov après la fin de l'examen du contrôle qualité (CQ) de la National Library of Medicine (NLM). Il y a généralement un délai de quelques jours entre la date à laquelle le promoteur de l'étude ou l'investigateur a soumis le dossier de l'étude et la première date de publication.
13 juillet 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

Dernière mise à jour publiée

La date la plus récente à laquelle les modifications apportées à un dossier d'étude ont été mises à disposition sur ClinicalTrials.gov. Il peut y avoir un délai entre le moment où les modifications ont été soumises à ClinicalTrials.gov par le promoteur ou l'investigateur de l'étude (la date de soumission de la dernière mise à jour) et la date de publication de la dernière mise à jour.
13 juillet 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

La date la plus récente à laquelle le promoteur de l'étude ou l'investigateur a soumis des modifications à un dossier d'étude qui sont conformes aux critères d'examen du contrôle qualité (CQ) de la National Library of Medicine (NLM). Il incombe au promoteur ou à l'investigateur de s'assurer que le dossier de l'étude est conforme aux critères d'examen du NLM QC.
7 juillet 2026

Dernière vérification

Dernière vérification

La date la plus récente à laquelle le promoteur de l'étude ou l'investigateur a confirmé que les informations sur une étude clinique sur ClinicalTrials.gov étaient exactes et à jour. Si une étude avec un statut de recrutement de recrutement ; pas encore de recrutement ; ou actif, aucun recrutement n'a été confirmé au cours des 2 dernières années, le statut de recrutement de l'étude est indiqué comme inconnu.
1 juin 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Mots clés

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

Identifiants ou numéros d'identification autres que le numéro NCT qui sont attribués à une étude clinique par le sponsor de l'étude, les bailleurs de fonds ou autres. Ces numéros peuvent inclure des identifiants uniques d'autres registres d'essais et des numéros de subvention des National Institutes of Health.
  • CTCM-HIV-INR-QLYQ-2026

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Description du régime IPD

The study involves HIV-related clinical data. The clinical data will be de-identified, stored in an EDC system, and exported only after written approval by the principal investigator.

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

Paramètres des cookies

Nous utilisons des cookies pour nous assurer de vous offrir la meilleure expérience sur notre site Web. Pour plus de détails, lisez attentivement notre Politique de confidentialité et de cookies. ...>>>Vous pouvez modifier vos préférences ou retirer votre consentement à tout moment en supprimant les cookies de votre site Web ou de votre ordinateur comme décrit dans la politique. Veuillez l'accepter et choisir vos préférences en cochant les cases correspondantes dans la section "Gérer les paramètres" ci-dessous. Veuillez lire attentivement nos Conditions d'utilisation avant de continuer à utiliser une partie de ce site Web.
«Gérer les paramètres