이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

암 치료 계획을 위한 노인 및 객관적 기능 평가 사용에 대한 노인의 선호도 및 견해 이해.

2026년 9월 16일 업데이트: Zachary Frosch, Fox Chase Cancer Center

Facilitating the Engagement and Satisfaction of Older Adults in Their Cancer Care Planning: A Randomized Study to Understand the Preferences and Views of Older Adults Regarding the Use of Geriatric and Objective Functional Assessments for Cancer Treatment Planning

This Interventional clinical study aims to explore how receiving information about their health and physical abilities affects the treatment decisions of older adults. The study will look at whether sharing detailed assessments of their health and functional status helps older adults better understand their condition and make informed decisions about their care.

The main question it aims to answer is if providing this information changes the treatment priorities of older adults, helping them focus on what matters most to them in their medical care.

연구 개요

상태

모병

정황

개입 / 치료

상세 설명

This randomized, interventional, cancer care delivery trial will test whether receipt of Geriatric Assessment (GA) and Objective Functional Status (OFS) assessment data affects older adults' treatment priorities. It will also assess the preferences of older adults for the collection, sharing, and use of their assessment data. Finally, it will explore whether less fit patients experience a lower level of satisfaction and a greater degree of regret with their decision to undergo anti-cancer therapy. This study will utilize a randomized design where participants will be randomized to either the intervention arm (early sharing of GA and OFS results) or to the control arm (delayed sharing of GA and OFS results). To assess patients' preferences for quality vs quantity of life, the investigators will use the Quality Quantity (QQ) questionnaire. All patients will complete this at baseline and then undergo their GA and OFS assessments. Patients randomized to the intervention group will be provided the results of their GA and OFS assessments, and then complete the QQ Questionnaire for a second time to assess for any changes following receipt of their assessment results. Patients randomized to the control group will undergo the assessments and complete the same questionnaire as the intervention group but will not receive the results of their GA and OFS assessments prior to completing the second QQ Questionnaire. For the control group, assessment results will be shared with patients after completion of the follow-up QQ Questionnaire. After reviewing their assessment results, patients in both groups will then complete a questionnaire that inquire about their preferences for receipt, use, and sharing of their assessment data. It will also inquire about the degree to which receipt of these data affected how they experienced their cancer care.

The Investigators will determine whether sharing of geriatric and OFS assessment results affected patients' treatment priorities by measuring the absolute change from baseline in the QQ questionnaire scores for quantity and quality of life, comparing the change in the intervention versus the control group. The Investigators will also describe patients' preferences for the collection, use and sharing of their assessment data as reported in the preferences questionnaire, both overall and by race/ethnicity. To explore differences in patients' satisfaction with their decision to pursue anti-cancer therapy by functional status level, participants will complete the "Was it Worth It" (WIWI) questionnaire at the first of either 1) the conclusion of their treatment regimen or 2) three months after enrollment. The provider assessment will ask whether patients experienced any of the following: a toxicity of treatment ≥grade 3, treatment dose reduction, treatment interruption, treatment discontinuation, hospitalization, or a decline in performance status.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (추정된)

100

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 연락처

연구 연락처 백업

연구 장소

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 미국, 19111
        • 모병
        • Fox Chase Cancer Center
        • 연락하다:
        • 연락하다:
        • 수석 연구원:
          • Zachary Frosch, MD, MSHP

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

65년 이상 (고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 65

At the time of study screening either:

  • Started a new qualifying index regimen within the last 30 days (inclusive)
  • Are being considered for a new qualifying index regimen

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients will be excluded if they

    • Do not have the capacity to consent to study procedures
    • Are unable to complete English language questionnaires
    • Are already using an activity tracker on a daily basis (and therefore may be aware of their current level of activity)
    • Are enrolled in another study in which physical activity is a substantial part or all of the therapeutic intervention or where physical activity is specifically being evaluated and shared with patients. Patients on studies not evaluating or sharing physical activity are eligible for the present study if they meet the other inclusion/exclusion criteria and participation in the present study is not excluded by other studies in which they are enrolled.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 지지 요법
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: Early Sharing Arm

early sharing of GA and OFS results to participants

Early vs. delayed sharing of GA and OFS diagnostic results and how that sharing affects patient preferences, decision- making, and satisfaction in the context of participants' cancer care.

다른 이름들:
  • 노인 및 OFS 평가
  • 품질 수량(QQ) 설문지
  • 비치료적
간섭 없음: Delayed Sharing Arm

delayed sharing of GA and OFS results to participants

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Absolute change in QQ-Length of life from baseline to post-intervention
기간: From baseline questionnaire at enrollment to post intervention questionnaire at an average of 4 weeks after enrollment.

The QQ uses a 5-point Likert scale to rate each of the 4 questions on the QQ-L subscale. The scores for this subscale are then summed, meaning that patients will receive a score ranging from 4-20 for the QQ-L. The total score from the 4 QQ-L items measures the strength of a participant's preference for length of life, with higher scores meaning greater preference for length of life.

From baseline questionnaire at enrollment to post intervention questionnaire at an average of 4 weeks after enrollment.

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
The secondary outcome will be the absolute change in the QQ quality of life subscale (QQ-Q) from baseline to post-intervention.
기간: From baseline questionnaire at enrollment to post intervention questionnaire at an average of 4 weeks after enrollment.

The QQ uses a 5-point Likert scale to rate each of the 4 questions on the QQ-Q subscale. The scores for the subscale are then summed, meaning that patients will receive a score ranging from 4-20 for the QQ-Q. The total score from the 4 QQ-Q items measures the strength of a participant's preference for quality of life, with higher scores meaning greater preference for quality of life.

From baseline questionnaire at enrollment to post intervention questionnaire at an average of 4 weeks after enrollment.

기타 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
The proportion of patients who, on the Was It Worth It (WIWI) questionnaire, report that their treatment was worthwhile, that they would undergo it again, and that they would recommend it to others.
기간: From enrollment to the end of treatment or at 3 months after study entry, whichever comes first.

The proportion of patients who, on the Was It Worth It (WIWI) questionnaire, report that their treatment was worthwhile, that they would undergo it again, and that they would recommend it to others.

From enrollment to the end of treatment or at 3 months after study entry, whichever comes first.
Summary/descriptive statistics for participants' answers to the preferences questionnaire.
기간: From baseline questionnaire at enrollment to post intervention questionnaire at an average of 4 weeks after enrollment.

It inquires about their preferences for receipt, use and sharing of their assessment results, along with the degree to which receipt of these results affected their understanding or approach to their care

From baseline questionnaire at enrollment to post intervention questionnaire at an average of 4 weeks after enrollment.

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

스폰서

협력자

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Zachary Frosch, MD, MSHP, Fox Chase Cancer Center

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2025년 2월 21일

기본 완료 (추정된)

2027년 3월 1일

연구 완료 (추정된)

2027년 5월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2024년 10월 15일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2024년 10월 21일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2024년 10월 22일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 9월 21일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 9월 16일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 9월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • 24-1020

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

아니요

IPD 계획 설명

Individual Participant Data will not be shared due to privacy concerns.

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .