Turkish Version of a Scale Measuring How People View Chronic Pain
Turkish Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Patients' Endorsement of a Biopsychosocial Model of Chronic Pain Scale
This study will translate and culturally adapt the Patients' Endorsement of a Biopsychosocial Model of Chronic Pain Scale (PEB) into Turkish and evaluate how well and consistently it measures the views of adults with chronic pain. The study will take place at the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic of Bilecik Training and Research Hospital. At least 200 adults will be included in the main sample. Participants will complete questionnaires that are expected to take 10 to 15 minutes. An additional 20 people who will not be included in the main sample will take part in a pilot assessment. Fifty participants from the main sample will complete the PEB Scale again after two weeks. No treatment or intervention will be assigned.
연구 개요
상태
상태
정황
정황
상세 설명
This is a methodological, cross-sectional study with a prospective test-retest component. The Turkish cross-cultural adaptation will include independent forward translations, reconciliation of the translations, independent back-translations, comparison with the original scale, and review of discrepancies. Seven experts in relevant fields will assess the clarity, cultural suitability, and content relevance of the items. The revised form will be pilot-tested with 20 adults with chronic pain who will not be included in the main sample.
The main psychometric evaluation will include at least 200 adults with chronic pain. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses will be used to evaluate the scale structure. Criterion-related validity will be assessed through correlations with pain beliefs, pain-related self-efficacy, pain intensity, interference with daily activities, and pain-related distress. Internal consistency and item characteristics will also be examined. Measurement invariance across selected participant groups will be evaluated using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis.
For test-retest reliability, 50 participants from the main sample whose clinical condition is not expected to change substantially will complete the PEB Scale again after two weeks. Agreement between the two measurements will be assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and its 95% confidence interval.
연구 유형
연구 유형
등록 (추정된)
등록
연락처 및 위치
연구 연락처
연구 연락처
- 이름: Burcu Bayrak Kahraman, PhD
- 전화번호: +905057542411
- 이메일: burcu.bayrak@bilecik.edu.tr
연구 장소
-
-
-
Bilecik, 터키 (Türkiye), 11000
- Bilecik Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi
-
연락하다:
- Burcu Bayrak Kahraman, Assoc. Prof.
- 전화번호: +905057542411
- 이메일: burcu.bayrak@bilecik.edu.tr
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
연구 대상 성별
샘플링 방법
연구 인구
Adults aged 18 years or older with physician-diagnosed chronic pain lasting or recurring for more than 3 months who receive follow-up or treatment at the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic of Bilecik Training and Research Hospital, Türkiye.
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 18 years or older.
- Voluntarily agrees to participate in the study.
- Has physician-diagnosed chronic pain lasting or recurring for more than 3 months.
- Able to read and write Turkish.
- Has sufficient cognitive ability to understand and complete the data collection forms.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presents with acute pain or does not meet the chronic pain criteria.
- Has a cognitive or communication impairment that prevents completion of the data collection forms.
- Submits incomplete data collection forms.
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 관찰 모델: OTHER
- 시간 관점: PROSPECTIVE
그룹/코호트 수
코호트 및 개입
그룹/코호트그룹/코호트 |
|---|
|
Adults With Chronic Pain
Adults aged 18 years or older with physician-diagnosed chronic pain lasting or recurring for more than 3 months. At least 200 participants will be included in the main sample, and an additional 20 participants will take part in the pilot assessment. Fifty participants from the main sample will complete the PEB Scale again after two weeks. No intervention will be assigned. |
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Construct validity and internal consistency of the Patients' Endorsement of a Biopsychosocial Model of Chronic Pain Scale
기간: At the initial assessment (single administration)
|
The Patients' Endorsement of a Biopsychosocial Model of Chronic Pain Scale (PEB Scale) consists of 11 items rated on a 4-point scale (1-4), yielding a total score of 11-44. Higher scores indicate stronger endorsement of the biopsychosocial model of chronic pain and represent a more favorable outcome. Construct validity will be evaluated using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Internal consistency will be assessed using Cronbach's alpha and corrected item-total correlations. |
At the initial assessment (single administration)
|
2차 결과 측정
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Test-retest reliability of the Patients' Endorsement of a Biopsychosocial Model of Chronic Pain Scale
기간: At the initial assessment and 2 weeks later
|
The Patients' Endorsement of a Biopsychosocial Model of Chronic Pain Scale (PEB Scale) consists of 11 items rated on a 4-point scale (1-4), yielding a total score of 11-44. Higher scores indicate stronger endorsement of the biopsychosocial model of chronic pain and represent a more favorable outcome. A subsample of 50 participants will complete the scale again after 2 weeks. Test-retest reliability will be evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and its 95% confidence interval. |
At the initial assessment and 2 weeks later
|
|
Criterion-related validity of the Patients' Endorsement of a Biopsychosocial Model of Chronic Pain Scale
기간: At the initial assessment
|
Criterion-related validity will be assessed by examining correlations between scores on the Patients' Endorsement of a Biopsychosocial Model of Chronic Pain Scale (PEB Scale), the Pain Beliefs Questionnaire, the University of Washington Pain-Related Self-Efficacy Scale Short Form, and three 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) items. The PEB Scale has 11 items rated 1-4, with a total score of 11-44; higher scores indicate stronger endorsement of the biopsychosocial model and represent a more favorable outcome. The Pain Beliefs Questionnaire has Organic Beliefs and Psychological Beliefs subscale mean scores ranging from 1-6; higher scores indicate stronger beliefs in the corresponding domain, with no uniformly better or worse direction. The University of Washington Pain-Related Self-Efficacy Scale Short Form has 6 items rated 1-5, with a total score of 6-30; higher scores indicate greater pain-related self-efficacy and represent a more favorable outcome. The three NRS items assess pain int |
At the initial assessment
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (추정된)
연구 시작
기본 완료 (추정된)
기본 완료
연구 완료 (추정된)
연구 완료
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
처음 게시됨
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
마지막 업데이트 게시됨
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
추가 관련 MeSH 약관
기타 연구 ID 번호
기타 연구 ID 번호
- PEB-TR-2026
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
IPD 계획 설명
No individual participant data will be shared with other researchers. The study involves sensitive health information, and participant confidentiality will be protected. Study findings will be reported in aggregate.
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .