Protocol for pragmatic randomised trial: integrating electronic health record-based behavioural economic 'nudges' into the electronic health record to reduce preoperative testing for patients undergoing cataract surgery

Alast Ahmadi, Andrea Sorensen, Chad Wes A Villaflores, John N Mafi, Sitaram S Vangala, Ira S Hofer, John D Bartlett, Eric M Cheng, Victor F Duval, Cheryl Damberg, David Elashoff, Noah J Goldstein, Joseph A Ladapo, James M Moore, Antonio M Pessegueiro, Suzanne B Shu, Samuel A Skootsky, Ashley Turner, Catherine A Sarkisian, Alast Ahmadi, Andrea Sorensen, Chad Wes A Villaflores, John N Mafi, Sitaram S Vangala, Ira S Hofer, John D Bartlett, Eric M Cheng, Victor F Duval, Cheryl Damberg, David Elashoff, Noah J Goldstein, Joseph A Ladapo, James M Moore, Antonio M Pessegueiro, Suzanne B Shu, Samuel A Skootsky, Ashley Turner, Catherine A Sarkisian

Abstract

Introduction: Robust randomised trial data have shown that routine preoperative (pre-op) testing for cataract surgery patients is inappropriate. While guidelines have discouraged testing since 2002, cataract pre-op testing rates have remained unchanged since the 1990s. Given the challenges of reducing low-value care despite strong consensus around the evidence, innovative approaches are needed to promote high-value care. This trial evaluates the impact of an interdisciplinary electronic health record (EHR) intervention that is informed by behavioural economic theory.

Methods and analysis: This pragmatic randomised trial is being conducted at UCLA Health between June 2021 and June 2022 with a 12-month follow-up period. We are randomising all UCLA Health physicians who perform pre-op visits during the study period to one of the three nudge arms or usual care. These three nudge alerts address (1) patient harm, (2) increased out-of-pocket costs for patients and (3) psychological harm to the patients related to pre-op testing. The nudges are triggered when a physician starts to order a pre-op test. We hypothesise that receipt of a nudge will be associated with reduced pre-op testing. The primary outcome will be the change in the percentage of patients undergoing pre-op testing at 12 months. Secondary outcomes will include the percentage of patients undergoing specific categories of pre-op tests (labs, EKGs, chest X-rays (CXRs)), the efficacy of each nudge, same-day surgery cancellations and cost savings.

Ethics and dissemination: The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of the University of California, Los Angeles as well as a nominated Data Safety Monitoring Board. If successful, we will have created a tool that can be disseminated rapidly to EHR vendors across the nation to reduce inappropriate testing for the most common low-risk surgical procedures in the country.

Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04104256.

Keywords: anaesthesia in ophthalmology; cataract and refractive surgery; geriatric medicine; health economics; quality in health care.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Nudge 1, alert highlighting the safety/liability aspects of preoperative tests.ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists, AAO: American Academy of Ophthalmology, UCLA: University of California, Los Angeles.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Nudge 2, alert highlighting the financial benefits to the patient of not experiencing preoperative tests.ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists, AAO: American Academy of Ophthalmology, UCLA: University of California, Los Angeles.Disclaimer: the image in the figure does not depict a patient and is license-free.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Nudge 3, alert highlighting the psychological benefits to the patient of not experiencing preoperative tests.ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists, AAO: American Academy of Ophthalmology, UCLA: University of California, Los Angeles.Disclaimer: the image in the figure does not depict a patient and is license-free.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Randomisation strategy: Randomizing the UCLA Health physicians who perform pre-op testing to one of the three intervention arms or the usual care arm.

References

    1. Schein OD, Cassard SD, Tielsch JM, et al. . Cataract surgery among Medicare beneficiaries. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2012;19:257–64. 10.3109/09286586.2012.698692
    1. Fleisher LA, Fleischmann KE, Auerbach AD, et al. . 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American heart association Task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:e77–137. 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.944
    1. Cullen KA, Hall MJ, Golosinskiy A. Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 2006. National Health Statistics Reports 2009;11:1–25.
    1. Schein OD, Friedman DS, Fleisher LA. Anesthesia management during cataract surgery. Evid Rep Technol Assess 2000;16:1.
    1. Cavallini GM, Saccarola P, D'Amico R, et al. . Impact of preoperative testing on ophthalmologic and systemic outcomes in cataract surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol 2004;14:369–74. 10.1177/112067210401400502
    1. Chen CL, Lin GA, Bardach NS, et al. . Preoperative medical testing in Medicare patients undergoing cataract surgery. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1530–8. 10.1056/NEJMsa1410846
    1. Keay L, Lindsley K, Tielsch J, et al. . Routine preoperative medical testing for cataract surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;2019. 10.1002/14651858.CD007293.pub4
    1. Schein OD, Katz J, Bass EB, et al. . The value of routine preoperative medical testing before cataract surgery. New England Journal of Medicine 2000;342:168–75. 10.1056/NEJM200001203420304
    1. American Academy of Opthalmology . Routine preoperative laboratory testing for patients scheduled for cataract surgery, 2014. Available:
    1. Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters, Apfelbaum JL, Connis RT, et al. . Practice Advisory for preanesthesia evaluation: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task force on Preanesthesia evaluation. Anesthesiology 2012;116:522–38. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31823c1067
    1. NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement . Focus on: cataracts, best practice guidance, 2008. Available:
    1. Royal College of Ophthalmologists . Cataract surgery guidelines London, 2010. Available:
    1. Bass EB, Steinberg EP, Luthra R, et al. . Do ophthalmologists, anesthesiologists, and internists agree about preoperative testing in healthy patients undergoing cataract surgery? Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:1248–56. 10.1001/archopht.1995.01100100036025
    1. Mafi JN, Russell K, Bortz BA, et al. . Low-Cost, high-volume health services contribute the most to unnecessary health spending. Health Aff 2017;36:1701–4. 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0385
    1. McGinnis JM, Stuckhardt L, Saunders R, et al. . Best care at lower cost: the path to continuously learning health care in America. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, 2013.
    1. Olsen L, Saunders RS, Yong PL. The healthcare imperative: lowering costs and improving outcomes: workshop series summary. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, 2010.
    1. Chen CL, Clay TH, McLeod S, et al. . A revised estimate of costs associated with routine preoperative testing in Medicare cataract patients with a procedure-specific indicator. JAMA Ophthalmol 2018;136:231–8. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.6372
    1. Nagtegaal R, Tummers L, Noordegraaf M, et al. . Nudging healthcare professionals towards evidence-based medicine: a systematic scoping review. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration 2019;2. 10.30636/jbpa.22.71
    1. Wang SY, Groene O. The effectiveness of behavioral economics-informed interventions on physician behavioral change: a systematic literature review. PLoS One 2020;15:e0234149. 10.1371/journal.pone.0234149
    1. Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. London: Penguin, 2009.
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, et al. . Spirit 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ 2013;346:e7586. 10.1136/bmj.e7586
    1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services . Clarifications to the ambulatory surgical center interpretive guidelines – comprehensive medical history and physical (H&P) assessment and anesthetic risk and evaluation, 2011. Available:
    1. The Joint Commission . Standards interpretation frequently asked questions: history and physical, 2017. Available:
    1. Steinberg EP, Javitt JC, Sharkey PD, et al. . The content and cost of cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:1041–9. 10.1001/archopht.1993.01090080037016
    1. Liao JM, Schapira MS, Navathe AS, et al. . The effect of emphasizing patient, societal, and institutional harms of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing on physician support of financial penalties: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2017;167:215–6. 10.7326/L17-0102
    1. Choosing Wisely®, American Academy of Ophthalmology . Five things physicians and patients should question, 2013. Available:
    1. Choosing Wisely®, American Society of Anesthesiologists . Five things physicians and patients should question, 2013. Available:
    1. Meeker D, Linder JA, Fox CR, et al. . Effect of behavioral interventions on inappropriate antibiotic prescribing among primary care practices: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2016;315:562–70. 10.1001/jama.2016.0275
    1. Mafi JN, Godoy-Travieso P, Wei E, et al. . Evaluation of an intervention to reduce low-value preoperative care for patients undergoing cataract surgery at a safety-net health system. JAMA Intern Med 2019;179:648–57. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.8358
    1. Rumball-Smith J, Shekelle PG, Bates DW. Using the electronic health record to understand and minimize overuse. JAMA 2017;317:257–8. 10.1001/jama.2016.18609

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren