Using Behavioral Economics to Reduce Low-Value Care

January 18, 2024 updated by: Catherine A. Sarkisian, University of California, Los Angeles

Pragmatic Trial of an Electronic Health Record/Behavioral Economics Intervention to Reduce Pre-Operative Testing for Cataract Surgery

There is strong consensus - based on robust randomized trial data - that routine pre-operative (pre-op) testing for cataract surgery is inappropriate. Despite these widely endorsed evidence-based recommendations, most seniors undergoing cataract surgery still receive unnecessary blood testing, EKGs, and chest X-rays (CXRs); another substantial percentage even undergo nonindicated cardiac stress tests. We will integrate three new best practice alert (BPA) nudges into the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Health electronic health record (EHR). The nudges are informed by behavioral economic theory and are designed to alter the choice architecture for physicians to decrease the rate of pre-op test ordering while still preserving clinician autonomy. We will conduct a pragmatic trial to evaluate whether these BPA nudges reduce low-value pre-op testing for cataract surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There is strong consensus - based on robust randomized trial data - that routine pre-operative (pre-op) testing for cataract surgery is inappropriate (Keay et al, 2009; Keay et al, 2012; Schein et al, 2000; Chen et al, 2015). Because pre-op testing provides no benefit to patients, the American Academy of Ophthalmology named reducing routine pre-op testing for cataract surgery the #1 issue that patients and physicians should question as part of the Choosing Wisely™ campaign (Schein et al, 2012). Despite these widely endorsed evidence-based recommendations, most seniors undergoing cataract surgery still receive unnecessary blood testing, EKGs, and chest X-rays (CXRs); another substantial percentage even undergo non-indicated cardiac stress tests (Rumball-Smith et al, 2017).

With cataract surgery being the most common medical procedure among Medicare beneficiaries (predicted 4.4 million per year by the year 2030) (Schein et al, 2012), widespread reduction of routine pre-op testing for cataract surgery would reduce costs, reduce exposure to unnecessary and potentially harmful tests, and allow millions of seniors to spend more time enjoying life rather than wasting their time receiving inappropriate health care.

The investigators hypothesize that an interdisciplinary electronic health record (EHR)-based intervention that applies behavioral economics approaches (i.e., "nudges") will dramatically reduce pre-op testing for cataract surgery in a real-world clinical setting. The investigators propose to test this hypothesis by conducting a pragmatic randomized trial, implementing this intervention at UCLA Health (Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center), where ~3200 cataract surgeries are performed per year. The specific aims are to:

  1. Integrate three new BPA nudges into the UCLA Health EHR. The investigators will conduct a four-arm randomized pragmatic trial to compare the effectiveness of the nudges vs. usual care. Three distinct nudges were tailored to highlight the safety aspects of pre-op tests, the financial harms to the patient of experiencing pre-op tests, and the potential psychological harms to the patient of experiencing preop tests. The pragmatic trial will include three types of behavioral nudges to promote the desired reduction in low value care:

    Nudge 1:

    • UCLA Ophthalmologists and Anesthesiologists ADVISE AGAINST routine pre-op testing.
    • UCLA Pre-op Eval and Planning Center (PEPC) will order any needed labs on the day of surgery.
    • Routine pre-op tests are inappropriate.
    • Routine pre-op tests do NOT increase patient safety and go AGAINST local and national guidelines
    • Hard stop before allowing the ordering of a pre-op test where physicians must provide accountable justification: "EXPLAIN WHY GOING AGAINST GUIDELINES"

    Nudge 2:

    • UCLA Ophthalmologists and Anesthesiologists ADVISE AGAINST routine pre-op testing.
    • UCLA Pre-op Eval and Planning Center (PEPC) will order any needed labs on the day of surgery.
    • Routine pre-op tests are inappropriate.
    • Routine pre-operative tests can increase the patient's out-of-pocket costs without improving the safety or medical outcomes of cataract surgery and go AGAINST local and national guidelines
    • Hard stop before allowing the ordering of a pre-op test where physicians must provide accountable justification: "EXPLAIN WHY GOING AGAINST GUIDELINES"

    Nudge 3:

    • UCLA Ophthalmologists and Anesthesiologists ADVISE AGAINST routine pre-op testing.
    • UCLA Pre-op Eval and Planning Center (PEPC) will order any needed labs on the day of surgery.
    • Routine pre-op tests are inappropriate.
    • Routine pre-operative tests can cause aggravation and psychological stress for the patient without improving the safety or medical outcomes of cataract surgery and go AGAINST local and national guidelines
    • Hard stop before allowing the ordering of a pre-op test where physicians must provide accountable justification: "EXPLAIN WHY GOING AGAINST GUIDELINES"
  2. Randomize providers who conducted a pre-op visit in 2019 and those who are expected to conduct such a visit during the 12-month study period to one of 4 study arms (usual pre-op care, Nudge #1, Nudge #2, or Nudge #3) and measure and compare the efficacy of each intervention. The investigators will measure and compare rates of testing before and after initiation of the randomization. Outcomes will be measured 12-months after the intervention start date.

For the primary outcome, we will assess the change in the percentage of cataract patients who undergo one or more pre-op tests after 12 months, where the baseline comparison will be 2019. While we intended to the 12-month pre-period as the baseline, the COVID-19 pandemic had a substantial impact on cataract surgeries. We will compare the percentage of patients receiving pre-op testing in the pooled nudge arms to the usual care arm (primary outcome) and measure the efficacy of each individual nudge arm to determine whether certain behavioral economic framing techniques are more effective than others at reducing pre-op testing (secondary outcomes). Other secondary outcomes will include the change in the percentage of patients who received pre-op labs, pre-op EKGs, and pre-op CXRs. We will also evaluate the total number of pre-op tests patients received, same-day surgery cancellations, cost savings to the health system, and cost savings to the patient. To elicit the views and experiences of physicians, we will survey physicians randomized to all intervention arms to evaluate their experience with the EHR alerts.

Reducing patient exposure to unnecessary care is central to improving patient outcomes and value. This project is fully aligned with UCLA Health leadership's current priority of supporting cross-departmental system change to improve quality of care, outcomes, and value for UCLA patients. Because of the close partnership between our UCLA Informatics co-Investigators and the EHR vendor (Epic), the low-cost intervention that we propose to implement and test will be easily disseminatable to all Epic-based health systems, and will have the potential to dramatically reduce inappropriate pre-op testing across the nation.

EHRs are in their infancy, and the scientific community is only beginning to learn how to use them as tools to promote desired care processes (Meeker et al, 2016). This proposed pragmatic trial would break new ground in our understanding of how behavioral economics approaches can be used to tamp down on care that does not promote better patient outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • UCLA Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient at UCLA undergoing cataract surgery, and receives pre-operative evaluation at UCLA Health

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cataract surgery patients who get their pre-operative evaluation from non-UCLA physicians

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Alert 1
Pre-op clinic physicians will be confronted with nudge #1 if they attempt to place an order for a pre-op test during the pre-op encounter.

Nudge 1:

  • UCLA Ophthalmologists and Anesthesiologists ADVISE AGAINST routine pre-op testing.
  • UCLA Pre-op Eval and Planning Center (PEPC) will order any needed labs on the day of surgery.
  • Routine pre-op tests are inappropriate.
  • Routine pre-op tests do NOT increase patient safety and go AGAINST local and national guidelines Hard stop before allowing the ordering of a pre-op test where physicians must provide accountable justification: "EXPLAIN WHY GOING AGAINST GUIDELINES"
Experimental: Alert 2
Pre-op clinic physicians will be confronted with nudge #1 if they attempt to place an order for a pre-op test during the pre-op encounter.

Nudge #2:

  • UCLA Ophthalmologists and Anesthesiologists ADVISE AGAINST routine pre-op testing.
  • UCLA Pre-op Eval and Planning Center (PEPC) will order any needed labs on the day of surgery.
  • Routine pre-op tests are inappropriate.
  • Routine pre-operative tests can increase the patient's out-of-pocket costs without improving the safety or medical outcomes of cataract surgery and go AGAINST local and national guidelines
  • Nudge includes "hard stop" before allowing the ordering of a pre-op test where physicians must provide accountable justification: "EXPLAIN WHY GOING AGAINST GUIDELINES"
Experimental: Alert 3
Pre-op clinic physicians will be confronted with nudge #1 if they attempt to place an order for a pre-op test during the pre-op encounter.

Nudge 3:

  • UCLA Ophthalmologists and Anesthesiologists ADVISE AGAINST routine pre-op testing.
  • UCLA Pre-op Eval and Planning Center (PEPC) will order any needed labs on the day of surgery.
  • Routine pre-op tests are inappropriate.
  • Routine pre-operative tests can cause aggravation and psychological stress for the patient without improving the safety or medical outcomes of cataract surgery and go AGAINST local and national guidelines
  • Hard stop before allowing the ordering of a pre-op test where physicians must provide accountable justification: "EXPLAIN WHY GOING AGAINST GUIDELINES"
Experimental: Control
Pre-op clinic physicians will not receive interventions and perform duties as usual.
Patients will receive usual care from their physicians.
Other Names:
  • Control

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pre-Operative Testing Change
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months
Change in percentage of patients undergoing pre-operative testing (labs, EKG, CXR)
Baseline, 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pre-Operative Testing Change
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 month
Efficacy of each individual nudge arm compared with usual care to determine whether certain behavioral economic framing techniques are more effective than others at reducing pre-op testing.
Baseline, 12 month
Pre-Operative Testing Change for Specific Categories of Tests
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months
Change in the percentage of patients who received pre-op labs, pre-op EKGs, and pre-op chest x-rays (CXRs).
Baseline, 12 months
Physician Experience Survey Results
Time Frame: 12 months
Perceived change in workflow, autonomy, satisfaction (Modified Survey)
12 months
System-level Change - Surgery Cancellations
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months
Analysis of day of surgery cancellations
Baseline, 12 months
System-level Change - Cost Savings
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months
Analysis of costs saved
Baseline, 12 months
System-level Change - Return on Investment
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months
Analysis of cost savings to the health system assuming a reduction of tests being ordered
Baseline, 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Catherine A Sarkisian, MD, MSPH, University of California, Los Angeles

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 24, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 11, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 24, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R01AG059815-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • 5R01AG059815 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pre-Operative Testing for Cataract Surgery

Clinical Trials on Usual Care

Subscribe