Patients With Acute Hip Fractures Will Receive Either the PENG Block or no Block Respectively. (PENGBlock)
Evaluation of the PENG Block vs Placebo for Preoperative Pain Control in Hip Fractures in the Elderly - a Double-blinded Randomised Controlled Trial
Hip fracture pain is often severe and traditionally managed by systemic opioids which have increased risk of side effects in frail elderly patients. Inadequately controlled pain may lead to delirium which increases mortality and morbidity. The overall aim of this RCT is to investigate the potential for improved pain relief accomplished by the addition of the PENG block to current standard practice of pre-operative analgesia (systemic morphine), compared to the control group, which involves no block (operator will still go through the motion as if performing a block) plus standard pre-operative analgesia.
The investigator hypothesize that the addition of a single shot PENG block at the side of hip fracture in addition to traditional systemic morphine provides good preoperative pain relief on movement and reduces the need for breakthrough opioid requirements. The investigator hypothesize that the interventional group dynamic pain score assessed at 30 minutes after the block compared to control group dynamic pain score at 30 minutes after the "block" will be at least a 3 point difference between the 2 groups .
Panoramica dello studio
Stato
Condizioni
Intervento / Trattamento
Descrizione dettagliata
Specific Aim1: To determine difference in pain scores on movement (dynamic pain scores) in patients who receive the PENG block in the intervention group compared to no block in the control group at 30 minutes after performance of the block.
Specific Aim2: To determine if there is any difference in pain at rest between the intervention group and the control group, and if so, the magnitude of the difference in pain scores.
Tipo di studio
Iscrizione (Anticipato)
Fase
- Non applicabile
Contatti e Sedi
Luoghi di studio
-
-
-
Singapore, Singapore, 169608
- Reclutamento
- Pain Management Center Sinagpore General Hospital
-
Contatto:
- Diana Xin Hui Chan
- Numero di telefono: 63266162
- Email: diana.chan.x.h@singhealth.com.sg
-
-
Criteri di partecipazione
Criteri di ammissibilità
Età idonea allo studio
Accetta volontari sani
Sessi ammissibili allo studio
Descrizione
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 60 years old and above
- Provided consent for the study
- Patients with solitary hip fracture (no other fracture) - intracapsular neck of femur fracture, intertrochanteric fracture
- Either awaiting hip fracture surgery or no plans for hip fracture surgery within the next 24 hours
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with cognitive impairment or inability to give consent, or refusal to give consent
- Multiple fracture cases
- Peri-prosthetic fractures and revisions
- Subclinical vertebral fractures
- Hip fractures due to major accidents such as road traffic accidents, fall from height or more than 2 meters
- Multiple trauma
- Pathological fractures secondary to metastases
Patients with contraindications to block performance
- Coagulopathy as demonstrated by PT/PTT/INR
- On antiplatelets or anticoagulation
- Infection/ compromised skin integrity at site of block performance
- Allergy to local anaesthetics and opioids
Piano di studio
Come è strutturato lo studio?
Dettagli di progettazione
- Scopo principale: Trattamento
- Assegnazione: Randomizzato
- Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
- Mascheramento: Doppio
Armi e interventi
Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm |
Intervento / Trattamento |
|---|---|
|
Comparatore placebo: Control
Only standard care
|
Cura standard
Altri nomi:
|
|
Sperimentale: Intervention group
The PENG block was performed for intervention group with local anaesthetic solution composed of 20 ml of ropivacaine 0.5%.
|
Local anaesthetic solution composed of ropivacaine 0.5%(intervention group)
|
Cosa sta misurando lo studio?
Misure di risultato primarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Dynamic pain scores (Numerical pain score (NRS) at 15 degrees leg lift)
Lasso di tempo: 30 minutes after receiving intervention
|
The difference in dynamic pain scores (NRS at 15 degrees leg lift) at 30 minutes post block performance in the intervention group vs the control group.
Assessment of the dynamic pain score is done prior to discharge from recovery at SGH Pain Management Centre.
|
30 minutes after receiving intervention
|
Misure di risultato secondarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain scores (NRS) at rest (static pain) and on movement (dynamic pain)
Lasso di tempo: Up to 24 hours from performance of block
|
It is measured at Baseline, Immediately after performance of block, 30 minutes after the lock in recovery At 60 minutes, 180 minutes and 24 hours post block in the ward
|
Up to 24 hours from performance of block
|
|
Pain scores collected to estimate the onset and duration of block Pain scores to estimate the onset and duration of block
Lasso di tempo: Up to 24 hours from performance of block
|
Taking the recorded time taken for the pain relieve to estimate onset time using models
|
Up to 24 hours from performance of block
|
|
Total opioid use over 24 hours as a surrogate measure
Lasso di tempo: Up to 24 hours from performance of block
|
Using the data recorded for : Oral morphine use Intravenous morphine use for patients on PCA Doses of opioid use will be converted to morphine milligram equivalent daily dose (MEDD) for standardized comparison. |
Up to 24 hours from performance of block
|
Collaboratori e investigatori
Sponsor
Pubblicazioni e link utili
Pubblicazioni generali
- Giron-Arango L, Peng PWH, Chin KJ, Brull R, Perlas A. Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Hip Fracture. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Nov;43(8):859-863. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000847.
- Tay E. Hip fractures in the elderly: operative versus nonoperative management. Singapore Med J. 2016 Apr;57(4):178-81. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2016071.
Collegamenti utili
Studiare le date dei record
Studia le date principali
Inizio studio (Effettivo)
Completamento primario (Anticipato)
Completamento dello studio (Anticipato)
Date di iscrizione allo studio
Primo inviato
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
Primo Inserito (Effettivo)
Aggiornamenti dei record di studio
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
Ultimo verificato
Maggiori informazioni
Termini relativi a questo studio
Parole chiave
Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
- 2 (Altro identificatore: Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires)
Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)
Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?
Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio
Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
prodotto fabbricato ed esportato dagli Stati Uniti
Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .
Prove cliniche su Fratture dell'anca
-
University Health Network, TorontoCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)ReclutamentoOsteoartrite del ginocchio | Osteoartrite dell'ancaCanada