Single Fraction and Multifraction Arc-Based Radiotherapy for Painful Bone Metastases (SMART)
2026년 8월 14일 업데이트: Balaji Subramanian Sitaraman, Oman Ministry of Health
The SMART Trial: A Randomised Feasibility Study Comparing Single Fraction and Multifraction Arc-Based Radiotherapy for Painful Bone Metastases
This prospective randomised pilot feasibility study will compare single-fraction radiotherapy (8 Gy × 1) with multifraction radiotherapy (20 Gy in 5 fractions) for the palliation of painful bone metastases.
The study will evaluate pain response at 4 weeks following radiotherapy, together with feasibility, treatment compliance, toxicity, pain flare, retreatment, patient convenience and resource utilisation.
The study will generate preliminary data to inform the design of a future definitive randomised trial.
연구 개요
상태
상태
아직 모집하지 않음
정황
정황
개입 / 치료
개입 / 치료
상세 설명
Single-fraction radiotherapy (SFRT) is an established standard treatment for palliation of painful bone metastases. However, multifraction radiotherapy (MFRT) continues to be widely used in clinical practice because of concerns regarding durability of pain control and retreatment. With the increasing use of modern arc-based radiotherapy techniques such as volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), there is a need to evaluate whether single-fraction radiotherapy can provide effective pain palliation while reducing treatment burden and improving resource utilisation.
The SMART trial is a prospective, single-centre, randomised, open-label, parallel-group pilot feasibility study comparing VMAT-based SFRT (8 Gy in 1 fraction) with VMAT-based MFRT (20 Gy in 5 fractions) in patients with painful bone metastases, including spinal metastases.
Approximately 70 participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either SFRT or MFRT. Both treatment schedules will be delivered using VMAT with daily image-guided radiotherapy using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based image guidance.
Stratified block randomisation will be used according to the site of metastasis (spine versus non-spine) to maintain balance between the two treatment groups. Within each stratum, computer-generated variable block randomisation using block sizes of 4 and 6 will be used. Allocation will be concealed using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes.
Pain will be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) and Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale at baseline and during follow-up. Participants will be assessed at 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 12 weeks after radiotherapy.
The primary aim of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial at the participating tertiary oncology centre. Feasibility will include recruitment, treatment completion, follow-up completion and completeness of study data.
The primary efficacy outcome will be overall pain response at 4 weeks following radiotherapy. Secondary outcomes will include pain response at other follow-up time points, retreatment rates, pain flare, treatment-related toxicity, patient convenience and resource utilisation.
The study is not powered to provide a definitive non-inferiority conclusion. A non-inferiority margin of 15% has been prespecified to guide estimation of the treatment effect and inform the design and sample size of a future definitive randomised trial. The primary efficacy analysis will compare overall pain response between the two treatment groups using the intention-to-treat population.
The study will generate preliminary feasibility and clinical outcome data to inform the design of a future definitive randomised controlled trial evaluating single-fraction versus multifraction radiotherapy for painful bone metastases.
연구 유형
연구 유형
중재적
등록 (추정된)
등록
70
단계
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.
연구 연락처
연구 연락처
- 이름: Balaji Subramanian Sitaraman, MBBS, DNB
- 전화번호: +96871926769
- 이메일: balaji.radonc@gmail.com
연구 장소
-
-
Muḩāfaz̧at Masqaţ
-
Muscat, Muḩāfaz̧at Masqaţ, 오만, 100
- Royal Hospital
-
-
참여기준
연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.
자격 기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
- 성인
- 고령자
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
아니
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥18 years
- Histologically proven malignancy
- Radiological evidence of bone or spine metastases
- Pain score ≥4 on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11)
- ECOG Performance Status 0-3
- Life expectancy ≥3 months.
- Ability to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Spinal cord compression requiring emergency therapy
- Previous radiotherapy to same site
- Unstable pathological fracture requiring surgery
- Pregnancy
- Inability to provide consent
- Oligometastatic bone metastases requiring Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT)
공부 계획
이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 치료
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)
팔의 수
2
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
실험적: Single-Fraction Radiotherapy (SFRT)
Participants will receive VMAT-basd radiotherapy to painful none metastasis, a total dose of 8 Gy delivered in a single fraction using CBCT based imaging guidance.
|
VMAT-based external beam radiotherapy planned to deliver 8 Gy in a single fraction with CBCT-based image guidance for the palliation of painful bone metastasis
|
|
활성 비교기: Multifraction Radiotherapy (MFRT)
Participants will receive VMAT-basd radiotherapy to painful none metastasis, a total dose of 20Gy delivered in Five fractions using daily CBCT based imaging guidance.
|
VMAT-based external beam radiotherapy planned to deliver 20 Gy in Five fractions of 4 Gy each with daily CBCT-based image guidance for the palliation of painful bone metastasis
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of target sample recruited
기간: From study initiation through completion of the recruitment period.
|
The percentage of the planned target sample successfully recruited during the recruitment period.
Recruitment feasibility will be interpreted using predefined traffic-light criteria: Green ≥80% (feasibility achieved), Amber 70-79% (borderline feasibility requiring review), and Red <70% (feasibility not achieved and requiring review).
|
From study initiation through completion of the recruitment period.
|
|
Percentage of participants completing assigned radiotherapy
기간: From randomisation through completion of assigned radiotherapy.
|
The percentage of randomised participants who complete the assigned radiotherapy treatment according to the study protocol.
Treatment completion feasibility will be interpreted using predefined traffic-light criteria: Green ≥90% (feasibility achieved), Amber 80-89% (borderline feasibility requiring review), and Red <80% (feasibility not achieved and requiring review).
|
From randomisation through completion of assigned radiotherapy.
|
|
Percentage of participants completing 3-month follow-up
기간: From randomisation through 3 months after radiotherapy.
|
The percentage of randomised participants who complete the required study follow-up through 3 months after radiotherapy.
Follow-up feasibility will be interpreted using predefined traffic-light criteria: Green ≥80% (feasibility achieved), Amber 70-79% (borderline feasibility requiring review), and Red <70% (feasibility not achieved and requiring review).
|
From randomisation through 3 months after radiotherapy.
|
|
Percentage of participants with complete required study data
기간: From study initiation through 3 months after radiotherapy.
|
The percentage of participants with complete required study data according to the study data collection requirements.
Data completeness will be interpreted using predefined traffic-light criteria: Green ≥90% (feasibility achieved), Amber 80-89% (borderline feasibility requiring review), and Red <80% (feasibility not achieved and requiring review).
|
From study initiation through 3 months after radiotherapy.
|
|
Percentage of participants with major protocol deviations
기간: From randomisation through 3 months after radiotherapy.
|
The percentage of participants with major protocol deviations during the study.
A major protocol deviation is a significant departure from the study protocol that may affect participant safety, treatment allocation, assessment of the primary outcome, or validity of the study results.
Protocol adherence will be interpreted using predefined traffic-light criteria: Green <10% major protocol deviations (feasibility achieved), Amber 10-20% (borderline feasibility requiring review), and Red >20% (feasibility not achieved and requiring review).
|
From randomisation through 3 months after radiotherapy.
|
2차 결과 측정
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of participants achieving overall pain response at 4 weeks.
기간: 4 weeks after radiotherapy
|
Overall pain response will be assessed using the NRS-11 and analgesic use.
Pain response is defined as a reduction of at least 2 points in pain from baseline with no escalation in analgesic use.
The percentage of participants achieving pain response will be compared between the SFRT and MFRT groups.
|
4 weeks after radiotherapy
|
|
Percentage of participants requiring retreatment
기간: From completion of radiotherapy through 3 months after radiotherapy
|
The percentage of participants requiring repeat radiotherapy to the treated sitefor persisten or recurrence of pain will be recorded and compared between the SFRT and MFRT groups.
|
From completion of radiotherapy through 3 months after radiotherapy
|
|
Percentage of participants experiencing pain flare
기간: From completion of radiotherapy through 10 days after radiotherapy.
|
Pain flare following radiotherapy will be recorded and compared between the SFRT and MFRT groups.
Pain flare is defined as increase in NRS pain score by ≥2 points without reduction in analgesic use, or Increase in analgesic requirement by ≥25% without improvement in pain score, followed by return to the baseline pain level or analgesic requirement within 10 days after radiotherapy.
|
From completion of radiotherapy through 10 days after radiotherapy.
|
|
Percentage of participants achieving overall pain response at 2 weeks and 3 months
기간: 2 weeks and 3 months after radiotherapy
|
Overall pain response will be assessed using the NRS-11 and analgesic use.
Pain response is defined as a reduction of at least 2 points in pain from baseline with no escalation in analgesic use.
The percentage of participants achieving pain response will be recorded at 2 weeks and 3 months after radiotherapy and compared between the SFRT and MFRT groups.
|
2 weeks and 3 months after radiotherapy
|
|
Change in analgesic requirement from baseline
기간: At 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 3 months after radiotherapy
|
Change in analgesic requirement from baseline will be assessed using the patient's analgesic consumption and expressed as oral morphine equivalent dose (OMED).
The change in analgesic requirement will be recorded and compared between the SFRT and MFRT groups.
|
At 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 3 months after radiotherapy
|
기타 결과 측정
기타 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of participants receiving radiotherapy to new painful metastatic sites
기간: From completion of radiotherapy through 3 months after radiotherapy
|
The number of participants who receive radiotherapy to new painful metastatic sites during the 3-month follow-up period will be recorded descriptively.
This outcome reflects the occurrence of new painful metastatic disease during follow-up and is not intended to assess the efficacy of SFRT versus MFRT.
|
From completion of radiotherapy through 3 months after radiotherapy
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.
협력자
협력자
수사관
수사관
- 수석 연구원: Balaji Subramanian Sitaraman, MBBS, DNB, Royal Hospital, Ministry of Health, Oman
간행물 및 유용한 링크
연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.
일반 간행물
- Hartsell WF, Scott CB, Bruner DW, Scarantino CW, Ivker RA, Roach M 3rd, Suh JH, Demas WF, Movsas B, Petersen IA, Konski AA, Cleeland CS, Janjan NA, DeSilvio M. Randomized trial of short- versus long-course radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Jun 1;97(11):798-804. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji139.
- Sahgal A, Myrehaug SD, Siva S, Masucci GL, Maralani PJ, Brundage M, Butler J, Chow E, Fehlings MG, Foote M, Gabos Z, Greenspoon J, Kerba M, Lee Y, Liu M, Liu SK, Thibault I, Wong RK, Hum M, Ding K, Parulekar WR; trial investigators. Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional external beam radiotherapy in patients with painful spinal metastases: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jul;22(7):1023-1033. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00196-0. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
- McDonald R, Chow E, Lam H, Rowbottom L, Soliman H. International patterns of practice in radiotherapy for bone metastases: A review of the literature. J Bone Oncol. 2014 Nov 7;3(3-4):96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2014.10.003. eCollection 2014 Nov.
- Hird A, Chow E, Zhang L, Wong R, Wu J, Sinclair E, Danjoux C, Tsao M, Barnes E, Loblaw A. Determining the incidence of pain flare following palliative radiotherapy for symptomatic bone metastases: results from three canadian cancer centers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Sep 1;75(1):193-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.044. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
- Westhoff PG, de Graeff A, Monninkhof EM, Pomp J, van Vulpen M, Leer JW, Marijnen CA, van der Linden YM; Dutch Bone Metastasis Study Group. Quality of Life in Relation to Pain Response to Radiation Therapy for Painful Bone Metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Nov 1;93(3):694-701. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.06.024. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
- BalajiSubramanian S, Sathiya K, Balaji K, Thirunavukarasu M, Phanikiran S, Rela M. Re-irradiation after stereotactic body radiotherapy for spine metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2021 Dec 30;26(6):1060-1065. doi: 10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0098. eCollection 2021.
- Chow E, Zeng L, Salvo N, Dennis K, Tsao M, Lutz S. Update on the systematic review of palliative radiotherapy trials for bone metastases. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2012 Mar;24(2):112-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2011.11.004. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
- Steenland E, Leer JW, van Houwelingen H, Post WJ, van den Hout WB, Kievit J, de Haes H, Martijn H, Oei B, Vonk E, van der Steen-Banasik E, Wiggenraad RG, Hoogenhout J, Warlam-Rodenhuis C, van Tienhoven G, Wanders R, Pomp J, van Reijn M, van Mierlo I, Rutten E. The effect of a single fraction compared to multiple fractions on painful bone metastases: a global analysis of the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study. Radiother Oncol. 1999 Aug;52(2):101-9. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(99)00110-3.
연구 기록 날짜
이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (추정된)
연구 시작
2026년 9월 1일
기본 완료 (추정된)
기본 완료
2027년 12월 1일
연구 완료 (추정된)
연구 완료
2027년 12월 30일
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
최초 제출
2026년 8월 8일
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
2026년 8월 14일
처음 게시됨 (실제)
처음 게시됨
2026년 8월 19일
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
마지막 업데이트 게시됨
2026년 8월 19일
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
2026년 8월 14일
마지막으로 확인됨
마지막으로 확인됨
2026년 8월 1일
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
추가 관련 MeSH 약관
기타 연구 ID 번호
기타 연구 ID 번호
- MoH/CSR/26/32133
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
아니요
IPD 계획 설명
Individual participant data will not be routinely shared with other researchers.
The study is a single-center feasibility study, and the collected data will be used for the approved study objectives and institutional research purposes.
Any data sharing, if required in the future, will be considered in accordance with institutional policies, ethical approval, participant confidentiality, and applicable regulations.
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
아니
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
아니
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .