Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Restoring Awareness

30 octobre 2026 mis à jour par: Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare

Restoring Awareness in Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness With Drug Recycling

The study will evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of saxagliptin in treating prolonged DoC through a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, delayed start Phase IIA trial. Twenty-four (24) patients with prolonged DOC (≥28 days post-injury) will be enrolled at Rehabilitation Hopsital's Center for Disorders of Consciousness (C³DoC).

Twelve patients will be randomized to receive placebo for 15 days followed by saxagliptin 5 mg for 15 days (Delayed Start Group), and 12 will receive saxagliptin 5 mg for the full 30 days (Full Treatment Group). Patients will be under continuous medical monitoring within C³DoC throughout their approximately 4-week admission. Validated behavioral biomarkers of consciousness (CRS-R) will be collected by blinded certified assessors at baseline (days -7 and 0), day 15, and day 30, with portable EEG-based AI biomarker assessments to corroborate behavioral findings. Follow-up DRS-PI assessments will be conducted at days 60 and 90.

A pre-planned adaptive dose escalation design will be employed. The first 6 patients (sentinel cohort) will receive 5 mg (or placebo per delayed start). Upon cohort completion, the independent Safety Monitoring Board (SMB), chaired by a Medical doctor , will review unblinded safety data. If IRB and FDA IND Exemption approval is obtained for dose escalation, and excellent safety criteria are met (zero SAEs, no Grade 2+ AEs, zero hypoglycemia), the SMB will direct escalation to 10 mg for subsequent patients (up to 400 mg/day has been shown to be well-tolerated in humans); otherwise, 5 mg continues. Investigators and patients remain blinded throughout.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Pas encore de recrutement

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

When individuals suffer a severe brain injury and do not completely regain their previous functional abilities, frequently develop a Disorder of Consciousness (DoC). This refers to a collection of interconnected conditions characterized by reduced awareness and alertness, such as the Vegetative State (VS) and the Minimally Conscious State(MCS). When these conditions persist over time, there are currently no authorized pharmacological interventions available to enhance their recovery. Only one medication, amantadine, has Class II evidence for DOC, offering modest benefit with no group difference versus placebo at trial end . Eight drugs, which are indicated for other conditions, have previously shown some promise in improving alertness and awareness in some DoC patients. These drugs are amantadine, apomorphine, baclofen, bromocriptine, desipramine, levodopa, methylphenidate, and zolpidem. In order to identify new potential drugs for DoC, investigators trained a deep neural network to predict the efficacy of these eight drugs, as well as 288 other drugs known to be ineffective (from prior research and patient records), based on their molecular structure. This phenotypic AI screening was trained on both acute coma and prolonged DOC cases. Investigators then used this trained network to predict the efficacy of all other FDA-approved drugs in chronic DoC. This in silico drug screen identified a new, FDA-approved medication with promise in ameliorating chronic DoC: the type 2 diabetes medication saxagliptin. This finding has since been supported by a retrospective study of 4,047 ICU acute coma patients matched by age, sex, Glasgow Coma Scale score, etiology, and glycemic status, in which incretin-based therapies (including DPP-4 inhibitors) yielded significantly higher recovery rates versus non-incretin diabetes medications (P=0.0331), patients without diabetes (P=0.0272), and amantadine-treated patients (P=0.0364) (Toker et al., 2025). Recovery rates with incretin-based drugs were consistent across coma etiologies: TBI (76.5%), stroke (73.7%), and anoxic (74.9%); saxagliptin-treated patients showed 89% recovery. A new preclinical study also demonstrated saxagliptin significantly improved neurobehavioral outcomes and attenuated neuropathologies in severe TBI in non-diabetic rats .

In the present study, investigators propose to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of saxagliptin in treating prolonged DoC through a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, delayed start Phase IIA trial. Twenty-four (24) patients with prolonged DOC (≥28 days post-injury) will be enrolled at Rehabilitation Hospital's Center for Disorders of Consciousness (C³DoC).

Twelve patients will be randomized to receive placebo for 15 days followed by saxagliptin 5 mg for 15 days (Delayed Start Group), and 12 will receive saxagliptin 5 mg for the full 30 days (Full Treatment Group). Patients will be undercontinuous medical monitoring within C³DoC throughout their approximately 4-week admission. Validated behavioral biomarkers of consciousness (CRS-R) will be collected by blinded certified assessors at baseline (days -7 and 0), day 15, and day 30, with portable EEG-based AI biomarker assessments to corroborate behavioral findings. Follow-up DRS-PI assessments will be conducted at days 60 and 90. A pre-planned adaptive dose escalation design will be employed. The first 8 patients (sentinel cohort) will receive 5 mg (or placebo per delayed start). Upon cohort completion, the independent Safety Monitoring Board (SMB),chaired by a Medical Doctor, will review unblinded safety data. If IRB and FDA IND Exemption approval is obtained for dose escalation, and excellent safety criteria are met (zero SAEs, no Grade 2+ AEs, zero hypoglycemia), the SMB will direct escalation to 10 mg for only the remaining 6 patients in the full treatment arm; All 12 Delayed-Start patients will remain at 5 mg during active treatment (up to 400 mg/day has been shown to be well-tolerated in humans); otherwise, 5 mg continues. Investigators and patients remain blinded throughout. No confirmed adverse events of special interest (AESIs), no permanent study-drug discontinuations for safety reasons, completion of treatment and follow-up through Day 44 before escalation review.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

24

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any etiology: traumatic brain injury, anoxic brain injury, or vascular (stroke) brain injury.
  • Enrolled at Casa Colina Hospital's Center for Disorders of Consciousness (C³DoC).
  • Legally authorized representative (LAR) available to provide informed consent.
  • Medically stable for participation as determined by the Clinical Co-Investigator (Dr. David Patterson, MD).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Type I or Type II Diabetes Mellitus.
  • Current use of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors (e.g., ketoconazole, clarithromycin) due to potential saxagliptin exposure increase.
  • Current use of insulin or insulin secretagogues.
  • Heart failure of NYHA Class II-IV, active decompensated heart failure, or hospitalization for heart failure within 12 months before screening. Because NYHA class is defined by symptoms during physical exertion and cannot be assessed in patients with disorders of consciousness, any patient with a documented diagnosis of heart failure is excluded unless the medical record documents NYHA Class I status before the qualifying brain injury and there has been no subsequent heart failure decompensation or hospitalization.
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m², calculated from the screening serum creatinine using the CKD-EPI 2021 equation (Inker et al., 2021). Because reduced muscle mass after prolonged immobility can cause creatinine-based eGFR to overestimate renal function, the Clinical Co-Investigator may additionally obtain a cystatin C-based eGFR; a patient is excluded if either estimate is <60 mL/min/1.73 m².
  • Known hypersensitivity to saxagliptin or any DPP-4 inhibitor, or a history of angioedema.
  • History of pancreatitis or bullous pemphigoid.
  • Unstable vital signs, active infections, or recent hospitalizations for acute medical illness.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Any condition that, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the patient unsuitable for participation.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Tripler

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Delayed Start Group

Placebo on days 1-15. Saxagliptin on days 16-30.

Days 16-30- administer 5 mg/day via G-tube

Days 1-30- administer 5 mg/day (or 10 mg/day per adaptive design) via G tube

Expérimental: Full Treatment Group

Saxagliptin given on days 1-30.

Days 16-30- administer 5 mg/day via G-tube

Days 1-30- administer 5 mg/day (or 10 mg/day per adaptive design) via G tube

Aucune intervention: Placebo

See delayed group information. Placebo will be given day 0-15

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs)
Délai: From days 1-30

Hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL via continuous glucose monitoring), non-serious AEs (CTCAE v5.0), and discontinuations vs. placebo (first 15 days), and vitals.

From days 1-30
Change in CRS-R total score from baseline to Day 15 (placebo-controlled comparison) and Day 30.
Délai: Baseline, Days 15 and Days 30

CRS-R assessment divided into 6 subscales Total score ranging from 0-23. Higher scores indicate higher levels of neurological function and consciousness. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

Baseline, Days 15 and Days 30

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
CRS-R subscales
Délai: Baseline, day 15, day 30

≥2-point increase or diagnostic advancement. DRS is out of 29 points (Scores range from 0 (no disability) to 29 (extreme vegetative state). Higher scores mean a better outcome.

Baseline, day 15, day 30
Portable EEG-based AI biomarker of consciousness level
Délai: Baseline, days 15, days 30

A framework to decode consciousness level

Baseline, days 15, days 30
DRS-PI
Délai: Days 60 and Days 90

The DRS-PI (Disability Rating Scale-Postacute Interview) is a standardized interview version of the Disability Rating Scale (DRS) designed for reliable telephone or direct administration with patients or proxy caregivers. Lower DRS-PI better outcome. Lower scores mean a better outcome.

Days 60 and Days 90

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Collaborateurs

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Publications générales

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

15 novembre 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

30 octobre 2029

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

30 octobre 2030

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

12 octobre 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

30 octobre 2026

Première publication (Réel)

5 novembre 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

5 novembre 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

30 octobre 2026

Dernière vérification

1 octobre 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • SaxaDOC

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Oui

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

produit fabriqué et exporté des États-Unis.

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .