Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Comparison of Double Lumen Tube Placement Techniques

20 juin 2018 mis à jour par: Igor Zhukov, Emory University

Comparison of Placement of Double-lumen Endobronchial Tube Using GlideScope With 2 Different Stylet Configurations vs Standard Macintosh Laryngoscopy

The purpose of this study is to compare three different standard of care methods of double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) placement in patients who are scheduled to have thoracic surgery in which lung isolation is required.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Résilié

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

The purpose of this study is to compare three different standard of care methods of double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) placement in patients who are scheduled to have thoracic surgery in which lung isolation is required. The investigators want to evaluate the technique of placement of the double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) using an included stylet that has been radically bent (ZU-bend) as compared to a commercial GlideRite stylet with the GlideScope and direct laryngoscopy using the Macintosh laryngoscope. A double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) is a breathing tube utilized to manage the airway when lung separation is needed for a surgical procedure. The investigator wants to evaluate how long it takes for successful placement of the double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) and assess the difficulty of the procedure experienced by the physician performing the intubation.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

19

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

  • États-Unis
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, États-Unis, 30322
        • Emory University Hospital
      • Atlanta, Georgia, États-Unis, 30308
        • Emory University Hospital Midtown

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male and female patients requiring a double-lumen endobronchial tube placement for surgery at Emory University Hospital or Emory University Hospital Midtown
  2. Patients willing and able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients in whom a previously difficult airway manipulation was recorded on an anesthetic record
  2. Lung transplantation procedures, as underlying pulmonary disorder that will confound the SpO2 (peripheral capillary oxygen saturation) metric
  3. Any patient who is receiving anticoagulants in excess of a daily aspirin, patients with an International Normalized Ratio or INR >1
  4. Patients in whom one lung ventilation or placement of a double-lumen endobronchial tube is contraindicated
  5. Patients who require a rapid-sequence intubation
  6. Patients undergoing emergency procedures

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Recherche sur les services de santé
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: ZU-bend stylet with GlideScope technique
Subjects scheduled for thoracic surgery in which the surgeon requests lung isolation will undergo laryngoscopy and intubation using the ZU-bend with the GlideScope technique of a double lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) placement as part of the anesthesia procedure prior to surgery.
Dispositif: ZU-bend stylet
Laryngoscopy and intubation after induction of anesthesia will be done using the GlideScope and the ZU-bend stylet. The ZU-bend is a specific shaping technique of the intubating stylet that is closely related to the GlideScope blade curvature. Zu-bend stylet is withdrawn as a part of placement procedure during the DLT advancement. Thereafter, GlideScope is removed and placement of the double-lumen endobronchial tube is verified with capnography and fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the usual manner.
Dispositif: GlideScope
Laryngoscopy and intubation after induction of anesthesia will be done using the the GlideScope technique. The GlideScope is a video laryngoscope that provides a real-time view of the airway and tube placement during intubation. GlideScope is removed after DLT is in the trachea, and placement of the double-lumen endobronchial tube is verified with capnography and fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the usual manner.
Comparateur actif: GlideScope with the GlideRite stylet
Subjects scheduled for thoracic surgery in which the surgeon requests lung isolation will undergo laryngoscopy and intubation using the GlideScope with the GlideRite stylet for placement of a double lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) as part of the anesthesia procedure prior to surgery.
Dispositif: GlideScope
Laryngoscopy and intubation after induction of anesthesia will be done using the the GlideScope technique. The GlideScope is a video laryngoscope that provides a real-time view of the airway and tube placement during intubation. GlideScope is removed after DLT is in the trachea, and placement of the double-lumen endobronchial tube is verified with capnography and fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the usual manner.
Dispositif: GlideRite stylet
Laryngoscopy and intubation after induction of anesthesia will be done with the GlideScope using the GlideRite stylet. The GlideRite stylet is specifically designed to work with the GlideScope and provides the necessary rigidity and curvature to an otherwise flexible tube. GlideRite stylet is withdrawn as a part of placement procedure during the DLT advancement. Thereafter, GlideScope is removed and placement of the double-lumen endobronchial tube is verified with capnography and fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the usual manner.
Comparateur actif: Macintosh blade and a regular DLT stylet
Subjects scheduled for thoracic surgery in which the surgeon requests lung isolation will undergo laryngoscopy and intubation using the direct laryngoscopy technique with the Macintosh blade and a regular double lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) stylet as part of the anesthesia procedure prior to surgery.
Dispositif: Macintosh blade
Direct laryngoscopy and intubation after induction of anesthesia will be done with the Macintosh blade and a regular double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) stylet. The Macintosh blade is used to facilitate visualization of the larynx during double or single lumen endobronchial tube placement. After intubation the Macintosh laryngoscope is removed and the confirmation of the successful placement of the double-lumen endobronchial tube in done in the standard fashion.
Autres noms:
  • Laryngoscope blade
Dispositif: Regular Double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) Stylet
Direct laryngoscopy and intubation after induction of anesthesia will be done with a regular double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) stylet and the Macintosh blade. The DLT stylet is withdrawn as a part of placement procedure during the DLT advancement. Thereafter, Macintosh laryngoscope is removed and placement of the double-lumen endobronchial tube is verified with capnography and fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the usual manner.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Mean Time to Place the Double-lumen Endobronchial Tube
Délai: during laryngoscope placement, up to 120 seconds
The time taken for successful intubation will be recorded by the anesthetist. The total duration from the time the laryngoscope is placed at the patient's lips to the first detection of End-tidal CO2 (EtCO2), an average of 120 seconds, will be recorded in seconds. A higher duration noted is indicative of a longer time taken for successful intubation. 0 seconds (laryngoscope at patient's lips), (first End-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) detection)
during laryngoscope placement, up to 120 seconds

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Success Rate of First Endobronchial Intubation Attempt
Délai: during laryngoscope placement, up to 120 seconds
The rate of first intubation attempt success will be recorded by the anesthetist. A successful first attempt intubation is when the double-lumen endobronchial tube is placed during the initial laryngoscopy within 120 seconds. The average time for successful intubation is 120 seconds, which is the time from when the laryngoscope is placed at the patient's lips to the first detection of End-tidal CO2 (EtCO2). Higher numbers of successful first attempt intubations indicate better rates of success of first endobronchial intubation attempts .
during laryngoscope placement, up to 120 seconds
Assessment of Difficulty of Intubation
Délai: during laryngoscope placement, up to 120 seconds
The ease of successful placement of the double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) will be assessed by the anesthetist's responses to a multi-question form which includes the following items that are scored; overall ease of intubation, laryngoscope insertion, glottic view, double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) delivery and placement. The subjective scores range from 0-10; where 0=worst, 10=best. The average time for successful intubation is 120 seconds, which is the time from when the laryngoscope is placed at the patient's lips to the first detection of End-tidal CO2 (EtCO2).
during laryngoscope placement, up to 120 seconds
Number of Cases With Complications
Délai: during laryngoscope placement, up to 120 seconds
Number of cases with complications during intubation will be will be assessed by the anesthetist's responses to a multi-question form which includes the following items; blood on device, SpO2 (peripheral capillary oxygen saturation) <96%, lip and dental trauma and double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) cuff rupture. The responses are recorded as Yes or No for each item. A 'yes' response indicates a complication. The average time for successful intubation is 120 seconds, which is the time from when the laryngoscope is placed at the patient's lips to the first detection of End-tidal CO2 (EtCO2).
during laryngoscope placement, up to 120 seconds
Number of Cases of Voice Change
Délai: Up to 60 minutes after extubation
Any voice change in the patient after extubation will be assessed in the Post-Operative Admission Unit (PACU) by asking the patient if any change in voice is experienced (Yes/No). The subjective answer given by the patient will be recorded. The average time for the patient to sufficiently recover to respond is expected to be 60 minutes after extubation.
Up to 60 minutes after extubation
Throat Pain
Délai: Up to 60 minutes after extubation
Any voice change in the patient after extubation will be assessed in the Post-Operative Admission Unit (PACU) by recording the patient's response to the degree of pain experienced. An analog pain scale will be used for scoring where: 0= no pain and 10= severe pain. The average time for the patient to sufficiently recover to respond is expected to be 60 minutes after extubation.
Up to 60 minutes after extubation

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Emory University

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Igor Zhukov, MD, Emory University

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 juillet 2015

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

27 juillet 2017

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

27 juillet 2017

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

9 juillet 2015

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

10 juillet 2015

Première publication (Estimation)

13 juillet 2015

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

27 juillet 2018

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

20 juin 2018

Dernière vérification

1 juin 2018

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Mots clés

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • IRB00081067

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

Essais cliniques sur ZU-bend stylet

Rechercher des essais similaires

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

CROs by country

CROs in Senegal

Conditions

Maladies rares

Interventions en matière de drogue

Compléments alimentaires

Commanditaire / collaborateurs

Emplacements

S'abonner