- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT03226080
GA/Spinal vs. GA/Spinal/NMB for Operative Repair of Hip Fracture
17 août 2019 mis à jour par: Scott Byram MD, Loyola University
Combined General and Spinal Anesthesia vs. Combined General and Spinal Anesthesia With Neuromuscular Blockade for Operative Repair of Hip Fractures
Surgical repair of hip fractures may be performed with various anesthetic techniques, but are most commonly completed under general anesthesia (GA) or neuraxial anesthesia (NA).
Numerous prospective and retrospective studies demonstrate improved morbidity and mortality when NA is used; however, many surgeons prefer the use of GA with neuromuscular blockade (NMB) due to the perception of better operative conditions.
This study aims to compare the operative conditions obtained from the use of combined GA and spinal with NMB vs. the use of GA with spinal without NMB.
84 patients will all receive a single shot spinal and GA and then will be randomized to receive either NMB or placebo.
The fracture reduction time will be measured.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Retiré
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
Eighty-four ASA I-IV patients presenting for operative repair of an unstable intertrochanteric femur fracture will be enrolled.
This will include fractures classified according to the Orthopaedic Trauma Association / Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesisfragen (OTA/AO) classification system as 31A2.2,
31A2.3,
31A3.1, 31A3.2, and 31A3.3.15
After consent and upon arrival to the operating room, patients will be monitored and then sedated with midazolam, fentanyl, and ketamine as necessary per standard practice to facilitate lateral positioning.
Patients will be positioned with the operative side down for the spinal blockade.
Under sterile conditions, spinal anesthesia will be induced with 10mg (1.2mL) of hyperbaric 0.75% bupivicaine as per standard practice.
The patient will then be given a standard general anesthetic induction consisting of propofol, succinylcholine, fentanyl, and lidocaine.
The patient will be intubated and anesthesia will be maintained with desflurane in oxygen and air.
At the time of incision, the patient will be randomized to one of two groups.
The surgeon and the anesthesiologist will be blinded to the patient's randomization status.
Group 1 (NMB) will be given IV rocuronium 0.6mg/kg in a volume of 10cc.
Group 2 (placebo) will be given 10cc normal saline.
The anesthesia practitioner will test a Train of Four (TOF) and confirm a return of twitches prior to administering the study intervention.
The nerve stimulator will then be disconnected until the conclusion of the case.
Hemodynamic changes which suggest light anesthesia will be treated with additional fentanyl in 50mcg increments and/or increasing the desflurane concentration.
Any hypotension directly attributed to the anesthetic by the anesthetic practitioner will be managed using a phenylephrine bolus and/or infusion as per standard anesthetic practice.
Surgery will be performed by one of three fellowship trained orthopedic trauma surgeons, and fixation of these fractures will be with a single type of cephalomedullary implant (Synthes TFN-A, West Chester, PA).
These three surgeons employ an identical bed, patient position, and traction technique (sterile skeletal traction) for these procedures.
A percutaneous reduction will first be attempted.
If unsuccessful, an open reduction will then be pursued.
Following adequate reduction, fixation with the cephalomedullary implant will then be completed.
Once skin closure has been initiated, to reverse any NMB, sugammadex 200mg in 2ml will be given to those patients randomized to the NMB group, and 2mL normal saline for the placebo group.
At the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist, a nerve stimulator may be reapplied not less than 5 minutes after NMB reversal (or saline) is given.
Once the attending surgeon has evaluated the final radiographs, all patients will have their anesthetics discontinued and will be extubated after emergence from anesthesia.
Type d'étude
Interventionnel
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts et emplacements
Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Illinois
-
Maywood, Illinois, États-Unis, 60153
- Loyola University Medical Center
-
-
Critères de participation
Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
55 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)
Accepte les volontaires sains
Non
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
Tout
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ASA I-IV Age 55 or older Scheduled for operative repair of isolated intertrochanteric hip fracture
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to consent/refusal Allergy to any of the study medications Multiple traumatic injuries Contraindication to neuraxial or general anesthesia Pregnancy
Plan d'étude
Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Tripler
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Comparateur placebo: Placebo
Patients will be monitored and then sedated with midazolam, fentanyl, and ketamine as necessary per standard practice to facilitate lateral positioning.
Patients will be positioned with the operative side down for the spinal blockade.
Under sterile conditions, spinal anesthesia will be induced with 9mg (1.2mL) of hyperbaric 0.75% bupivacaine as per standard practice.
The patient will then be given a standard general anesthetic induction consisting of propofol, succinylcholine, fentanyl, and lidocaine.
At the time of incision, this group will be given 10cc normal saline.
Once skin closure has been initiated, 2mL normal saline will be administered.
|
Normal saline will be administered as a placebo in equal volume for the placebo group
|
|
Comparateur actif: Neuromuscular Blockade
Patients will be monitored and then sedated with midazolam, fentanyl, and ketamine as necessary per standard practice to facilitate lateral positioning.
Patients will be positioned with the operative side down for the spinal blockade.
Under sterile conditions, spinal anesthesia will be induced with 9mg (1.2mL) of hyperbaric 0.75% bupivacaine as per standard practice.
The patient will then be given a standard general anesthetic induction consisting of propofol, succinylcholine, fentanyl, and lidocaine.
At the time of incision, this group will be given IV rocuronium 0.6mg/kg in a volume of 10cc.
Once skin closure has been initiated, sugammadex 200mg in 2ml will be administered.
|
The neuromuscular blockade group will receive intravenous rocuronium
The neuromuscular blockade group will receive intravenous sugammadex for reversal of residual rocuronium
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to complete reduction of the fracture
Délai: Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
Time necessary for complete reduction in the operating room.
|
Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Surgical Operative Conditions
Délai: Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
The surgeon's opinion of the operative conditions, as measured using a 4 point likert scale.
|
Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
|
Estimated Blood Loss
Délai: Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
Final estimated blood loss in mL for the procedure
|
Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
|
Total operating room time
Délai: Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
Total number of minutes spent in the operating room
|
Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
|
Time to extubation
Délai: Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
Total time from intubation to extubation
|
Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
|
Intraoperative fentanyl use
Délai: Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
Total amount (in mcg) of intravenous fentanyl used during the procedure
|
Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.
Parrainer
Publications et liens utiles
La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.
Publications générales
- Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, McKee A, Kehlet H, van Zundert A, Sage D, Futter M, Saville G, Clark T, MacMahon S. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ. 2000 Dec 16;321(7275):1493. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7275.1493.
- Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2006 Dec;17(12):1726-33. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4. Epub 2006 Sep 16.
- Neuman MD, Silber JH, Elkassabany NM, Ludwig JM, Fleisher LA. Comparative effectiveness of regional versus general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery in adults. Anesthesiology. 2012 Jul;117(1):72-92. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182545e7c.
- Minville V, Fourcade O, Grousset D, Chassery C, Nguyen L, Asehnoune K, Colombani A, Goulmamine L, Samii K. Spinal anesthesia using single injection small-dose bupivacaine versus continuous catheter injection techniques for surgical repair of hip fracture in elderly patients. Anesth Analg. 2006 May;102(5):1559-63. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000218421.18723.cf.
- Roche JJ, Wenn RT, Sahota O, Moran CG. Effect of comorbidities and postoperative complications on mortality after hip fracture in elderly people: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ. 2005 Dec 10;331(7529):1374. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38643.663843.55. Epub 2005 Nov 18.
- Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, Broderick JS, Creevey W, DeCoster TA, Prokuski L, Sirkin MS, Ziran B, Henley B, Audige L. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Nov-Dec;21(10 Suppl):S1-133. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200711101-00001.
- Chu CC, Weng SF, Chen KT, Chien CC, Shieh JP, Chen JY, Wang JJ. Propensity Score-matched Comparison of Postoperative Adverse Outcomes between Geriatric Patients Given a General or a Neuraxial Anesthetic for Hip Surgery: A Population-based Study. Anesthesiology. 2015 Jul;123(1):136-47. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000695.
- Basques BA, Bohl DD, Golinvaux NS, Samuel AM, Grauer JG. General versus spinal anaesthesia for patients aged 70 years and older with a fracture of the hip. Bone Joint J. 2015 May;97-B(5):689-95. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B5.35042.
- Bulka CM, Terekhov MA, Martin BJ, Dmochowski RR, Hayes RM, Ehrenfeld JM. Nondepolarizing Neuromuscular Blocking Agents, Reversal, and Risk of Postoperative Pneumonia. Anesthesiology. 2016 Oct;125(4):647-55. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001279.
- Stewart PA, Liang SS, Li QS, Huang ML, Bilgin AB, Kim D, Phillips S. The Impact of Residual Neuromuscular Blockade, Oversedation, and Hypothermia on Adverse Respiratory Events in a Postanesthetic Care Unit: A Prospective Study of Prevalence, Predictors, and Outcomes. Anesth Analg. 2016 Oct;123(4):859-68. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001513.
- Chang CC, Lin HC, Lin HW, Lin HC. Anesthetic management and surgical site infections in total hip or knee replacement: a population-based study. Anesthesiology. 2010 Aug;113(2):279-84. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181e2c1c3.
- Zorrilla-Vaca A, Grant MC, Mathur V, Li J, Wu CL. The Impact of Neuraxial Versus General Anesthesia on the Incidence of Postoperative Surgical Site Infections Following Knee or Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):555-63. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000437.
- Mauermann WJ, Shilling AM, Zuo Z. A comparison of neuraxial block versus general anesthesia for elective total hip replacement: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2006 Oct;103(4):1018-25. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000237267.75543.59.
- Mazze RI, Fujinaga M. Postdural puncture headache after continuous spinal anesthesia with 18-gauge and 20-gauge needles. Reg Anesth. 1993 Jan-Feb;18(1):47-51.
- Holmstrom B, Laugaland K, Rawal N, Hallberg S. Combined spinal epidural block versus spinal and epidural block for orthopaedic surgery. Can J Anaesth. 1993 Jul;40(7):601-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03009695.
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
19 juillet 2017
Achèvement primaire (Anticipé)
1 août 2019
Achèvement de l'étude (Anticipé)
1 août 2020
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
1 mai 2017
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
19 juillet 2017
Première publication (Réel)
21 juillet 2017
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
20 août 2019
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
17 août 2019
Dernière vérification
1 août 2019
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
- Blessures et Blessures
- Blessures aux jambes
- Fracture fémorale
- Blessures à la hanche
- Fractures, Os
- Fracture de la hanche
- Effets physiologiques des médicaments
- Agents du système nerveux périphérique
- Agents neuromusculaires
- Agents neuromusculaires non dépolarisants
- Agents bloquants neuromusculaires
- Rocuronium
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- 209397
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
NON
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Oui
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
produit fabriqué et exporté des États-Unis.
Non
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .
Essais cliniques sur Normal saline
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterComplété
-
Qu Biologics Inc.The National Research Council of Canada Industrial Research Assistance ProgramRecrutement
-
Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, PakistanRecrutement
-
McMaster Children's HospitalLondon Health Sciences Centre; St. Justine's HospitalComplétéRectocolite hémorragique | Maladie inflammatoire de l'intestinCanada
-
Yasser S Mostafa, MDFayoum University HospitalComplétéMaladies utérinesEgypte
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalPas encore de recrutementOcclusion de Port-a-cath | Solution saline normale | Verrouillage de l'héparine
-
Sanaria Inc.Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute; Ifakara Health Institute; Medical...ComplétéPaludisme | Paludisme, FalciparumTanzanie
-
Hospital Universiti Sains MalaysiaComplétéGingivite | Gingivite induite par la plaqueMalaisie
-
BioAegis Therapeutics Inc.ComplétéPneumonie communautaireAustralie, Géorgie
-
Codagenix, IncComplété