Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Essai clinique sur la maladie de Parkinson utilisant des HB-adMSC allogéniques (PD précoce et modérée)

14 mai 2026 mis à jour par: Hope Biosciences Research Foundation

Une étude randomisée, en double aveugle, monocentrique, de phase 2, d'efficacité et d'innocuité des CSM-HB allogéniques par rapport à un placebo pour le traitement des patients atteints de la maladie de Parkinson

Il s'agit d'une étude randomisée, en double aveugle, monocentrique, de phase 2 visant à évaluer l'efficacité et l'innocuité de plusieurs CSM-HB allogéniques par rapport à un placebo pour le traitement de la maladie de Parkinson.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

L'essai comprend une période de dépistage pouvant aller jusqu'à 4 semaines, une période de traitement de 32 semaines et une période de suivi de l'innocuité de 20 semaines après la dernière administration du produit expérimental.

Cet essai clinique sera ouvert au recrutement de 60 participants éligibles diagnostiqués avec la maladie de Parkinson. Le recrutement des patients sera effectué par l'équipe de l'étude, si des participants éligibles sont identifiés sur la base des critères d'éligibilité, une visite de dépistage sera programmée. Un formulaire de consentement éclairé sera remis aux participants à l'étude et signé avant toute procédure d'étude. Le formulaire de consentement éclairé comprendra des informations sur l'essai clinique et certains aspects doivent être pris en compte au cours de ce processus.

Une fois le consentement éclairé obtenu, chaque participant doit effectuer les visites suivantes.

  • Visite 1 - Dépistage, lors de cette visite, l'investigateur principal prendra la décision de déterminer si le participant dépisté est éligible et si la prochaine visite peut être programmée. Une fois que l'investigateur principal a évalué l'éligibilité du sujet dépisté (jusqu'à 28 jours), un processus de randomisation sera mené afin d'attribuer au sujet éligible soit des HB-adMSC allogéniques, soit un placebo. La randomisation ne s'appliquera qu'aux sujets éligibles. Si un participant à l'étude ne répond pas aux critères d'inclusion et d'exclusion au cours du processus de sélection, il sera considéré comme un échec de dépistage (SF) et la randomisation n'est pas nécessaire.
  • Visite 2 - Infusion 1, (Base de référence) : cette visite sera utilisée comme point de départ pour la comparaison des données des participants. Au cours de cette visite, les participants éligibles à l'étude recevront leur première administration de produit expérimental ou un placebo avec surveillance des signes vitaux pendant un total de 2 heures après l'exposition au médicament. D'autres évaluations d'études seront réalisées dans le cadre de cette visite.
  • Visite 3 - Perfusion 2 : environ 4 semaines après l'administration initiale du produit expérimental, cette visite doit être terminée. D'autres évaluations d'études seront réalisées dans le cadre de cette visite.
  • Visite 4 - Perfusion 3 : environ 8 semaines après l'administration initiale du produit expérimental, cette visite doit être terminée. D'autres évaluations d'études seront réalisées dans le cadre de cette visite.
  • Visite 5 - Perfusion 4 : environ 12 semaines après l'administration initiale du produit expérimental, cette visite doit être terminée. D'autres évaluations d'études seront réalisées dans le cadre de cette visite.
  • Visite 6 - Perfusion 5 : environ 16 semaines après l'administration initiale du produit expérimental, cette visite doit être terminée. D'autres évaluations d'études seront réalisées dans le cadre de cette visite.
  • Visite 7 - Perfusion 6 : environ 20 semaines après l'administration initiale du produit expérimental, cette visite doit être terminée. D'autres évaluations d'études seront réalisées dans le cadre de cette visite.
  • Appel téléphonique - Suivi de sécurité : environ 24 semaines après l'administration initiale du produit expérimental, les participants actifs à l'étude effectueront un suivi téléphonique.
  • Appel téléphonique - Suivi de sécurité : environ 32 semaines après l'administration initiale du produit expérimental, les participants actifs à l'étude effectueront un suivi téléphonique.
  • Visite 8 - Fin de l'étude, au cours de cette dernière visite (environ 52 semaines après la semaine 0), un groupe complet d'évaluations de l'étude sera effectué pour évaluer l'innocuité et l'efficacité des HB-adMSC allogéniques ou des administrations de placebo.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • Texas
      • Sugar Land, Texas, États-Unis, 77478
        • Hope Biosciences Stem Cell Research Foundation

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

45 ans à 80 ans (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Critère d'intégration:

  • Un participant à l'étude ne pourra être inclus dans cette étude que si tous les critères suivants s'appliquent :

    1. Participants masculins et féminins âgés de 45 à 80 ans.
    2. Lors de la visite de dépistage, les participants à l'étude doivent avoir un score MDS-UPDRS partie II compris entre 7 et 28.
    3. Les participants à l'étude doivent avoir un score MDS-UPDRS partie III entre 20 et 57 lors de la visite de dépistage.
    4. La dose totale de carbidopa/lévodopa doit être inférieure à 1200 mg par jour pour les participants à l'étude.
    5. La dose équivalente totale de lévodopa pour les participants à l'étude doit être inférieure à 1400 mg par jour.
    6. Le participant à l'étude doit avoir reçu un diagnostic de maladie de Parkinson précoce et/ou modérée au moins 2 ans avant la participation à l'étude.
    7. Les participants à l'étude doivent être capables de lire, de comprendre et de fournir un consentement écrit.
    8. Consentement éclairé signé volontairement obtenu avant que toute procédure liée à un essai clinique ne soit effectuée.
    9. Les participantes à l'étude ne doivent pas être enceintes ou prévoir de devenir enceintes pendant leur participation à l'étude et pendant 6 mois après la dernière administration du produit expérimental.
    10. Les participants masculins, si leurs partenaires sexuelles peuvent devenir enceintes, doivent utiliser une méthode de contraception pendant leur participation à l'étude et pendant 6 mois après la dernière administration du produit étudié.
    11. Le participant à l'étude est capable et disposé à se conformer aux exigences de cet essai clinique.

Critère d'exclusion:

  • Un participant à l'étude ne sera pas éligible pour être inclus dans cet essai clinique si l'un des critères suivants s'applique :

    1. Grossesse, allaitement. Femmes en âge de procréer qui ne sont pas enceintes mais qui ne prennent pas de mesures contraceptives efficaces.
    2. Participants à l'étude atteints de la maladie de Parkinson à un stade avancé décrits comme ayant une invalidité grave, en fauteuil roulant ou alités.
    3. Le participant à l'étude a une malignité active, y compris des signes de carcinome basocellulaire, épidermoïde ou de mélanome cutané.
    4. Le participant à l'étude a connu une dépendance ou une dépendance à l'alcool ou a actuellement un usage ou un abus de substances.
    5. Le participant à l'étude a 1 ou plusieurs conditions médicales concomitantes importantes (vérifiées par les dossiers médicaux), y compris les suivantes :

      • Diabète sucré mal contrôlé (PCDM) défini comme des antécédents de traitement standard déficient et / ou une glycémie préprandiale> 130 mg / dl lors de la visite de dépistage ou une glycémie post-prandiale> 200 mg / dl.
      • Antécédents médicaux de diagnostic d'insuffisance rénale chronique (IRC) et/ou résultats de dépistage d'eGFR < 59 mL/min/1,73 m2.
      • Présence d'une insuffisance cardiaque de classe III/IV de la New York Heart Association (NYHA) lors de la visite de dépistage.
      • Tout antécédent médical d'infarctus du myocarde dans l'un des différents types, tels que l'infarctus du myocarde avec élévation du segment ST (STEMI) ou l'infarctus du myocarde sans élévation du segment ST (NSTEMI), les spasmes coronariens ou l'angor instable.
      • Antécédents médicaux d'hypertension artérielle non contrôlée définie comme un traitement standard déficient et/ou une pression artérielle > 180/120 mm/Hg lors de la visite de dépistage.
      • Antécédents médicaux de thrombophilies héréditaires, chirurgie générale majeure récente (dans les 12 mois précédant le dépistage), paralysie des membres inférieurs due à une lésion de la moelle épinière, fracture du bassin, des hanches ou du fémur, cancer du poumon, du cerveau, du système lymphatique, gynécologique ( ovaire ou utérus), ou tractus gastro-intestinal (comme le pancréas ou l'estomac).
      • Antécédents de chirurgie cérébrale pour la maladie de Parkinson.
    6. Le participant à l'étude a reçu un traitement à base de cellules souches dans les 6 mois précédant la première dose de produit expérimental autre que les cellules souches produites par Hope Biosciences.
    7. Recevoir toute thérapie expérimentale ou toute thérapie approuvée à des fins expérimentales dans l'année précédant la première dose du produit expérimental autre que les vaccins COVID-19.
    8. Le participant à l'étude présente une anomalie de laboratoire lors du dépistage, notamment :

      • Nombre de globules blancs < 3000/mm3
      • Numération plaquettaire < 80 000 mm3
      • Nombre absolu de neutrophiles < 1500/mm3
      • Alanine aminotransférase (ALT) ou aspartate aminotransférase (AST) 10 limite supérieure de la normale (LSN) x 1,5
    9. Le participant à l'étude présente toute autre anomalie de laboratoire ou condition médicale qui, de l'avis de l'investigateur, pose un risque pour la sécurité ou empêchera le sujet de terminer l'étude.
    10. Il est peu probable que le participant à l'étude termine l'étude ou adhère aux procédures de l'étude.
    11. Participant à l'étude atteint d'une hépatite virale B ou C aiguë ou chronique concomitante connue ou d'une infection par le virus de l'immunodéficience humaine (VIH).
    12. Le participant à l'étude a un trouble psychiatrique précédemment diagnostiqué qui, de l'avis de l'investigateur, peut affecter les auto-évaluations.
    13. Participant à l'étude présentant une infection systémique nécessitant un traitement avec des antibiotiques, des antiviraux ou des antifongiques dans les 30 jours précédant la première dose du produit expérimental.
    14. Participants masculins à l'étude qui prévoient de donner leur sperme pendant l'étude ou dans les 6 mois suivant la dernière dose. Patientes qui envisagent de donner des ovules ou de suivre un traitement de fécondation in vitro pendant l'étude ou dans les 6 mois suivant la dernière dose.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Quadruple

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Comparateur actif: HB-adMSC allogéniques.

Biologique/Vaccin : HB-adMSC allogéniques

Les HB-adMSC allogéniques seront administrés par voie intraveineuse aux participants à l'étude qui se qualifient.

Autres noms : Cellules souches mésenchymateuses dérivées du tissu adipeux de Hope Biosciences allogéniques.

Les HB-adMSC seront administrés par voie intraveineuse aux participants à l'étude qui se qualifient.
Autres noms:
  • Cellules souches mésenchymateuses dérivées de cellules adipeuses de Hope Biosciences allogéniques.
Solution saline stérile 0,9 %
Autres noms:
  • Le placebo sera administré par voie intraveineuse aux participants à l'étude qui se qualifient.
Comparateur placebo: Placebo

Le placebo sera administré par voie intraveineuse aux participants à l'étude qui se qualifient.

Autres noms : solution saline stérile à 0,9 %

Les HB-adMSC seront administrés par voie intraveineuse aux participants à l'étude qui se qualifient.
Autres noms:
  • Cellules souches mésenchymateuses dérivées de cellules adipeuses de Hope Biosciences allogéniques.
Solution saline stérile 0,9 %
Autres noms:
  • Le placebo sera administré par voie intraveineuse aux participants à l'étude qui se qualifient.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part III Total Score
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part III. The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part III tests Motor Examination, which tests speech, facial expression, rigidity, finger and hand movement, pronation-supination movements of hands, toe tapping, leg agility, arising from chair, gait, freezing of gait, postural stability, posture, global spontaneity of movement, postural tremor of the hands, kinetic tremor of the hands, rest tremor amplitude, constancy of rest tremor, dyskinesias impact and Hoehn and Yahr stage (18 items total). Each item is rated from 0-4: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The Part III score ranges from 0 - 132; 32 and below is mild, 59 and above is severe. The total MDS-UPDRS Parts I-IV score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 260 (total disability). Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part III (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part III. The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part III tests Motor Examination, which tests speech, facial expression, rigidity, finger and hand movement, pronation-supination movements of hands, toe tapping, leg agility, arising from chair, gait, freezing of gait, postural stability, posture, global spontaneity of movement, postural tremor of the hands, kinetic tremor of the hands, rest tremor amplitude, constancy of rest tremor, dyskinesias impact and Hoehn and Yahr stage (18 items total). Each item is rated from 0-4: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The Part III score ranges from 0 - 132; 32 and below is mild, 59 and above is severe. The total MDS-UPDRS Parts I-IV score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 260 (total disability). Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part III (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part III. The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part III tests Motor Examination, which tests speech, facial expression, rigidity, finger and hand movement, pronation-supination movements of hands, toe tapping, leg agility, arising from chair, gait, freezing of gait, postural stability, posture, global spontaneity of movement, postural tremor of the hands, kinetic tremor of the hands, rest tremor amplitude, constancy of rest tremor, dyskinesias impact and Hoehn and Yahr stage (18 items total). Each item is rated from 0-4: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The Part III score ranges from 0 - 132; 32 and below is mild, 59 and above is severe. The total MDS-UPDRS Parts I-IV score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 260 (total disability). Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Subjects Achieving an Improvement (Reduction) in Outcome Measure >= MCID (Established/Published) From Baseline to Week 52 in Total MDS-UPDRS Part III Score - by Treatment Week
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part III tests Motor Examination, which tests speech, facial expression, rigidity, finger and hand movement, pronation-supination movements of hands, toe tapping, leg agility, arising from chair, gait, freezing of gait, postural stability, posture, global spontaneity of movement, postural tremor of the hands, kinetic tremor of the hands, rest tremor amplitude, constancy of rest tremor, dyskinesias impact and Hoehn and Yahr stage (18 items total). Each item is rated from 0-4: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The Part III score ranges from 0 - 132; 32 and below is mild, 59 and above is severe. The total MDS-UPDRS Parts I-IV score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 260 (total disability). Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part II Total Score
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part II.The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. The MDS-UPDRS scale consists of 4 segments. Part II tests "Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living". Each answer to the scale is evaluated by the principal investigator during the study visit. Some sections of the MDS-UPDRS scale require multiple grades assigned to each extremity.

There are 13 items included in Part II. Part II score ranges from 0 - 52; 12 and below is mild, 30 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Changes From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part II (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part II.The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. The MDS-UPDRS scale consists of 4 segments. Part II tests "Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living". Each answer to the scale is evaluated by the principal investigator during the study visit. Some sections of the MDS-UPDRS scale require multiple grades assigned to each extremity.

There are 13 items included in Part II. Part II score ranges from 0 - 52; 12 and below is mild, 30 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part II (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part II.The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. The MDS-UPDRS scale consists of 4 segments. Part II tests "Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living". Each answer to the scale is evaluated by the principal investigator during the study visit. Some sections of the MDS-UPDRS scale require multiple grades assigned to each extremity.

There are 13 items included in Part II. Part II score ranges from 0 - 52; 12 and below is mild, 30 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Subjects Achieving an Improvement (Reduction) in Outcome Measure >= MCID (Established/Published) From Baseline to Week 52 in Total MDS-UPDRS Part II Score - by Treatment Week
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. The MDS-UPDRS scale consists of 4 segments. Part II tests "Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living". Each answer to the scale is evaluated by the principal investigator during the study visit. Some sections of the MDS-UPDRS scale require multiple grades assigned to each extremity. There are 13 items included in Part II. Part II score ranges from 0 - 52; 12 and below is mild, 30 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part I Total Score
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part I tests "Nonmotor experiences of daily living". Non-Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living (nM-EDL), including complex behaviors such as, cognitive impairment, hallucinations and psychosis, depressed mood, anxious mood, apathy, features of dopamine dysregulation syndrome, sleep problems, daytime sleepiness, pain and other sensations, urinary problems, constipation problems, light headedness on standing and fatigue.

There are 13 items included in Part I. Part I score ranges from 0 - 52; 10 and below is mild, 22 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part I (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part I tests "Nonmotor experiences of daily living". Non-Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living (nM-EDL), including complex behaviors such as, cognitive impairment, hallucinations and psychosis, depressed mood, anxious mood, apathy, features of dopamine dysregulation syndrome, sleep problems, daytime sleepiness, pain and other sensations, urinary problems, constipation problems, light headedness on standing and fatigue.

There are 13 items included in Part I. Part I score ranges from 0 - 52; 10 and below is mild, 22 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part I (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part I tests "Nonmotor experiences of daily living". Non-Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living (nM-EDL), including complex behaviors such as, cognitive impairment, hallucinations and psychosis, depressed mood, anxious mood, apathy, features of dopamine dysregulation syndrome, sleep problems, daytime sleepiness, pain and other sensations, urinary problems, constipation problems, light headedness on standing and fatigue.

There are 13 items included in Part I. Part I score ranges from 0 - 52; 10 and below is mild, 22 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Subjects Achieving an Improvement (Reduction) in Outcome Measure >= MCID (Established/Published) From Baseline to Week 52 in Total MDS-UPDRS Part I Score - by Treatment Week
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part I tests "Nonmotor experiences of daily living". Non-Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living (nM-EDL), including complex behaviors such as, cognitive impairment, hallucinations and psychosis, depressed mood, anxious mood, apathy, features of dopamine dysregulation syndrome, sleep problems, daytime sleepiness, pain and other sensations, urinary problems, constipation problems, light headedness on standing and fatigue.

There are 13 items included in Part I. Part I score ranges from 0 - 52; 10 and below is mild, 22 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part IV Total Score
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part IV. The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part IV tests "Motor Complications", including time spent with dyskinesias and others. There are 6 items included in Part IV. Part IV score ranges from 0 - 24; 4 and below is mild, 13 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part IV Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part IV. The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part IV tests "Motor Complications", including time spent with dyskinesias and others. There are 6 items included in Part IV. Part IV score ranges from 0 - 24; 4 and below is mild, 13 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part IV Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part IV. The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part IV tests "Motor Complications", including time spent with dyskinesias and others. There are 6 items included in Part IV. Part IV score ranges from 0 - 24; 4 and below is mild, 13 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Subjects Achieving an Improvement (Reduction) in Outcome Measure >= MCID (Established/Published) From Baseline to Week 52 in Total MDS-UPDRS Part IV Score - by Treatment Week
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part IV tests "Motor Complications", including time spent with dyskinesias and others. There are 6 items included in Part IV. Part IV score ranges from 0 - 24; 4 and below is mild, 13 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average General Health) Total Score
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Physical Functioning) Total Score
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Health Domain (Average Emotional Well-Being) Total Score
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Social Functioning) Total Score
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Vitality Domain (Average Energy/Fatigue) Total Score
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Bodily Pain Domain (Average Pain) Total Score
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Role Limitations Due to Physical Health) Total Score
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Role Limitations Due to Emotional Problems) Total Score
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average General Health) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Physical Functioning) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Health Domain (Average Emotional Well-Being) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Social Functioning) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Vitality Domain (Average Energy/Fatigue) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Bodily Pain Domain (Average Pain) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Role Limitations Due to Physical Health ) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Role Limitations Due to Emotional Problems) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average General Health) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Physical Functioning) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Health Domain (Average Emotional Well-Being) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Social Functioning) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Vitality Domain (Average Energy/Fatigue) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Bodily Pain Domain (Average Pain) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Role Limitations Due To Physical Health) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Role Limitations Due To Emotional Problems) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) Raw Scores
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
The Parkinson's Disease Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) is a patient-rated scale that measures fatigue in Parkinson's patients. It has 7 items on the measurement of presence of fatigue and 9 items on its impact on daily function. It can be used to assess levels of fatigue and measure any changes that treatment or lifestyle changes may affect. There are five answer choices for each item: Strongly disagree (1 point), Disagree (2 points), Do not agree or disagree (3 points), Agree (4 points), and Strongly agree (5 points). The PFS-16 score ranges from 16 (minimum) to 80 (maximum). Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in PFS-16 scores. The Parkinson's Disease Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) is a patient-rated scale that measures fatigue in Parkinson's patients. It has 7 items on the measurement of presence of fatigue and 9 items on its impact on daily function. It can be used to assess levels of fatigue and measure any changes that treatment or lifestyle changes may affect. There are five answer choices for each item: Strongly disagree (1 point), Disagree (2 points), Do not agree or disagree (3 points), Agree (4 points), and Strongly agree (5 points). The PFS-16 score ranges from 16 (minimum) to 80 (maximum). Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in PFS-16 scores. The Parkinson's Disease Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) is a patient-rated scale that measures fatigue in Parkinson's patients. It has 7 items on the measurement of presence of fatigue and 9 items on its impact on daily function. It can be used to assess levels of fatigue and measure any changes that treatment or lifestyle changes may affect. There are five answer choices for each item: Strongly disagree (1 point), Disagree (2 points), Do not agree or disagree (3 points), Agree (4 points), and Strongly agree (5 points). The PFS-16 score ranges from 16 (minimum) to 80 (maximum). Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Summary Index (SI) Raw Scores
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in PDQ-39 SI raw scores. The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire, or PDQ-39, is a 39-item self-report questionnaire which assesses Parkinson's disease-specific health related quality of life over the last month. The assessment looks at how often patient experience difficulties across the 8 quality of life dimensions (Mobility, Activities of Daily Living, Emotional well-being, Stigma, Social support, Cognition, Communication, and Bodily discomfort) and assesses the impact of Parkinson's disease on specific dimensions of functioning and well-being. Each item is scored with one of the following selections: 0 (Never), 25 (Occasionally), 50 (Sometimes), 75 (Often), and 100 (Always). The answers to the items for each dimension are averaged to calculate a dimension score (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100). To calculate the Summary Index, all 8 dimension scores are averaged (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100). Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Summary Index (SI) Raw Scores (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in PDQ-39 SI raw scores. The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire, or PDQ-39, is a 39-item self-report questionnaire which assesses Parkinson's disease-specific health related quality of life over the last month. The assessment looks at how often patient experience difficulties across the 8 quality of life dimensions (Mobility, Activities of Daily Living, Emotional well-being, Stigma, Social support, Cognition, Communication, and Bodily discomfort) and assesses the impact of Parkinson's disease on specific dimensions of functioning and well-being. Each item is scored with one of the following selections: 0 (Never), 25 (Occasionally), 50 (Sometimes), 75 (Often), and 100 (Always). The answers to the items for each dimension are averaged to calculate a dimension score (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100). To calculate the Summary Index, all 8 dimension scores are averaged (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100). Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Summary Index (SI) Raw Scores (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in PDQ-39 SI raw scores. The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire, or PDQ-39, is a 39-item self-report questionnaire which assesses Parkinson's disease-specific health related quality of life over the last month. The assessment looks at how often patient experience difficulties across the 8 quality of life dimensions (Mobility, Activities of Daily Living, Emotional well-being, Stigma, Social support, Cognition, Communication, and Bodily discomfort) and assesses the impact of Parkinson's disease on specific dimensions of functioning and well-being. Each item is scored with one of the following selections: 0 (Never), 25 (Occasionally), 50 (Sometimes), 75 (Often), and 100 (Always). The answers to the items for each dimension are averaged to calculate a dimension score (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100). To calculate the Summary Index, all 8 dimension scores are averaged (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100). Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Subjects Achieving an Improvement (Reduction) in Outcome Measure >= MCID (Established/Published) From Baseline to Week 52 in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Summary Index (SI) Raw Scores - by Treatment Week
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire, or PDQ-39, is a 39-item self-report questionnaire which assesses Parkinson's disease-specific health related quality of life over the last month. The assessment looks at how often patient experience difficulties across the 8 quality of life dimensions (Mobility, Activities of Daily Living, Emotional well-being, Stigma, Social support, Cognition, Communication, and Bodily discomfort) and assesses the impact of Parkinson's disease on specific dimensions of functioning and well-being. Each item is scored with one of the following selections: 0 (Never), 25 (Occasionally), 50 (Sometimes), 75 (Often), and 100 (Always). The answers to the items for each dimension are averaged to calculate a dimension score (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100). To calculate the Summary Index, all 8 dimension scores are averaged (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100). Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Raw Scores
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in VAS Pain raw scores. The VAS is a validated, subjective measurement tool, typically a 10-cm line anchored by "no pain" and "worst imaginable pain" used to measure intensity in pain and various other areas. The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their pain intensity. The minimum score is read as 0 cm and the maximum score is read as 10 cm. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in VAS Pain raw scores. The VAS is a validated, subjective measurement tool, typically a 10-cm line anchored by "no pain" and "worst imaginable pain" used to measure intensity in pain and various other areas. The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their pain intensity. The minimum score is read as 0 cm and the maximum score is read as 10 cm. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in VAS Pain raw scores. The VAS is a validated, subjective measurement tool, typically a 10-cm line anchored by "no pain" and "worst imaginable pain" used to measure intensity in pain and various other areas. The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their pain intensity. The minimum score is read as 0 cm and the maximum score is read as 10 cm. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Muscle Spasm Raw Scores
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in VAS Muscle Spasm raw scores. The VAS is a validated, subjective measurement tool, typically a 10-cm line anchored by "no muscle spasms" and "worst muscle spasms" used to measure intensity in muscle spasms and various other areas. The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their muscle spasm intensity. The minimum score is read as 0 cm and the maximum score is read as 10 cm. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Muscle Spasm Scores (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in VAS Muscle Spasm raw scores. The VAS is a validated, subjective measurement tool, typically a 10-cm line anchored by "no muscle spasms" and "worst muscle spasms" used to measure intensity in muscle spasms and various other areas. The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their muscle spasm intensity. The minimum score is read as 0 cm and the maximum score is read as 10 cm. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Muscle Spasm Scores (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in VAS Muscle Spasm raw scores. The VAS is a validated, subjective measurement tool, typically a 10-cm line anchored by "no muscle spasms" and "worst muscle spasms" used to measure intensity in muscle spasms and various other areas. The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their muscle spasm intensity. The minimum score is read as 0 cm and the maximum score is read as 10 cm. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Subjects Achieving an Improvement (Reduction) in Outcome Measure >= MCID (Established/Published) From Baseline to Week 52 in Total VAS Scores - by Treatment Week
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
The VAS is a validated, subjective measurement tool, typically a 10-cm line anchored by "no pain" and "worst imaginable pain" in the Pain section and "No muscle spasm" and "worst muscle spasm" in the Muscle Spasm section, used to measure intensity in pain and various other areas. The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their pain intensity. The minimum score is read as 0 cm and the maximum score is read as 10 cm for each section. The total score is achieved by summing the two individual scores. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Summary of PD Medication Dose Changes by Visit
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
The following table depicts the count of participants that decreased, increased, or did not change their Parkinson's disease medication dosage over the course of the study at various timepoints. The safety analysis set (30 patients in Placebo, 30 patients in HB-adMSCs) was assessed at the various timepoints.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Summary of PD Medication Reinstatement by Visit
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
The table prior to this one depicts the count of participants that decreased, increased, or did not change their Parkinson's disease medication dosage over the course of the study at various timepoints. This table depicts the count of participants that reinstated their dose of Parkinson's disease medications after decreasing it throughout the clinical trial. The safety analysis set (30 patients in Placebo, 30 patients in HB-adMSCs) was assessed at the various timepoints.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (Subjects With >= 1 Adverse Event) - Summary - Safety Analysis Set
Délai: Baseline to Week 24
Unit (# of participants) - Treatment emergent Adverse events (Subjects with >= 1 adverse event) - Summary - Safety analysis set. Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were monitored from Week 0 (Infusion 1) through Week 24 (Follow-Up 1). A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an event that has onset date on or after the first day of exposure to infusion treatment and on or before the first safety follow-up (week 24).
Baseline to Week 24
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (Serious AEs) - Summary - Safety Analysis Set
Délai: Baseline to Week 24
Unit (# of participants) - Treatment emergent Adverse events (Serious AEs) - Summary - Safety analysis set. Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were monitored from Week 0 (Infusion 1) through Week 24 (Follow-Up 1). A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an event that has onset date on or after the first day of exposure to infusion treatment and on or before the first safety follow-up (week 24).
Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CBC (x10^9 Cells/L) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (x10^9 cells/L) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Complete Blood Count (CBC) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CBC (%) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (%) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Complete Blood Count (CBC) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CBC (g/dL) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (g/dL) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Complete Blood Count (CBC) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CBC (pg) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (pg) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Complete Blood Count (CBC) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CBC (fL) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (fL) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Complete Blood Count (CBC) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CBC (10^12/L) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (10^12/L) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Complete Blood Count (CBC) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CMP (g/dL) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (g/dL) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CMP (Ratio) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (Ratio) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CMP (IU/L) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (IU/L) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (mg/dL) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CMP (mmol/L) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (mmol/L) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CMP (mL/Min/1.73 m^2) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (mL/min/1.73 m^2) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - Coagulation Panel (Ratio) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (Ratio) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Coagulation Panel by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - Coagulation Panel (Sec.) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (sec.) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Coagulation Panel by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Diastolic Blood Pressure - mmHg)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Heart Rate - Beats/Min)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Oxygen Saturation - %)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Respiration Rate - Breaths/Min)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Systolic Blood Pressure - mmHg)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Temperature - Celsius)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Weight - kg)
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - Abdomen
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - Cardiovascular
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - HEENT
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set - Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose, and Throat
Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - Lymph Node
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - Musculoskeletal
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - Neurological
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - Respiratory
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - Skin
Délai: Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set
Baseline to Weeks 52

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Collaborateurs

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Djamchid Lotfi, MD, Hope Biosciences Stem Cell Research Foundation

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Publications générales

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

16 juillet 2021

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

3 octobre 2025

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

3 octobre 2025

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

16 juillet 2021

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

2 août 2021

Première publication (Réel)

6 août 2021

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

10 juin 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

14 mai 2026

Dernière vérification

1 mai 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Oui

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

produit fabriqué et exporté des États-Unis.

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner