Multicenter Trial of a Tubeless, On-Body Automated Insulin Delivery System With Customizable Glycemic Targets in Pediatric and Adult Participants With Type 1 Diabetes

Sue A Brown, Gregory P Forlenza, Bruce W Bode, Jordan E Pinsker, Carol J Levy, Amy B Criego, David W Hansen, Irl B Hirsch, Anders L Carlson, Richard M Bergenstal, Jennifer L Sherr, Sanjeev N Mehta, Lori M Laffel, Viral N Shah, Anuj Bhargava, Ruth S Weinstock, Sarah A MacLeish, Daniel J DeSalvo, Thomas C Jones, Grazia Aleppo, Bruce A Buckingham, Trang T Ly, Omnipod 5 Research Group, Sue A Brown, Mary Voelmle, Emma Emory, Gregory P Forlenza, R Paul Wadwa, Robert Slover, Erin Cobry, Laurel H Messer, Cari Berget, Susan McCoy, Viral N Shah, Halis K Akturk, Nicole Schneider, Hal Joseph, Prakriti Joshee, Christie Beatson, Bruce W Bode, Brooke Narron, Tricia Lopez, Jordan E Pinsker, Mei Mei Church, Kristin Castorino, Molly Piper, Jimena Perez, Carol J Levy, David W Lam, Camilla Levister, Grenye O'Malley, Selassie Ogyaadu, Dushyanthy Arasaratnam, Mitchell Plesser, Emily Nosova, Suzan Bzdick, David W Hansen, Sheri L Stone, Ruth S Weinstock, Irl B Hirsch, Subbulaxmi Trikudanathan, Nancy Sanborn, Dori Khakpour, Anders L Carlson, Amy B Criego, Richard M Bergenstal, Thomas Martens, Aimee Grieme, Jamie Hyatt, Alina Punel, Diane Whipple, Jennifer L Sherr, Michelle Van Name, Michelle Brei, Melinda Zgorski, Amy Steffen, Lori Carria, Sanjeev N Mehta, Lori M Laffel, Lindsay Roethke, Margaret Fisher, Rebecca Ortiz La Banca, Lisa Volkening, Louise Ambler-Osborn, Christine Turcotte, Emily F Freiner, Anuj Bhargava, Lisa Borg, Sarah A MacLeish, Jamie R Wood, Beth A Kaminski, Terri L Casey, Wendy Campbell, Daniel J DeSalvo, Siripoom McKay, Mary Kylie DeLaO, Carolina Villegas, Thomas C Jones, Barry Russel Johns, Ashwini Gore, Leslie Harvill, Kayla Merritt, Jennifer Stanfield, Jennifer Sheldon, Lisa Hichkad, Erica Burnett, Alicia Castelot, Lindsay Bounds, Kaitlyn Preston, Rebecca Goldfaden, Grazia Aleppo, Jelena Kravarusic, Anupam Bansal, Bruce A Buckingham, Laya Ekhlaspour, Ryan Kingman, Kaisa Kivilaid, Krista Kleve, Trang T Ly, Bonnie Dumais, Todd Vienneau, Lauren M Huyett, Joon Bok Lee, Jason O'Connor, Eric Benjamin, Sue A Brown, Gregory P Forlenza, Bruce W Bode, Jordan E Pinsker, Carol J Levy, Amy B Criego, David W Hansen, Irl B Hirsch, Anders L Carlson, Richard M Bergenstal, Jennifer L Sherr, Sanjeev N Mehta, Lori M Laffel, Viral N Shah, Anuj Bhargava, Ruth S Weinstock, Sarah A MacLeish, Daniel J DeSalvo, Thomas C Jones, Grazia Aleppo, Bruce A Buckingham, Trang T Ly, Omnipod 5 Research Group, Sue A Brown, Mary Voelmle, Emma Emory, Gregory P Forlenza, R Paul Wadwa, Robert Slover, Erin Cobry, Laurel H Messer, Cari Berget, Susan McCoy, Viral N Shah, Halis K Akturk, Nicole Schneider, Hal Joseph, Prakriti Joshee, Christie Beatson, Bruce W Bode, Brooke Narron, Tricia Lopez, Jordan E Pinsker, Mei Mei Church, Kristin Castorino, Molly Piper, Jimena Perez, Carol J Levy, David W Lam, Camilla Levister, Grenye O'Malley, Selassie Ogyaadu, Dushyanthy Arasaratnam, Mitchell Plesser, Emily Nosova, Suzan Bzdick, David W Hansen, Sheri L Stone, Ruth S Weinstock, Irl B Hirsch, Subbulaxmi Trikudanathan, Nancy Sanborn, Dori Khakpour, Anders L Carlson, Amy B Criego, Richard M Bergenstal, Thomas Martens, Aimee Grieme, Jamie Hyatt, Alina Punel, Diane Whipple, Jennifer L Sherr, Michelle Van Name, Michelle Brei, Melinda Zgorski, Amy Steffen, Lori Carria, Sanjeev N Mehta, Lori M Laffel, Lindsay Roethke, Margaret Fisher, Rebecca Ortiz La Banca, Lisa Volkening, Louise Ambler-Osborn, Christine Turcotte, Emily F Freiner, Anuj Bhargava, Lisa Borg, Sarah A MacLeish, Jamie R Wood, Beth A Kaminski, Terri L Casey, Wendy Campbell, Daniel J DeSalvo, Siripoom McKay, Mary Kylie DeLaO, Carolina Villegas, Thomas C Jones, Barry Russel Johns, Ashwini Gore, Leslie Harvill, Kayla Merritt, Jennifer Stanfield, Jennifer Sheldon, Lisa Hichkad, Erica Burnett, Alicia Castelot, Lindsay Bounds, Kaitlyn Preston, Rebecca Goldfaden, Grazia Aleppo, Jelena Kravarusic, Anupam Bansal, Bruce A Buckingham, Laya Ekhlaspour, Ryan Kingman, Kaisa Kivilaid, Krista Kleve, Trang T Ly, Bonnie Dumais, Todd Vienneau, Lauren M Huyett, Joon Bok Lee, Jason O'Connor, Eric Benjamin

Abstract

Objective: Advances in diabetes technology have transformed the treatment paradigm for type 1 diabetes, yet the burden of disease is significant. We report on a pivotal safety study of the first tubeless, on-body automated insulin delivery system with customizable glycemic targets.

Research design and methods: This single-arm, multicenter, prospective study enrolled 112 children (age 6-13.9 years) and 129 adults (age 14-70 years). A 2-week standard therapy phase (usual insulin regimen) was followed by 3 months of automated insulin delivery. Primary safety outcomes were incidence of severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis. Primary effectiveness outcomes were change in HbA1c and percent time in sensor glucose range 70-180 mg/dL ("time in range").

Results: A total of 235 participants (98% of enrolled, including 111 children and 124 adults) completed the study. HbA1c was significantly reduced in children by 0.71% (7.8 mmol/mol) (mean ± SD: 7.67 ± 0.95% to 6.99 ± 0.63% [60 ± 10.4 mmol/mol to 53 ± 6.9 mmol/mol], P < 0.0001) and in adults by 0.38% (4.2 mmol/mol) (7.16 ± 0.86% to 6.78 ± 0.68% [55 ± 9.4 mmol/mol to 51 ± 7.4 mmol/mol], P < 0.0001). Time in range was improved from standard therapy by 15.6 ± 11.5% or 3.7 h/day in children and 9.3 ± 11.8% or 2.2 h/day in adults (both P < 0.0001). This was accomplished with a reduction in time in hypoglycemia <70 mg/dL among adults (median [interquartile range]: 2.00% [0.63, 4.06] to 1.09% [0.46, 1.75], P < 0.0001), while this parameter remained the same in children. There were three severe hypoglycemia events not attributable to automated insulin delivery malfunction and one diabetic ketoacidosis event from an infusion site failure.

Conclusions: This tubeless automated insulin delivery system was safe and allowed participants to significantly improve HbA1c levels and time in target glucose range with a very low occurrence of hypoglycemia.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04196140.

© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Changes in HbA1c. Individual participant HbA1c results are shown before (baseline) and after (follow-up) the 3-month automated insulin delivery phase for all participants with measurements available at both time points. HbA1c at follow-up plotted vs. HbA1c at baseline for children age 6–13.9 years (n = 108) (A) and adults age 14–70 years (n = 124) (B), with each circle representing a single participant. Mean HbA1c (%) values at baseline and follow-up when stratified into two groups by baseline HbA1c <8% (blue circle) and ≥8% (red square) for children (n = 108) (C) and adults (n = 124) (D), with the distribution of individual participant results at each time point shown as gray circles. Mean HbA1c (mmol/mol) values for children (C) with baseline HbA1c <64 mmol/mol (blue circle) and ≥64 mmol/mol (red square) are 55 and 72 mmol/mol at baseline and 50 and 59 mmol/mol at follow-up (change −4.9 and −12.9 mmol/mol), respectively. HbA1c values for adults (D) with baseline HbA1c <64 mmol/mol (blue circle) and ≥64 mmol/mol (red square) are 51 and 70 mmol/mol at baseline and 49 and 60 mmol/mol at follow-up (change −3.0 and −9.9 mmol/mol), respectively. In the analysis of change in HbA1c stratified by baseline HbA1c, the change was significant for each combination of age-group and baseline HbA1c category (all P < 0.0001 by paired t test). The cutoff of HbA1c <8.0% (<64 mmol/mol) was selected as a measure of adequate HbA1c control set by the Comprehensive Diabetes Care Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (20).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sensor glucose measurements. Median sensor glucose measurements are shown for children (age 6–13.9 years, n = 112) (A) and adults (age 14–70 years, n = 128) (B) during the automated insulin delivery phase (blue dashed line) and the standard therapy phase (red line), with blue and red shaded areas indicating the interquartile range for each phase. The target range (70–180 mg/dL) is indicated by black dashed lines. Measurements represent a 24-h period from midnight to midnight.

References

    1. American Diabetes Association . 6. Glycemic Targets: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care 2020;43(Suppl. 1):S66–S76
    1. Battelino T, Danne T, Bergenstal RM, et al. . Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: recommendations from the International Consensus on Time in Range. Diabetes Care 2019;42:1593–1603
    1. Foster NC, Beck RW, Miller KM, et al. . State of type 1 diabetes management and outcomes from the T1D exchange in 2016-2018. Diabetes Technol Ther 2019;21:66–72
    1. Miller KM, Foster NC, Beck RW, et al. .; T1D Exchange Clinic Network . Current state of type 1 diabetes treatment in the U.S.: updated data from the T1D Exchange clinic registry. Diabetes Care 2015;38:971–978
    1. Pettus JH, Zhou FL, Shepherd L, et al. . Incidences of severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis and prevalence of microvascular complications stratified by age and glycemic control in U.S. adult patients with type 1 diabetes: a real-world study. Diabetes Care 2019;42:2220–2227
    1. Brown SA, Kovatchev BP, Raghinaru D, et al. .; iDCL Trial Research Group . Six-month randomized, multicenter trial of closed-loop control in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2019;381:1707–1717
    1. Breton MD, Kanapka LG, Beck RW, et al. . iDCL Trial Research Group . A randomized trial of closed-loop control in children with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2020;383:836–845
    1. Weisman A, Bai JW, Cardinez M, Kramer CK, Perkins BA. Effect of artificial pancreas systems on glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outpatient randomised controlled trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2017;5:501–512
    1. Tauschmann M, Thabit H, Bally L, et al. .; APCam11 Consortium . Closed-loop insulin delivery in suboptimally controlled type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, 12-week randomised trial. Lancet 2018;392:1321–1329
    1. Bergenstal RM, Garg S, Weinzimer SA, et al. . Safety of a hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery system in patients with type 1 diabetes. JAMA 2016;316:1407–1408
    1. Leelarathna L, Choudhary P, Wilmot EG, et al. . Hybrid closed-loop therapy: where are we in 2021? Diabetes Obes Metab 2021;23:655–660
    1. Boughton CK, Hovorka R. New closed-loop insulin systems. Diabetologia 2021;64:1007–1015
    1. Berget C, Messer LH, Forlenza GP. A clinical overview of insulin pump therapy for the management of diabetes: past, present, and future of intensive therapy. Diabetes Spectr 2019;32:194–204
    1. Forlenza GP, Buckingham BA, Brown SA, et al. . First outpatient evaluation of a tubeless automated insulin delivery system with customizable glucose targets in children and adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 18 January 2021 [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2020.0546
    1. Buckingham BA, Forlenza GP, Pinsker JE, et al. . Safety and feasibility of the Omnipod hybrid closed-loop system in adult, adolescent, and pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes using a personalized model predictive control algorithm. Diabetes Technol Ther 2018;20:257–262
    1. Forlenza GP, Buckingham BA, Christiansen MP, et al. . Performance of Omnipod personalized model predictive control algorithm with moderate intensity exercise in adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2019;21:265–272
    1. Sherr JL, Buckingham BA, Forlenza GP, et al. . Safety and performance of the Omnipod hybrid closed-loop system in adults, adolescents, and children with type 1 diabetes over 5 days under free-living conditions. Diabetes Technol Ther 2020;22:174–184
    1. Buckingham BA, Christiansen MP, Forlenza GP, et al. . Performance of the Omnipod personalized model predictive control algorithm with meal bolus challenges in adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2018;20:585–595
    1. Nathan DM, Genuth S, Lachin J, et al. .; Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group . The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977–986
    1. National Committee on Quality Assurance . Comprehensive Diabetes Care (CDC), 2020. Accessed. Available from
    1. Forlenza GP, Pinhas-Hamiel O, Liljenquist DR, et al. . Safety evaluation of the MiniMed 670G system in children 7-13 years of age with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2019;21:11–19
    1. Rohlfing CL, Wiedmeyer H-M, Little RR, England JD, Tennill A, Goldstein DE. Defining the relationship between plasma glucose and HbA(1c): analysis of glucose profiles and HbA(1c) in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Care 2002;25:275–278
    1. Riddlesworth TD, Beck RW, Gal RL, et al. . Optimal sampling duration for continuous glucose monitoring to determine long-term glycemic control. Diabetes Technol Ther 2018;20:314–316

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren