Pivotal Omnipod Horizon™ Automated Glucose Control System

April 12, 2021 updated by: Insulet Corporation

Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of the Omnipod Horizon™ Automated Glucose Control System in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes

Subjects will undergo a 14-day outpatient, standard therapy phase during which sensor and insulin data will be collected. This will be followed by a 94-day (13-week) hybrid closed-loop phase conducted in an outpatient setting and an optional 12-month extension phase.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

The study schedule will consist of a standard therapy data collection phase followed by a hybrid closed-loop phase.

Subjects will undergo a 14-day outpatient, standard therapy phase during which sensor and insulin data will be collected. Subjects, or their caregivers, will manage their diabetes at home per their usual routine using the study continuous glucose monitoring system (CGM) and remain on current multiple daily injections (MDI) or pump therapy. This will be followed by a 94-day (13-week) hybrid closed-loop phase, conducted in an outpatient setting where subjects, or their caregivers, will manage their diabetes at home using the Omnipod Horizon™ Automated Glucose Control System. After completing the 94-day hybrid closed-loop phase, subjects will have the option to continue using the system for an additional 12 months.

During the hybrid closed-loop phase, there will be supervised exercise challenges. A subset of subjects will participate in 5-days of supervised Meal and Exercise challenges. A subset of subjects will participate in 3-days of supervised HypoProtect Exercise challenges.

The hybrid closed-loop phase will begin on Study Day 1.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

235

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University
      • Santa Barbara, California, United States, 93105
        • Sansum Diabetes Research Institute
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • University of Colorado Denver
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06511
        • Yale University
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30318
        • Atlanta Diabetes
      • Macon, Georgia, United States, 31210
        • East Coast Institute for Research
    • Illinois
      • Evanston, Illinois, United States, 60208
        • Northwestern University
    • Iowa
      • West Des Moines, Iowa, United States, 50265
        • Iowa Diabetes
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Joslin Diabetes Center
    • Minnesota
      • Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States, 55416
        • International Diabetes Center
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Mount Sinai
      • Syracuse, New York, United States, 13244
        • SUNY Syracuse
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • University Hospitals Cleveland
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Baylor College of Medicine
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22904
        • University of Virginia
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98109
        • University of Washington

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 70 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age at time of consent/assent 6-70 years
  2. Subjects aged < 18 years must be living with parent/legal guardian
  3. Diagnosed with type 1 diabetes for at least 6 months. Diagnosis is based on investigator's clinical judgment
  4. Deemed appropriate for pump therapy per investigator's assessment taking into account previous history of severe hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic events, and other comorbidities
  5. Investigator has confidence that the subject can successfully operate all study devices and is capable of adhering to the protocol
  6. Willing to use only the following types of insulin during the study: Humalog, Novolog, Admelog or Apidra during the study
  7. Must be willing to travel to and participate in meal and exercise challenges during 5-days of the hybrid closed-loop phase
  8. Willing to wear the system continuously throughout the study
  9. A1C <10% at screening visit
  10. Must be willing to use the Dexcom App on the Omnipod Horizon™ Personal Diabetes Manager (PDM) as the sole source of Dexcom data (with the exception of the Dexcom Follow App) during the hybrid closed-loop phase
  11. Subjects scoring ≥ 4 on the Clarke Questionnaire must agree to have an overnight companion, defined as someone who resides in the same home or building as the study subject and who can be available overnight
  12. Able to read and speak English fluently
  13. Willing and able to sign the Informed Consent Form (ICF) and/or has a parent/guardian willing and able to sign the ICF. Assent will be obtained from pediatric and adolescent subjects aged < 18 years per State requirements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. A medical condition, which in the opinion of the investigator, would put the subject at an unacceptable safety risk
  2. History of severe hypoglycemia in the past 6 months
  3. History of DKA in the past 6 months, unrelated to an intercurrent illness, infusion set failure or initial diagnosis
  4. Diagnosed with sickle cell disease
  5. Diagnosed with hemophilia or any other bleeding disorders
  6. Plans to receive blood transfusion over the course of the study
  7. Currently diagnosed with anorexia nervosa or bulimia
  8. Acute or chronic kidney disease (e.g. estimated GFR < 45) or currently on hemodialysis
  9. History of adrenal insufficiency
  10. Has taken oral or injectable steroids within the past 8-weeks or plans to take oral or injectable steroids during the course of the study
  11. Unable to tolerate adhesive tape or has any unresolved skin condition in the area of sensor or pump placement
  12. Plans to use insulin other than U-100 insulin intended for use in the study device during the course of the study
  13. Use of non-insulin anti-diabetic medication other than metformin (e.g. GLP1 agonist, SGLT2 inhibitor, DPP-4 inhibitor, pramlintide)
  14. Current or known history of coronary artery disease that is not stable with medical management, including unstable angina, or angina that prevents moderate exercise despite medical management, or a history of myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery bypass grafting within the previous 12-months.
  15. For subjects >50 years old or with diabetes duration >20 years, abnormal electrocardiogram consistent with increased risk of arrhythmia, ischemia, or prolonged QTc interval (> 450 ms)
  16. Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) is outside of normal range with clinical signs of hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism
  17. Pregnant or lactating, or is a woman of childbearing potential and not on acceptable form of birth control (acceptable includes abstinence, condoms, oral/injectable contraceptives, IUD or implant)
  18. Participation in another clinical study using an investigational drug or device other than the Omnipod Horizon™ Automated Glucose Control System within the preceding 30-days or intends to participate during the study period
  19. Unable to follow clinical protocol for the duration of the study or is otherwise deemed unacceptable to participate in the study per the investigator's clinical judgment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment
All subjects wearing the Omnipod Horizon™ Automated Glucose Control System using the closed-loop algorithm.
The Omnipod Horizon™ Automated Glucose Control System will provide automated insulin delivery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence rate of severe hypoglycemia (events per person months)
Time Frame: Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days)
Measure of serious device-related adverse events
Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days)
Incidence rate of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) (events per person months)
Time Frame: Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days)
Measure of serious device-related adverse events
Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days)
Glycated hemoglobin (A1C)
Time Frame: 6 weeks continuous Phase 2 participation compared to baseline
Measures device effectiveness
6 weeks continuous Phase 2 participation compared to baseline
Time in range 70-180 mg/dL
Time Frame: Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) compared to Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days)
Measures device effectiveness
Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) compared to Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
percent of time >180 mg/dL
Time Frame: Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) compared to Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days)
Glucose metric from study continuous glucose monitoring system (CGM)
Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) compared to Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days)
percent of time <70 mg/dL
Time Frame: Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) compared to Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days)
Glucose metric from study continuous glucose monitoring system (CGM)
Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) compared to Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days)
Glycated hemoglobin (A1C)
Time Frame: at least 6 weeks and at least 8 weeks of continuous Phase 2 participation, end of Phase 2 (94 days), 6 months (180 days) and end of Phase 3 (270 days)
Measures device effectiveness
at least 6 weeks and at least 8 weeks of continuous Phase 2 participation, end of Phase 2 (94 days), 6 months (180 days) and end of Phase 3 (270 days)
Mean glucose
Time Frame: Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days) during the day, overnight, and overall
Glucose metric from study continuous glucose monitoring system (CGM)
Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days) during the day, overnight, and overall
percent of time in range 70-180 mg/dL
Time Frame: Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days) during the day, overnight, and overall
Glucose metric from study continuous glucose monitoring system (CGM)
Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days) during the day, overnight, and overall
percent of time in range 70-140 mg/dL
Time Frame: Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days) during the day, overnight, and overall
Glucose metric from study continuous glucose monitoring system (CGM)
Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days) during the day, overnight, and overall
percent of time >180 mg/dL
Time Frame: Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days) during the day, overnight, and overall
Glucose metric from study continuous glucose monitoring system (CGM)
Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days) during the day, overnight, and overall
percent of time ≥ 250 mg/dL
Time Frame: Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days) during the day, overnight, and overall
Glucose metric from study continuous glucose monitoring system (CGM)
Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days) during the day, overnight, and overall
percent of time ≥ 300 mg/dL
Time Frame: Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days) during the day, overnight, and overall
Glucose metric from study continuous glucose monitoring system (CGM)
Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days) during the day, overnight, and overall
percent of time < 70 mg/dL
Time Frame: Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days) during the day, overnight, and overall
Glucose metric from study continuous glucose monitoring system (CGM)
Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days) during the day, overnight, and overall
percent of time < 54 mg/dL
Time Frame: Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days) during the day, overnight, and overall
Glucose metric from study continuous glucose monitoring system (CGM)
Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days) during the day, overnight, and overall
Standard deviation
Time Frame: Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days) during the day, overnight, and overall
Glucose metric from study continuous glucose monitoring system (CGM)-measured glucose variability with the standard deviation (SD)
Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days) during the day, overnight, and overall
Coefficient of variation
Time Frame: Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days) during the day, overnight, and overall
Glucose metric from study continuous glucose monitoring system (CGM)-measured glucose variability with the coefficient of variation (CV)
Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days) during the day, overnight, and overall
Percentage of time in hybrid closed-loop as proportion of overall device usage time
Time Frame: Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 (270 days)
Measure of system usage
Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 (270 days)
Glucose management indicator (GMI) based on overall mean glucose
Time Frame: Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to the Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days)
Measurement of glucose management using overall glucose averages
Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to the Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days)
Total daily insulin (TDI) (units)
Time Frame: Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to the Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days)
Measure of insulin requirements
Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to the Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days)
Total daily insulin (TDI) (units/kg)
Time Frame: Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to the Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days)
Measure of insulin requirements
Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to the Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days)
Total daily basal insulin (units)
Time Frame: Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to the Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days)
Measure of insulin requirements
Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to the Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days)
Total daily basal insulin (units/kg)
Time Frame: Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to the Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days)
Measure of insulin requirements
Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to the Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days)
Total daily bolus insulin (units)
Time Frame: Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to the Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days)
Measure of insulin requirements
Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to the Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days)
Total daily bolus insulin (units/kg)
Time Frame: Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to the Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days)
Measure of insulin requirements
Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to the Phase 1 standard therapy (14 days)
Body Mass Index (BMI) (kg/m2)
Time Frame: Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to baseline
Measure of change in weight
Phase 2 hybrid closed-loop (94 days) and Phase 3 hybrid closed-loop (270 days) compared to baseline

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence rate of hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL confirmed by BG)
Time Frame: HypoProtect compared to standard Omnipod 5 system use (3-day exercise challenge)
Measure of device safety
HypoProtect compared to standard Omnipod 5 system use (3-day exercise challenge)
Average number of hypoglycemic events (<70 mg/dL confirmed by BG)
Time Frame: HypoProtect compared to Automated Mode (3-day exercise challenge)
Measure of device effectiveness
HypoProtect compared to Automated Mode (3-day exercise challenge)
Area under the curve (AUC) less than 70 mg/dL (based on CGM value)
Time Frame: HypoProtect compared to Automated Mode (3-day exercise challenge)
Measure of device effectiveness
HypoProtect compared to Automated Mode (3-day exercise challenge)
Minimum continuous glucose monitor value (nadir glucose)
Time Frame: HypoProtect compared to Automated Mode (3-day exercise challenge)
Measure of device effectiveness
HypoProtect compared to Automated Mode (3-day exercise challenge)
Area under the curve (AUC) greater than 180 mg/dL (based on CGM value)
Time Frame: HypoProtect compared to Automated Mode (3-day exercise challenge)
Measure of device effectiveness
HypoProtect compared to Automated Mode (3-day exercise challenge)
Mean absolute decrease in glucose (based on CGM value, from start of exercise to nadir glucose)
Time Frame: HypoProtect compared to Automated Mode (3-day exercise challenge)
Measure of device effectiveness
HypoProtect compared to Automated Mode (3-day exercise challenge)
Carbohydrates consumed during exercise (grams)
Time Frame: HypoProtect compared to Automated Mode (3-day exercise challenge)
Measure of device effectiveness
HypoProtect compared to Automated Mode (3-day exercise challenge)
Mean glucose
Time Frame: Automated Mode compared to HypoProtect use during 70-minute exercise session and at 4-, 12-, and 24-hours post-exercise
Glucose metric from study continuous glucose monitoring system (CGM)
Automated Mode compared to HypoProtect use during 70-minute exercise session and at 4-, 12-, and 24-hours post-exercise
percent of time in range 70-180 mg/dL
Time Frame: Automated Mode compared to HypoProtect use during 70-minute exercise session and at 4-, 12-, and 24-hours post-exercise
Measure of device effectiveness
Automated Mode compared to HypoProtect use during 70-minute exercise session and at 4-, 12-, and 24-hours post-exercise
percent of time > 180 mg/dL
Time Frame: Automated Mode compared to HypoProtect use during 70-minute exercise session and at 4-, 12-, and 24-hours post-exercise
Measure of device effectiveness
Automated Mode compared to HypoProtect use during 70-minute exercise session and at 4-, 12-, and 24-hours post-exercise
percent of time ≥ 250 mg/dL
Time Frame: Automated Mode compared to HypoProtect use during 70-minute exercise session and at 4-, 12-, and 24-hours post-exercise
Measure of device effectiveness
Automated Mode compared to HypoProtect use during 70-minute exercise session and at 4-, 12-, and 24-hours post-exercise
percent of time ≥ 300 mg/dL
Time Frame: Automated Mode compared to HypoProtect use during 70-minute exercise session and at 4-, 12-, and 24-hours post-exercise
Measure of device effectiveness
Automated Mode compared to HypoProtect use during 70-minute exercise session and at 4-, 12-, and 24-hours post-exercise
percent of time < 70 mg/dL
Time Frame: Automated Mode compared to HypoProtect use during 70-minute exercise session and at 4-, 12-, and 24-hours post-exercise
Measure of device effectiveness
Automated Mode compared to HypoProtect use during 70-minute exercise session and at 4-, 12-, and 24-hours post-exercise
percent of time < 54 mg/dL
Time Frame: Automated Mode compared to HypoProtect use during 70-minute exercise session and at 4-, 12-, and 24-hours post-exercise
Measure of device effectiveness
Automated Mode compared to HypoProtect use during 70-minute exercise session and at 4-, 12-, and 24-hours post-exercise
Standard deviations
Time Frame: Automated Mode compared to HypoProtect use during 70-minute exercise session and at 4-, 12-, and 24-hours post-exercise
Glucose metric from study continuous glucose monitoring system (CGM)-measured glucose variability with the standard deviation (SD)
Automated Mode compared to HypoProtect use during 70-minute exercise session and at 4-, 12-, and 24-hours post-exercise
Coefficient of variation
Time Frame: Automated Mode compared to HypoProtect use during 70-minute exercise session and at 4-, 12-, and 24-hours post-exercise
Glucose metric from study continuous glucose monitoring system (CGM)-measured glucose variability with the coefficient of variation (CV)
Automated Mode compared to HypoProtect use during 70-minute exercise session and at 4-, 12-, and 24-hours post-exercise

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Sue Brown, MD, University of Virginia
  • Study Chair: Bruce Buckingham, MD, Stanford University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 30, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 22, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 12, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on Omnipod Horizon™ Automated Glucose Control System

3
Subscribe