Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Verständnis der Vorlieben und Ansichten älterer Erwachsener zur Verwendung geriatrischer und objektiver Funktionsbeurteilungen für die Planung der Krebsbehandlung.

16. September 2026 aktualisiert von: Zachary Frosch, Fox Chase Cancer Center

Facilitating the Engagement and Satisfaction of Older Adults in Their Cancer Care Planning: A Randomized Study to Understand the Preferences and Views of Older Adults Regarding the Use of Geriatric and Objective Functional Assessments for Cancer Treatment Planning

This Interventional clinical study aims to explore how receiving information about their health and physical abilities affects the treatment decisions of older adults. The study will look at whether sharing detailed assessments of their health and functional status helps older adults better understand their condition and make informed decisions about their care.

The main question it aims to answer is if providing this information changes the treatment priorities of older adults, helping them focus on what matters most to them in their medical care.

Studienübersicht

Status

Rekrutierung

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

This randomized, interventional, cancer care delivery trial will test whether receipt of Geriatric Assessment (GA) and Objective Functional Status (OFS) assessment data affects older adults' treatment priorities. It will also assess the preferences of older adults for the collection, sharing, and use of their assessment data. Finally, it will explore whether less fit patients experience a lower level of satisfaction and a greater degree of regret with their decision to undergo anti-cancer therapy. This study will utilize a randomized design where participants will be randomized to either the intervention arm (early sharing of GA and OFS results) or to the control arm (delayed sharing of GA and OFS results). To assess patients' preferences for quality vs quantity of life, the investigators will use the Quality Quantity (QQ) questionnaire. All patients will complete this at baseline and then undergo their GA and OFS assessments. Patients randomized to the intervention group will be provided the results of their GA and OFS assessments, and then complete the QQ Questionnaire for a second time to assess for any changes following receipt of their assessment results. Patients randomized to the control group will undergo the assessments and complete the same questionnaire as the intervention group but will not receive the results of their GA and OFS assessments prior to completing the second QQ Questionnaire. For the control group, assessment results will be shared with patients after completion of the follow-up QQ Questionnaire. After reviewing their assessment results, patients in both groups will then complete a questionnaire that inquire about their preferences for receipt, use, and sharing of their assessment data. It will also inquire about the degree to which receipt of these data affected how they experienced their cancer care.

The Investigators will determine whether sharing of geriatric and OFS assessment results affected patients' treatment priorities by measuring the absolute change from baseline in the QQ questionnaire scores for quantity and quality of life, comparing the change in the intervention versus the control group. The Investigators will also describe patients' preferences for the collection, use and sharing of their assessment data as reported in the preferences questionnaire, both overall and by race/ethnicity. To explore differences in patients' satisfaction with their decision to pursue anti-cancer therapy by functional status level, participants will complete the "Was it Worth It" (WIWI) questionnaire at the first of either 1) the conclusion of their treatment regimen or 2) three months after enrollment. The provider assessment will ask whether patients experienced any of the following: a toxicity of treatment ≥grade 3, treatment dose reduction, treatment interruption, treatment discontinuation, hospitalization, or a decline in performance status.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

100

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studieren Sie die Kontaktsicherung

Studienorte

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Vereinigte Staaten, 19111
        • Rekrutierung
        • Fox Chase Cancer Center
        • Kontakt:
        • Kontakt:
        • Hauptermittler:
          • Zachary Frosch, MD, MSHP

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

65 Jahre und älter (Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 65

At the time of study screening either:

  • Started a new qualifying index regimen within the last 30 days (inclusive)
  • Are being considered for a new qualifying index regimen

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients will be excluded if they

    • Do not have the capacity to consent to study procedures
    • Are unable to complete English language questionnaires
    • Are already using an activity tracker on a daily basis (and therefore may be aware of their current level of activity)
    • Are enrolled in another study in which physical activity is a substantial part or all of the therapeutic intervention or where physical activity is specifically being evaluated and shared with patients. Patients on studies not evaluating or sharing physical activity are eligible for the present study if they meet the other inclusion/exclusion criteria and participation in the present study is not excluded by other studies in which they are enrolled.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Unterstützende Pflege
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Early Sharing Arm

early sharing of GA and OFS results to participants

Early vs. delayed sharing of GA and OFS diagnostic results and how that sharing affects patient preferences, decision- making, and satisfaction in the context of participants' cancer care.

Andere Namen:
  • geriatrische und OFS-Beurteilung
  • Fragebogen zur Qualität und Quantität (QQ).
  • Nicht therapeutisch
Kein Eingriff: Delayed Sharing Arm

delayed sharing of GA and OFS results to participants

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Absolute change in QQ-Length of life from baseline to post-intervention
Zeitfenster: From baseline questionnaire at enrollment to post intervention questionnaire at an average of 4 weeks after enrollment.

The QQ uses a 5-point Likert scale to rate each of the 4 questions on the QQ-L subscale. The scores for this subscale are then summed, meaning that patients will receive a score ranging from 4-20 for the QQ-L. The total score from the 4 QQ-L items measures the strength of a participant's preference for length of life, with higher scores meaning greater preference for length of life.

From baseline questionnaire at enrollment to post intervention questionnaire at an average of 4 weeks after enrollment.

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
The secondary outcome will be the absolute change in the QQ quality of life subscale (QQ-Q) from baseline to post-intervention.
Zeitfenster: From baseline questionnaire at enrollment to post intervention questionnaire at an average of 4 weeks after enrollment.

The QQ uses a 5-point Likert scale to rate each of the 4 questions on the QQ-Q subscale. The scores for the subscale are then summed, meaning that patients will receive a score ranging from 4-20 for the QQ-Q. The total score from the 4 QQ-Q items measures the strength of a participant's preference for quality of life, with higher scores meaning greater preference for quality of life.

From baseline questionnaire at enrollment to post intervention questionnaire at an average of 4 weeks after enrollment.

Andere Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
The proportion of patients who, on the Was It Worth It (WIWI) questionnaire, report that their treatment was worthwhile, that they would undergo it again, and that they would recommend it to others.
Zeitfenster: From enrollment to the end of treatment or at 3 months after study entry, whichever comes first.

The proportion of patients who, on the Was It Worth It (WIWI) questionnaire, report that their treatment was worthwhile, that they would undergo it again, and that they would recommend it to others.

From enrollment to the end of treatment or at 3 months after study entry, whichever comes first.
Summary/descriptive statistics for participants' answers to the preferences questionnaire.
Zeitfenster: From baseline questionnaire at enrollment to post intervention questionnaire at an average of 4 weeks after enrollment.

It inquires about their preferences for receipt, use and sharing of their assessment results, along with the degree to which receipt of these results affected their understanding or approach to their care

From baseline questionnaire at enrollment to post intervention questionnaire at an average of 4 weeks after enrollment.

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Mitarbeiter

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Zachary Frosch, MD, MSHP, Fox Chase Cancer Center

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

21. Februar 2025

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

1. März 2027

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

1. Mai 2027

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

15. Oktober 2024

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

21. Oktober 2024

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

22. Oktober 2024

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

21. September 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

16. September 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. September 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

Individual Participant Data will not be shared due to privacy concerns.

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .