Restoring Awareness
Restoring Awareness in Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness With Drug Recycling
The study will evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of saxagliptin in treating prolonged DoC through a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, delayed start Phase IIA trial. Twenty-four (24) patients with prolonged DOC (≥28 days post-injury) will be enrolled at Rehabilitation Hopsital's Center for Disorders of Consciousness (C³DoC).
Twelve patients will be randomized to receive placebo for 15 days followed by saxagliptin 5 mg for 15 days (Delayed Start Group), and 12 will receive saxagliptin 5 mg for the full 30 days (Full Treatment Group). Patients will be under continuous medical monitoring within C³DoC throughout their approximately 4-week admission. Validated behavioral biomarkers of consciousness (CRS-R) will be collected by blinded certified assessors at baseline (days -7 and 0), day 15, and day 30, with portable EEG-based AI biomarker assessments to corroborate behavioral findings. Follow-up DRS-PI assessments will be conducted at days 60 and 90.
A pre-planned adaptive dose escalation design will be employed. The first 6 patients (sentinel cohort) will receive 5 mg (or placebo per delayed start). Upon cohort completion, the independent Safety Monitoring Board (SMB), chaired by a Medical doctor , will review unblinded safety data. If IRB and FDA IND Exemption approval is obtained for dose escalation, and excellent safety criteria are met (zero SAEs, no Grade 2+ AEs, zero hypoglycemia), the SMB will direct escalation to 10 mg for subsequent patients (up to 400 mg/day has been shown to be well-tolerated in humans); otherwise, 5 mg continues. Investigators and patients remain blinded throughout.
調査の概要
状態
状態
条件
条件
介入・治療
介入・治療
詳細な説明
When individuals suffer a severe brain injury and do not completely regain their previous functional abilities, frequently develop a Disorder of Consciousness (DoC). This refers to a collection of interconnected conditions characterized by reduced awareness and alertness, such as the Vegetative State (VS) and the Minimally Conscious State(MCS). When these conditions persist over time, there are currently no authorized pharmacological interventions available to enhance their recovery. Only one medication, amantadine, has Class II evidence for DOC, offering modest benefit with no group difference versus placebo at trial end . Eight drugs, which are indicated for other conditions, have previously shown some promise in improving alertness and awareness in some DoC patients. These drugs are amantadine, apomorphine, baclofen, bromocriptine, desipramine, levodopa, methylphenidate, and zolpidem. In order to identify new potential drugs for DoC, investigators trained a deep neural network to predict the efficacy of these eight drugs, as well as 288 other drugs known to be ineffective (from prior research and patient records), based on their molecular structure. This phenotypic AI screening was trained on both acute coma and prolonged DOC cases. Investigators then used this trained network to predict the efficacy of all other FDA-approved drugs in chronic DoC. This in silico drug screen identified a new, FDA-approved medication with promise in ameliorating chronic DoC: the type 2 diabetes medication saxagliptin. This finding has since been supported by a retrospective study of 4,047 ICU acute coma patients matched by age, sex, Glasgow Coma Scale score, etiology, and glycemic status, in which incretin-based therapies (including DPP-4 inhibitors) yielded significantly higher recovery rates versus non-incretin diabetes medications (P=0.0331), patients without diabetes (P=0.0272), and amantadine-treated patients (P=0.0364) (Toker et al., 2025). Recovery rates with incretin-based drugs were consistent across coma etiologies: TBI (76.5%), stroke (73.7%), and anoxic (74.9%); saxagliptin-treated patients showed 89% recovery. A new preclinical study also demonstrated saxagliptin significantly improved neurobehavioral outcomes and attenuated neuropathologies in severe TBI in non-diabetic rats .
In the present study, investigators propose to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of saxagliptin in treating prolonged DoC through a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, delayed start Phase IIA trial. Twenty-four (24) patients with prolonged DOC (≥28 days post-injury) will be enrolled at Rehabilitation Hospital's Center for Disorders of Consciousness (C³DoC).
Twelve patients will be randomized to receive placebo for 15 days followed by saxagliptin 5 mg for 15 days (Delayed Start Group), and 12 will receive saxagliptin 5 mg for the full 30 days (Full Treatment Group). Patients will be undercontinuous medical monitoring within C³DoC throughout their approximately 4-week admission. Validated behavioral biomarkers of consciousness (CRS-R) will be collected by blinded certified assessors at baseline (days -7 and 0), day 15, and day 30, with portable EEG-based AI biomarker assessments to corroborate behavioral findings. Follow-up DRS-PI assessments will be conducted at days 60 and 90. A pre-planned adaptive dose escalation design will be employed. The first 8 patients (sentinel cohort) will receive 5 mg (or placebo per delayed start). Upon cohort completion, the independent Safety Monitoring Board (SMB),chaired by a Medical Doctor, will review unblinded safety data. If IRB and FDA IND Exemption approval is obtained for dose escalation, and excellent safety criteria are met (zero SAEs, no Grade 2+ AEs, zero hypoglycemia), the SMB will direct escalation to 10 mg for only the remaining 6 patients in the full treatment arm; All 12 Delayed-Start patients will remain at 5 mg during active treatment (up to 400 mg/day has been shown to be well-tolerated in humans); otherwise, 5 mg continues. Investigators and patients remain blinded throughout. No confirmed adverse events of special interest (AESIs), no permanent study-drug discontinuations for safety reasons, completion of treatment and follow-up through Day 44 before escalation review.
研究の種類
研究の種類
入学 (推定)
入学
段階
段階
- フェーズ2
連絡先と場所
研究連絡先
研究連絡先
- 名前:Caroline Schnakers, PhD, Schnakers, PhD
- 電話番号:3038 (909)596-7733
- メール:CSchnakers@casacolina.org
参加基準
適格基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Any etiology: traumatic brain injury, anoxic brain injury, or vascular (stroke) brain injury.
- Enrolled at Casa Colina Hospital's Center for Disorders of Consciousness (C³DoC).
- Legally authorized representative (LAR) available to provide informed consent.
- Medically stable for participation as determined by the Clinical Co-Investigator (Dr. David Patterson, MD).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Type I or Type II Diabetes Mellitus.
- Current use of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors (e.g., ketoconazole, clarithromycin) due to potential saxagliptin exposure increase.
- Current use of insulin or insulin secretagogues.
- Heart failure of NYHA Class II-IV, active decompensated heart failure, or hospitalization for heart failure within 12 months before screening. Because NYHA class is defined by symptoms during physical exertion and cannot be assessed in patients with disorders of consciousness, any patient with a documented diagnosis of heart failure is excluded unless the medical record documents NYHA Class I status before the qualifying brain injury and there has been no subsequent heart failure decompensation or hospitalization.
- Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m², calculated from the screening serum creatinine using the CKD-EPI 2021 equation (Inker et al., 2021). Because reduced muscle mass after prolonged immobility can cause creatinine-based eGFR to overestimate renal function, the Clinical Co-Investigator may additionally obtain a cystatin C-based eGFR; a patient is excluded if either estimate is <60 mL/min/1.73 m².
- Known hypersensitivity to saxagliptin or any DPP-4 inhibitor, or a history of angioedema.
- History of pancreatitis or bullous pemphigoid.
- Unstable vital signs, active infections, or recent hospitalizations for acute medical illness.
- Pregnancy or lactation.
- Any condition that, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the patient unsuitable for participation.
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:処理
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:並列代入
- マスキング:トリプル
アーム数
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的:Delayed Start Group
Placebo on days 1-15. Saxagliptin on days 16-30. |
Days 16-30- administer 5 mg/day via G-tube Days 1-30- administer 5 mg/day (or 10 mg/day per adaptive design) via G tube |
|
実験的:Full Treatment Group
Saxagliptin given on days 1-30. |
Days 16-30- administer 5 mg/day via G-tube Days 1-30- administer 5 mg/day (or 10 mg/day per adaptive design) via G tube |
|
介入なし:Placebo
See delayed group information. Placebo will be given day 0-15 |
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs)
時間枠:From days 1-30
|
Hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL via continuous glucose monitoring), non-serious AEs (CTCAE v5.0), and discontinuations vs. placebo (first 15 days), and vitals. |
From days 1-30
|
|
Change in CRS-R total score from baseline to Day 15 (placebo-controlled comparison) and Day 30.
時間枠:Baseline, Days 15 and Days 30
|
CRS-R assessment divided into 6 subscales Total score ranging from 0-23. Higher scores indicate higher levels of neurological function and consciousness. Higher scores mean a better outcome. |
Baseline, Days 15 and Days 30
|
二次結果の測定
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
CRS-R subscales
時間枠:Baseline, day 15, day 30
|
≥2-point increase or diagnostic advancement. DRS is out of 29 points (Scores range from 0 (no disability) to 29 (extreme vegetative state). Higher scores mean a better outcome. |
Baseline, day 15, day 30
|
|
Portable EEG-based AI biomarker of consciousness level
時間枠:Baseline, days 15, days 30
|
A framework to decode consciousness level |
Baseline, days 15, days 30
|
|
DRS-PI
時間枠:Days 60 and Days 90
|
The DRS-PI (Disability Rating Scale-Postacute Interview) is a standardized interview version of the Disability Rating Scale (DRS) designed for reliable telephone or direct administration with patients or proxy caregivers. Lower DRS-PI better outcome. Lower scores mean a better outcome. |
Days 60 and Days 90
|
協力者と研究者
協力者
協力者
出版物と役立つリンク
一般刊行物
- Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Dec;85(12):2020-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.033.
- Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N, Cranford R, Jennett B, Katz DI, Kelly JP, Rosenberg JH, Whyte J, Zafonte RD, Zasler ND. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 2002 Feb 12;58(3):349-53. doi: 10.1212/wnl.58.3.349.
- Turner-Stokes L, Dzingina M, Shavelle R, Bill A, Williams H, Sephton K. Estimated Life-Time Savings in the Cost of Ongoing Care Following Specialist Rehabilitation for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the United Kingdom. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2019 Jul/Aug;34(4):205-214. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000473.
- Toker D, Chiang JN, Vespa PM, Schnakers C, Monti MM. The Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Saxagliptin as a Candidate Treatment for Disorders of Consciousness: A Deep Learning and Retrospective Clinical Analysis. Neurocrit Care. 2025 Aug;43(1):101-118. doi: 10.1007/s12028-025-02217-0. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
- TBI Model systems National Database (2016). Moderate to severe traumatic brain injury is a lifelong condition. https:// www.tbindsc.org/StaticFiles/Documents/CDC_NIDILRR_IAA_Policy.pdf.
- Schnakers C, Monti MM. Disorders of consciousness after severe brain injury: therapeutic options. Curr Opin Neurol. 2017 Dec;30(6):573-579. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000495.
- Pistoia F, Mura E, Govoni S, Fini M, Sara M. Awakenings and awareness recovery in disorders of consciousness: is there a role for drugs? CNS Drugs. 2010 Aug;24(8):625-38. doi: 10.2165/11535940-000000000-00000.
- Paul D, Sanap G, Shenoy S, Kalyane D, Kalia K, Tekade RK. Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development. Drug Discov Today. 2021 Jan;26(1):80-93. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
- Pastores SM, Dakwar J, Halpern NA. Costs of critical care medicine. Crit Care Clin. 2012 Jan;28(1):1-10, v. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2011.10.003.
- Monti MM. Cognition in the vegetative state. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2012;8:431-54. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143050. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
- Gray DS, Burnham RS. Preliminary outcome analysis of a long-term rehabilitation program for severe acquired brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Nov;81(11):1447-56. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.16343.
- Gosseries O, Demertzi A, Ledoux D, Bruno MA, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Thibaut A, Laureys S, Schnakers C. Burnout in healthcare workers managing chronic patients with disorders of consciousness. Brain Inj. 2012;26(12):1493-9. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2012.695426. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
- Deacon CF, Holst JJ. Saxagliptin: a new dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Adv Ther. 2009 May;26(5):488-99. doi: 10.1007/s12325-009-0030-9. Epub 2009 May 14.
- Cullen NK, Park YG, Bayley MT. Functional recovery following traumatic vs non-traumatic brain injury: a case-controlled study. Brain Inj. 2008 Dec;22(13-14):1013-20. doi: 10.1080/02699050802530581.
- Corso P, Finkelstein E, Miller T, Fiebelkorn I, Zaloshnja E. Incidence and lifetime costs of injuries in the United States. Inj Prev. 2015 Dec;21(6):434-40. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.010983rep.
- Chen A, Bushmeneva K, Zagorski B, Colantonio A, Parsons D, Wodchis WP. Direct cost associated with acquired brain injury in Ontario. BMC Neurol. 2012 Aug 17;12:76. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-76.
- Bernat JL. Chronic disorders of consciousness. Lancet. 2006 Apr 8;367(9517):1181-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68508-5.
- Baral B, Chauhan C, Mishra T, Kaundal RK. Neuroprotective effects of Saxagliptin in traumatic brain injury: ameliorating oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and apoptosis. Metab Brain Dis. 2025 Apr 11;40(4):175. doi: 10.1007/s11011-025-01584-z.
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (推定)
研究開始
一次修了 (推定)
一次修了
研究の完了 (推定)
研究の完了
試験登録日
最初に提出
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
最初の投稿
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
投稿された最後の更新
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
追加の関連 MeSH 用語
その他の研究ID番号
その他の研究ID番号
- SaxaDOC
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
米国で製造され、米国から輸出された製品。
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。