Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Exercício de Dupla Tarefa vs. Exercício Multicomponente em Idosos Institucionalizados (DT-Fall)

2 de novembro de 2026 atualizado por: Filipe Fernandes Rodrigues, Instituto Politécnico de Leiria

Efeitos dos Programas de Exercício de Dupla Tarefa versus Exercício Multicomponente no Medo de Cair e Risco de Queda em Idosos Institucionalizados: Um Ensaio Controlado Randomizado

The aging global population faces a major public health challenge regarding the growing number of older adults in long-term care facilities. Institutionalized older adults exhibit high rates of sedentary behavior, accelerating physiological decline (such as sarcopenia, diminished muscle strength, and impaired balance) and increasing fall risk. Beyond biomechanical risks, the fear of falling acts as a psychological barrier, creating a negative spiral of frailty where a lack of confidence leads to activity restriction. This further reduces functional capacity and paradoxically increases the actual fall risk. Addressing fall risk requires interventions targeting both the physical mechanisms of balance and the psychological mechanisms of self-efficacy.

Current WHO guidelines emphasize multicomponent physical activity (combining balance, strength, and aerobic training) to prevent falls. However, traditional programs may not fully address the cognitive-motor interference of real-world falls, which often occur during complex, divided-attention tasks. Institutionalized older adults often struggle to allocate attentional resources efficiently. This study posits that breaking the spiral of inactivity requires stimulating the complex demands of daily living. The investigators hypothesize that a Dual-Task Exercise Program, integrating cognitive challenges (e.g., executive function tasks, memory recall) into a multicomponent routine, will provide superior benefits compared to a Multicomponent Exercise Program alone. By training cognitive functions to process mental stimuli while maintaining motor control, the goal is to improve physical and cognitive capabilities and enhance participants' confidence.

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effects of these two modalities on physical fall risk and psychological fear of falling. Conducted in a nursing home for over 12 weeks, participants will be randomly assigned to either the Control Group (Multicomponent Training: physical strength and balance) or the Experimental Group (Dual-Task Training: physical protocol with simultaneous cognitive stimulation).

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

Ageing is a universal biological process. However, the trajectory of physical and cognitive decline varies significantly across individuals based on their lifestyle and environment. Literature consistently demonstrates that older adults residing in long-term care institutions (nursing homes) represent a particularly vulnerable demographic compared to those living in the community. While community-dwelling older adults often maintain a baseline level of physical activity through household chores, social interactions, and recreational tasks, institutionalized older adults frequently face an environment characterized by sedentarism and a lack of autonomy. This environmental physical deprivation in institutional settings leads not only to physical deconditioning (loss of strength, loss of balance, and reduced mobility) but also to a lack of cognitive stimulation. The absence of complex daily challenges means that these individuals rarely engage the neuro-motor pathways required to manage simultaneous tasks. Consequently, institutionalized older adults are at a disproportionately high risk of adverse health outcomes, most notably falls.

Falls are not merely biomechanical events caused by muscle weakness; they are deeply intertwined with psychological factors. Recent systematic reviews highlight fear of falling as a critical health concern that affects a vast majority of institutionalized older adults, regardless of whether they have a history of falling. Fear of falling acts as a psychological barrier that triggers a negative spiral of frailty, specifically, the fear leads to self-imposed activity restriction, which further degrades physical fitness (i.e., strength and balance), thereby paradoxically increasing the actual risk of future falls. Breaking this cycle is imperative. The literature suggests that interventions must address not only the physical capacity to move but also the confidence to move safely. While physical activity is widely recognized as a protective factor, reducing fall risk and promoting independence, the specific type of physical activity that best addresses the psychological aspect of fear of falling remains a subject of investigation.

International guidelines, such as those from the World Health Organization and Cochrane reviews, advocate for multicomponent exercise programs by combining resistance, balance, and aerobic training, as the most effective strategy for fall prevention. These programs, typically prescribed at moderate intensities, have proven effective in improving pure physical parameters like muscle strength and static balance. However, a critical gap exists between clinical improvements and real-world applicability. Standard multicomponent exercise is often performed in controlled environments where the individual focuses exclusively on the motor task (i.e., single tasking). Yet, in daily life, falls rarely occur when an individual is solely focused on walking. Instead, falls predominantly happen during complex, multi-task scenarios, such as walking while talking or carrying objects, navigating obstacles, or processing environmental cues. This discrepancy suggests that traditional multicomponent training may lack ecological validity. It strengthens the muscles but may not sufficiently train the brain to allocate attentional resources efficiently during movement, leaving the older adult vulnerable when distracted.

The Cognitive-Motor Interference theory posits that when older adults with cognitive deficits attempt to perform a motor task and a cognitive task simultaneously, performance in one or both domains deteriorates. This dual-task cost is a strong predictor of falls. Therefore, to effectively reduce fall risk and, crucially, the fear of falling, an intervention must simulate these complex demands. This leads to the hypothesis that dual-task training, the integration of simultaneous cognitive challenges (e.g., verbal fluency, arithmetic calculations, memory recall) into physical exercise, may offer superior benefits to multicomponent training alone. By forcing the central nervous system to manage competing attentional demands, dual-task training aims to improve neuroplasticity and executive function alongside physical conditioning.

The primary aim of this investigation is to determine whether increasing the complexity of the training stimulus (Dual-Task) yields greater benefits than the standard physical stimulus (Multicomponent) in institutionalized older adults. Specifically, this study seeks to understand if adding a cognitive load to a standard exercise protocol is a key ingredient required to significantly reduce fear of falling and improve functional mobility in this specific population. Rather than focusing solely on the volume or intensity of exercise, as emphasized in general guidelines, this research focuses on the specificity of the training type. If dual-task training proves more effective, it suggests that fall prevention strategies in nursing homes should move beyond simple repetitive movements and embrace physical and cognitive training. The findings will support healthcare professionals in tailoring interventions that are not only physically strengthening but also cognitively engaging, ultimately promoting a more robust and confident functional independence among the oldest old.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

54

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

    • Leiria District
      • Alcobaça, Leiria District, Portugal, 2460-009
        • Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Alcobaça

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

65 anos e mais velhos (Adulto mais velho)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 65 years or older.
  • Resident in the institution (nursing home) for at least 6 months.
  • Autonomous ambulation capacity (independent walking ability, with or without walking aids like canes or walkers).
  • Medical clearance/approval to participate in physical exercise.
  • Ability to understand verbal instructions and communicate.
  • Absence of severe cognitive impairment that prevents understanding of the tasks.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncontrolled cardiovascular or metabolic conditions (e.g., severe heart failure, unstable angina, recent myocardial infarction in the last month).
  • Severe musculoskeletal, visual, or auditory impairments that preclude participation in the exercise program.
  • Diagnosis of severe dementia or other neurological conditions that prevent following the protocol instructions.
  • Absence from more than 5 consecutive sessions or attendance of less than 75% of the total sessions.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Prevenção
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Solteiro

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Comparador Ativo: Multicomponent Exercise Group

Participants in this group will perform a standard multicomponent exercise program.

The program consists of 45-60 minute sessions, twice a week for 12 weeks. It includes resistance training (using free weights, elastic bands, and body weight), static and dynamic balance training, and aerobic walking exercises. Intensity is moderate, adjusted to individual tolerance using the Borg Scale.

Experimental: Dual-Task Exercise Group

Participants in this group will perform the multicomponent protocol with added cognitive demands.

Participants perform the exact same physical exercises as the control group (same duration, frequency, and intensity), but with simultaneous cognitive tasks designed to induce cognitive-motor interference. Tasks include verbal fluency (naming animals/colors), arithmetic calculations (subtraction), and memory recall while performing motor movements.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Change in Fear of Falling
Prazo: Baseline (Week 0) and Post-Intervention (Week 13).

Assessed using the Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I). This self-report questionnaire assesses the level of concern about falling during 16 social and physical activities inside and outside the home. Total scores range from 16 (no concern) to 64 (extreme concern).

Baseline (Week 0) and Post-Intervention (Week 13).

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Change in Functional Mobility and Fall Risk
Prazo: Baseline (Week 0) and Post-Intervention (Week 13).

Assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. Measures the time (in seconds) required to stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn, walk back, and sit down. Lower times indicate better mobility and reduced fall risk.

Baseline (Week 0) and Post-Intervention (Week 13).
Change in Physical Performance
Prazo: Baseline (Week 0) and Post-Intervention (Week 13).

Assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). A composite score evaluating three domains: balance (side-by-side, semi-tandem, tandem stands), gait speed (4 meters), and chair stand ability (5 repetitions). Total scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 12. Higher scores indicate a better outcome (better physical function).

Baseline (Week 0) and Post-Intervention (Week 13).
Exercise Adherence (Attendance Rate)
Prazo: Through study completion (up to Week 12).

Measures the frequency of participation in the assigned exercise program. It will be recorded as the total number of sessions attended by each participant divided by the total number of scheduled sessions (24 sessions), expressed as a percentage. This variable assesses the feasibility and acceptance of the training frequency.

Through study completion (up to Week 12).

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

10 de novembro de 2025

Conclusão Primária (Real)

27 de fevereiro de 2026

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

27 de fevereiro de 2026

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

17 de fevereiro de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

17 de fevereiro de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

23 de fevereiro de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

4 de novembro de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

2 de novembro de 2026

Última verificação

1 de maio de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • CE/IPLEIRIA/88/2025

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

SIM

Prazo de Compartilhamento de IPD

Data will be available beginning 6 months and ending 5 years following article publication.

Critérios de acesso de compartilhamento IPD

Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. Proposals should be directed to the Principal Investigator (filipe.rodrigues@ipleiria.pt). To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

Tipo de informação de suporte de compartilhamento de IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDO
  • SEIVA
  • CIF

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever