Denna sida har översatts automatiskt och översättningens korrekthet kan inte garanteras. Vänligen se engelsk version för en källtext.

Klinisk prövning för Parkinsons sjukdom med allogena HB-adMSCs (tidig och måttlig PD)

14 maj 2026 uppdaterad av: Hope Biosciences Research Foundation

En randomiserad, dubbelblind, singelcenter, fas 2, effekt- och säkerhetsstudie av allogena HB-adMSCs vs placebo för behandling av patienter med Parkinsons sjukdom

Detta är en randomiserad, dubbelblind fas 2-studie med singelcenter för att bedöma effektiviteten och säkerheten för flera allogena HB-adMSCs kontra placebo för behandling av Parkinsons sjukdom.

Studieöversikt

Status

Avslutad

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Detaljerad beskrivning

Studien inkluderar en screeningperiod på upp till 4 veckor, en 32-veckors behandlingsperiod och en säkerhetsuppföljningsperiod på 20 veckor efter den senaste prövningsprodukten.

Denna kliniska prövning kommer att vara öppen för att registrera 60 berättigade deltagare med diagnosen Parkinsons sjukdom. Patientrekrytering kommer att utföras av studieteamet, om kvalificerade deltagare identifieras baserat på behörighetskriterier kommer ett screeningbesök att planeras. Formulär för informerat samtycke kommer att ges till studiedeltagarna och undertecknas före eventuella studieprocedurer. Formulär för informerat samtycke kommer att innehålla information om den kliniska prövningen och vissa aspekter bör beaktas under denna process.

Efter att informerat samtycke har erhållits ska varje deltagare genomföra följande besök.

  • Besök 1 – Screening, under detta besök kommer huvudutredaren att fatta beslutet för att avgöra om den screenade deltagaren är berättigad och om nästa besök kan schemaläggas. När huvudutredaren har utvärderat kvalifikationen för den testade försökspersonen (upp till 28 dagar), kommer en randomiseringsprocess att genomföras för att tilldela den berättigade försökspersonen antingen allogena HB-adMSCs eller placebo. Randomisering kommer endast att gälla för behöriga ämnen. Om en studiedeltagare inte uppfyller inklusions- och exkluderingskriterierna under screeningprocessen, kommer han/hon att betraktas som Screen Failure (SF) och randomisering krävs inte.
  • Besök 2 - Infusion 1, (Baslinje): detta besök kommer att användas som utgångspunkt för jämförelse av deltagardata. Under detta besök kommer kvalificerade studiedeltagare att få sin första prövningsprodukt eller placebo med övervakning av vitala tecken i totalt 2 timmar efter läkemedelsexponering. Andra studieutvärderingar kommer att slutföras som en del av detta besök.
  • Besök 3 - Infusion 2: cirka 4 veckor efter den första administreringen av prövningsprodukten bör detta besök avslutas. Andra studieutvärderingar kommer att slutföras som en del av detta besök.
  • Besök 4 - Infusion 3: cirka 8 veckor efter den första administreringen av prövningsprodukten bör detta besök avslutas. Andra studieutvärderingar kommer att slutföras som en del av detta besök.
  • Besök 5 - Infusion 4: cirka 12 veckor efter den första administreringen av prövningsprodukten bör detta besök avslutas. Andra studieutvärderingar kommer att slutföras som en del av detta besök.
  • Besök 6 - Infusion 5: cirka 16 veckor efter den första administreringen av prövningsprodukten bör detta besök avslutas. Andra studieutvärderingar kommer att slutföras som en del av detta besök.
  • Besök 7 - Infusion 6: cirka 20 veckor efter den första administreringen av prövningsprodukten bör detta besök avslutas. Andra studieutvärderingar kommer att slutföras som en del av detta besök.
  • Telefonsamtal - Säkerhetsuppföljning: cirka 24 veckor efter den inledande produktadministrationen, kommer aktiva studiedeltagare att genomföra en telefonsamtalsuppföljning.
  • Telefonsamtal - Säkerhetsuppföljning: cirka 32 veckor efter den inledande produktadministrationen, kommer aktiva studiedeltagare att genomföra en uppföljning av telefonsamtal.
  • Besök 8 - Slut på studien, under detta sista besök (cirka 52 veckor efter vecka 0) kommer en komplett grupp av studiebedömningar att utföras för att utvärdera säkerheten och effekten av allogena HB-adMSCs eller placeboadministrationer.

Studietyp

Interventionell

Inskrivning (Faktisk)

60

Fas

  • Fas 2

Kontakter och platser

Det här avsnittet innehåller kontaktuppgifter för dem som genomför studien och information om var denna studie genomförs.

Studieorter

  • Förenta staterna
    • Texas
      • Sugar Land, Texas, Förenta staterna, 77478
        • Hope Biosciences Stem Cell Research Foundation

Deltagandekriterier

Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.

Urvalskriterier

Åldrar som är berättigade till studier

45 år till 80 år (Vuxen, Äldre vuxen)

Tar emot friska volontärer

Nej

Beskrivning

Inklusionskriterier:

  • En studiedeltagare kommer endast att vara berättigad att inkluderas i denna studie om alla följande kriterier gäller:

    1. Manliga och kvinnliga deltagare 45 - 80 år.
    2. Vid screeningbesöket måste studiedeltagarna ha ett MDS-UPDRS del II-poäng mellan 7 och 28.
    3. Studiedeltagare måste ha ett MDS-UPDRS del III-poäng mellan 20 och 57 under screeningbesöket.
    4. Den totala dosen av Carbidopa/Levodopa måste vara mindre än 1200 mg per dag för studiedeltagare.
    5. Den totala Levodopa-ekvivalentdosen för studiedeltagare måste vara mindre än 1400 mg per dag.
    6. Studiedeltagaren måste ha diagnostiserats med tidig och/eller måttlig Parkinsons sjukdom minst 2 år innan studiedeltagandet.
    7. Studiedeltagare ska kunna läsa, förstå och ge skriftligt samtycke.
    8. Frivilligt undertecknat informerat samtycke erhållits innan några kliniska prövningsrelaterade procedurer utförs.
    9. Kvinnliga deltagare i studien ska inte vara gravida eller planera att bli gravida under studiedeltagandet och under 6 månader efter den senaste administreringen av prövningsprodukten.
    10. Manliga deltagare om deras sexpartner kan bli gravida bör använda en preventivmetod under studiedeltagandet och i 6 månader efter den senaste administreringen av den undersökta produkten.
    11. Studiedeltagaren kan och är villig att uppfylla kraven i denna kliniska prövning.

Exklusions kriterier:

  • En studiedeltagare kommer inte att vara berättigad till inkludering i denna kliniska prövning om något av följande kriterier gäller:

    1. Graviditet, amning. Kvinnor i fertil ålder som inte är gravida men inte använder effektiva preventivmedel.
    2. Studiedeltagare med avancerad Parkinsons sjukdom beskrivs som gravt funktionshinder, rullstolsbundna eller sängliggande.
    3. Studiedeltagaren har någon aktiv malignitet, inklusive tecken på kutant basal-, skivepitelcancer eller melanom.
    4. Studiedeltagaren har känt alkoholberoende eller beroende eller har aktuellt missbruk eller missbruk.

    5. Studiedeltagaren har 1 eller flera signifikanta samtidiga medicinska tillstånd (verifierade av medicinska journaler), inklusive följande:

      • Dåligt kontrollerad diabetes mellitus (PCDM) definieras som en historia av bristfällig standardbehandling och/eller pre-prandial glukos >130mg/dl under screeningbesök eller postprandial glukos >200mg/dl.
      • Medicinsk historia av kronisk njursjukdom (CKD) diagnos och/eller screeningresultat av eGFR < 59 ml/min/1,73 m2.
      • Närvaro av New York Heart Association (NYHA) klass III/IV hjärtsvikt under screeningbesök.
      • All medicinsk historia av hjärtinfarkt i någon av de olika typerna, såsom ST-förhöjd hjärtinfarkt (STEMI) eller icke-ST-förhöjd hjärtinfarkt (NSTEMI), kranskärlspasm eller instabil angina.
      • Anamnes med okontrollerat högt blodtryck definierat som bristfällig standardbehandling och/eller blodtryck > 180/120 mm/Hg under screeningbesök.
      • Medicinsk historia av ärftlig trombofili, nyligen genomförd större allmän operation (inom 12 månader före screening), förlamning av nedre extremiteter på grund av ryggmärgsskada, fraktur i bäcken, höfter eller lårben, cancer i lungan, hjärnan, lymfsystemet, gynekologiskt system ( äggstock eller livmoder), eller mag-tarmkanalen (som bukspottkörteln eller magen).
      • Historik om hjärnkirurgi för Parkinsons sjukdom.
    6. Studiedeltagaren har fått någon stamcellsbehandling inom 6 månader före den första dosen av undersökningsprodukten annan än stamceller producerade av Hope Biosciences.
    7. Att få någon undersökningsterapi eller någon godkänd terapi för prövningsanvändning inom 1 år före den första dosen av prövningsprodukten annat än covid-19-vacciner.

    8. Studiedeltagaren har en laboratorieavvikelse under screening, inklusive följande:

      • Antal vita blodkroppar < 3000/mm3
      • Trombocytantal < 80 000 mm3
      • Absolut neutrofilantal < 1500/mm3
      • Alaninaminotransferas (ALT) eller aspartataminotransferas (AST) 10 övre normalgräns (ULN) x 1,5
    9. Studiedeltagaren har någon annan laboratorieavvikelse eller medicinskt tillstånd som, enligt utredarens uppfattning, utgör en säkerhetsrisk eller kommer att hindra försökspersonen från att slutföra studien.
    10. Det är osannolikt att studiedeltagaren kommer att slutföra studien eller följa studieprocedurerna.
    11. Studiedeltagare med känd samtidig akut eller kronisk virusinfektion med hepatis B eller C eller humant immunbristvirus (HIV).
    12. Studiedeltagaren har ett tidigare diagnostiserat psykiatriskt tillstånd som enligt utredarens uppfattning kan påverka självbedömningar.
    13. Studiedeltagare med någon systemisk infektion som kräver behandling med antibiotika, antivirala eller svampdödande medel inom 30 dagar före första dosen av undersökningsprodukten.
    14. Manliga studiedeltagare som planerar att donera spermier under studien eller inom 6 månader efter den sista dosen. Kvinnliga patienter som planerar att donera ägg eller genomgå provrörsbefruktningsbehandling under studien eller inom 6 månader efter den sista dosen.

Studieplan

Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.

Hur är studien utformad?

Designdetaljer

  • Primärt syfte: Behandling
  • Tilldelning: Randomiserad
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallellt uppdrag
  • Maskning: Fyrdubbla

Vapen och interventioner

Deltagargrupp / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: Allogena HB-adMSCs.

Biologiskt/vaccin: Allogena HB-adMSCs

Allogena HB-adMSCs kommer att administreras intravenöst till studiedeltagare som kvalificerar sig.

Andra namn: Allogeneic Hope Biosciences fetthärledda mesenkymala stamceller.
Biologisk: Biologiskt/vaccin: Allogena HB-adMSCs
HB-adMSCs kommer att administreras intravenöst till studiedeltagare som kvalificerar sig.
Andra namn:
  • Allogeneic Hope Biosciences fetthärledda mesenkymala stamceller.
Övrig: Placebo
Steril saltlösning 0,9 %
Andra namn:
  • Placebo kommer att administreras intravenöst till studiedeltagare som kvalificerar sig.
Placebo-jämförare: Placebo

Placebo kommer att administreras intravenöst till studiedeltagare som kvalificerar sig.

Andra namn: Steril saltlösning 0,9 %
Biologisk: Biologiskt/vaccin: Allogena HB-adMSCs
HB-adMSCs kommer att administreras intravenöst till studiedeltagare som kvalificerar sig.
Andra namn:
  • Allogeneic Hope Biosciences fetthärledda mesenkymala stamceller.
Övrig: Placebo
Steril saltlösning 0,9 %
Andra namn:
  • Placebo kommer att administreras intravenöst till studiedeltagare som kvalificerar sig.

Vad mäter studien?

Primära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part III Total Score
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part III. The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part III tests Motor Examination, which tests speech, facial expression, rigidity, finger and hand movement, pronation-supination movements of hands, toe tapping, leg agility, arising from chair, gait, freezing of gait, postural stability, posture, global spontaneity of movement, postural tremor of the hands, kinetic tremor of the hands, rest tremor amplitude, constancy of rest tremor, dyskinesias impact and Hoehn and Yahr stage (18 items total). Each item is rated from 0-4: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The Part III score ranges from 0 - 132; 32 and below is mild, 59 and above is severe. The total MDS-UPDRS Parts I-IV score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 260 (total disability). Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part III (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part III. The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part III tests Motor Examination, which tests speech, facial expression, rigidity, finger and hand movement, pronation-supination movements of hands, toe tapping, leg agility, arising from chair, gait, freezing of gait, postural stability, posture, global spontaneity of movement, postural tremor of the hands, kinetic tremor of the hands, rest tremor amplitude, constancy of rest tremor, dyskinesias impact and Hoehn and Yahr stage (18 items total). Each item is rated from 0-4: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The Part III score ranges from 0 - 132; 32 and below is mild, 59 and above is severe. The total MDS-UPDRS Parts I-IV score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 260 (total disability). Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part III (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part III. The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part III tests Motor Examination, which tests speech, facial expression, rigidity, finger and hand movement, pronation-supination movements of hands, toe tapping, leg agility, arising from chair, gait, freezing of gait, postural stability, posture, global spontaneity of movement, postural tremor of the hands, kinetic tremor of the hands, rest tremor amplitude, constancy of rest tremor, dyskinesias impact and Hoehn and Yahr stage (18 items total). Each item is rated from 0-4: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The Part III score ranges from 0 - 132; 32 and below is mild, 59 and above is severe. The total MDS-UPDRS Parts I-IV score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 260 (total disability). Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Subjects Achieving an Improvement (Reduction) in Outcome Measure >= MCID (Established/Published) From Baseline to Week 52 in Total MDS-UPDRS Part III Score - by Treatment Week
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part III tests Motor Examination, which tests speech, facial expression, rigidity, finger and hand movement, pronation-supination movements of hands, toe tapping, leg agility, arising from chair, gait, freezing of gait, postural stability, posture, global spontaneity of movement, postural tremor of the hands, kinetic tremor of the hands, rest tremor amplitude, constancy of rest tremor, dyskinesias impact and Hoehn and Yahr stage (18 items total). Each item is rated from 0-4: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The Part III score ranges from 0 - 132; 32 and below is mild, 59 and above is severe. The total MDS-UPDRS Parts I-IV score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 260 (total disability). Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part II Total Score
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part II.The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. The MDS-UPDRS scale consists of 4 segments. Part II tests "Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living". Each answer to the scale is evaluated by the principal investigator during the study visit. Some sections of the MDS-UPDRS scale require multiple grades assigned to each extremity.

There are 13 items included in Part II. Part II score ranges from 0 - 52; 12 and below is mild, 30 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Changes From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part II (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part II.The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. The MDS-UPDRS scale consists of 4 segments. Part II tests "Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living". Each answer to the scale is evaluated by the principal investigator during the study visit. Some sections of the MDS-UPDRS scale require multiple grades assigned to each extremity.

There are 13 items included in Part II. Part II score ranges from 0 - 52; 12 and below is mild, 30 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part II (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part II.The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. The MDS-UPDRS scale consists of 4 segments. Part II tests "Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living". Each answer to the scale is evaluated by the principal investigator during the study visit. Some sections of the MDS-UPDRS scale require multiple grades assigned to each extremity.

There are 13 items included in Part II. Part II score ranges from 0 - 52; 12 and below is mild, 30 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Subjects Achieving an Improvement (Reduction) in Outcome Measure >= MCID (Established/Published) From Baseline to Week 52 in Total MDS-UPDRS Part II Score - by Treatment Week
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. The MDS-UPDRS scale consists of 4 segments. Part II tests "Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living". Each answer to the scale is evaluated by the principal investigator during the study visit. Some sections of the MDS-UPDRS scale require multiple grades assigned to each extremity. There are 13 items included in Part II. Part II score ranges from 0 - 52; 12 and below is mild, 30 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52

Sekundära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part I Total Score
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part I tests "Nonmotor experiences of daily living". Non-Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living (nM-EDL), including complex behaviors such as, cognitive impairment, hallucinations and psychosis, depressed mood, anxious mood, apathy, features of dopamine dysregulation syndrome, sleep problems, daytime sleepiness, pain and other sensations, urinary problems, constipation problems, light headedness on standing and fatigue.

There are 13 items included in Part I. Part I score ranges from 0 - 52; 10 and below is mild, 22 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part I (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part I tests "Nonmotor experiences of daily living". Non-Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living (nM-EDL), including complex behaviors such as, cognitive impairment, hallucinations and psychosis, depressed mood, anxious mood, apathy, features of dopamine dysregulation syndrome, sleep problems, daytime sleepiness, pain and other sensations, urinary problems, constipation problems, light headedness on standing and fatigue.

There are 13 items included in Part I. Part I score ranges from 0 - 52; 10 and below is mild, 22 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part I (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part I tests "Nonmotor experiences of daily living". Non-Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living (nM-EDL), including complex behaviors such as, cognitive impairment, hallucinations and psychosis, depressed mood, anxious mood, apathy, features of dopamine dysregulation syndrome, sleep problems, daytime sleepiness, pain and other sensations, urinary problems, constipation problems, light headedness on standing and fatigue.

There are 13 items included in Part I. Part I score ranges from 0 - 52; 10 and below is mild, 22 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Subjects Achieving an Improvement (Reduction) in Outcome Measure >= MCID (Established/Published) From Baseline to Week 52 in Total MDS-UPDRS Part I Score - by Treatment Week
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part I tests "Nonmotor experiences of daily living". Non-Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living (nM-EDL), including complex behaviors such as, cognitive impairment, hallucinations and psychosis, depressed mood, anxious mood, apathy, features of dopamine dysregulation syndrome, sleep problems, daytime sleepiness, pain and other sensations, urinary problems, constipation problems, light headedness on standing and fatigue.

There are 13 items included in Part I. Part I score ranges from 0 - 52; 10 and below is mild, 22 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part IV Total Score
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part IV. The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part IV tests "Motor Complications", including time spent with dyskinesias and others. There are 6 items included in Part IV. Part IV score ranges from 0 - 24; 4 and below is mild, 13 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part IV Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part IV. The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part IV tests "Motor Complications", including time spent with dyskinesias and others. There are 6 items included in Part IV. Part IV score ranges from 0 - 24; 4 and below is mild, 13 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part IV Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part IV. The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part IV tests "Motor Complications", including time spent with dyskinesias and others. There are 6 items included in Part IV. Part IV score ranges from 0 - 24; 4 and below is mild, 13 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Subjects Achieving an Improvement (Reduction) in Outcome Measure >= MCID (Established/Published) From Baseline to Week 52 in Total MDS-UPDRS Part IV Score - by Treatment Week
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part IV tests "Motor Complications", including time spent with dyskinesias and others. There are 6 items included in Part IV. Part IV score ranges from 0 - 24; 4 and below is mild, 13 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average General Health) Total Score
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Physical Functioning) Total Score
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Health Domain (Average Emotional Well-Being) Total Score
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Social Functioning) Total Score
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Vitality Domain (Average Energy/Fatigue) Total Score
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Bodily Pain Domain (Average Pain) Total Score
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Role Limitations Due to Physical Health) Total Score
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Role Limitations Due to Emotional Problems) Total Score
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average General Health) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Physical Functioning) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Health Domain (Average Emotional Well-Being) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Social Functioning) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Vitality Domain (Average Energy/Fatigue) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Bodily Pain Domain (Average Pain) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Role Limitations Due to Physical Health ) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Role Limitations Due to Emotional Problems) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average General Health) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Physical Functioning) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Health Domain (Average Emotional Well-Being) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Social Functioning) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Vitality Domain (Average Energy/Fatigue) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Bodily Pain Domain (Average Pain) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Role Limitations Due To Physical Health) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Role Limitations Due To Emotional Problems) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) Raw Scores
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
The Parkinson's Disease Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) is a patient-rated scale that measures fatigue in Parkinson's patients. It has 7 items on the measurement of presence of fatigue and 9 items on its impact on daily function. It can be used to assess levels of fatigue and measure any changes that treatment or lifestyle changes may affect. There are five answer choices for each item: Strongly disagree (1 point), Disagree (2 points), Do not agree or disagree (3 points), Agree (4 points), and Strongly agree (5 points). The PFS-16 score ranges from 16 (minimum) to 80 (maximum). Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in PFS-16 scores. The Parkinson's Disease Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) is a patient-rated scale that measures fatigue in Parkinson's patients. It has 7 items on the measurement of presence of fatigue and 9 items on its impact on daily function. It can be used to assess levels of fatigue and measure any changes that treatment or lifestyle changes may affect. There are five answer choices for each item: Strongly disagree (1 point), Disagree (2 points), Do not agree or disagree (3 points), Agree (4 points), and Strongly agree (5 points). The PFS-16 score ranges from 16 (minimum) to 80 (maximum). Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in PFS-16 scores. The Parkinson's Disease Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) is a patient-rated scale that measures fatigue in Parkinson's patients. It has 7 items on the measurement of presence of fatigue and 9 items on its impact on daily function. It can be used to assess levels of fatigue and measure any changes that treatment or lifestyle changes may affect. There are five answer choices for each item: Strongly disagree (1 point), Disagree (2 points), Do not agree or disagree (3 points), Agree (4 points), and Strongly agree (5 points). The PFS-16 score ranges from 16 (minimum) to 80 (maximum). Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Summary Index (SI) Raw Scores
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in PDQ-39 SI raw scores. The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire, or PDQ-39, is a 39-item self-report questionnaire which assesses Parkinson's disease-specific health related quality of life over the last month. The assessment looks at how often patient experience difficulties across the 8 quality of life dimensions (Mobility, Activities of Daily Living, Emotional well-being, Stigma, Social support, Cognition, Communication, and Bodily discomfort) and assesses the impact of Parkinson's disease on specific dimensions of functioning and well-being. Each item is scored with one of the following selections: 0 (Never), 25 (Occasionally), 50 (Sometimes), 75 (Often), and 100 (Always). The answers to the items for each dimension are averaged to calculate a dimension score (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100). To calculate the Summary Index, all 8 dimension scores are averaged (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100). Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Summary Index (SI) Raw Scores (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in PDQ-39 SI raw scores. The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire, or PDQ-39, is a 39-item self-report questionnaire which assesses Parkinson's disease-specific health related quality of life over the last month. The assessment looks at how often patient experience difficulties across the 8 quality of life dimensions (Mobility, Activities of Daily Living, Emotional well-being, Stigma, Social support, Cognition, Communication, and Bodily discomfort) and assesses the impact of Parkinson's disease on specific dimensions of functioning and well-being. Each item is scored with one of the following selections: 0 (Never), 25 (Occasionally), 50 (Sometimes), 75 (Often), and 100 (Always). The answers to the items for each dimension are averaged to calculate a dimension score (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100). To calculate the Summary Index, all 8 dimension scores are averaged (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100). Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Summary Index (SI) Raw Scores (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in PDQ-39 SI raw scores. The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire, or PDQ-39, is a 39-item self-report questionnaire which assesses Parkinson's disease-specific health related quality of life over the last month. The assessment looks at how often patient experience difficulties across the 8 quality of life dimensions (Mobility, Activities of Daily Living, Emotional well-being, Stigma, Social support, Cognition, Communication, and Bodily discomfort) and assesses the impact of Parkinson's disease on specific dimensions of functioning and well-being. Each item is scored with one of the following selections: 0 (Never), 25 (Occasionally), 50 (Sometimes), 75 (Often), and 100 (Always). The answers to the items for each dimension are averaged to calculate a dimension score (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100). To calculate the Summary Index, all 8 dimension scores are averaged (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100). Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Subjects Achieving an Improvement (Reduction) in Outcome Measure >= MCID (Established/Published) From Baseline to Week 52 in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Summary Index (SI) Raw Scores - by Treatment Week
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire, or PDQ-39, is a 39-item self-report questionnaire which assesses Parkinson's disease-specific health related quality of life over the last month. The assessment looks at how often patient experience difficulties across the 8 quality of life dimensions (Mobility, Activities of Daily Living, Emotional well-being, Stigma, Social support, Cognition, Communication, and Bodily discomfort) and assesses the impact of Parkinson's disease on specific dimensions of functioning and well-being. Each item is scored with one of the following selections: 0 (Never), 25 (Occasionally), 50 (Sometimes), 75 (Often), and 100 (Always). The answers to the items for each dimension are averaged to calculate a dimension score (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100). To calculate the Summary Index, all 8 dimension scores are averaged (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100). Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Raw Scores
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in VAS Pain raw scores. The VAS is a validated, subjective measurement tool, typically a 10-cm line anchored by "no pain" and "worst imaginable pain" used to measure intensity in pain and various other areas. The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their pain intensity. The minimum score is read as 0 cm and the maximum score is read as 10 cm. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in VAS Pain raw scores. The VAS is a validated, subjective measurement tool, typically a 10-cm line anchored by "no pain" and "worst imaginable pain" used to measure intensity in pain and various other areas. The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their pain intensity. The minimum score is read as 0 cm and the maximum score is read as 10 cm. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in VAS Pain raw scores. The VAS is a validated, subjective measurement tool, typically a 10-cm line anchored by "no pain" and "worst imaginable pain" used to measure intensity in pain and various other areas. The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their pain intensity. The minimum score is read as 0 cm and the maximum score is read as 10 cm. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Muscle Spasm Raw Scores
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in VAS Muscle Spasm raw scores. The VAS is a validated, subjective measurement tool, typically a 10-cm line anchored by "no muscle spasms" and "worst muscle spasms" used to measure intensity in muscle spasms and various other areas. The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their muscle spasm intensity. The minimum score is read as 0 cm and the maximum score is read as 10 cm. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Muscle Spasm Scores (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in VAS Muscle Spasm raw scores. The VAS is a validated, subjective measurement tool, typically a 10-cm line anchored by "no muscle spasms" and "worst muscle spasms" used to measure intensity in muscle spasms and various other areas. The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their muscle spasm intensity. The minimum score is read as 0 cm and the maximum score is read as 10 cm. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Muscle Spasm Scores (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in VAS Muscle Spasm raw scores. The VAS is a validated, subjective measurement tool, typically a 10-cm line anchored by "no muscle spasms" and "worst muscle spasms" used to measure intensity in muscle spasms and various other areas. The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their muscle spasm intensity. The minimum score is read as 0 cm and the maximum score is read as 10 cm. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Subjects Achieving an Improvement (Reduction) in Outcome Measure >= MCID (Established/Published) From Baseline to Week 52 in Total VAS Scores - by Treatment Week
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
The VAS is a validated, subjective measurement tool, typically a 10-cm line anchored by "no pain" and "worst imaginable pain" in the Pain section and "No muscle spasm" and "worst muscle spasm" in the Muscle Spasm section, used to measure intensity in pain and various other areas. The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their pain intensity. The minimum score is read as 0 cm and the maximum score is read as 10 cm for each section. The total score is achieved by summing the two individual scores. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Summary of PD Medication Dose Changes by Visit
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
The following table depicts the count of participants that decreased, increased, or did not change their Parkinson's disease medication dosage over the course of the study at various timepoints. The safety analysis set (30 patients in Placebo, 30 patients in HB-adMSCs) was assessed at the various timepoints.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Summary of PD Medication Reinstatement by Visit
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
The table prior to this one depicts the count of participants that decreased, increased, or did not change their Parkinson's disease medication dosage over the course of the study at various timepoints. This table depicts the count of participants that reinstated their dose of Parkinson's disease medications after decreasing it throughout the clinical trial. The safety analysis set (30 patients in Placebo, 30 patients in HB-adMSCs) was assessed at the various timepoints.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (Subjects With >= 1 Adverse Event) - Summary - Safety Analysis Set
Tidsram: Baseline to Week 24
Unit (# of participants) - Treatment emergent Adverse events (Subjects with >= 1 adverse event) - Summary - Safety analysis set. Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were monitored from Week 0 (Infusion 1) through Week 24 (Follow-Up 1). A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an event that has onset date on or after the first day of exposure to infusion treatment and on or before the first safety follow-up (week 24).
Baseline to Week 24
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (Serious AEs) - Summary - Safety Analysis Set
Tidsram: Baseline to Week 24
Unit (# of participants) - Treatment emergent Adverse events (Serious AEs) - Summary - Safety analysis set. Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were monitored from Week 0 (Infusion 1) through Week 24 (Follow-Up 1). A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an event that has onset date on or after the first day of exposure to infusion treatment and on or before the first safety follow-up (week 24).
Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CBC (x10^9 Cells/L) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (x10^9 cells/L) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Complete Blood Count (CBC) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CBC (%) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (%) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Complete Blood Count (CBC) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CBC (g/dL) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (g/dL) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Complete Blood Count (CBC) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CBC (pg) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (pg) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Complete Blood Count (CBC) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CBC (fL) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (fL) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Complete Blood Count (CBC) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CBC (10^12/L) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (10^12/L) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Complete Blood Count (CBC) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CMP (g/dL) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (g/dL) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CMP (Ratio) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (Ratio) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CMP (IU/L) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (IU/L) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (mg/dL) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CMP (mmol/L) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (mmol/L) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CMP (mL/Min/1.73 m^2) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (mL/min/1.73 m^2) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - Coagulation Panel (Ratio) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (Ratio) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Coagulation Panel by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - Coagulation Panel (Sec.) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (sec.) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Coagulation Panel by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Diastolic Blood Pressure - mmHg)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Heart Rate - Beats/Min)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Oxygen Saturation - %)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Respiration Rate - Breaths/Min)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Systolic Blood Pressure - mmHg)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Temperature - Celsius)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Weight - kg)
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - Abdomen
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - Cardiovascular
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - HEENT
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set - Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose, and Throat
Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - Lymph Node
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - Musculoskeletal
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - Neurological
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - Respiratory
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - Skin
Tidsram: Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set
Baseline to Weeks 52

Samarbetspartners och utredare

Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.

Sponsor

Hope Biosciences Research Foundation

Samarbetspartners

Hope Biosciences

Utredare

  • Huvudutredare: Djamchid Lotfi, MD, Hope Biosciences Stem Cell Research Foundation

Publikationer och användbara länkar

Den som ansvarar för att lägga in information om studien tillhandahåller frivilligt dessa publikationer. Dessa kan handla om allt som har med studien att göra.

Allmänna publikationer

Studieavstämningsdatum

Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.

Studera stora datum

Studiestart (Faktisk)

16 juli 2021

Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)

3 oktober 2025

Avslutad studie (Faktisk)

3 oktober 2025

Studieregistreringsdatum

Först inskickad

16 juli 2021

Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

2 augusti 2021

Första postat (Faktisk)

6 augusti 2021

Uppdateringar av studier

Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)

10 juni 2026

Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

14 maj 2026

Senast verifierad

1 maj 2026

Mer information

Termer relaterade till denna studie

Ytterligare relevanta MeSH-villkor

Andra studie-ID-nummer

  • HBPD04

Plan för individuella deltagardata (IPD)

Planerar du att dela individuella deltagardata (IPD)?

NEJ

Läkemedels- och apparatinformation, studiedokument

Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad läkemedelsprodukt

Ja

Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad produktprodukt

Nej

produkt tillverkad i och exporterad från U.S.A.

Nej

Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .

Prenumerera