Restoring Awareness
Restoring Awareness in Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness With Drug Recycling
The study will evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of saxagliptin in treating prolonged DoC through a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, delayed start Phase IIA trial. Twenty-four (24) patients with prolonged DOC (≥28 days post-injury) will be enrolled at Rehabilitation Hopsital's Center for Disorders of Consciousness (C³DoC).
Twelve patients will be randomized to receive placebo for 15 days followed by saxagliptin 5 mg for 15 days (Delayed Start Group), and 12 will receive saxagliptin 5 mg for the full 30 days (Full Treatment Group). Patients will be under continuous medical monitoring within C³DoC throughout their approximately 4-week admission. Validated behavioral biomarkers of consciousness (CRS-R) will be collected by blinded certified assessors at baseline (days -7 and 0), day 15, and day 30, with portable EEG-based AI biomarker assessments to corroborate behavioral findings. Follow-up DRS-PI assessments will be conducted at days 60 and 90.
A pre-planned adaptive dose escalation design will be employed. The first 6 patients (sentinel cohort) will receive 5 mg (or placebo per delayed start). Upon cohort completion, the independent Safety Monitoring Board (SMB), chaired by a Medical doctor , will review unblinded safety data. If IRB and FDA IND Exemption approval is obtained for dose escalation, and excellent safety criteria are met (zero SAEs, no Grade 2+ AEs, zero hypoglycemia), the SMB will direct escalation to 10 mg for subsequent patients (up to 400 mg/day has been shown to be well-tolerated in humans); otherwise, 5 mg continues. Investigators and patients remain blinded throughout.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Statut
Les conditions
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
When individuals suffer a severe brain injury and do not completely regain their previous functional abilities, frequently develop a Disorder of Consciousness (DoC). This refers to a collection of interconnected conditions characterized by reduced awareness and alertness, such as the Vegetative State (VS) and the Minimally Conscious State(MCS). When these conditions persist over time, there are currently no authorized pharmacological interventions available to enhance their recovery. Only one medication, amantadine, has Class II evidence for DOC, offering modest benefit with no group difference versus placebo at trial end . Eight drugs, which are indicated for other conditions, have previously shown some promise in improving alertness and awareness in some DoC patients. These drugs are amantadine, apomorphine, baclofen, bromocriptine, desipramine, levodopa, methylphenidate, and zolpidem. In order to identify new potential drugs for DoC, investigators trained a deep neural network to predict the efficacy of these eight drugs, as well as 288 other drugs known to be ineffective (from prior research and patient records), based on their molecular structure. This phenotypic AI screening was trained on both acute coma and prolonged DOC cases. Investigators then used this trained network to predict the efficacy of all other FDA-approved drugs in chronic DoC. This in silico drug screen identified a new, FDA-approved medication with promise in ameliorating chronic DoC: the type 2 diabetes medication saxagliptin. This finding has since been supported by a retrospective study of 4,047 ICU acute coma patients matched by age, sex, Glasgow Coma Scale score, etiology, and glycemic status, in which incretin-based therapies (including DPP-4 inhibitors) yielded significantly higher recovery rates versus non-incretin diabetes medications (P=0.0331), patients without diabetes (P=0.0272), and amantadine-treated patients (P=0.0364) (Toker et al., 2025). Recovery rates with incretin-based drugs were consistent across coma etiologies: TBI (76.5%), stroke (73.7%), and anoxic (74.9%); saxagliptin-treated patients showed 89% recovery. A new preclinical study also demonstrated saxagliptin significantly improved neurobehavioral outcomes and attenuated neuropathologies in severe TBI in non-diabetic rats .
In the present study, investigators propose to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of saxagliptin in treating prolonged DoC through a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, delayed start Phase IIA trial. Twenty-four (24) patients with prolonged DOC (≥28 days post-injury) will be enrolled at Rehabilitation Hospital's Center for Disorders of Consciousness (C³DoC).
Twelve patients will be randomized to receive placebo for 15 days followed by saxagliptin 5 mg for 15 days (Delayed Start Group), and 12 will receive saxagliptin 5 mg for the full 30 days (Full Treatment Group). Patients will be undercontinuous medical monitoring within C³DoC throughout their approximately 4-week admission. Validated behavioral biomarkers of consciousness (CRS-R) will be collected by blinded certified assessors at baseline (days -7 and 0), day 15, and day 30, with portable EEG-based AI biomarker assessments to corroborate behavioral findings. Follow-up DRS-PI assessments will be conducted at days 60 and 90. A pre-planned adaptive dose escalation design will be employed. The first 8 patients (sentinel cohort) will receive 5 mg (or placebo per delayed start). Upon cohort completion, the independent Safety Monitoring Board (SMB),chaired by a Medical Doctor, will review unblinded safety data. If IRB and FDA IND Exemption approval is obtained for dose escalation, and excellent safety criteria are met (zero SAEs, no Grade 2+ AEs, zero hypoglycemia), the SMB will direct escalation to 10 mg for only the remaining 6 patients in the full treatment arm; All 12 Delayed-Start patients will remain at 5 mg during active treatment (up to 400 mg/day has been shown to be well-tolerated in humans); otherwise, 5 mg continues. Investigators and patients remain blinded throughout. No confirmed adverse events of special interest (AESIs), no permanent study-drug discontinuations for safety reasons, completion of treatment and follow-up through Day 44 before escalation review.
Type d'étude
Type d'étude
Inscription (Estimé)
Inscription
Phase
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts et emplacements
Coordonnées de l'étude
Coordonnées de l'étude
- Nom: Caroline Schnakers, PhD, Schnakers, PhD
- Numéro de téléphone: 3038 (909)596-7733
- E-mail: CSchnakers@casacolina.org
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
Accepte les volontaires sains
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Any etiology: traumatic brain injury, anoxic brain injury, or vascular (stroke) brain injury.
- Enrolled at Casa Colina Hospital's Center for Disorders of Consciousness (C³DoC).
- Legally authorized representative (LAR) available to provide informed consent.
- Medically stable for participation as determined by the Clinical Co-Investigator (Dr. David Patterson, MD).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Type I or Type II Diabetes Mellitus.
- Current use of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors (e.g., ketoconazole, clarithromycin) due to potential saxagliptin exposure increase.
- Current use of insulin or insulin secretagogues.
- Heart failure of NYHA Class II-IV, active decompensated heart failure, or hospitalization for heart failure within 12 months before screening. Because NYHA class is defined by symptoms during physical exertion and cannot be assessed in patients with disorders of consciousness, any patient with a documented diagnosis of heart failure is excluded unless the medical record documents NYHA Class I status before the qualifying brain injury and there has been no subsequent heart failure decompensation or hospitalization.
- Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m², calculated from the screening serum creatinine using the CKD-EPI 2021 equation (Inker et al., 2021). Because reduced muscle mass after prolonged immobility can cause creatinine-based eGFR to overestimate renal function, the Clinical Co-Investigator may additionally obtain a cystatin C-based eGFR; a patient is excluded if either estimate is <60 mL/min/1.73 m².
- Known hypersensitivity to saxagliptin or any DPP-4 inhibitor, or a history of angioedema.
- History of pancreatitis or bullous pemphigoid.
- Unstable vital signs, active infections, or recent hospitalizations for acute medical illness.
- Pregnancy or lactation.
- Any condition that, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the patient unsuitable for participation.
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Tripler
Nombre de bras
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / BrasGroupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / TraitementIntervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: Delayed Start Group
Placebo on days 1-15. Saxagliptin on days 16-30. |
Days 16-30- administer 5 mg/day via G-tube Days 1-30- administer 5 mg/day (or 10 mg/day per adaptive design) via G tube |
|
Expérimental: Full Treatment Group
Saxagliptin given on days 1-30. |
Days 16-30- administer 5 mg/day via G-tube Days 1-30- administer 5 mg/day (or 10 mg/day per adaptive design) via G tube |
|
Aucune intervention: Placebo
See delayed group information. Placebo will be given day 0-15 |
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs)
Délai: From days 1-30
|
Hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL via continuous glucose monitoring), non-serious AEs (CTCAE v5.0), and discontinuations vs. placebo (first 15 days), and vitals. |
From days 1-30
|
|
Change in CRS-R total score from baseline to Day 15 (placebo-controlled comparison) and Day 30.
Délai: Baseline, Days 15 and Days 30
|
CRS-R assessment divided into 6 subscales Total score ranging from 0-23. Higher scores indicate higher levels of neurological function and consciousness. Higher scores mean a better outcome. |
Baseline, Days 15 and Days 30
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
CRS-R subscales
Délai: Baseline, day 15, day 30
|
≥2-point increase or diagnostic advancement. DRS is out of 29 points (Scores range from 0 (no disability) to 29 (extreme vegetative state). Higher scores mean a better outcome. |
Baseline, day 15, day 30
|
|
Portable EEG-based AI biomarker of consciousness level
Délai: Baseline, days 15, days 30
|
A framework to decode consciousness level |
Baseline, days 15, days 30
|
|
DRS-PI
Délai: Days 60 and Days 90
|
The DRS-PI (Disability Rating Scale-Postacute Interview) is a standardized interview version of the Disability Rating Scale (DRS) designed for reliable telephone or direct administration with patients or proxy caregivers. Lower DRS-PI better outcome. Lower scores mean a better outcome. |
Days 60 and Days 90
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Parrainer
Collaborateurs
Collaborateurs
Publications et liens utiles
Publications générales
- Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Dec;85(12):2020-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.033.
- Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N, Cranford R, Jennett B, Katz DI, Kelly JP, Rosenberg JH, Whyte J, Zafonte RD, Zasler ND. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 2002 Feb 12;58(3):349-53. doi: 10.1212/wnl.58.3.349.
- Turner-Stokes L, Dzingina M, Shavelle R, Bill A, Williams H, Sephton K. Estimated Life-Time Savings in the Cost of Ongoing Care Following Specialist Rehabilitation for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the United Kingdom. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2019 Jul/Aug;34(4):205-214. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000473.
- Toker D, Chiang JN, Vespa PM, Schnakers C, Monti MM. The Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Saxagliptin as a Candidate Treatment for Disorders of Consciousness: A Deep Learning and Retrospective Clinical Analysis. Neurocrit Care. 2025 Aug;43(1):101-118. doi: 10.1007/s12028-025-02217-0. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
- TBI Model systems National Database (2016). Moderate to severe traumatic brain injury is a lifelong condition. https:// www.tbindsc.org/StaticFiles/Documents/CDC_NIDILRR_IAA_Policy.pdf.
- Schnakers C, Monti MM. Disorders of consciousness after severe brain injury: therapeutic options. Curr Opin Neurol. 2017 Dec;30(6):573-579. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000495.
- Pistoia F, Mura E, Govoni S, Fini M, Sara M. Awakenings and awareness recovery in disorders of consciousness: is there a role for drugs? CNS Drugs. 2010 Aug;24(8):625-38. doi: 10.2165/11535940-000000000-00000.
- Paul D, Sanap G, Shenoy S, Kalyane D, Kalia K, Tekade RK. Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development. Drug Discov Today. 2021 Jan;26(1):80-93. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
- Pastores SM, Dakwar J, Halpern NA. Costs of critical care medicine. Crit Care Clin. 2012 Jan;28(1):1-10, v. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2011.10.003.
- Monti MM. Cognition in the vegetative state. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2012;8:431-54. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143050. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
- Gray DS, Burnham RS. Preliminary outcome analysis of a long-term rehabilitation program for severe acquired brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Nov;81(11):1447-56. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.16343.
- Gosseries O, Demertzi A, Ledoux D, Bruno MA, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Thibaut A, Laureys S, Schnakers C. Burnout in healthcare workers managing chronic patients with disorders of consciousness. Brain Inj. 2012;26(12):1493-9. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2012.695426. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
- Deacon CF, Holst JJ. Saxagliptin: a new dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Adv Ther. 2009 May;26(5):488-99. doi: 10.1007/s12325-009-0030-9. Epub 2009 May 14.
- Cullen NK, Park YG, Bayley MT. Functional recovery following traumatic vs non-traumatic brain injury: a case-controlled study. Brain Inj. 2008 Dec;22(13-14):1013-20. doi: 10.1080/02699050802530581.
- Corso P, Finkelstein E, Miller T, Fiebelkorn I, Zaloshnja E. Incidence and lifetime costs of injuries in the United States. Inj Prev. 2015 Dec;21(6):434-40. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.010983rep.
- Chen A, Bushmeneva K, Zagorski B, Colantonio A, Parsons D, Wodchis WP. Direct cost associated with acquired brain injury in Ontario. BMC Neurol. 2012 Aug 17;12:76. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-76.
- Bernat JL. Chronic disorders of consciousness. Lancet. 2006 Apr 8;367(9517):1181-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68508-5.
- Baral B, Chauhan C, Mishra T, Kaundal RK. Neuroprotective effects of Saxagliptin in traumatic brain injury: ameliorating oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and apoptosis. Metab Brain Dis. 2025 Apr 11;40(4):175. doi: 10.1007/s11011-025-01584-z.
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Estimé)
Début de l'étude
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
Achèvement primaire
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
Achèvement de l'étude
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Première publication
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour publiée
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
- Manifestations neurologiques
- Maladies du cerveau
- Maladies du système nerveux central
- Maladies du système nerveux
- Manifestations neurocomportementales
- Lésions cérébrales chroniques
- Troubles de la conscience
- Inconscience
- Conditions pathologiques, signes et symptômes
- Signes et symptômes
- État végétatif persistant
- saxagliptine
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- SaxaDOC
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
produit fabriqué et exporté des États-Unis.
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .