同種HB-adMSCを用いたパーキンソン病の臨床試験（早期および中等度のPD）
パーキンソン病患者の治療のための同種HB-adMSC対プラセボの無作為化、二重盲検、単一施設、第2相、有効性および安全性試験
調査の概要
詳細な説明
この試験には、最大 4 週間のスクリーニング期間、32 週間の治療期間、および最後の治験薬投与後 20 週間の安全性追跡期間が含まれます。
この臨床試験は、パーキンソン病と診断された60人の適格な参加者を登録するために開かれています。 患者の募集は研究チームによって行われ、適格基準に基づいて適格な参加者が特定された場合、スクリーニング訪問が予定されます。 インフォームドコンセントフォームが研究参加者に渡され、研究手順の前に署名されます。 インフォームド コンセント フォームには、臨床試験に関する情報が含まれており、このプロセス中にいくつかの側面を考慮する必要があります。
インフォームドコンセントが得られた後、各参加者は次の訪問を完了する必要があります。
- 訪問 1 - スクリーニング。この訪問中に、主治医は、スクリーニングされた参加者が適格であるかどうか、および次の訪問をスケジュールできるかどうかを判断します。 主治医がスクリーニング対象の適格性を評価した後 (最大 28 日間)、適格な対象を同種 HB-adMSC またはプラセボのいずれかに割り当てるために無作為化プロセスが実施されます。 無作為化は適格な被験者にのみ適用されます。 研究参加者がスクリーニングプロセス中に包含および除外基準を満たさない場合、その参加者はスクリーニング失敗（SF）と見なされ、無作為化は必要ありません。
- 訪問 2 - 注入 1、(ベースライン): この訪問は、参加者のデータを比較するための開始点として使用されます。 この訪問中、適格な研究参加者は、薬物暴露後合計2時間バイタルサインを監視しながら、最初の治験薬投与またはプラセボを受け取ります。 他の研究評価は、この訪問の一部として完了します。
- 訪問 3 - 注入 2: 最初の治験薬投与から約 4 週間後に、この訪問を完了する必要があります。 他の研究評価は、この訪問の一部として完了します。
- 訪問 4 - 注入 3: 最初の治験薬投与から約 8 週間後に、この訪問を完了する必要があります。 他の研究評価は、この訪問の一部として完了します。
- 訪問 5 - 点滴 4: 最初の治験薬投与から約 12 週間後に、この訪問を完了する必要があります。 他の研究評価は、この訪問の一部として完了します。
- 訪問 6 - 注入 5: 最初の治験薬投与から約 16 週間後に、この訪問を完了する必要があります。 他の研究評価は、この訪問の一部として完了します。
- 通院 7 - 注入 6: 最初の治験薬投与から約 20 週間後に、この通院を完了する必要があります。 他の研究評価は、この訪問の一部として完了します。
- 電話 - 安全性のフォローアップ: 最初の治験薬投与から約 24 週間後、積極的な研究参加者は電話によるフォローアップを完了します。
- 電話 - 安全性のフォローアップ: 最初の治験薬投与から約 32 週間後に、積極的な研究参加者は電話によるフォローアップを完了します。
- 訪問8 - 研究の終了、この最後の訪問中(第0週から約52週間後)、同種HB-adMSCまたはプラセボ投与の安全性と有効性を評価するために、研究評価の完全なグループが実施されます。
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- フェーズ2
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
Texas
-
Sugar Land、Texas、アメリカ、77478
- Hope Biosciences Stem Cell Research Foundation
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
説明
包含基準:
研究参加者は、次のすべての基準が当てはまる場合にのみ、この研究に含める資格があります。
- 参加者は45～80歳の男女。
- スクリーニング訪問時に、研究参加者は7〜28のMDS-UPDRSパートIIスコアを持っている必要があります。
- -調査参加者は、スクリーニング訪問中に20〜57のMDS-UPDRSパートIIIスコアを持っている必要があります。
- -カルビドパ/レボドパの総投与量は、研究参加者の1日あたり1200 mg未満でなければなりません。
- 研究参加者の総レボドパ等価用量は、1日あたり1400 mg未満でなければなりません。
- -研究参加者は、研究参加の少なくとも2年前に早期および/または中等度のパーキンソン病と診断されている必要があります。
- 研究参加者は、読み、理解し、書面による同意を提供できる必要があります。
- -臨床試験関連の手順が実行される前に、自発的に署名されたインフォームドコンセントが得られます。
- 女性の研究参加者は、研究参加中および最後の治験薬投与後6か月間、妊娠していないか、妊娠する予定があってはなりません。
- 男性の参加者は、性的パートナーが妊娠する可能性がある場合、研究参加中および調査対象製品の最終投与後 6 か月間、避妊法を使用する必要があります。
- -研究参加者は、この臨床試験の要件を順守することができ、順守する意思があります。
除外基準:
以下の基準のいずれかに該当する場合、研究参加者はこの臨床試験に参加する資格がありません。
- 妊娠、授乳。 妊娠していないが効果的な避妊手段を講じていない出産可能年齢の女性。
- -重度の障害、車椅子に縛られている、または寝たきりであると説明されている進行したパーキンソン病の研究参加者。
- -研究参加者は、皮膚基底部、扁平上皮癌または黒色腫の証拠を含む、活動中の悪性腫瘍を持っています。
- -研究参加者は、アルコール依存症または依存症を知っているか、現在の薬物使用または乱用があります。
研究参加者は、以下を含む1つ以上の重大な併発病状（医療記録によって検証されます）を持っています：
- -コントロール不良の糖尿病（PCDM）は、不十分な標準治療の病歴として定義されます および/またはスクリーニング訪問中の食前グルコース> 130mg / dlまたは食後グルコース> 200mg / dl。
- -慢性腎臓病（CKD）診断の病歴および/またはeGFR <59mL / min / 1.73m2のスクリーニング結果。
- -スクリーニング訪問中のニューヨーク心臓協会（NYHA）のクラスIII / IV心不全の存在。
- -ST上昇型心筋梗塞（STEMI）または非ST上昇型心筋梗塞（NSTEMI）、冠状動脈痙攣、または不安定狭心症など、さまざまなタイプの心筋梗塞の病歴。
- -コントロールされていない高血圧の病歴は、不十分な標準のケア治療として定義されています および/またはスクリーニング訪問中の血圧> 180/120 mm / Hg。
- -遺伝性血栓形成傾向の病歴、最近の大規模な一般手術（スクリーニング前の12か月以内）、脊髄損傷による下肢麻痺、骨盤、股関節または大腿骨の骨折、肺癌、脳癌、リンパ管癌、婦人科系（卵巣または子宮）、または消化管（膵臓または胃など）。
- パーキンソン病の脳手術歴。
- -研究参加者は、Hope Biosciencesによって生成された幹細胞以外の治験薬の初回投与前6か月以内に幹細胞治療を受けました。
- -COVID-19ワクチン以外の治験薬の初回投与前1年以内に、治験薬または治験薬として承認された治療法を受けている。
研究参加者は、スクリーニング中に以下を含む臨床検査値に異常があります。
- 白血球数 < 3000/mm3
- 血小板数 < 80,000mm3
- 絶対好中球数 < 1500/mm3
- アラニンアミノトランスフェラーゼ (ALT) またはアスパラギン酸アミノトランスフェラーゼ (AST) 10 正常上限 (ULN) x 1.5
- -研究参加者は、研究者の意見では、安全上のリスクをもたらす、または被験者が研究を完了するのを妨げる他の実験室の異常または医学的状態を持っています。
- -研究参加者が研究を完了するか、研究手順を順守する可能性は低い。
- -既知の同時急性または慢性のウイルス性B型またはC型肝炎またはヒト免疫不全ウイルス（HIV）感染のある研究参加者。
- -研究参加者は、以前に診断された精神医学的状態にあり、研究者の意見では、自己評価に影響を与える可能性があります。
- -治験薬の初回投与前30日以内に抗生物質、抗ウイルス薬、または抗真菌薬による治療を必要とする全身感染症のある研究参加者。
- -研究中または最後の投与後6か月以内に精子を提供する予定の男性研究参加者。 試験期間中または最終投与後6ヶ月以内に卵子提供または体外受精を予定している女性患者。
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：処理
- 割り当て：ランダム化
- 介入モデル：並列代入
- マスキング：4倍
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
アクティブコンパレータ：同種 HB-adMSC。
生物/ワクチン: 同種 HB-adMSC 同種HB-adMSCは、資格のある研究参加者に静脈内投与されます。 他の名前: 同種ホープ バイオサイエンシズ脂肪由来の間葉系幹細胞。 |
HB-adMSCは、資格のある研究参加者に静脈内投与されます。
他の名前：
滅菌生理食塩水 0.9%
他の名前：
|
|
プラセボコンパレーター：プラセボ
プラセボは、資格のある研究参加者に静脈内投与されます。 ほかの名前: 滅菌生理食塩水 0.9% |
HB-adMSCは、資格のある研究参加者に静脈内投与されます。
他の名前：
滅菌生理食塩水 0.9%
他の名前：
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part III Total Score
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part III.
The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients.
Part III tests Motor Examination, which tests speech, facial expression, rigidity, finger and hand movement, pronation-supination movements of hands, toe tapping, leg agility, arising from chair, gait, freezing of gait, postural stability, posture, global spontaneity of movement, postural tremor of the hands, kinetic tremor of the hands, rest tremor amplitude, constancy of rest tremor, dyskinesias impact and Hoehn and Yahr stage (18 items total).
Each item is rated from 0-4: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe).
The Part III score ranges from 0 - 132; 32 and below is mild, 59 and above is severe.
The total MDS-UPDRS Parts I-IV score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 260 (total disability).
Higher values represent a worse outcome.
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part III (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part III.
The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients.
Part III tests Motor Examination, which tests speech, facial expression, rigidity, finger and hand movement, pronation-supination movements of hands, toe tapping, leg agility, arising from chair, gait, freezing of gait, postural stability, posture, global spontaneity of movement, postural tremor of the hands, kinetic tremor of the hands, rest tremor amplitude, constancy of rest tremor, dyskinesias impact and Hoehn and Yahr stage (18 items total).
Each item is rated from 0-4: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe).
The Part III score ranges from 0 - 132; 32 and below is mild, 59 and above is severe.
The total MDS-UPDRS Parts I-IV score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 260 (total disability).
Higher values represent a worse outcome.
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part III (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part III.
The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients.
Part III tests Motor Examination, which tests speech, facial expression, rigidity, finger and hand movement, pronation-supination movements of hands, toe tapping, leg agility, arising from chair, gait, freezing of gait, postural stability, posture, global spontaneity of movement, postural tremor of the hands, kinetic tremor of the hands, rest tremor amplitude, constancy of rest tremor, dyskinesias impact and Hoehn and Yahr stage (18 items total).
Each item is rated from 0-4: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe).
The Part III score ranges from 0 - 132; 32 and below is mild, 59 and above is severe.
The total MDS-UPDRS Parts I-IV score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 260 (total disability).
Higher values represent a worse outcome.
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Subjects Achieving an Improvement (Reduction) in Outcome Measure >= MCID (Established/Published) From Baseline to Week 52 in Total MDS-UPDRS Part III Score - by Treatment Week
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients.
Part III tests Motor Examination, which tests speech, facial expression, rigidity, finger and hand movement, pronation-supination movements of hands, toe tapping, leg agility, arising from chair, gait, freezing of gait, postural stability, posture, global spontaneity of movement, postural tremor of the hands, kinetic tremor of the hands, rest tremor amplitude, constancy of rest tremor, dyskinesias impact and Hoehn and Yahr stage (18 items total).
Each item is rated from 0-4: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe).
The Part III score ranges from 0 - 132; 32 and below is mild, 59 and above is severe.
The total MDS-UPDRS Parts I-IV score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 260 (total disability).
Higher values represent a worse outcome.
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part II Total Score
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part II.The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. The MDS-UPDRS scale consists of 4 segments. Part II tests "Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living". Each answer to the scale is evaluated by the principal investigator during the study visit. Some sections of the MDS-UPDRS scale require multiple grades assigned to each extremity. There are 13 items included in Part II. Part II score ranges from 0 - 52; 12 and below is mild, 30 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Changes From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part II (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part II.The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. The MDS-UPDRS scale consists of 4 segments. Part II tests "Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living". Each answer to the scale is evaluated by the principal investigator during the study visit. Some sections of the MDS-UPDRS scale require multiple grades assigned to each extremity. There are 13 items included in Part II. Part II score ranges from 0 - 52; 12 and below is mild, 30 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part II (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part II.The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. The MDS-UPDRS scale consists of 4 segments. Part II tests "Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living". Each answer to the scale is evaluated by the principal investigator during the study visit. Some sections of the MDS-UPDRS scale require multiple grades assigned to each extremity. There are 13 items included in Part II. Part II score ranges from 0 - 52; 12 and below is mild, 30 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Subjects Achieving an Improvement (Reduction) in Outcome Measure >= MCID (Established/Published) From Baseline to Week 52 in Total MDS-UPDRS Part II Score - by Treatment Week
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients.
The MDS-UPDRS scale consists of 4 segments.
Part II tests "Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living".
Each answer to the scale is evaluated by the principal investigator during the study visit.
Some sections of the MDS-UPDRS scale require multiple grades assigned to each extremity.
There are 13 items included in Part II.
Part II score ranges from 0 - 52; 12 and below is mild, 30 and above is severe.
Each item has 0-4 ratings: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe).
The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability.
Higher values represent a worse outcome.
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part I Total Score
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part I tests "Nonmotor experiences of daily living". Non-Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living (nM-EDL), including complex behaviors such as, cognitive impairment, hallucinations and psychosis, depressed mood, anxious mood, apathy, features of dopamine dysregulation syndrome, sleep problems, daytime sleepiness, pain and other sensations, urinary problems, constipation problems, light headedness on standing and fatigue. There are 13 items included in Part I. Part I score ranges from 0 - 52; 10 and below is mild, 22 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part I (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part I tests "Nonmotor experiences of daily living". Non-Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living (nM-EDL), including complex behaviors such as, cognitive impairment, hallucinations and psychosis, depressed mood, anxious mood, apathy, features of dopamine dysregulation syndrome, sleep problems, daytime sleepiness, pain and other sensations, urinary problems, constipation problems, light headedness on standing and fatigue. There are 13 items included in Part I. Part I score ranges from 0 - 52; 10 and below is mild, 22 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part I (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part I tests "Nonmotor experiences of daily living". Non-Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living (nM-EDL), including complex behaviors such as, cognitive impairment, hallucinations and psychosis, depressed mood, anxious mood, apathy, features of dopamine dysregulation syndrome, sleep problems, daytime sleepiness, pain and other sensations, urinary problems, constipation problems, light headedness on standing and fatigue. There are 13 items included in Part I. Part I score ranges from 0 - 52; 10 and below is mild, 22 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Subjects Achieving an Improvement (Reduction) in Outcome Measure >= MCID (Established/Published) From Baseline to Week 52 in Total MDS-UPDRS Part I Score - by Treatment Week
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The MDS-UPDRS scale refers to Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and it is a rating tool used to gauge the course of Parkinson's disease in patients. Part I tests "Nonmotor experiences of daily living". Non-Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living (nM-EDL), including complex behaviors such as, cognitive impairment, hallucinations and psychosis, depressed mood, anxious mood, apathy, features of dopamine dysregulation syndrome, sleep problems, daytime sleepiness, pain and other sensations, urinary problems, constipation problems, light headedness on standing and fatigue. There are 13 items included in Part I. Part I score ranges from 0 - 52; 10 and below is mild, 22 and above is severe. Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability. Higher values represent a worse outcome. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part IV Total Score
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part IV.
The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients.
Part IV tests "Motor Complications", including time spent with dyskinesias and others.
There are 6 items included in Part IV.
Part IV score ranges from 0 - 24; 4 and below is mild, 13 and above is severe.
Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe).
The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability.
Higher values represent a worse outcome.
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part IV Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part IV.
The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients.
Part IV tests "Motor Complications", including time spent with dyskinesias and others.
There are 6 items included in Part IV.
Part IV score ranges from 0 - 24; 4 and below is mild, 13 and above is severe.
Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe).
The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability.
Higher values represent a worse outcome.
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Part IV Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Clinically significant changes in MDS-UPDRS Part IV.
The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients.
Part IV tests "Motor Complications", including time spent with dyskinesias and others.
There are 6 items included in Part IV.
Part IV score ranges from 0 - 24; 4 and below is mild, 13 and above is severe.
Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe).
The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability.
Higher values represent a worse outcome.
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Subjects Achieving an Improvement (Reduction) in Outcome Measure >= MCID (Established/Published) From Baseline to Week 52 in Total MDS-UPDRS Part IV Score - by Treatment Week
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or MDS-UPDRS, is a four-part rating tool used to gauge the progress of Parkinson's disease in patients.
Part IV tests "Motor Complications", including time spent with dyskinesias and others.
There are 6 items included in Part IV.
Part IV score ranges from 0 - 24; 4 and below is mild, 13 and above is severe.
Each item has 0-4 ratings:0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe).
The total score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability.
Higher values represent a worse outcome.
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average General Health) Total Score
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health. Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are: Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100 Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Physical Functioning) Total Score
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health. Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are: Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100 Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Health Domain (Average Emotional Well-Being) Total Score
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health. Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are: Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100 Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Social Functioning) Total Score
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health. Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are: Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100 Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Vitality Domain (Average Energy/Fatigue) Total Score
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health. Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are: Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100 Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Bodily Pain Domain (Average Pain) Total Score
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health. Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are: Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100 Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Role Limitations Due to Physical Health) Total Score
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health. Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are: Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100 Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Role Limitations Due to Emotional Problems) Total Score
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health. Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are: Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100 Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average General Health) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health. Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are: Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100 Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Physical Functioning) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health. Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are: Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100 Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Health Domain (Average Emotional Well-Being) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health. Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are: Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100 Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Social Functioning) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health. Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are: Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100 Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Vitality Domain (Average Energy/Fatigue) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health. Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are: Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100 Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Bodily Pain Domain (Average Pain) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health. Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are: Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100 Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Role Limitations Due to Physical Health ) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health. Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are: Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100 Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Role Limitations Due to Emotional Problems) Total Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health. Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are: Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100 Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average General Health) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health. Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are: Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100 Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Physical Functioning) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health. Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are: Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100 Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Health Domain (Average Emotional Well-Being) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health. Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are: Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100 Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Social Functioning) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health. Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are: Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100 Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Vitality Domain (Average Energy/Fatigue) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health. Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are: Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100 Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Bodily Pain Domain (Average Pain) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health. Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are: Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100 Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Role Limitations Due To Physical Health) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health. Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are: Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100 Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in SF-36 (Average Role Limitations Due To Emotional Problems) Total Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The SF-36 Health Survey is a patient-reported assessment that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), and mental health. Each of the eight domains is scored separately and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. The domains and their score ranges are: Physical Functioning (PF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP): 0-100 Bodily Pain (BP): 0-100 General Health (GH): 0-100 Vitality (VT): 0-100 Social Functioning (SF): 0-100 Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE): 0-100 Mental Health (MH): 0-100 Each domain score is calculated by summing and transforming item responses within that domain. In addition to these, two summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived using standardized scoring methods. |
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) Raw Scores
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The Parkinson's Disease Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) is a patient-rated scale that measures fatigue in Parkinson's patients.
It has 7 items on the measurement of presence of fatigue and 9 items on its impact on daily function.
It can be used to assess levels of fatigue and measure any changes that treatment or lifestyle changes may affect.
There are five answer choices for each item: Strongly disagree (1 point), Disagree (2 points), Do not agree or disagree (3 points), Agree (4 points), and Strongly agree (5 points).
The PFS-16 score ranges from 16 (minimum) to 80 (maximum).
Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) Score (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Clinically significant changes in PFS-16 scores.
The Parkinson's Disease Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) is a patient-rated scale that measures fatigue in Parkinson's patients.
It has 7 items on the measurement of presence of fatigue and 9 items on its impact on daily function.
It can be used to assess levels of fatigue and measure any changes that treatment or lifestyle changes may affect.
There are five answer choices for each item: Strongly disagree (1 point), Disagree (2 points), Do not agree or disagree (3 points), Agree (4 points), and Strongly agree (5 points).
The PFS-16 score ranges from 16 (minimum) to 80 (maximum).
Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) Score (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Clinically significant changes in PFS-16 scores.
The Parkinson's Disease Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) is a patient-rated scale that measures fatigue in Parkinson's patients.
It has 7 items on the measurement of presence of fatigue and 9 items on its impact on daily function.
It can be used to assess levels of fatigue and measure any changes that treatment or lifestyle changes may affect.
There are five answer choices for each item: Strongly disagree (1 point), Disagree (2 points), Do not agree or disagree (3 points), Agree (4 points), and Strongly agree (5 points).
The PFS-16 score ranges from 16 (minimum) to 80 (maximum).
Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Summary Index (SI) Raw Scores
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Clinically significant changes in PDQ-39 SI raw scores.
The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire, or PDQ-39, is a 39-item self-report questionnaire which assesses Parkinson's disease-specific health related quality of life over the last month.
The assessment looks at how often patient experience difficulties across the 8 quality of life dimensions (Mobility, Activities of Daily Living, Emotional well-being, Stigma, Social support, Cognition, Communication, and Bodily discomfort) and assesses the impact of Parkinson's disease on specific dimensions of functioning and well-being.
Each item is scored with one of the following selections: 0 (Never), 25 (Occasionally), 50 (Sometimes), 75 (Often), and 100 (Always).
The answers to the items for each dimension are averaged to calculate a dimension score (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100).
To calculate the Summary Index, all 8 dimension scores are averaged (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100).
Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Summary Index (SI) Raw Scores (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Clinically significant changes in PDQ-39 SI raw scores.
The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire, or PDQ-39, is a 39-item self-report questionnaire which assesses Parkinson's disease-specific health related quality of life over the last month.
The assessment looks at how often patient experience difficulties across the 8 quality of life dimensions (Mobility, Activities of Daily Living, Emotional well-being, Stigma, Social support, Cognition, Communication, and Bodily discomfort) and assesses the impact of Parkinson's disease on specific dimensions of functioning and well-being.
Each item is scored with one of the following selections: 0 (Never), 25 (Occasionally), 50 (Sometimes), 75 (Often), and 100 (Always).
The answers to the items for each dimension are averaged to calculate a dimension score (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100).
To calculate the Summary Index, all 8 dimension scores are averaged (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100).
Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Summary Index (SI) Raw Scores (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Clinically significant changes in PDQ-39 SI raw scores.
The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire, or PDQ-39, is a 39-item self-report questionnaire which assesses Parkinson's disease-specific health related quality of life over the last month.
The assessment looks at how often patient experience difficulties across the 8 quality of life dimensions (Mobility, Activities of Daily Living, Emotional well-being, Stigma, Social support, Cognition, Communication, and Bodily discomfort) and assesses the impact of Parkinson's disease on specific dimensions of functioning and well-being.
Each item is scored with one of the following selections: 0 (Never), 25 (Occasionally), 50 (Sometimes), 75 (Often), and 100 (Always).
The answers to the items for each dimension are averaged to calculate a dimension score (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100).
To calculate the Summary Index, all 8 dimension scores are averaged (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100).
Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Subjects Achieving an Improvement (Reduction) in Outcome Measure >= MCID (Established/Published) From Baseline to Week 52 in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Summary Index (SI) Raw Scores - by Treatment Week
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire, or PDQ-39, is a 39-item self-report questionnaire which assesses Parkinson's disease-specific health related quality of life over the last month.
The assessment looks at how often patient experience difficulties across the 8 quality of life dimensions (Mobility, Activities of Daily Living, Emotional well-being, Stigma, Social support, Cognition, Communication, and Bodily discomfort) and assesses the impact of Parkinson's disease on specific dimensions of functioning and well-being.
Each item is scored with one of the following selections: 0 (Never), 25 (Occasionally), 50 (Sometimes), 75 (Often), and 100 (Always).
The answers to the items for each dimension are averaged to calculate a dimension score (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100).
To calculate the Summary Index, all 8 dimension scores are averaged (minimum of 0 and maximum of 100).
Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Raw Scores
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Clinically significant changes in VAS Pain raw scores.
The VAS is a validated, subjective measurement tool, typically a 10-cm line anchored by "no pain" and "worst imaginable pain" used to measure intensity in pain and various other areas.
The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their pain intensity.
The minimum score is read as 0 cm and the maximum score is read as 10 cm.
Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Clinically significant changes in VAS Pain raw scores.
The VAS is a validated, subjective measurement tool, typically a 10-cm line anchored by "no pain" and "worst imaginable pain" used to measure intensity in pain and various other areas.
The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their pain intensity.
The minimum score is read as 0 cm and the maximum score is read as 10 cm.
Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Clinically significant changes in VAS Pain raw scores.
The VAS is a validated, subjective measurement tool, typically a 10-cm line anchored by "no pain" and "worst imaginable pain" used to measure intensity in pain and various other areas.
The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their pain intensity.
The minimum score is read as 0 cm and the maximum score is read as 10 cm.
Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Muscle Spasm Raw Scores
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Clinically significant changes in VAS Muscle Spasm raw scores.
The VAS is a validated, subjective measurement tool, typically a 10-cm line anchored by "no muscle spasms" and "worst muscle spasms" used to measure intensity in muscle spasms and various other areas.
The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their muscle spasm intensity.
The minimum score is read as 0 cm and the maximum score is read as 10 cm.
Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Muscle Spasm Scores (Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Clinically significant changes in VAS Muscle Spasm raw scores.
The VAS is a validated, subjective measurement tool, typically a 10-cm line anchored by "no muscle spasms" and "worst muscle spasms" used to measure intensity in muscle spasms and various other areas.
The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their muscle spasm intensity.
The minimum score is read as 0 cm and the maximum score is read as 10 cm.
Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Muscle Spasm Scores (Bayesian Statistical Analysis - RMA Model)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Clinically significant changes in VAS Muscle Spasm raw scores.
The VAS is a validated, subjective measurement tool, typically a 10-cm line anchored by "no muscle spasms" and "worst muscle spasms" used to measure intensity in muscle spasms and various other areas.
The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their muscle spasm intensity.
The minimum score is read as 0 cm and the maximum score is read as 10 cm.
Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Subjects Achieving an Improvement (Reduction) in Outcome Measure >= MCID (Established/Published) From Baseline to Week 52 in Total VAS Scores - by Treatment Week
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The VAS is a validated, subjective measurement tool, typically a 10-cm line anchored by "no pain" and "worst imaginable pain" in the Pain section and "No muscle spasm" and "worst muscle spasm" in the Muscle Spasm section, used to measure intensity in pain and various other areas.
The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their pain intensity.
The minimum score is read as 0 cm and the maximum score is read as 10 cm for each section.
The total score is achieved by summing the two individual scores.
Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Summary of PD Medication Dose Changes by Visit
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The following table depicts the count of participants that decreased, increased, or did not change their Parkinson's disease medication dosage over the course of the study at various timepoints.
The safety analysis set (30 patients in Placebo, 30 patients in HB-adMSCs) was assessed at the various timepoints.
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Summary of PD Medication Reinstatement by Visit
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
The table prior to this one depicts the count of participants that decreased, increased, or did not change their Parkinson's disease medication dosage over the course of the study at various timepoints.
This table depicts the count of participants that reinstated their dose of Parkinson's disease medications after decreasing it throughout the clinical trial.
The safety analysis set (30 patients in Placebo, 30 patients in HB-adMSCs) was assessed at the various timepoints.
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (Subjects With >= 1 Adverse Event) - Summary - Safety Analysis Set
時間枠：Baseline to Week 24
|
Unit (# of participants) - Treatment emergent Adverse events (Subjects with >= 1 adverse event) - Summary - Safety analysis set.
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were monitored from Week 0 (Infusion 1) through Week 24 (Follow-Up 1).
A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an event that has onset date on or after the first day of exposure to infusion treatment and on or before the first safety follow-up (week 24).
|
Baseline to Week 24
|
|
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (Serious AEs) - Summary - Safety Analysis Set
時間枠：Baseline to Week 24
|
Unit (# of participants) - Treatment emergent Adverse events (Serious AEs) - Summary - Safety analysis set.
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were monitored from Week 0 (Infusion 1) through Week 24 (Follow-Up 1).
A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an event that has onset date on or after the first day of exposure to infusion treatment and on or before the first safety follow-up (week 24).
|
Baseline to Week 24
|
|
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CBC (x10^9 Cells/L) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Unit (x10^9 cells/L) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Complete Blood Count (CBC) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CBC (%) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Unit (%) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Complete Blood Count (CBC) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CBC (g/dL) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Unit (g/dL) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Complete Blood Count (CBC) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CBC (pg) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Unit (pg) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Complete Blood Count (CBC) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CBC (fL) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Unit (fL) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Complete Blood Count (CBC) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CBC (10^12/L) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Unit (10^12/L) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Complete Blood Count (CBC) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CMP (g/dL) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Unit (g/dL) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CMP (Ratio) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Unit (Ratio) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CMP (IU/L) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Unit (IU/L) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Unit (mg/dL) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CMP (mmol/L) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Unit (mmol/L) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - CMP (mL/Min/1.73 m^2) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Unit (mL/min/1.73
m^2) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - Coagulation Panel (Ratio) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Unit (Ratio) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Coagulation Panel by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline Laboratory Values - Coagulation Panel (Sec.) [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52]
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Unit (sec.) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Coagulation Panel by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Diastolic Blood Pressure - mmHg)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Heart Rate - Beats/Min)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Oxygen Saturation - %)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Respiration Rate - Breaths/Min)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Systolic Blood Pressure - mmHg)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Temperature - Celsius)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Weight - kg)
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - Abdomen
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - Cardiovascular
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - HEENT
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set - Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose, and Throat
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - Lymph Node
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - Musculoskeletal
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - Neurological
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - Respiratory
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
|
Physical Examination - by Treatment Week - Skin
時間枠：Baseline to Weeks 52
|
Physical examination - by treatment week - Summary - Safety analysis set
|
Baseline to Weeks 52
|
協力者と研究者
協力者
捜査官
- 主任研究者：Djamchid Lotfi, MD、Hope Biosciences Stem Cell Research Foundation
出版物と役立つリンク
一般刊行物
- Meirelles Lda S, Fontes AM, Covas DT, Caplan AI. Mechanisms involved in the therapeutic properties of mesenchymal stem cells. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2009 Oct-Dec;20(5-6):419-27. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2009.10.002. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
- Garretti F, Agalliu D, Lindestam Arlehamn CS, Sette A, Sulzer D. Autoimmunity in Parkinson's Disease: The Role of alpha-Synuclein-Specific T Cells. Front Immunol. 2019 Feb 25;10:303. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00303. eCollection 2019.
- Musial-Wysocka A, Kot M, Majka M. The Pros and Cons of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Based Therapies. Cell Transplant. 2019 Jul;28(7):801-812. doi: 10.1177/0963689719837897. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
- Giannini EG, Testa R, Savarino V. Liver enzyme alteration: a guide for clinicians. CMAJ. 2005 Feb 1;172(3):367-79. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1040752.
- Kalia LV, Lang AE. Parkinson's disease. Lancet. 2015 Aug 29;386(9996):896-912. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61393-3. Epub 2015 Apr 19.
- Dimarino AM, Caplan AI, Bonfield TL. Mesenchymal stem cells in tissue repair. Front Immunol. 2013 Sep 4;4:201. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00201.
- Cuenca L, Gil-Martinez AL, Cano-Fernandez L, Sanchez-Rodrigo C, Estrada C, Fernandez-Villalba E, Herrero MT. Parkinson's disease: a short story of 200 years. Histol Histopathol. 2019 Jun;34(6):573-591. doi: 10.14670/HH-18-073. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
- Goetz CG. The history of Parkinson's disease: early clinical descriptions and neurological therapies. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2011 Sep;1(1):a008862. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a008862.
- Stoker TB, Greenland JC, editors. Parkinson's Disease: Pathogenesis and Clinical Aspects [Internet]. Brisbane (AU): Codon Publications; 2018 Dec 21. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK536721/
- Armstrong MJ, Okun MS. Diagnosis and Treatment of Parkinson Disease: A Review. JAMA. 2020 Feb 11;323(6):548-560. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.22360.
- Tambasco N, Romoli M, Calabresi P. Levodopa in Parkinson's Disease: Current Status and Future Developments. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2018;16(8):1239-1252. doi: 10.2174/1570159X15666170510143821.
- Marsden CD. Problems with long-term levodopa therapy for Parkinson's disease. Clin Neuropharmacol. 1994;17 Suppl 2:S32-44.
- Coppin L, Sokal E, Stephenne X. Thrombogenic Risk Induced by Intravascular Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Cells. 2019 Sep 27;8(10):1160. doi: 10.3390/cells8101160.
- Tatsumi K, Ohashi K, Matsubara Y, Kohori A, Ohno T, Kakidachi H, Horii A, Kanegae K, Utoh R, Iwata T, Okano T. Tissue factor triggers procoagulation in transplanted mesenchymal stem cells leading to thromboembolism. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013 Feb 8;431(2):203-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.12.134. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
- Tan EK, Chao YX, West A, Chan LL, Poewe W, Jankovic J. Parkinson disease and the immune system - associations, mechanisms and therapeutics. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020 Jun;16(6):303-318. doi: 10.1038/s41582-020-0344-4. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
- Ra JC, Shin IS, Kim SH, Kang SK, Kang BC, Lee HY, Kim YJ, Jo JY, Yoon EJ, Choi HJ, Kwon E. Safety of intravenous infusion of human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells in animals and humans. Stem Cells Dev. 2011 Aug;20(8):1297-308. doi: 10.1089/scd.2010.0466. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。