이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

수술 후 신경통 치료를 위한 Qutenza(8% 캡사이신)와 저용량 캡사이신의 비교 (RISE)

2026년 8월 26일 업데이트: Averitas Pharma, Inc.

수술 후 신경병증성 통증이 있는 피험자에서 Qutenza®의 효능 및 안전성을 평가하는 중재적, III상, 이중맹검, 무작위배정, 대조, 병렬 그룹, 다중 부위 임상 시험

This is an interventional, Phase III, double-blind, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, multi-site, clinical trial to confirm the efficacy and safety of repeated topical application of Qutenza (capsaicin 8% topical system) versus low-dose capsaicin control (capsaicin 0.04% topical system) in subjects with moderate to severe postsurgical neuropathic pain (PSNP).

연구 개요

상태

완전한

정황

개입 / 치료

상세 설명

After a Screening Period of up to 19 days, including the Baseline Phase from Day -7 to Day -1, subjects will be allocated to Qutenza or to low-dose capsaicin control topical system (capsaicin 0.04%) at the Randomization Visit. The blinded Treatment Period consists of a Core Phase (Day 1 to Week 12) and an Extension Phase (Week 13 to Week 42), which includes a Follow-up of 14 days

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

412

단계

  • 3단계

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

      • Amsterdam, 네덜란드
        • VUMC
      • Beek, 네덜란드
        • PT&R
      • Hengelo, 네덜란드
        • NOCEPTA
      • Leiden, 네덜란드
        • Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, 미국, 85712
        • Tucson Orthopaedic Institute
    • California
      • Vista, California, 미국, 92009
        • ILD Research Center
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 미국, 20006
        • International Spine, Pain, and Performance Center
    • Florida
      • Clermont, Florida, 미국, 34711
        • South Lake Pain Institute
      • DeLand, Florida, 미국, 32720
        • University Clinical Research - DeLand Clinical Research Unit
      • Miami, Florida, 미국, 33174
        • Florida Research Center, Inc.
      • Tampa, Florida, 미국, 33606
        • Clinical Research of West Florida
    • Georgia
      • Marietta, Georgia, 미국, 30060
        • Drug Studies America
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, 미국, 60612
        • Rush University Medical Center
    • Kansas
      • Overland Park, Kansas, 미국, 66210
        • Neuroscience Research Center, LLC
      • Overland Park, Kansas, 미국, 66211
        • Kansas City Bone & Joint Clinic, P.A.
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, 미국, 02131
        • Boston Clinical Trials
    • Michigan
      • Bay City, Michigan, 미국, 48706
        • Great Lakes Research Group, Inc.
    • New Jersey
      • Shrewsbury, New Jersey, 미국, 07702
        • Premier Pain Centers
    • New York
      • New York, New York, 미국, 10022
        • Ainsworth Institute of Pain Management
    • North Carolina
      • Wilmington, North Carolina, 미국, 28401
        • Accellacare
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 미국, 27103
        • The Center for Clinical Research
    • Ohio
      • Dayton, Ohio, 미국, 45432
        • META Medical Research Institute, LLC
    • Pennsylvania
      • King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, 미국, 19406
        • Main Line Spine
    • Tennessee
      • Knoxville, Tennessee, 미국, 37909
        • New Phase Research & Development
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, 미국, 77079
        • Expert Pain
      • San Antonio, Texas, 미국, 78229
        • The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, 미국, 84107
        • Wasatch Clinical Research, LLC
      • Alicante, 스페인
        • Hospital General Universitario de Alicante
      • Barcelona, 스페인
        • Hospital Del Mar
      • L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 스페인
        • Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge
      • Madrid, 스페인
        • Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
      • Madrid, 스페인
        • Hospital Universitario La Moraleja
      • Málaga, 스페인
        • Hospital Quironsalud Malaga
      • Pamplona, 스페인
        • Clinica Universidad de Navarra
      • Santiago de Compostela, 스페인
        • Clinica Gaias
      • Valencia, 스페인
        • Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia
      • Valladolid, 스페인
        • Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valladolid
      • Aberdeen, 영국
        • Aberdeen Royal Infirmary (ARI) - NHS Grampian
      • Coventry, 영국
        • Accellacare
      • Leeds, 영국
        • Leeds General Infirmary - Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
      • Northwood, 영국
        • Accellacare - (MeDiNova Limited) - North London
      • Sidcup, 영국
        • MeDiNova South London Quality Research Site
    • Northamptonshire
      • Corby, Northamptonshire, 영국
        • Accellacare - (MeDiNova Limited) - Northamptonshire
    • Yorkshire
      • Shipley, Yorkshire, 영국
        • Accellacare - (MeDiNova Limited) - Yorkshire
      • Bialystok, 폴란드
        • Vitamed Nzoz Im. Edyty Jakubow
      • Katowice, 폴란드
        • Nzoz Neuro-Medic
      • Krakow, 폴란드
        • Linden Centrum Medyczne
      • Oświęcim, 폴란드
        • Instytut Zdrowia dr Boczarska-Jedynak
      • Warsaw, 폴란드
        • Centrum Badan Medycznych Nigrir
      • Wroclaw, 폴란드
        • FutureMeds sp. z o. o.
      • Świdnik, 폴란드
        • Lubelskie Centrum Diagnostyczne
    • Silesian Voivodeship
      • Katowice, Silesian Voivodeship, 폴란드
        • Centrum Medyczne Pratia Katowice
      • Katowice, Silesian Voivodeship, 폴란드
        • Silmedic Sp z o.o. Oddzial w Katowicach
      • Amiens, 프랑스
        • CHU Amiens Picardie
      • Angers, 프랑스
        • Centre Regional De Lutte Contre Le Cancer (Crlcc) -Centre Paul Papin
      • Cahors, 프랑스
        • Centre Hospitalier Jean Rougier
      • Clermont-Ferrand, 프랑스
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont Ferrand
      • Lille, 프랑스
        • Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire (CHRU) de Lille - Hopital Claude Huriez
      • Limoges, 프랑스
        • Clinique Francois Chenieux
      • Paris, 프랑스
        • Cochin Hospital-Paris Descartes University
      • Paris, 프랑스
        • Groupe Hospitalier Paris saint-Joseph
      • Poitiers, 프랑스
        • CHU Poitiers / La Miletrie
    • Pays de la Loire Region
      • La Roche-sur-Yon, Pays de la Loire Region, 프랑스
        • Centre Hospitalier Departemental Vendee - Centre d'evaluation et de Traitement de la Douleur
      • Nantes, Pays de la Loire Region, 프랑스
        • CHU de Nantes - Hopital Nord Laennec

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

18년 이상 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

General

  1. The subject has given written informed consent to participate.

  2. Female or male subjects aged 18 years or older.

  3. For women of childbearing potential: negative pregnancy tests at Screening Visit (Visit 1), the Randomization Visit (Visit 2), and prior to each reapplication of the investigational medicinal product (IMP), and must have agreed to practice medically acceptable methods of birth control.

    Confirmation of diagnosis of chronic moderate to severe PSNP

  4. Documented diagnosis of PSNP by the following criteria:

    1. A history of post-surgical pain with a duration of at least 6 months to maximally 60 months that is plausibly related to the surgical intervention as documented on a body map.
    2. Douleur Neuropathique 4 interview (DN4i) of at least 3 out of 7 points at Visit 1.
    3. The pain must extend beyond the scar area to neuroanatomically adjacent skin areas and be related to the site of the surgery.
  5. Documented diagnosis of probable or definite PSNP according to the following criteria (Finnerup et al. 2016):

    1. The pain must be associated with sensory signs in the same neuroanatomically plausible distribution. The area of sensory changes may extend beyond, be within, or overlap with the area of pain (criterion for probable neuropathic pain), or
    2. In addition to 5a : Direct surgical evidence (e.g., surgeon´s clear verification of an intraoperative nerve lesion) (criterion for definite neuropathic pain).
  6. The subject has moderate to severe pain with a baseline value for 24-hr average pain intensity of at least 4 points on the NPRS. The baseline value is calculated as the average of the 24-hr average pain intensity ratings of the Baseline Phase (Day -7 to Day -1). At least 5 (out of the last 7 days) pain ratings should be available during the Baseline Phase. If less than 5 pain ratings are available in the last 7 days, the subject may be rescheduled for Visit 2 (1 time only) after having received appropriate re-training in the use of the e-diary to ensure compliance.

    Suitability for treatment with IMP

  7. The size of the affected painful intact skin area is not larger than the size of 4 standard Qutenza topical systems (1120 cm2).

  8. The skin in the area where the IMP will be applied, and that may also contain the scar tissue, is intact, dry, and non-irritated (i.e., there are no signs and symptoms of skin disease, skin irritation, inflammation or injury, such as active herpes zoster lesions, atopic dermatitis, ulceration, wounds). This is reflected by a dermal assessment score of 0 = "no evidence of irritation" or 1 = "minimal erythema, barely perceptible".

    Eligibility with regard to protocol adherence, to allowed pre-treatments and concomitant treatments

  9. The subject is willing to adhere to the restricted use of concomitant treatments .

  10. The subject experiencing pain is:

    1. currently not receiving treatment for PSNP or
    2. receives a stable systemic treatment for PSNP that started more than 30 days prior to the Randomization Visit (Visit 2).

Non-exhaustive list of examples of types of surgeries with resulting PSNP:

Thoracic surgery Breast surgery Abdominal surgery (cholecystectomy, appendectomy) Donor nephrectomy Gynecologic surgery (hysterectomy, C-section) Varicose vein surgery Inguinal herniotomy Lipoma removal Knee surgery Knee arthroplasty Ankle surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

General or previous treatments

  1. The subject received Qutenza before the Randomization Visit (Visit 2) or received a medical device in another clinical trial within 7 days before the Randomization Visit (Visit 2), or

    1. Any former use of topical capsaicin in the area of the PSNP before Visit 2, except for the use of a low-dose (<1%) capsaicin product - but not within 7 days before Visit 2.
    2. The subject participated previously in this clinical trial or participated in another clinical trial for the treatment of PSNP completing less than 3 months ago.
  2. A score of 0 out of 5 in all 3 categories of the neurological/sensory examinations, i.e., for warm sensation, pinprick and cold sensation at the Screening Visit (Visit 1).

    Confounding factors

  3. The subject reported a 24-hr average pain intensity score of 10 on the NPRS for at least 4 days during the Baseline Phase.

  4. Any painful procedure planned during the course of the trial that may, in the opinion of the investigator, affect the efficacy or safety assessments.

  5. Subjects with PSNP related to a surgery/condition with a high potential for confounding symptoms, e.g., the pain is at least partially due to pain in deeper structures such as muscles or bones (including referred pain from deeper structures) as listed in examples.

  6. Other painful conditions in the body area that is affected by PSNP and may affect efficacy or safety assessments and cannot be discriminated from the target pain by the subject, including infectious, non-infectious, inflammatory or neuropathic conditions which could also be complications related to the previous surgical procedure.

    Non-exhaustive list of examples of types of surgeries/conditions not suitable for eligibility Any surgery performed due to suspected neoplasia: suspected residual neoplasia or metastases Conditions where nociceptive or neuropathic pain has been the reason for the surgery, e.g., failed back surgery, carpal tunnel syndrome or other nerve compression syndromes leading to neuropathic pain, (e.g., meralgia paresthetica) Conditions of projected neuropathic pain (i.e., from inguinal hernia repair) with painful symptoms in the genital region, e.g., the scrotum or vagina Amputations Radicular pain and nerve trunk lesions Scar pain neuroma Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (Type I or Type II)

    Contraindications to IMP

  7. Neuropathic pain areas located only on the face, above the hairline of the scalp, and/or in proximity to mucous membranes.

  8. Hypersensitivity to capsaicin (i.e., chili peppers or over-the-counter [OTC] capsaicin products), or to any excipients of the IMP or to excipients of the cleansing gel in use and their components, or to topical anesthetics in use and their components.

    Medical history/concurrent condition(s)/other factors

  9. Pending litigation due to chronic pain or disability.

  10. The subject has a history of alcohol or drug abuse or is actively abusing drugs (including alcohol, medication) during the 1 year prior to the Screening Visit (Visit 1) as judged by the investigator.

  11. Evidence or history of severe psychiatric illness/disorder during the 3 years prior to the Screening Visit (Visit 1) that, in the investigator's opinion, may affect efficacy or safety assessments or may compromise the subject's safety during trial participation, e.g., major depression, major anxiety disorder, psychosis, severe personality disorders.

  12. Evidence of cognitive impairment including dementia that may interfere with the subject's ability to complete pain assessments requiring recall of the average pain level in the past 24 hrs.

  13. Surgical intervention in the last 3 months preceding the Screening Visit (Visit 1) if it is affecting the efficacy or safety assessments, or any scheduled or planned surgery during the trial, with the exception of the Extension Phase if the planned surgery is not expected to affect the efficacy or safety assessments.

  14. Patients with current clinically significant disease(s) or condition(s) (including clinically significant cardiovascular disease and/or significant pain in other areas) that may affect efficacy or safety assessments, or any other reason which, in the investigator's opinion, may preclude the subject's participation in the full duration of the trial. Patients with current signs and symptoms consistent with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (e.g., dry cough, dyspnea, sore throat, fatigue, fever) or patients who had those symptoms within the last 14 days prior to screening and had a positive SARS-CoV2 PCR test result.

  15. Unstable or poorly controlled blood pressure which, in the opinion of the investigator, would put the subject at risk of severe adverse blood pressure increases upon IMP application.

  16. Known or suspected of not being able to comply with the requirements of the trial protocol or the instructions of the trial site staff.

  17. Not able to communicate meaningfully with the trial site staff.

  18. The subject is an employee of the investigator or trial site, with direct involvement in the proposed trial or other trials under the direction of that investigator or trial site, or is a family member of the employees or the investigator.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 치료
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 네 배로

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: Qutenza (capsaicin) 8% topical system

Qutenza (capsaicin 8% topical system, containing capsaicin 179 mg or capsaicin 640 µg/cm2 of topical system)

High concentration capsaicin

활성 비교기: Low-dose capsaicin control

capsaicin 0.04% topical system

Low-dose capsaicin control

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Change From Baseline in the 24-Hour Average Pain Intensity (API) Between Week 2 and Week 12 [Core Phase]
기간: From the Baseline Phase (Day -7 to Day -1) to Visit 6 (Week 12/Day 84).

NOTES:

  • For non-US regulatory authorities: Change from baseline to the average score of the entire period between Week 2 and Week 12 in the 24 h API analyzed using ANCOVA.
  • The 24 h API was assessed and reported in the e-diary once daily in the evening, using an 11 point numeric pain rating scale NPRS] (from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine).
  • The outcome was the change from baseline to the average score over the entire period between Week 2 and Week 12. A negative change indicates a reduction in pain.
From the Baseline Phase (Day -7 to Day -1) to Visit 6 (Week 12/Day 84).
Change From Baseline in the 24-Hour API to Week 12 [Core Phase]
기간: From the Baseline Phase (Day -7 to Day -1) to Visit 6 (Week 12/Day 84).

NOTES:

  • For US regulatory authority: Change from baseline to the weekly average score of Week 12 in the 24 h API analyzed using MMRM.
  • The 24 h API was assessed and reported in the e-diary once daily in the evening, using an 11 point numeric pain rating scale NPRS] (from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine).
  • The outcome was the change from baseline to the weekly average score at Week 12. A negative change indicates a reduction in pain.
From the Baseline Phase (Day -7 to Day -1) to Visit 6 (Week 12/Day 84).

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Change From Baseline in the 24-Hour API Between Week 2 and Week 42 [Extension Phase]
기간: Baseline Phase (Day -7 to Day -1) up to the Final Visit (Week 42/Day 294).

NOTES:

  • For non-US regulatory authorities: Change from baseline to the average score of the entire period between Weeks 2-42 in the 24 h API.
  • The 24 h API was assessed and reported in the e-diary once daily in the evening, using an 11 point numeric pain rating scale NPRS] (from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine).
  • The outcome was the change from baseline to the average score over the entire period between Week 2 and Week 42. A negative change indicates a reduction in pain.
Baseline Phase (Day -7 to Day -1) up to the Final Visit (Week 42/Day 294).
Change From Baseline in the 24-Hour API at Week 42 [Extension Phase]
기간: Baseline Phase (Day -7 to Day -1) up to the Final Visit (Week 42/Day 294).

NOTES:

  • For US regulatory authority: Change from baseline to the weekly average score of Week 42 in the 24 h API analyzed using ANCOVA..
  • The 24 h API was assessed and reported in the e-diary once daily in the evening, using an 11 point numeric pain rating scale NPRS] (from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine).
  • The outcome was the change from baseline to the weekly average score at Week 42. A negative change indicates a reduction in pain.
Baseline Phase (Day -7 to Day -1) up to the Final Visit (Week 42/Day 294).
Change From Baseline in Treatment Area Size at Week 12 [Core Phase]
기간: From Visit 2 (Day 1, before IMP application) to Visit 6 (Week 12/Day 84, before IMP application).

Treatment area size was measured in square centimeters (cm²) and comprised the area identified by the participant as the usually most painful area(s), and/or the area characterized by dynamic mechanical allodynia (DMA), and/or the area of pinprick hyperalgesia. Treatment area size was assessed at Visit 2 (Day 1) before IMP application and at Visit 6 (Week 12/Day 84) before IMP application. The outcome was the change from baseline to Week 12 in treatment area size. A negative change indicates a reduction in treatment area size.

From Visit 2 (Day 1, before IMP application) to Visit 6 (Week 12/Day 84, before IMP application).
Change From Baseline in Treatment Area Size at Week 42 [Extension Phase]
기간: From baseline to the Final Visit at Week 42.

Treatment area size was measured in square centimeters (cm²) and comprised the area identified by the participant as the usually most painful area(s), and/or the area characterized by dynamic mechanical allodynia (DMA), and/or the area of pinprick hyperalgesia. The outcome was the change from baseline to the Final Visit at Week 42 in treatment area size. A negative change indicates a reduction in treatment area size.

From baseline to the Final Visit at Week 42.
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) [Core Phase]
기간: Visit 2 (Day 1) up to Visit 6 (Week 12/Day 84)

Documentation of TEAEs (Safety and tolerability) from the start of treatment at Visit 2 (Day 1) up to the end of the Core Phase of the Treatment Period.

Visit 2 (Day 1) up to Visit 6 (Week 12/Day 84)
Incidence of TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation From Trial [Core Phase]
기간: Visit 2 (Day 1) up to Visit 6 (Week 12/Day 84)

Documentation of TEAEs (Safety and tolerability) from the start of treatment at Visit 2 (Day 1) up to the end of the Core Phase of the Treatment Period.

Visit 2 (Day 1) up to Visit 6 (Week 12/Day 84)
Incidence of TEAEs [Extension Phase]
기간: Visit 2 (Day 1) up to Final Visit (Week 42/Day 294)

Documentation of TEAEs (Safety and tolerability) from the start of treatment at Visit 2 (Day 1) up to the end of the Extension Phase.

Visit 2 (Day 1) up to Final Visit (Week 42/Day 294)
Incidence of TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation From Trial [Extension Phase]
기간: Visit 2 (Day 1) up to Final Visit (Week 42/Day 294)

Documentation of TEAEs (Safety and tolerability) from the start of treatment at Visit 2 (Day 1) up to the end of the Extension Phase.

Visit 2 (Day 1) up to Final Visit (Week 42/Day 294)

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

스폰서

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2021년 7월 13일

기본 완료 (실제)

2025년 8월 28일

연구 완료 (실제)

2025년 8월 28일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2021년 6월 10일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2021년 7월 8일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2021년 7월 19일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 9월 21일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 8월 26일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 8월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • AV001

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

예

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .