このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

デュアルタスク対マルチコンポーネント運動:施設入居高齢者における比較 (DT-Fall)

2026年11月2日 更新者:Filipe Fernandes Rodrigues、Instituto Politécnico de Leiria

施設入所高齢者における二重課題対多成分運動プログラムの転倒恐怖および転倒リスクへの効果:無作為化比較試験

The aging global population faces a major public health challenge regarding the growing number of older adults in long-term care facilities. Institutionalized older adults exhibit high rates of sedentary behavior, accelerating physiological decline (such as sarcopenia, diminished muscle strength, and impaired balance) and increasing fall risk. Beyond biomechanical risks, the fear of falling acts as a psychological barrier, creating a negative spiral of frailty where a lack of confidence leads to activity restriction. This further reduces functional capacity and paradoxically increases the actual fall risk. Addressing fall risk requires interventions targeting both the physical mechanisms of balance and the psychological mechanisms of self-efficacy.

Current WHO guidelines emphasize multicomponent physical activity (combining balance, strength, and aerobic training) to prevent falls. However, traditional programs may not fully address the cognitive-motor interference of real-world falls, which often occur during complex, divided-attention tasks. Institutionalized older adults often struggle to allocate attentional resources efficiently. This study posits that breaking the spiral of inactivity requires stimulating the complex demands of daily living. The investigators hypothesize that a Dual-Task Exercise Program, integrating cognitive challenges (e.g., executive function tasks, memory recall) into a multicomponent routine, will provide superior benefits compared to a Multicomponent Exercise Program alone. By training cognitive functions to process mental stimuli while maintaining motor control, the goal is to improve physical and cognitive capabilities and enhance participants' confidence.

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effects of these two modalities on physical fall risk and psychological fear of falling. Conducted in a nursing home for over 12 weeks, participants will be randomly assigned to either the Control Group (Multicomponent Training: physical strength and balance) or the Experimental Group (Dual-Task Training: physical protocol with simultaneous cognitive stimulation).

調査の概要

詳細な説明

Ageing is a universal biological process. However, the trajectory of physical and cognitive decline varies significantly across individuals based on their lifestyle and environment. Literature consistently demonstrates that older adults residing in long-term care institutions (nursing homes) represent a particularly vulnerable demographic compared to those living in the community. While community-dwelling older adults often maintain a baseline level of physical activity through household chores, social interactions, and recreational tasks, institutionalized older adults frequently face an environment characterized by sedentarism and a lack of autonomy. This environmental physical deprivation in institutional settings leads not only to physical deconditioning (loss of strength, loss of balance, and reduced mobility) but also to a lack of cognitive stimulation. The absence of complex daily challenges means that these individuals rarely engage the neuro-motor pathways required to manage simultaneous tasks. Consequently, institutionalized older adults are at a disproportionately high risk of adverse health outcomes, most notably falls.

Falls are not merely biomechanical events caused by muscle weakness; they are deeply intertwined with psychological factors. Recent systematic reviews highlight fear of falling as a critical health concern that affects a vast majority of institutionalized older adults, regardless of whether they have a history of falling. Fear of falling acts as a psychological barrier that triggers a negative spiral of frailty, specifically, the fear leads to self-imposed activity restriction, which further degrades physical fitness (i.e., strength and balance), thereby paradoxically increasing the actual risk of future falls. Breaking this cycle is imperative. The literature suggests that interventions must address not only the physical capacity to move but also the confidence to move safely. While physical activity is widely recognized as a protective factor, reducing fall risk and promoting independence, the specific type of physical activity that best addresses the psychological aspect of fear of falling remains a subject of investigation.

International guidelines, such as those from the World Health Organization and Cochrane reviews, advocate for multicomponent exercise programs by combining resistance, balance, and aerobic training, as the most effective strategy for fall prevention. These programs, typically prescribed at moderate intensities, have proven effective in improving pure physical parameters like muscle strength and static balance. However, a critical gap exists between clinical improvements and real-world applicability. Standard multicomponent exercise is often performed in controlled environments where the individual focuses exclusively on the motor task (i.e., single tasking). Yet, in daily life, falls rarely occur when an individual is solely focused on walking. Instead, falls predominantly happen during complex, multi-task scenarios, such as walking while talking or carrying objects, navigating obstacles, or processing environmental cues. This discrepancy suggests that traditional multicomponent training may lack ecological validity. It strengthens the muscles but may not sufficiently train the brain to allocate attentional resources efficiently during movement, leaving the older adult vulnerable when distracted.

The Cognitive-Motor Interference theory posits that when older adults with cognitive deficits attempt to perform a motor task and a cognitive task simultaneously, performance in one or both domains deteriorates. This dual-task cost is a strong predictor of falls. Therefore, to effectively reduce fall risk and, crucially, the fear of falling, an intervention must simulate these complex demands. This leads to the hypothesis that dual-task training, the integration of simultaneous cognitive challenges (e.g., verbal fluency, arithmetic calculations, memory recall) into physical exercise, may offer superior benefits to multicomponent training alone. By forcing the central nervous system to manage competing attentional demands, dual-task training aims to improve neuroplasticity and executive function alongside physical conditioning.

The primary aim of this investigation is to determine whether increasing the complexity of the training stimulus (Dual-Task) yields greater benefits than the standard physical stimulus (Multicomponent) in institutionalized older adults. Specifically, this study seeks to understand if adding a cognitive load to a standard exercise protocol is a key ingredient required to significantly reduce fear of falling and improve functional mobility in this specific population. Rather than focusing solely on the volume or intensity of exercise, as emphasized in general guidelines, this research focuses on the specificity of the training type. If dual-task training proves more effective, it suggests that fall prevention strategies in nursing homes should move beyond simple repetitive movements and embrace physical and cognitive training. The findings will support healthcare professionals in tailoring interventions that are not only physically strengthening but also cognitively engaging, ultimately promoting a more robust and confident functional independence among the oldest old.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (実際)

54

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

    • Leiria District
      • Alcobaça、Leiria District、ポルトガル、2460-009
        • Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Alcobaça

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

65年歳以上 (高齢者)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

全て

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 65 years or older.
  • Resident in the institution (nursing home) for at least 6 months.
  • Autonomous ambulation capacity (independent walking ability, with or without walking aids like canes or walkers).
  • Medical clearance/approval to participate in physical exercise.
  • Ability to understand verbal instructions and communicate.
  • Absence of severe cognitive impairment that prevents understanding of the tasks.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncontrolled cardiovascular or metabolic conditions (e.g., severe heart failure, unstable angina, recent myocardial infarction in the last month).
  • Severe musculoskeletal, visual, or auditory impairments that preclude participation in the exercise program.
  • Diagnosis of severe dementia or other neurological conditions that prevent following the protocol instructions.
  • Absence from more than 5 consecutive sessions or attendance of less than 75% of the total sessions.

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:防止
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:独身

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
アクティブコンパレータ:Multicomponent Exercise Group

Participants in this group will perform a standard multicomponent exercise program.

The program consists of 45-60 minute sessions, twice a week for 12 weeks. It includes resistance training (using free weights, elastic bands, and body weight), static and dynamic balance training, and aerobic walking exercises. Intensity is moderate, adjusted to individual tolerance using the Borg Scale.

実験的:Dual-Task Exercise Group

Participants in this group will perform the multicomponent protocol with added cognitive demands.

Participants perform the exact same physical exercises as the control group (same duration, frequency, and intensity), but with simultaneous cognitive tasks designed to induce cognitive-motor interference. Tasks include verbal fluency (naming animals/colors), arithmetic calculations (subtraction), and memory recall while performing motor movements.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Change in Fear of Falling
時間枠:Baseline (Week 0) and Post-Intervention (Week 13).

Assessed using the Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I). This self-report questionnaire assesses the level of concern about falling during 16 social and physical activities inside and outside the home. Total scores range from 16 (no concern) to 64 (extreme concern).

Baseline (Week 0) and Post-Intervention (Week 13).

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Change in Functional Mobility and Fall Risk
時間枠:Baseline (Week 0) and Post-Intervention (Week 13).

Assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. Measures the time (in seconds) required to stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn, walk back, and sit down. Lower times indicate better mobility and reduced fall risk.

Baseline (Week 0) and Post-Intervention (Week 13).
Change in Physical Performance
時間枠:Baseline (Week 0) and Post-Intervention (Week 13).

Assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). A composite score evaluating three domains: balance (side-by-side, semi-tandem, tandem stands), gait speed (4 meters), and chair stand ability (5 repetitions). Total scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 12. Higher scores indicate a better outcome (better physical function).

Baseline (Week 0) and Post-Intervention (Week 13).
Exercise Adherence (Attendance Rate)
時間枠:Through study completion (up to Week 12).

Measures the frequency of participation in the assigned exercise program. It will be recorded as the total number of sessions attended by each participant divided by the total number of scheduled sessions (24 sessions), expressed as a percentage. This variable assesses the feasibility and acceptance of the training frequency.

Through study completion (up to Week 12).

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

出版物と役立つリンク

研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2025年11月10日

一次修了 (実際)

2026年2月27日

研究の完了 (実際)

2026年2月27日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年2月17日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年2月17日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年2月23日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年11月4日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年11月2日

最終確認日

2026年5月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • CE/IPLEIRIA/88/2025

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

はい

IPD 共有時間枠

Data will be available beginning 6 months and ending 5 years following article publication.

IPD 共有アクセス基準

Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. Proposals should be directed to the Principal Investigator (filipe.rodrigues@ipleiria.pt). To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

IPD 共有サポート情報タイプ

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する