Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Study to Understand Pain Experiences in Relationships (SUPER)

21 aprile 2019 aggiornato da: Angelia Corley, Wayne State University
Chronic pain is a highly prevalent and costly health care problem. Yet, little is known about the optimal ways for health care providers and family members to respond to the distress expressed by people with chronic pain. The aim of the current study is to compare two models of responsiveness to identify responses that result in better functioning and adjustment. An experimental design will be used to test the extent to which emotional validation (e.g., an empathic response to distress) increases or decreases pain behaviors during physical activity. Romantic partners of individuals with chronic pain will be randomly assigned to receive validation or control training. Following training, people with chronic pain and their partners will engage in a discussion about pain and complete household tasks to examine the effects of partner training on communication, pain intensity, and pain behavior. Additionally, each individual in the couple will complete self-report measures after the discussion, after the household tasks, and one-month following the laboratory visit.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Completato

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

80

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

  • Stati Uniti
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, Stati Uniti, 48202
        • Wayne State University's Relationships and Health Lab

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

18 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Romantic couples who are married or living with each other for 6 months or longer or have been in a romantic relationship 2+ years.
  • One individual in the couple must have chronic muscoskeletal pain, lasting 3 months or longer. Participants may have multiple pain sites.
  • The individual with chronic pain must report that their pain occurs nearly daily.
  • The individual with chronic pain must have an average pain intensity of 3 or greater on an 11-point scale (from 0: no pain to 10: worst pain imaginable)
  • The individual with chronic pain must have an average pain interference of 3 or greater on an 11-point scale (from 0: does not interfere to 10: completely interferes)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • One or both individuals in the couple are unable to speak, read, or write in English.
  • Both individuals in the couple have chronic pain. Couples may consist of one individual with chronic pain and one individual with "minimal pain", which we define as having some aspects of chronic pain but not all (e.g., has had nearly daily pain for 4 months but rates their pain below 3 in regards to interference and intensity)
  • One or both individuals in the couple have widespread pain (e.g., fibromyalgia)

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Altro
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: Validation Training
In this arm, the romantic partner of the individual with chronic pain receives training on how to validate which is provided by the research assistant.
Comportamentale: Emotional Validation Training for Romantic Partners
In this intervention, romantic partners of individuals with chronic pain are trained individually by a research assistant. The romantic partner is trained on how to validate the individual with chronic pain's pain-related distress and given education about validation. This involves an approximately 45-minute brief, interactive training.
Altri nomi:
  • Convalida
Comparatore placebo: Education Training
In this arm, the romantic partner of the individual with chronic pain receives training on how to ask questions about treatments, which is provided by the research assistant.
Comportamentale: Chronic Pain Education Training for Romantic Partners
In this intervention, romantic partners of individuals with chronic pain are trained individually by a research assistant. The romantic partner is trained on how to ask health professionals questions about treatment options and given health education about chronic pain. This involves an approximately 45-minute brief, interactive training.
Altri nomi:
  • Formazione scolastica

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Pain Behavior (Behavioral coding)
Lasso di tempo: During lab visit, during household tasks conducted in the laboratory, approx. 15 - 35 mins. after partner training (intervention)
Pain behaviors (e.g., grimacing, guarding) measured with behavioral coding conducted by research assistants.
During lab visit, during household tasks conducted in the laboratory, approx. 15 - 35 mins. after partner training (intervention)
Pain Intensity (0 - 10 self-report rating scale)
Lasso di tempo: During lab visit, during discussion task, approx. 5 minutes after partner training (intervention)
The individual with chronic pain will be asked to report on the pain they experienced during the discussion with their partner, controlling for their baseline pain rating at the beginning of their laboratory visit.
During lab visit, during discussion task, approx. 5 minutes after partner training (intervention)
Pain Intensity (0 - 10 self-report rating scale)
Lasso di tempo: During lab visit, during household tasks, approx. 15 - 35 mins. after partner training (intervention)
The individual with chronic pain will be asked to report on the pain they experienced during each household task (e.g., making a bed), controlling for baseline pain rating at the beginning of their laboratory visit.
During lab visit, during household tasks, approx. 15 - 35 mins. after partner training (intervention)
Number of Partner Validating Responses (Behavioral coding)
Lasso di tempo: During lab visit, during discussion task, approx. 5 minutes after partner training (intervention)
Validating responses will be coded by research assistants.
During lab visit, during discussion task, approx. 5 minutes after partner training (intervention)
Number of Partner Invalidating Responses (Behavioral coding)
Lasso di tempo: During lab visit, during discussion task, approx. 5 minutes after partner training (intervention)
Invalidating responses will be coded by research assistants.
During lab visit, during discussion task, approx. 5 minutes after partner training (intervention)
Pain-Related Emotional Disclosures (Behavioral coding)
Lasso di tempo: During lab visit, during household tasks, approx. 15 - 35 mins. after partner training (intervention)
Behavioral coding by research assistants, accounting for activity level during household tasks.
During lab visit, during household tasks, approx. 15 - 35 mins. after partner training (intervention)
Number of Partner Validating Responses (Behavioral coding)
Lasso di tempo: During lab visit, during household tasks, approx. 15 - 35 mins. after partner training (intervention)
Validating responses will be coded by research assistants
During lab visit, during household tasks, approx. 15 - 35 mins. after partner training (intervention)
Number of Partner Invalidating Responses (Behavioral coding)
Lasso di tempo: During lab visit, during household tasks, approx. 15 - 35 mins. after partner training (intervention)
Invalidating responses will be coded by research assistants
During lab visit, during household tasks, approx. 15 - 35 mins. after partner training (intervention)
Partner Instrumental support (Behavioral coding)
Lasso di tempo: During lab visit, during household tasks, approx. 15 - 35 mins. after partner training (intervention)
Partner instrumental support includes number of offers of assistance, acts of assistance, and behaviors that discourage physical activity, which will be measured by behavioral coding by research assistants
During lab visit, during household tasks, approx. 15 - 35 mins. after partner training (intervention)
Individual with Chronic Pain Assistance Behavior (Behavioral coding)
Lasso di tempo: During lab visit, during household tasks, approx. 15 - 35 mins. after partner training (intervention)
Includes requests for assistance and accepting assistance, as measured by behavioral coding conducted by a research assistant
During lab visit, during household tasks, approx. 15 - 35 mins. after partner training (intervention)

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Relationship Satisfaction (Questionnaire)
Lasso di tempo: 1-month after the intervention
Couples Satisfaction Index, Funk & Rogge, 2007. Both partners' self-reports of relationship satisfaction.
1-month after the intervention
Interpersonal Closeness (Questionnaire)
Lasso di tempo: During lab visit, during discussion task (approx. 5 mins. after intervention), and during household tasks (approx. 15 - 35 mins. after intervention), and 1-month after intervention
Inclusion of Other in Self Scale, Aron, Aron, & Smollan, 1992. Both partners' self-reports of interpersonal closeness.
During lab visit, during discussion task (approx. 5 mins. after intervention), and during household tasks (approx. 15 - 35 mins. after intervention), and 1-month after intervention
Perceived Partner Responsiveness (Questionnaire)
Lasso di tempo: During lab visit, during discussion task (approx. 5 mins. after intervention), and during household tasks (approx. 15 - 35 mins. after intervention), and 1-month after intervention
Reis et al., 2003.Both partners' self-reports on Perceived Partner Responsiveness.
During lab visit, during discussion task (approx. 5 mins. after intervention), and during household tasks (approx. 15 - 35 mins. after intervention), and 1-month after intervention
Pain Intensity (Questionnaire)
Lasso di tempo: 1-month after the intervention
Brief Pain Inventory, Cleeland, 1992. The individual with chronic pain reports on their pain intensity using a 0 - 10 self-report scale, and indicates their average pain intensity over the last 24 hours.
1-month after the intervention
Accuracy of Estimate of Individual with Chronic Pain's Pain Intensity
Lasso di tempo: During lab visit, during discussion task (approx. 5 mins. after intervention), and during household tasks (approx. 15 - 35 mins. after intervention), and 1-month after intervention
Romantic partner will be asked to estimate the individual with chronic pain's average pain intensity, which will be compared to the individual with chronic pain's report to assess accuracy.
During lab visit, during discussion task (approx. 5 mins. after intervention), and during household tasks (approx. 15 - 35 mins. after intervention), and 1-month after intervention
Close other responses to pain and partner support (Questionnaire)
Lasso di tempo: 1-month after the intervention
West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory, Kerns, Turk, & Rudy, 1985. Both partners' reports of partner responses to pain and partner support, i.e., self-report for the partner, and other-report for the individual with chronic pain.
1-month after the intervention
Perceived Partner Validation (Questionnaire)
Lasso di tempo: During lab visit, during discussion task (approx. 5 mins. after intervention), and during household tasks (approx. 15 - 35 mins. after intervention), and 1-month after intervention
Both partners' reports of partner's validation behavior, i.e., self-report for the partner, and other-report for the individual with chronic pain.
During lab visit, during discussion task (approx. 5 mins. after intervention), and during household tasks (approx. 15 - 35 mins. after intervention), and 1-month after intervention
Perceived Partner Invalidation (Questionnaire)
Lasso di tempo: During lab visit, during discussion task (approx. 5 mins. after intervention), and during household tasks (approx. 15 - 35 mins. after intervention), and 1-month after intervention
Both partners report on partner's invalidation behavior, i.e., self-report for the partner, and other-report for the individual with chronic pain.
During lab visit, during discussion task (approx. 5 mins. after intervention), and during household tasks (approx. 15 - 35 mins. after intervention), and 1-month after intervention
Ambivalence about emotional expression measured by Holding Back Scale (Questionnaire)
Lasso di tempo: 1-month after the intervention
  • (Holding Back Scale; Pistrang & Barker, 1995)
  • (Holding Back Scale; Pistrang & Barker, 1995)
  • (Holding Back Scale; Pistrang & Barker, 1995)
  • (Holding Back Scale; Pistrang & Barker, 1995)
  • (Holding Back Scale; Pistrang & Barker, 1995) Holding Back Scale, Pistrang & Barker, 1995; Both partners report on individual with chronic pain's behavior.
1-month after the intervention
Self- and Other-Oriented Distress (Questionnaire)
Lasso di tempo: During lab visit, during discussion task (approx. 5 mins. after intervention) and during household tasks (approx. 15 - 35 mins. after intervention)
Batson, Fultz, & Schoendrade, 1987. Both partners' self-report of self- and other-oriented distress.
During lab visit, during discussion task (approx. 5 mins. after intervention) and during household tasks (approx. 15 - 35 mins. after intervention)
Individual with Chronic Pain's Emotional Expression (Questionnaire)
Lasso di tempo: During lab visit, during discussion task (approx. 5 mins. after intervention), and during household tasks (approx. 15 - 35 mins. after intervention), and 1-month after intervention
Both partners' report on individual with chronic pain's emotional expression.
During lab visit, during discussion task (approx. 5 mins. after intervention), and during household tasks (approx. 15 - 35 mins. after intervention), and 1-month after intervention
Individual with Chronic Pain's Pain Expression (Questionnaire)
Lasso di tempo: During lab visit, during discussion task (approx. 5 mins. after intervention)and during household tasks (approx. 15 - 35 mins. after intervention)
Both partners' report on individual with chronic pain's pain expression.
During lab visit, during discussion task (approx. 5 mins. after intervention)and during household tasks (approx. 15 - 35 mins. after intervention)
Perceived Division of Workload and Collaboration (Questionnaire)
Lasso di tempo: After household tasks (approx. 35 - 45 mins. after intervention)
Both partners' report on their perceptions of division of workload and collaboration during household tasks.
After household tasks (approx. 35 - 45 mins. after intervention)
Satisfaction with the discussion (Questionnaire)
Lasso di tempo: After discussion (approx. 15 mins. after intervention)
Both partners' report on their satisfaction with the discussion.
After discussion (approx. 15 mins. after intervention)
Satisfaction with household tasks
Lasso di tempo: After household tasks (approx. 35 - 45 mins. after intervention)
Both partners' report
After household tasks (approx. 35 - 45 mins. after intervention)

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

Wayne State University

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Angelia M Corley, M.A., Wayne State University

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Collegamenti utili

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

1 luglio 2016

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

1 dicembre 2017

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

1 giugno 2018

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

1 agosto 2016

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

3 agosto 2016

Primo Inserito (Stima)

9 agosto 2016

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

23 aprile 2019

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

21 aprile 2019

Ultimo verificato

1 aprile 2019

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Parole chiave

Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • ACorley

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Prove cliniche su Dolore cronico

Cerca prove simili

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

CROs by country

CROs in Kenya

Condizioni

Malattie rare

Interventi farmacologici

Supplementi dietetici

Sponsor / Collaboratori

Sedi

Sottoscrivi