- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensaios clínicos dos EUA
- Ensaio Clínico NCT03226080
GA/Spinal vs. GA/Spinal/NMB for Operative Repair of Hip Fracture
17 de agosto de 2019 atualizado por: Scott Byram MD, Loyola University
Combined General and Spinal Anesthesia vs. Combined General and Spinal Anesthesia With Neuromuscular Blockade for Operative Repair of Hip Fractures
Surgical repair of hip fractures may be performed with various anesthetic techniques, but are most commonly completed under general anesthesia (GA) or neuraxial anesthesia (NA).
Numerous prospective and retrospective studies demonstrate improved morbidity and mortality when NA is used; however, many surgeons prefer the use of GA with neuromuscular blockade (NMB) due to the perception of better operative conditions.
This study aims to compare the operative conditions obtained from the use of combined GA and spinal with NMB vs. the use of GA with spinal without NMB.
84 patients will all receive a single shot spinal and GA and then will be randomized to receive either NMB or placebo.
The fracture reduction time will be measured.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Retirado
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
Eighty-four ASA I-IV patients presenting for operative repair of an unstable intertrochanteric femur fracture will be enrolled.
This will include fractures classified according to the Orthopaedic Trauma Association / Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesisfragen (OTA/AO) classification system as 31A2.2,
31A2.3,
31A3.1, 31A3.2, and 31A3.3.15
After consent and upon arrival to the operating room, patients will be monitored and then sedated with midazolam, fentanyl, and ketamine as necessary per standard practice to facilitate lateral positioning.
Patients will be positioned with the operative side down for the spinal blockade.
Under sterile conditions, spinal anesthesia will be induced with 10mg (1.2mL) of hyperbaric 0.75% bupivicaine as per standard practice.
The patient will then be given a standard general anesthetic induction consisting of propofol, succinylcholine, fentanyl, and lidocaine.
The patient will be intubated and anesthesia will be maintained with desflurane in oxygen and air.
At the time of incision, the patient will be randomized to one of two groups.
The surgeon and the anesthesiologist will be blinded to the patient's randomization status.
Group 1 (NMB) will be given IV rocuronium 0.6mg/kg in a volume of 10cc.
Group 2 (placebo) will be given 10cc normal saline.
The anesthesia practitioner will test a Train of Four (TOF) and confirm a return of twitches prior to administering the study intervention.
The nerve stimulator will then be disconnected until the conclusion of the case.
Hemodynamic changes which suggest light anesthesia will be treated with additional fentanyl in 50mcg increments and/or increasing the desflurane concentration.
Any hypotension directly attributed to the anesthetic by the anesthetic practitioner will be managed using a phenylephrine bolus and/or infusion as per standard anesthetic practice.
Surgery will be performed by one of three fellowship trained orthopedic trauma surgeons, and fixation of these fractures will be with a single type of cephalomedullary implant (Synthes TFN-A, West Chester, PA).
These three surgeons employ an identical bed, patient position, and traction technique (sterile skeletal traction) for these procedures.
A percutaneous reduction will first be attempted.
If unsuccessful, an open reduction will then be pursued.
Following adequate reduction, fixation with the cephalomedullary implant will then be completed.
Once skin closure has been initiated, to reverse any NMB, sugammadex 200mg in 2ml will be given to those patients randomized to the NMB group, and 2mL normal saline for the placebo group.
At the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist, a nerve stimulator may be reapplied not less than 5 minutes after NMB reversal (or saline) is given.
Once the attending surgeon has evaluated the final radiographs, all patients will have their anesthetics discontinued and will be extubated after emergence from anesthesia.
Tipo de estudo
Intervencional
Estágio
- Fase 4
Contactos e Locais
Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.
Locais de estudo
-
-
Illinois
-
Maywood, Illinois, Estados Unidos, 60153
- Loyola University Medical Center
-
-
Critérios de participação
Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
55 anos e mais velhos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Não
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Tudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- ASA I-IV Age 55 or older Scheduled for operative repair of isolated intertrochanteric hip fracture
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to consent/refusal Allergy to any of the study medications Multiple traumatic injuries Contraindication to neuraxial or general anesthesia Pregnancy
Plano de estudo
Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Triplo
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Comparador de Placebo: Placebo
Patients will be monitored and then sedated with midazolam, fentanyl, and ketamine as necessary per standard practice to facilitate lateral positioning.
Patients will be positioned with the operative side down for the spinal blockade.
Under sterile conditions, spinal anesthesia will be induced with 9mg (1.2mL) of hyperbaric 0.75% bupivacaine as per standard practice.
The patient will then be given a standard general anesthetic induction consisting of propofol, succinylcholine, fentanyl, and lidocaine.
At the time of incision, this group will be given 10cc normal saline.
Once skin closure has been initiated, 2mL normal saline will be administered.
|
Normal saline will be administered as a placebo in equal volume for the placebo group
|
|
Comparador Ativo: Neuromuscular Blockade
Patients will be monitored and then sedated with midazolam, fentanyl, and ketamine as necessary per standard practice to facilitate lateral positioning.
Patients will be positioned with the operative side down for the spinal blockade.
Under sterile conditions, spinal anesthesia will be induced with 9mg (1.2mL) of hyperbaric 0.75% bupivacaine as per standard practice.
The patient will then be given a standard general anesthetic induction consisting of propofol, succinylcholine, fentanyl, and lidocaine.
At the time of incision, this group will be given IV rocuronium 0.6mg/kg in a volume of 10cc.
Once skin closure has been initiated, sugammadex 200mg in 2ml will be administered.
|
The neuromuscular blockade group will receive intravenous rocuronium
The neuromuscular blockade group will receive intravenous sugammadex for reversal of residual rocuronium
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to complete reduction of the fracture
Prazo: Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
Time necessary for complete reduction in the operating room.
|
Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Surgical Operative Conditions
Prazo: Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
The surgeon's opinion of the operative conditions, as measured using a 4 point likert scale.
|
Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
|
Estimated Blood Loss
Prazo: Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
Final estimated blood loss in mL for the procedure
|
Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
|
Total operating room time
Prazo: Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
Total number of minutes spent in the operating room
|
Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
|
Time to extubation
Prazo: Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
Total time from intubation to extubation
|
Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
|
Intraoperative fentanyl use
Prazo: Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
Total amount (in mcg) of intravenous fentanyl used during the procedure
|
Measured once Post-Op Day #0 in the recovery room
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.
Patrocinador
Publicações e links úteis
A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.
Publicações Gerais
- Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, McKee A, Kehlet H, van Zundert A, Sage D, Futter M, Saville G, Clark T, MacMahon S. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ. 2000 Dec 16;321(7275):1493. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7275.1493.
- Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2006 Dec;17(12):1726-33. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4. Epub 2006 Sep 16.
- Neuman MD, Silber JH, Elkassabany NM, Ludwig JM, Fleisher LA. Comparative effectiveness of regional versus general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery in adults. Anesthesiology. 2012 Jul;117(1):72-92. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182545e7c.
- Minville V, Fourcade O, Grousset D, Chassery C, Nguyen L, Asehnoune K, Colombani A, Goulmamine L, Samii K. Spinal anesthesia using single injection small-dose bupivacaine versus continuous catheter injection techniques for surgical repair of hip fracture in elderly patients. Anesth Analg. 2006 May;102(5):1559-63. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000218421.18723.cf.
- Roche JJ, Wenn RT, Sahota O, Moran CG. Effect of comorbidities and postoperative complications on mortality after hip fracture in elderly people: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ. 2005 Dec 10;331(7529):1374. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38643.663843.55. Epub 2005 Nov 18.
- Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, Broderick JS, Creevey W, DeCoster TA, Prokuski L, Sirkin MS, Ziran B, Henley B, Audige L. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Nov-Dec;21(10 Suppl):S1-133. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200711101-00001.
- Chu CC, Weng SF, Chen KT, Chien CC, Shieh JP, Chen JY, Wang JJ. Propensity Score-matched Comparison of Postoperative Adverse Outcomes between Geriatric Patients Given a General or a Neuraxial Anesthetic for Hip Surgery: A Population-based Study. Anesthesiology. 2015 Jul;123(1):136-47. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000695.
- Basques BA, Bohl DD, Golinvaux NS, Samuel AM, Grauer JG. General versus spinal anaesthesia for patients aged 70 years and older with a fracture of the hip. Bone Joint J. 2015 May;97-B(5):689-95. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B5.35042.
- Bulka CM, Terekhov MA, Martin BJ, Dmochowski RR, Hayes RM, Ehrenfeld JM. Nondepolarizing Neuromuscular Blocking Agents, Reversal, and Risk of Postoperative Pneumonia. Anesthesiology. 2016 Oct;125(4):647-55. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001279.
- Stewart PA, Liang SS, Li QS, Huang ML, Bilgin AB, Kim D, Phillips S. The Impact of Residual Neuromuscular Blockade, Oversedation, and Hypothermia on Adverse Respiratory Events in a Postanesthetic Care Unit: A Prospective Study of Prevalence, Predictors, and Outcomes. Anesth Analg. 2016 Oct;123(4):859-68. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001513.
- Chang CC, Lin HC, Lin HW, Lin HC. Anesthetic management and surgical site infections in total hip or knee replacement: a population-based study. Anesthesiology. 2010 Aug;113(2):279-84. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181e2c1c3.
- Zorrilla-Vaca A, Grant MC, Mathur V, Li J, Wu CL. The Impact of Neuraxial Versus General Anesthesia on the Incidence of Postoperative Surgical Site Infections Following Knee or Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):555-63. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000437.
- Mauermann WJ, Shilling AM, Zuo Z. A comparison of neuraxial block versus general anesthesia for elective total hip replacement: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2006 Oct;103(4):1018-25. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000237267.75543.59.
- Mazze RI, Fujinaga M. Postdural puncture headache after continuous spinal anesthesia with 18-gauge and 20-gauge needles. Reg Anesth. 1993 Jan-Feb;18(1):47-51.
- Holmstrom B, Laugaland K, Rawal N, Hallberg S. Combined spinal epidural block versus spinal and epidural block for orthopaedic surgery. Can J Anaesth. 1993 Jul;40(7):601-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03009695.
Datas de registro do estudo
Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
19 de julho de 2017
Conclusão Primária (Antecipado)
1 de agosto de 2019
Conclusão do estudo (Antecipado)
1 de agosto de 2020
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
1 de maio de 2017
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
19 de julho de 2017
Primeira postagem (Real)
21 de julho de 2017
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
20 de agosto de 2019
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
17 de agosto de 2019
Última verificação
1 de agosto de 2019
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- 209397
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
NÃO
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Sim
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
produto fabricado e exportado dos EUA
Não
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .
Ensaios clínicos em Normal saline
-
Esraa Salah Mohamed Abdallah EladlInscrevendo-se por convitePneumonia Associada à Ventilação (PAV)Egito
-
Helsinki University Central HospitalLaerdal Foundation; The Finnish Medical Association; Orion Research Foundation; Finnish...ConcluídoParada Cardíaca Fora do HospitalDinamarca, Finlândia
-
Columbia UniversityNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)ConcluídoObesidade | Doença cardiovascular | Diabetes Mellitus, Tipo IIEstados Unidos
-
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research FoundationSuspensoArritmia VentricularEstados Unidos
-
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoRetirado
-
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research FoundationConcluído
-
Kafrelsheikh UniversityConcluídoPedra renal | Mini nefrolitotomia percutâneaEgito
-
MemorialCare Health SystemConcluídoDuração do Trabalho | Segunda fase do trabalho de parto | Hidratação Intravenosa do Trabalho de PartoEstados Unidos
-
University of HaifaWestern Galilee Hospital-NahariyaRecrutamento
-
Kangbuk Samsung HospitalConcluído