子どもたちの成長の余地評価 (RTG)
乳幼児期の子育て総合支援と子どもの健康と発達
調査の概要
詳細な説明
RtG の革新的なプログラムの目標は、親が子供たちが学校に入学し、教育、仕事、市民権の可能性を最大限に発揮できるようになる可能性を高めるのを支援することです。 治療的で精神力学的なアプローチと、家族との 3 年間にわたる強固な関係は、子育て方法と家族システムの安定性における持続可能で長期的な変化の触媒として機能するように設計されています。 RtG は、子育てと子どもの発達を改善することを目的とした他のプログラムとは対照的に、経済的ストレスを軽減し、不足しているリソースを解放することで、低所得世帯へのカウンセリングと紹介の効果を高めると RtG は確信しています。 このプログラムは、低所得世帯とその子供たちに対する子育て支援の重要性、子供たちの健康と発達を促進する上での具体的な物的支援と貧困削減の重要性、幼児期が効果的な時期であるという認識に関する数十年にわたる研究に基づいています。長期的な結果に影響を与える重要なサポートを提供します。 低所得の新米ママの子育てをサポートする家庭訪問モデルなど、数多くのプログラムが有望な成果を上げています。 所得、貧困、および子供の健康と発達の間の関係を確立する数十年の相関研究の後、収入が子供の結果にとって重要であるという説得力のある因果的証拠を提供する新たな文献があります。 この研究の両方の系統は、介入が低所得の子供とその家族の運命に永続的な違いをもたらす可能性がある幼児期が脆弱な重要な時期であることを明確に示唆する追加の研究に基づいています。 この研究はこの文献に基づいており、子育て支援と有意義な物質的支援の提供の両方を組み合わせた介入をテストすることによって、本質的に、組み合わせたアプローチがその部分の合計よりも潜在的に強力であることが証明できるかどうかを評価します.
RtG の評価は、子育て教育と社会的および物質的サポートの組み合わせの価値をテストする前例のない機会を提供します。 このプロジェクトは、所得支援、育児教育、コミュニティ サービスへの接続を組み合わせた革新的なアプローチを活用して、幼児の早期の健康と発達を促進します。 子育てプログラムと所得支援プログラムはどちらも、低所得層と中所得層の家族の前向きな健康と発達を促進することを目的としていますが、あまりにも多くの場合、彼らは孤立して働いており、親と子供の両方の健康と発達の格差を縮小する能力を制限する可能性があります. RtG の革新的なモデルは、これらのサービスの複合効果をテストする機会を提供し、これらのプログラム コンポーネントの相乗効果に関する実務家や政策立案者に貴重な情報を提供します。 提案された研究は、この革新的なモデルが生後 1 年間の重要な近位転帰に対して実証可能な効果を達成できるという予備的証拠を実証することにより、幼児期の分野の変化を促進し、目標を満たすための多面的なアプローチの証拠を構築するための第一歩を提供することができます。低所得世帯のニーズ。 この研究から得られた知見は、物的支援、リソースへの接続、子育て支援を組み合わせて幼児の健康と発達に真の影響を与える、より統合されたアプローチに向けてこの分野を導く可能性があります。 ルーム・トゥ・グローとその評価は、幼児期における健康文化と関連政策の発展に明確な貢献をもたらすでしょう。 これは、子育てと地域社会のサポートを実質的かつ強力な物質的サポートの提供と組み合わせて提供する最初の RCT となります。 多くの育児プログラムは、発達に適した本やおもちゃを提供しますが、人生の最初の 3 年間に約 10,000 ドル相当のサポートを提供することは非常にまれです。 これにより、RtG のようなモデルが、幼児期の子育てプログラムを変革し、健康の文化を構築し、さまざまな背景を持つ子供たちの健康格差を縮小するのに役立つかどうかが立証されます。 組織とその指導者は、プログラムの提供とカリキュラムで何がうまく機能し、何が改善できるかを理解するために、評価プロジェクトから学ぶことを楽しみにしています。 RtG のチームは、データを使用して意思決定を行う文化を意図的に作成し、RCT からの結果の全範囲を理解することを楽しみにしています。 RtG は現在、正式な戦略計画プロセスの一環として、今後 5 年間の拡張計画を策定しています。 この組織は、ニューヨークとボストンの各都市で、最終的には 2 倍以上の家族にサービスを提供したいと考えています。 内部評価から得られたこれまでの調査結果は、非常に心強いものです。 他の財団や政府機関 (または民間の寄付者) が、ロバート ウッド ジョンソン財団からの支援に基づいて構築することに興奮し、研究者がこのプロジェクトによって生成された初期の勢いを時間をかけて拡張できるようになることを研究者は望んでいます。
このプロジェクトは、近位の結果を調査するように設計されています。 長期的には、研究チームはこれらの近位の結果に基づいて構築し、最終的には学齢期まで子供を追跡し、RCT プロジェクトに含まれる子供の数を大幅に拡大したいと考えています。
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
New York
-
New York、New York、アメリカ、10032
- Columbia University - Columbia Population Research Center (CPRC)
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
説明
包含基準:
- 女性
- 16歳以上である必要があります
- 妊娠後期(28~34週)
- Room to Grow プログラムの基準を満たす
- 低収入
- サービスが必要な場合
除外基準:
- 英語および/またはスペイン語の読み書きができない
- 男
- 妊娠後期
- すでに出産済み
- 中高年収
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:他の
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:並列代入
- マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的:Intervention Group
The treatment group will consist of mothers who were randomly selected to receive Room to Grow services, which include three years of social and practical support for the mother and baby through a combination of one-on-one sessions with an expert clinical social worker in-person every three months and provision of essential baby items and equipment.
|
治療グループは、無作為に選ばれた母親で構成され、母親と赤ちゃんのための 3 年間の社会的および実践的なサポートを含む、ルーム トゥ グロー サービスを受けます。
研究に基づいたプログラム モデルは、3 か月ごとに専門の臨床ソーシャル ワーカーとの個別のセッションと、本、おもちゃ、衣類、備品などの必須のベビー アイテムの提供 (現物アイテムの小売価格) を組み合わせたものです。 3 年間で平均 10,000 ドル)、重要なコミュニティ リソース (住宅、資格、育児、社会サービスなど) への接続。
|
|
介入なし:Control Group
The control group will consist of mothers who will not receive Room to Grow services.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Score of Depressive Symptoms Using the CES-D Scale
時間枠:At Baseline (weeks 28-34 of pregnancy); 10.5 months after birth of child; 25 months after birth of child
|
The Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D), is a 20-item measure that asks caregivers to rate how often over the past week they experienced symptoms associated with depression, such as restless sleep, poor appetite, and feeling lonely. Response options range from 0 to 3 for each item (0 = Rarely or None of the Time, 1 = Some or Little of the Time, 2 = Moderately or Much of the time, 3 = Most or Almost All the Time). Scores range from 0 to 60, with high scores indicating greater depressive symptoms. The Baseline and 25-month surveys included 12 items from the scale, and the 10.5-month survey included 7 items. The subscale scores range from 0 - 21 and 0 - 36, respectively. Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptoms. |
At Baseline (weeks 28-34 of pregnancy); 10.5 months after birth of child; 25 months after birth of child
|
|
Mean Score of Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
時間枠:At Baseline (weeks 28-34 of pregnancy); 10.5 months after birth of child; 25 months after birth of child
|
The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is a widely used instrument for measuring the perception of general stress. This 14-item scale measures how stressful or uncontrollable participants find their lives. Respondents rate the frequency of their feelings and thoughts related to events and situations that occurred in the last month. Individual scores on the PSS can range from 0-40 with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress. Scores ranging from 0-13 would be considered low stress. Scores ranging from 14-26 would be considered moderate stress. Scores ranging from 27-40 would be considered high perceived stress. The Baseline and 10.5-month surveys included 4 items from the scale. The 25-month survey included 6 items. Scores ranged from 0 - 16 and 0 - 24, respectively. Higher scores indicate higher perceived stress levels. |
At Baseline (weeks 28-34 of pregnancy); 10.5 months after birth of child; 25 months after birth of child
|
|
Mean Score of Parental Sense of Competence Using PSOC Scale
時間枠:At Baseline (weeks 28-34 of pregnancy); 10.5 months after birth of child; 25 months after birth of child
|
The Parenting Sense of Competence Scale (PSOC). The PSOC measures parental competence on two dimensions: Satisfaction and Efficacy. It is a 17-item Likert-scale questionnaire (on a 6-point scale ranging from strongly agree [1] to strongly disagree [6]), with nine questions under Satisfaction and eight under Efficacy. Satisfaction section examines the parents' anxiety, motivation and frustration, while the Efficacy section looks at the parents' competence, capability levels, and problem-solving abilities in their parental role. Scores range from 17-102. A higher score indicates a higher parenting sense of competency. The Baseline and the 10.5-month surveys included 5 items from the scale with a modified 4-point scale ranging from strongly agree [1] to strongly disagree [4]. The 25-month survey included 8 items with the modified 4-point scale. Scores ranged from 4 - 20 and 4 - 32, respectively, with higher scores indicating a higher parenting sense of competency. |
At Baseline (weeks 28-34 of pregnancy); 10.5 months after birth of child; 25 months after birth of child
|
|
Mean Score of the Confusion, Hubbub, and Order Scale (CHAOS)
時間枠:At Baseline (weeks 28-34 of pregnancy); 10.5 months after birth of child; 25 months after birth of child
|
The Confusion, Hubbub, and Order Scale (CHAOS) is a questionnaire filled out by parents that is designed to assess the level of confusion and disorganization in the child's home environment. The statements are scored using a 4-point scoring system. The questionnaire consists of 15 statements, to each of which a parent or caregiver responds (1) True, or (0) False (scoring was adjusted for items that required reverse coding). Scores ranged from 0-15. The Baseline and the 10.5-month surveys included 2 items from the scale with a modified 4-point scale ranging from 0 - 3: 0 = Not at all like your own home; 1 = A little bit like your own home; 2 = Somewhat like your own home; 3 = Very much like your own home. The 25-month survey included 5 items from the scale. Item scores were averaged and ranged from 0 - 3. A higher score represents characteristics of a more chaotic, disorganized, and hurried home. |
At Baseline (weeks 28-34 of pregnancy); 10.5 months after birth of child; 25 months after birth of child
|
|
Mean Score of Cognitive Stimulation in the Home (STIMQ)
時間枠:10.5 months after birth of child; 25 months after birth of child
|
STIMQ is a measure of cognitive stimulation in the home consisting of 4 subscales: Availability of Learning Materials (ALM), Reading, Parental Involvement in Developmental Advance (PIDA), and Parental Verbal Responsivity (PVR). The 10-month & 25-month surveys contained 4 of the 7 items in the PVR scale to measure cognitive stimulation. Respondents reported on the frequency of verbal responsiveness during everyday routines with their child. The full PVR scale uses an 8-point response scale ranging from 0 (never) - 7 (every day) and total scores range from 0 - 49 for preschool-age children. A modified 4-point response scale ranging from 1 (not at all) - 4 (every day). The average score of the four items was used and total scores ranged from 1-4. A higher score represents more responsivity and reflects greater stimulation in the home (a more favorable outcome). |
10.5 months after birth of child; 25 months after birth of child
|
|
Mean Score of Aggravation in Parenting Scale
時間枠:10.5 months after birth of child; 25 months after birth of child
|
A measurement of stress experienced by parents associated with caring for children.
It measures the amount of parenting stress brought on by changes in employment, income or other factors in the parent's life.
Research has shown that high levels of aggravation in parenting are related to mothers' employment status and to child behavior problems.
High stress and aggravation in parents are associated with poor cognitive and socioemotional development of young children.
6 of the 9 items in the scale were included in the surveys.
Response categories being (0) Strongly agree, (1) Somewhat agree, (2) Somewhat disagree, (3) Strongly disagree.
This 0-3 score is reverse coded, and items are averaged to create an overall score with higher scores indicating more stress.
Total scores ranged from 0-3.
|
10.5 months after birth of child; 25 months after birth of child
|
|
Number of Toys and Goods in the Home
時間枠:10.5 months after birth of child; 25 months after birth of child
|
Subjects are asked if they have certain types of developmentally appropriate toys and games in the categories of symbolic play (doll, toy pots, small car), art (crayons, Play-Doh, paint), adaptive/fine motor toys (puzzle, shape sorter, pop-up toy), language (toy letters or numbers, toys that make animal sounds) and life-size toys (toy car or animal for child to ride).
Respondents can answer yes/no for each (1=yes, 0=no).
Subjects were asked about 13 items in the 10-month survey and 16 items in the 25-month survey.
Items were replaced or supplemented for age-appropriateness at each wave.
Item responses were tallied resulting in scores ranging from 0-13 and 0-16, respectively.
A higher score or number of developmentally appropriate toys and goods in the home reflects a more favorable outcome for the child.
|
10.5 months after birth of child; 25 months after birth of child
|
|
Worry Enough Money for Baby Scale Score
時間枠:At Baseline (weeks 28-34 of pregnancy); 10.5 months after birth of child; 25 months after birth of child
|
Subjects are asked to rate (on a scale of 1-10) how worried they are about having enough money to cover their baby's expenses with 1 being "Not at all worried" and 10 being "Very worried".
A lower score indicates less concern and is therefore favorable.
|
At Baseline (weeks 28-34 of pregnancy); 10.5 months after birth of child; 25 months after birth of child
|
|
Mean Score of Parent Supportiveness Using the 3-bag Task
時間枠:At follow-up in-person meeting (42-72 months after birth of child)
|
The 3-bag task utilizes a semi-structured play protocol in which the parent-child dyad is instructed to play with the toys in each of three bags in a predetermined sequence.
The semi-structured play interactions are videotaped and the parent-child behaviors scored in accordance with the 3-bag task coding scales used in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Study of Early Child Care.
Parent supportiveness is the average of three measures: maternal sensitivity, positive affect, and the extent to which the parent provides cognitive stimulation while interacting with their child.
Scoring for all three considers both the quantity and quality or intensity of behavioral indicators observed for each; a score of 1 represents virtually no evidence of the particular behavior and a score of 7 indicates very high levels of the behavior.
As an average of the three, parent supportiveness follows the same scoring scheme and higher scores represent a more favorable outcome.
|
At follow-up in-person meeting (42-72 months after birth of child)
|
|
Mean Score of Parent Detachment Using 3 Bag-task
時間枠:At follow-up in-person meeting (42-72 months after birth of child)
|
The 3-bag task utilizes a semi-structured play protocol in which the parent-child dyad is instructed to play with the toys in each of three bags in a predetermined sequence.
The semi-structured play interactions are videotaped and the parent-child behaviors scored in accordance with the 3-bag task coding scales used in the NICHD Study of Early Child Care.
The parent detachment scale is based on observations of the parent's awareness of, attention to, and engagement with the child.
Behavioral indicators of detachment include being consistently inattentive, being inconsistently attentive, and/or interacting with the child in a perfunctory or indifferent manner.
Scoring considers both the quantity of behavioral indicators observed and the quality or intensity of the behaviors.
A score of 1 represents very low detachment and score of 7 indicates very high detachment.
A lower score represents a more favorable outcome.
|
At follow-up in-person meeting (42-72 months after birth of child)
|
|
Mean Proportion Correct Score on Working Memory Span Performance
時間枠:At follow-up in-person meeting (42- 72 months after birth of child)
|
This task measures working memory.
Working memory involves holding information in short-term storage and attending to one item (i.e., a house) while overcoming interference from the other (i.e., an animal or color).
The task requires children to perform the operation of naming and holding in mind two pieces of information simultaneously and to activate one while overcoming interference occurring from the other.
The task becomes more difficult as the number of houses increases.
In the pretest phase, it is established that children can name both the colors and the animals in the task.
Children then receive three 1-house trials, three 2-house trials, and three 3-house trials.
There are 18 items.
Individually, incorrect items receive a score of 0 and correct items receive a score of 1. Item scores are averaged and the total score on this activity is a proportion correct score of all items which ranges from 0 to 1.
|
At follow-up in-person meeting (42- 72 months after birth of child)
|
|
Mean Proportion Correct Score on Inhibitory Motor Control Performance
時間枠:At follow-up in-person meeting (42-72 months after birth of child)
|
This task measures inhibitory motor control and is a standard go no-go task.
Children are presented with a large green button on the screen that makes a "popping" sound when it is touched.
Children are instructed to touch the button every time that they see an animal (the 'go' response) except when that animal is a pig (the 'no-go' response).
No-go responses vary in difficulty depending on how many go responses preceded them.
In the pretest phase, children are asked to identify all of the animals.
During administration items, the task is presented in varying numbers of go trials prior to each no-go trial, including, in standard order, 1-go, 3-go, 3-go, 5-go, 1-go, 5-go, 7-go and 7-go.
There are 40 items.
Individually, incorrect items receive a score of 0 and correct items receive a score of 1. Item scores are averaged and the total score on this activity is a proportion correct score of all items ranging from 0 to 1.
|
At follow-up in-person meeting (42-72 months after birth of child)
|
|
Mean Proportion Correct Score on Attention Shifting Performance
時間枠:At follow-up in-person meeting (42-72 months after birth of child)
|
This task measures attention shifting and requires children to use flexible thinking.
For the initial trials in the task, children are presented with two pictures (animals, flowers, etc.) that are similar along a single dimension of color, shape, or size.
Initially, the child is explicitly told how two of the pictures are the same in some way.
Then, the child is presented with a third picture alongside the original two and asked to state how the new picture is similar to one of the original pictures.
This task requires the child to shift his/her attention from the initial dimension of similarity to a new dimension of similarity.
In the most difficult, items all of the pictures are presented at once and children are prompted to identify both dimensions of similarity.
There are 30 items.
Incorrect items receive a score of 0 and correct items receive a score of 1. Item scores are averaged and the total score on this activity is a proportion correct score of all items ranging from 0 to 1.
|
At follow-up in-person meeting (42-72 months after birth of child)
|
|
Mean Language Total Standard Score
時間枠:At follow-up in-person meeting (42-72 months after birth of child)
|
The Receptive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test, Fourth Edition (ROWPVT-4) is a norm-referenced assessment that tests an individual's ability to match a spoken word with an image of an object, action, or concept.
The test targets the ability to understand the meaning of words spoken and name what is depicted on a test plate without context.
Scores range from 55 - 145.
This is a standardized language assessment based on a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15.
Scores of 85-115 are considered to be within the average range of functioning.
Scores above 115 are considered above average and scores below 85 are considered below average.
Scores from this measure indicate that a child's receptive vocabulary is above average, below average, or equivalent to their peers of the same age.
|
At follow-up in-person meeting (42-72 months after birth of child)
|
協力者と研究者
スポンサー
捜査官
- 主任研究者:Christopher Wimer, PhD、Senior Research Scientist at CPRC, School of Social Work
出版物と役立つリンク
一般刊行物
- Peacock S, Konrad S, Watson E, Nickel D, Muhajarine N. Effectiveness of home visiting programs on child outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2013 Jan 9;13:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-17.
- Duncan GJ, Morris PA, Rodrigues C. Does money really matter? Estimating impacts of family income on young children's achievement with data from random-assignment experiments. Dev Psychol. 2011 Sep;47(5):1263-79. doi: 10.1037/a0023875.
- Chaudry A, Wimer C. Poverty is Not Just an Indicator: The Relationship Between Income, Poverty, and Child Well-Being. Acad Pediatr. 2016 Apr;16(3 Suppl):S23-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2015.12.010.
- Duncan, G.J., Magnuson, K., Kalil, A. et al. Soc Indic Res (2012) 108: 87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9867-9
- Cates CB, Weisleder A, Mendelsohn AL. Mitigating the Effects of Family Poverty on Early Child Development through Parenting Interventions in Primary Care. Acad Pediatr. 2016 Apr;16(3 Suppl):S112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2015.12.015.
- Wimer C, Marti M, Brooks-Gunn J, Waldfogel J. Early Impacts of Room to Grow: A Multifaceted Intervention Supporting Parents and Children Age Zero to Three. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2021 Jul;126:106041. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106041. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。