Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Ensaio clínico para doença de Parkinson usando HB-adMSCs alogênicos (DP inicial e moderado)

14 de maio de 2026 atualizado por: Hope Biosciences Research Foundation

Um estudo randomizado, duplo-cego, de centro único, fase 2, estudo de eficácia e segurança de HB-adMSCs alogênicas versus placebo para o tratamento de pacientes com doença de Parkinson

Este é um estudo randomizado, duplo-cego, de centro único, fase 2 para avaliar a eficácia e segurança de múltiplas HB-adMSCs alogênicas versus Placebo para o tratamento da doença de Parkinson.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

O estudo inclui um período de triagem de até 4 semanas, um período de tratamento de 32 semanas e um período de acompanhamento de segurança de 20 semanas após a última administração do produto experimental.

Este ensaio clínico estará aberto para inscrever 60 participantes elegíveis diagnosticados com a doença de Parkinson. O recrutamento dos pacientes será conduzido pela equipe do estudo, se os participantes elegíveis forem identificados com base nos critérios de elegibilidade, uma visita de triagem será agendada. O formulário de consentimento informado será entregue aos participantes do estudo e assinado antes de qualquer procedimento do estudo. O termo de consentimento informado incluirá informações sobre o ensaio clínico e alguns aspectos devem ser considerados durante esse processo.

Depois de obtido o consentimento informado, cada participante deve completar as visitas seguintes.

  • Visita 1 - Triagem, durante esta visita, o investigador principal tomará a decisão de determinar se o participante rastreado é elegível e se a próxima visita pode ser agendada. Uma vez que o investigador principal tenha avaliado a elegibilidade do sujeito rastreado (até 28 dias), um processo de randomização será conduzido para atribuir ao sujeito elegível HB-adMSCs alogênicas ou placebo. A randomização só se aplica a indivíduos elegíveis. Se um participante do estudo não atender aos critérios de inclusão e exclusão durante o processo de triagem, ele será considerado Falha na triagem (SF) e a randomização não será necessária.
  • Visita 2 - Infusão 1, (linha de base): esta visita será usada como ponto de partida para comparação dos dados do participante. Durante esta visita, os participantes elegíveis do estudo receberão sua primeira administração de produto experimental ou placebo com monitoramento de sinais vitais por um total de 2 horas após a exposição ao medicamento. Outras avaliações de estudo serão concluídas como parte desta visita.
  • Visita 3 - Infusão 2: aproximadamente 4 semanas após a administração inicial do produto experimental, esta visita deve ser concluída. Outras avaliações de estudo serão concluídas como parte desta visita.
  • Visita 4 - Infusão 3: aproximadamente 8 semanas após a administração inicial do produto experimental, esta visita deve ser concluída. Outras avaliações de estudo serão concluídas como parte desta visita.
  • Visita 5 - Infusão 4: aproximadamente 12 semanas após a administração inicial do produto experimental, esta visita deve ser concluída. Outras avaliações de estudo serão concluídas como parte desta visita.
  • Visita 6 - Infusão 5: aproximadamente 16 semanas após a administração inicial do produto experimental, esta visita deve ser concluída. Outras avaliações de estudo serão concluídas como parte desta visita.
  • Visita 7 - Infusão 6: aproximadamente 20 semanas após a administração inicial do produto experimental, esta visita deve ser concluída. Outras avaliações de estudo serão concluídas como parte desta visita.
  • Telefonema - Acompanhamento de segurança: aproximadamente 24 semanas após a administração inicial do produto experimental, os participantes ativos do estudo completarão um telefonema de acompanhamento.
  • Telefonema - Acompanhamento de segurança: aproximadamente 32 semanas após a administração inicial do produto experimental, os participantes ativos do estudo completarão um telefonema de acompanhamento.
  • Visita 8 - Fim do Estudo, durante esta visita final (aproximadamente 52 semanas após a Semana 0), um grupo completo de avaliações do estudo será realizado para avaliar a segurança e eficácia de HB-adMSCs alogênicos ou administrações de Placebo.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

60

Estágio

  • Fase 2

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

    • Texas
      • Sugar Land, Texas, Estados Unidos, 77478
        • Hope Biosciences Stem Cell Research Foundation

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

45 anos a 80 anos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Descrição

Critério de inclusão:

  • Um participante do estudo será elegível para inclusão neste estudo somente se todos os critérios a seguir se aplicarem:

    1. Participantes masculinos e femininos de 45 a 80 anos.
    2. Na visita de triagem, os participantes do estudo devem ter uma pontuação MDS-UPDRS parte II entre 7 e 28.
    3. Os participantes do estudo devem ter uma pontuação MDS-UPDRS parte III entre 20 e 57 durante a visita de triagem.
    4. A dosagem total de carbidopa/levodopa deve ser inferior a 1200 mg por dia para os participantes do estudo.
    5. A dose equivalente total de Levodopa para os participantes do estudo deve ser inferior a 1400 mg por dia.
    6. O participante do estudo deve ter sido diagnosticado com doença de Parkinson precoce e/ou moderada pelo menos 2 anos antes da participação no estudo.
    7. Os participantes do estudo devem ser capazes de ler, entender e fornecer consentimento por escrito.
    8. Consentimento informado voluntariamente assinado obtido antes da realização de qualquer procedimento relacionado ao estudo clínico.
    9. As participantes do estudo do sexo feminino não devem estar grávidas ou planejar engravidar durante a participação no estudo e por 6 meses após a última administração do produto experimental.
    10. Participantes do sexo masculino, se suas parceiras sexuais puderem engravidar, devem usar um método contraceptivo durante a participação no estudo e por 6 meses após a última administração do produto investigado.
    11. O participante do estudo é capaz e deseja cumprir os requisitos deste ensaio clínico.

Critério de exclusão:

  • Um participante do estudo não será elegível para inclusão neste ensaio clínico se qualquer um dos seguintes critérios se aplicar:

    1. Gravidez, lactação. Mulheres em idade reprodutiva que não estão grávidas, mas não tomam medidas contraceptivas eficazes.
    2. Participantes do estudo com doença de Parkinson avançada descrita como deficiência grave, cadeira de rodas ou acamada.
    3. O participante do estudo tem qualquer malignidade ativa, incluindo evidências de carcinoma de células escamosas, basal cutâneo ou melanoma.
    4. O participante do estudo tem dependência ou vício alcoólico conhecido ou tem uso ou abuso atual de substâncias.
    5. O participante do estudo tem 1 ou mais condições médicas concomitantes significativas (verificadas por registros médicos), incluindo o seguinte:

      • Diabetes mellitus mal controlado (PCDM) definido como histórico de tratamento padrão deficiente e/ou glicose pré-prandial >130mg/dl durante a consulta de triagem ou glicose pós-prandial >200mg/dl.
      • Histórico médico de diagnóstico de doença renal crônica (DRC) e/ou resultados de triagem de eGFR < 59mL/min/1,73m2.
      • Presença de insuficiência cardíaca Classe III/IV da New York Heart Association (NYHA) durante a visita de triagem.
      • Qualquer histórico médico de infarto do miocárdio em qualquer um dos diferentes tipos, como infarto do miocárdio com elevação do segmento ST (STEMI) ou infarto do miocárdio sem elevação do segmento ST (NSTEMI), espasmo coronário ou angina instável.
      • História médica de hipertensão arterial não controlada definida como padrão deficiente de tratamento e/ou pressão arterial > 180/120 mm/Hg durante a visita de triagem.
      • Histórico médico de trombofilias hereditárias, cirurgia geral importante recente (dentro de 12 meses antes da triagem), paralisia dos membros inferiores devido a lesão da medula espinhal, fratura da pelve, quadril ou fêmur, câncer de pulmão, cérebro, linfático, sistema ginecológico ( ovário ou útero) ou trato gastrointestinal (como pâncreas ou estômago).
      • História da cirurgia cerebral para a doença de Parkinson.
    6. O participante do estudo recebeu qualquer tratamento com células-tronco dentro de 6 meses antes da primeira dose do produto experimental, exceto células-tronco produzidas pela Hope Biosciences.
    7. Receber qualquer terapia experimental ou qualquer terapia aprovada para uso experimental dentro de 1 ano antes da primeira dose do produto experimental, exceto as vacinas COVID-19.
    8. O participante do estudo tem uma anormalidade laboratorial durante a triagem, incluindo o seguinte:

      • Contagem de glóbulos brancos <3000/mm3
      • Contagem de plaquetas < 80.000 mm3
      • Contagem absoluta de neutrófilos < 1500/mm3
      • Alanina aminotransferase (ALT) ou aspartato aminotransferase (AST) 10 limite superior do normal (ULN) x 1,5
    9. O participante do estudo tem qualquer outra anormalidade laboratorial ou condição médica que, na opinião do investigador, represente um risco de segurança ou impeça o sujeito de concluir o estudo.
    10. É improvável que o participante do estudo conclua o estudo ou adote os procedimentos do estudo.
    11. Participante do estudo com hepatite B ou C viral aguda ou crônica conhecida ou infecção pelo vírus da imunodeficiência humana (HIV).
    12. O participante do estudo tem uma condição psiquiátrica previamente diagnosticada que, na opinião do investigador, pode afetar as autoavaliações.
    13. Participante do estudo com qualquer infecção sistêmica que exija tratamento com antibióticos, antivirais ou antifúngicos dentro de 30 dias antes da primeira dose do produto experimental.
    14. Participantes masculinos do estudo que planejam doar esperma durante o estudo ou dentro de 6 meses após a última dose. Pacientes do sexo feminino que planejam doar óvulos ou fazer tratamento de fertilização in vitro durante o estudo ou até 6 meses após a última dose.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Quadruplicar

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Comparador Ativo: HB-adMSCs alogênicas.

Biológica/Vacina: HB-adMSCs alogênicas

As HB-adMSCs alogênicas serão administradas por via intravenosa aos participantes do estudo que se qualificarem.

Outros nomes: Células-tronco mesenquimais derivadas de tecido adiposo da Hope Biosciences.

HB-adMSCs serão administrados por via intravenosa aos participantes do estudo que se qualificarem.
Outros nomes:
  • Células-tronco mesenquimais derivadas de células adiposas da Hope Biosciences alogênicas.
Solução salina estéril 0,9%
Outros nomes:
  • O placebo será administrado por via intravenosa aos participantes do estudo que se qualificarem.
Comparador de Placebo: Placebo

O placebo será administrado por via intravenosa aos participantes do estudo que se qualificarem.

Outros nomes: Solução salina estéril 0,9%

HB-adMSCs serão administrados por via intravenosa aos participantes do estudo que se qualificarem.
Outros nomes:
  • Células-tronco mesenquimais derivadas de células adiposas da Hope Biosciences alogênicas.
Solução salina estéril 0,9%
Outros nomes:
  • O placebo será administrado por via intravenosa aos participantes do estudo que se qualificarem.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part III Total Score
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part III. The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part III tests Motor Examination, which tests speech, facial expression, rigidity, finger and hand movement, pronation-supination movements of hands, toe tapping, leg agility, arising from chair, gait, freezing of gait, postural stability, posture, global spontaneity of movement, postural tremor of the hands, kinetic tremor of the hands, rest tremor amplitude, constancy of rest tremor, dyskinesias impact and Hoehn and Yahr stage (18 items total). Each item is rated from 0-4: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The Part III score ranges from 0 - 132; 32 and below is mild, 59 and above is severe. The total MDS-UPDRS Parts I-IV score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 260 (total disability). Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part III (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part III. The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part III tests Motor Examination, which tests speech, facial expression, rigidity, finger and hand movement, pronation-supination movements of hands, toe tapping, leg agility, arising from chair, gait, freezing of gait, postural stability, posture, global spontaneity of movement, postural tremor of the hands, kinetic tremor of the hands, rest tremor amplitude, constancy of rest tremor, dyskinesias impact and Hoehn and Yahr stage (18 items total). Each item is rated from 0-4: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The Part III score ranges from 0 - 132; 32 and below is mild, 59 and above is severe. The total MDS-UPDRS Parts I-IV score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 260 (total disability). Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part III (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part III. The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part III tests Motor Examination, which tests speech, facial expression, rigidity, finger and hand movement, pronation-supination movements of hands, toe tapping, leg agility, arising from chair, gait, freezing of gait, postural stability, posture, global spontaneity of movement, postural tremor of the hands, kinetic tremor of the hands, rest tremor amplitude, constancy of rest tremor, dyskinesias impact and Hoehn and Yahr stage (18 items total). Each item is rated from 0-4: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The Part III score ranges from 0 - 132; 32 and below is mild, 59 and above is severe. The total MDS-UPDRS Parts I-IV score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 260 (total disability). Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Subjects Achieving an Improvement (Reduction) in Outcome Measure >= MCID (Established/Published) From Baseline to Week 52 in Total MDS-UPDRS Part III Score - by Treatment Week
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part III tests Motor Examination, which tests speech, facial expression, rigidity, finger and hand movement, pronation-supination movements of hands, toe tapping, leg agility, arising from chair, gait, freezing of gait, postural stability, posture, global spontaneity of movement, postural tremor of the hands, kinetic tremor of the hands, rest tremor amplitude, constancy of rest tremor, dyskinesias impact and Hoehn and Yahr stage (18 items total). Each item is rated from 0-4: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The Part III score ranges from 0 - 132; 32 and below is mild, 59 and above is severe. The total MDS-UPDRS Parts I-IV score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 260 (total disability). Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part II Total Score
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part II.The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. The MDS-UPDRS scale consists of 4 segments. Part II tests "Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living". Each answer to the scale is evaluated by the principal investigator during the study visit. Some sections of the MDS-UPDRS scale require multiple grades assigned to each extremity.

There are 13 items included in Part II. Part II score ranges from 0 - 52; 12 and below is mild, 30 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Changes From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part II (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part II.The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. The MDS-UPDRS scale consists of 4 segments. Part II tests "Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living". Each answer to the scale is evaluated by the principal investigator during the study visit. Some sections of the MDS-UPDRS scale require multiple grades assigned to each extremity.

There are 13 items included in Part II. Part II score ranges from 0 - 52; 12 and below is mild, 30 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part II (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part II.The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. The MDS-UPDRS scale consists of 4 segments. Part II tests "Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living". Each answer to the scale is evaluated by the principal investigator during the study visit. Some sections of the MDS-UPDRS scale require multiple grades assigned to each extremity.

There are 13 items included in Part II. Part II score ranges from 0 - 52; 12 and below is mild, 30 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Subjects Achieving an Improvement (Reduction) in Outcome Measure >= MCID (Established/Published) From Baseline to Week 52 in Total MDS-UPDRS Part II Score - by Treatment Week
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. The MDS-UPDRS scale consists of 4 segments. Part II tests "Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living". Each answer to the scale is evaluated by the principal investigator during the study visit. Some sections of the MDS-UPDRS scale require multiple grades assigned to each extremity. There are 13 items included in Part II. Part II score ranges from 0 - 52; 12 and below is mild, 30 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part I Total Score
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part I tests "Nonmotor experiences of daily living". Non-Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living (nM-EDL), including complex behaviors such as, cognitive impairment, hallucinations and psychosis, depressed mood, anxious mood, apathy, features of dopamine dysregulation syndrome, sleep problems, daytime sleepiness, pain and other sensations, urinary problems, constipation problems, light headedness on standing and fatigue.

There are 13 items included in Part I. Part I score ranges from 0 - 52; 10 and below is mild, 22 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part I (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part I tests "Nonmotor experiences of daily living". Non-Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living (nM-EDL), including complex behaviors such as, cognitive impairment, hallucinations and psychosis, depressed mood, anxious mood, apathy, features of dopamine dysregulation syndrome, sleep problems, daytime sleepiness, pain and other sensations, urinary problems, constipation problems, light headedness on standing and fatigue.

There are 13 items included in Part I. Part I score ranges from 0 - 52; 10 and below is mild, 22 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part I (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part I tests "Nonmotor experiences of daily living". Non-Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living (nM-EDL), including complex behaviors such as, cognitive impairment, hallucinations and psychosis, depressed mood, anxious mood, apathy, features of dopamine dysregulation syndrome, sleep problems, daytime sleepiness, pain and other sensations, urinary problems, constipation problems, light headedness on standing and fatigue.

There are 13 items included in Part I. Part I score ranges from 0 - 52; 10 and below is mild, 22 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Subjects Achieving an Improvement (Reduction) in Outcome Measure >= MCID (Established/Published) From Baseline to Week 52 in Total MDS-UPDRS Part I Score - by Treatment Week
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part I tests "Nonmotor experiences of daily living". Non-Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living (nM-EDL), including complex behaviors such as, cognitive impairment, hallucinations and psychosis, depressed mood, anxious mood, apathy, features of dopamine dysregulation syndrome, sleep problems, daytime sleepiness, pain and other sensations, urinary problems, constipation problems, light headedness on standing and fatigue.

There are 13 items included in Part I. Part I score ranges from 0 - 52; 10 and below is mild, 22 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part IV Total Score
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part IV. The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part IV tests "Motor Complications", including time spent with dyskinesias and others. There are 6 items included in Part IV. Part IV score ranges from 0 - 24; 4 and below is mild, 13 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part IV Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part IV. The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part IV tests "Motor Complications", including time spent with dyskinesias and others. There are 6 items included in Part IV. Part IV score ranges from 0 - 24; 4 and below is mild, 13 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part IV Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part IV. The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part IV tests "Motor Complications", including time spent with dyskinesias and others. There are 6 items included in Part IV. Part IV score ranges from 0 - 24; 4 and below is mild, 13 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Subjects Achieving an Improvement (Reduction) in Outcome Measure >= MCID (Established/Published) From Baseline to Week 52 in Total MDS-UPDRS Part IV Score - by Treatment Week
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part IV tests "Motor Complications", including time spent with dyskinesias and others. There are 6 items included in Part IV. Part IV score ranges from 0 - 24; 4 and below is mild, 13 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average General Health) Total Score
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Physical Functioning) Total Score
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Health Domain (Average Emotional Well-Being) Total Score
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Social Functioning) Total Score
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Vitality Domain (Average Energy/Fatigue) Total Score
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Bodily Pain Domain (Average Pain) Total Score
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Role Limitations Due to Physical Health) Total Score
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Role Limitations Due to Emotional Problems) Total Score
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average General Health) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Physical Functioning) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Health Domain (Average Emotional Well-Being) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Social Functioning) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Vitality Domain (Average Energy/Fatigue) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Bodily Pain Domain (Average Pain) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Role Limitations Due to Physical Health ) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Role Limitations Due to Emotional Problems) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average General Health) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Physical Functioning) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Health Domain (Average Emotional Well-Being) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Social Functioning) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Vitality Domain (Average Energy/Fatigue) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Bodily Pain Domain (Average Pain) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Role Limitations Due To Physical Health) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Role Limitations Due To Emotional Problems) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52

The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health.

Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are:

Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100

Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods.

Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) Raw Scores
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
The Parkinson's Disease Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) is a patient-rated scale that measures fatigue in Parkinson's patients. It has 7 items on the measurement of presence of fatigue and 9 items on its impact on daily function. It can be used to assess levels of fatigue and measure any changes that treatment or lifestyle changes may affect. There are five answer choices for each item: Strongly disagree (1 point), Disagree (2 points), Do not agree or disagree (3 points), Agree (4 points), and Strongly agree (5 points). The PFS-16 score ranges from 16 (minimum) to 80 (maximum). Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in PFS-16 scores. The Parkinson's Disease Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) is a patient-rated scale that measures fatigue in Parkinson's patients. It has 7 items on the measurement of presence of fatigue and 9 items on its impact on daily function. It can be used to assess levels of fatigue and measure any changes that treatment or lifestyle changes may affect. There are five answer choices for each item: Strongly disagree (1 point), Disagree (2 points), Do not agree or disagree (3 points), Agree (4 points), and Strongly agree (5 points). The PFS-16 score ranges from 16 (minimum) to 80 (maximum). Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in PFS-16 scores. The Parkinson's Disease Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) is a patient-rated scale that measures fatigue in Parkinson's patients. It has 7 items on the measurement of presence of fatigue and 9 items on its impact on daily function. It can be used to assess levels of fatigue and measure any changes that treatment or lifestyle changes may affect. There are five answer choices for each item: Strongly disagree (1 point), Disagree (2 points), Do not agree or disagree (3 points), Agree (4 points), and Strongly agree (5 points). The PFS-16 score ranges from 16 (minimum) to 80 (maximum). Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Summary Index (SI) Raw Scores
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in PDQ-39 SI raw scores. The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire, or PDQ-39, is a 39-item self-report questionnaire which assesses Parkinson's disease-specific health related quality of life over the last month. The assessment looks at how often patient experience difficulties across the 8 quality of life dimensions (Mobility, Activities of Daily Living, Emotional well-being, Stigma, Social support, Cognition, Communication, and Bodily discomfort) and assesses the impact of Parkinson's disease on specific dimensions of functioning and well-being. Each item is scored with one of the following selections: 0 (Never), 25 (Occasionally), 50 (Sometimes), 75 (Often), and 100 (Always). The answers to the items for each dimension are averaged to calculate a dimension score (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100). To calculate the Summary Index, all 8 dimension scores are averaged (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100). Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Summary Index (SI) Raw Scores (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in PDQ-39 SI raw scores. The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire, or PDQ-39, is a 39-item self-report questionnaire which assesses Parkinson's disease-specific health related quality of life over the last month. The assessment looks at how often patient experience difficulties across the 8 quality of life dimensions (Mobility, Activities of Daily Living, Emotional well-being, Stigma, Social support, Cognition, Communication, and Bodily discomfort) and assesses the impact of Parkinson's disease on specific dimensions of functioning and well-being. Each item is scored with one of the following selections: 0 (Never), 25 (Occasionally), 50 (Sometimes), 75 (Often), and 100 (Always). The answers to the items for each dimension are averaged to calculate a dimension score (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100). To calculate the Summary Index, all 8 dimension scores are averaged (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100). Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Summary Index (SI) Raw Scores (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in PDQ-39 SI raw scores. The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire, or PDQ-39, is a 39-item self-report questionnaire which assesses Parkinson's disease-specific health related quality of life over the last month. The assessment looks at how often patient experience difficulties across the 8 quality of life dimensions (Mobility, Activities of Daily Living, Emotional well-being, Stigma, Social support, Cognition, Communication, and Bodily discomfort) and assesses the impact of Parkinson's disease on specific dimensions of functioning and well-being. Each item is scored with one of the following selections: 0 (Never), 25 (Occasionally), 50 (Sometimes), 75 (Often), and 100 (Always). The answers to the items for each dimension are averaged to calculate a dimension score (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100). To calculate the Summary Index, all 8 dimension scores are averaged (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100). Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Subjects Achieving an Improvement (Reduction) in Outcome Measure >= MCID (Established/Published) From Baseline to Week 52 in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Summary Index (SI) Raw Scores - by Treatment Week
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire, or PDQ-39, is a 39-item self-report questionnaire which assesses Parkinson's disease-specific health related quality of life over the last month. The assessment looks at how often patient experience difficulties across the 8 quality of life dimensions (Mobility, Activities of Daily Living, Emotional well-being, Stigma, Social support, Cognition, Communication, and Bodily discomfort) and assesses the impact of Parkinson's disease on specific dimensions of functioning and well-being. Each item is scored with one of the following selections: 0 (Never), 25 (Occasionally), 50 (Sometimes), 75 (Often), and 100 (Always). The answers to the items for each dimension are averaged to calculate a dimension score (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100). To calculate the Summary Index, all 8 dimension scores are averaged (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100). Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Raw Scores
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in VAS Pain raw scores. The VAS is a validated, subjective measurement tool, typically a 10-cm line anchored by "no pain" and "worst imaginable pain" used to measure intensity in pain and various other areas. The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their pain intensity. The minimum score is read as 0 cm and the maximum score is read as 10 cm. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in VAS Pain raw scores. The VAS is a validated, subjective measurement tool, typically a 10-cm line anchored by "no pain" and "worst imaginable pain" used to measure intensity in pain and various other areas. The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their pain intensity. The minimum score is read as 0 cm and the maximum score is read as 10 cm. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in VAS Pain raw scores. The VAS is a validated, subjective measurement tool, typically a 10-cm line anchored by "no pain" and "worst imaginable pain" used to measure intensity in pain and various other areas. The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their pain intensity. The minimum score is read as 0 cm and the maximum score is read as 10 cm. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Muscle Spasm Raw Scores
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in VAS Muscle Spasm raw scores. The VAS is a validated, subjective measurement tool, typically a 10-cm line anchored by "no muscle spasms" and "worst muscle spasms" used to measure intensity in muscle spasms and various other areas. The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their muscle spasm intensity. The minimum score is read as 0 cm and the maximum score is read as 10 cm. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Muscle Spasm Scores (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in VAS Muscle Spasm raw scores. The VAS is a validated, subjective measurement tool, typically a 10-cm line anchored by "no muscle spasms" and "worst muscle spasms" used to measure intensity in muscle spasms and various other areas. The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their muscle spasm intensity. The minimum score is read as 0 cm and the maximum score is read as 10 cm. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Muscle Spasm Scores (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Clinically significant changes in VAS Muscle Spasm raw scores. The VAS is a validated, subjective measurement tool, typically a 10-cm line anchored by "no muscle spasms" and "worst muscle spasms" used to measure intensity in muscle spasms and various other areas. The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their muscle spasm intensity. The minimum score is read as 0 cm and the maximum score is read as 10 cm. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Subjects Achieving an Improvement (Reduction) in Outcome Measure >= MCID (Established/Published) From Baseline to Week 52 in Total VAS Scores - by Treatment Week
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
The VAS is a validated, subjective measurement tool, typically a 10-cm line anchored by "no pain" and "worst imaginable pain" in the Pain section and "No muscle spasm" and "worst muscle spasm" in the Muscle Spasm section, used to measure intensity in pain and various other areas. The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their pain intensity. The minimum score is read as 0 cm and the maximum score is read as 10 cm for each section. The total score is achieved by summing the two individual scores. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Summary of PD Medication Dose Changes by Visit
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
The following table depicts the count of participants that decreased, increased, or did not change their Parkinson's disease medication dosage over the course of the study at various timepoints. The safety analysis set (30 patients in Placebo, 30 patients in HB-adMSCs) was assessed at the various timepoints.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Summary of PD Medication Reinstatement by Visit
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
The table prior to this one depicts the count of participants that decreased, increased, or did not change their Parkinson's disease medication dosage over the course of the study at various timepoints. This table depicts the count of participants that reinstated their dose of Parkinson's disease medications after decreasing it throughout the clinical trial. The safety analysis set (30 patients in Placebo, 30 patients in HB-adMSCs) was assessed at the various timepoints.
Baseline to Weeks 52
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (Subjects With >= 1 Adverse Event) - Summary - Safety Analysis Set
Prazo: Baseline to Week 24
Unit (# of participants) - Treatment emergent Adverse events (Subjects with >= 1 adverse event) - Summary - Safety analysis set. Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were monitored from Week 0 (Infusion 1) through Week 24 (Follow-Up 1). A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an event that has onset date on or after the first day of exposure to infusion treatment and on or before the first safety follow-up (week 24).
Baseline to Week 24
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (Serious AEs) - Summary - Safety Analysis Set
Prazo: Baseline to Week 24
Unit (# of participants) - Treatment emergent Adverse events (Serious AEs) - Summary - Safety analysis set. Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were monitored from Week 0 (Infusion 1) through Week 24 (Follow-Up 1). A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an event that has onset date on or after the first day of exposure to infusion treatment and on or before the first safety follow-up (week 24).
Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CBC (x10^9 Cells/L) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (x10^9 cells/L) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Complete Blood Count (CBC) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CBC (%) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (%) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Complete Blood Count (CBC) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CBC (g/dL) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (g/dL) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Complete Blood Count (CBC) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CBC (pg) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (pg) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Complete Blood Count (CBC) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CBC (fL) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (fL) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Complete Blood Count (CBC) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CBC (10^12/L) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (10^12/L) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Complete Blood Count (CBC) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CMP (g/dL) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (g/dL) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CMP (Ratio) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (Ratio) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CMP (IU/L) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (IU/L) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (mg/dL) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CMP (mmol/L) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (mmol/L) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CMP (mL/Min/1.73 m^2) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (mL/min/1.73 m^2) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - Coagulation Panel (Ratio) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (Ratio) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Coagulation Panel by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - Coagulation Panel (Sec.) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Unit (sec.) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Coagulation Panel by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Diastolic Blood Pressure - mmHg)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Heart Rate - Beats/Min)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Oxygen Saturation - %)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Respiration Rate - Breaths/Min)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Systolic Blood Pressure - mmHg)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Temperature - Celsius)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Weight - kg)
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - Abdomen
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - Cardiovascular
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - HEENT
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set - Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose, and Throat
Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - Lymph Node
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - Musculoskeletal
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - Neurological
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - Respiratory
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set
Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - Skin
Prazo: Baseline to Weeks 52
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set
Baseline to Weeks 52

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Colaboradores

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Djamchid Lotfi, MD, Hope Biosciences Stem Cell Research Foundation

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Publicações Gerais

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

16 de julho de 2021

Conclusão Primária (Real)

3 de outubro de 2025

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

3 de outubro de 2025

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

16 de julho de 2021

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

2 de agosto de 2021

Primeira postagem (Real)

6 de agosto de 2021

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

10 de junho de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

14 de maio de 2026

Última verificação

1 de maio de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Sim

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

produto fabricado e exportado dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever