Multimodal Balance Training Supported by Rhythmic Auditory Stimuli in Parkinson Disease: Effects in Freezers and Nonfreezers

Tamine T C Capato, Nienke M de Vries, Joanna IntHout, Jordache Ramjith, Egberto R Barbosa, Jorik Nonnekes, Bastiaan R Bloem, Tamine T C Capato, Nienke M de Vries, Joanna IntHout, Jordache Ramjith, Egberto R Barbosa, Jorik Nonnekes, Bastiaan R Bloem

Abstract

Objective: To fulfill the potential of nonpharmacological interventions for people with Parkinson disease (PD), individually tailored treatment is needed. Multimodal balance training supported by rhythmic auditory stimuli (RAS) can improve balance and gait in people with PD. The purpose of this study was to determine whether both freezers and nonfreezers benefit.

Methods: A secondary analysis was conducted on a large randomized controlled trial that included 154 patients with PD (Hoehn & Yahr Stages 1-3 while ON-medication) who were assigned randomly to 3 groups: (1) multimodal balance training with RAS delivered by a metronome (RAS-supported multimodal balance training); (2) regular multimodal balance training without rhythmic auditory cues; and (3) a control intervention (involving an educational program). Training was performed for 5 weeks, twice per week. The primary outcome was the Mini-BESTest score directly after the training period. Assessments were performed by a single, masked assessor at baseline, directly postintervention, and after 1-month and 6-month follow-up. Outcomes were analyzed in 1 analysis, and the results were presented separately for freezers and nonfreezers with a linear mixed model, adjusted for baseline Mini-BESTest scores, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale scores, and levodopa equivalent dose.

Results: In both freezers and nonfreezers, both RAS-supported multimodal training and regular training significantly improved the Mini-BESTest scores compared with baseline scores and with the control group scores. The improvement was larger for RAS-supported training compared with regular training, for both freezers and nonfreezers. Only the RAS-supported training group retained the improvements compared with baseline measurements at 6-month follow-up, and this was true for both freezers and nonfreezers.

Conclusions: RAS-supported multimodal training is effective in improving balance performance in both freezers and nonfreezers.

Impact: Until this study, it was unknown whether both freezers and nonfreezers could benefit from multimodal balance training. With this information, clinicians who work with people with PD will be better able to apply personalized gait rehabilitation.

Lay summary: Adding rhythmic auditory stimuli (RAS) to balance training is beneficial for both freezers and nonfreezers, at least in persons with mild to moderate disease stages. This RAS-supported multimodal training has good potential for a wider clinical implementation with good long-term effects.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02488265.

© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Physical Therapy Association.

Figures

Figure
Figure
Mini-BESTest, New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire, and Timed Up and Go Test at each test visit. The blue line represents multimodal balance training supported by rhythmical auditory stimuli (RAS-supported), the dark-blue line represents multimodal balance training without RAS (regular), and the gray line represents the control intervention group. Error bars represent the 95% CIs.

References

    1. Bloem BR, Ypinga JHL, Willis A, et al. . Using medical claims analyses to understand interventions for Parkinson patients. J Parkinsons Dis. 2018;8:45–58.
    1. Bloem BR, de Vries NM, Ebersbach G. Nonpharmacological treatments for patients with Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2015;30:1504–1520.
    1. Fox SH, Katzenschlager R, Lim SY, et al. . International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society evidence-based medicine review: update on treatments for the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2018;33:1248–1266.
    1. Keus S, Munneke M, Graziano M, et al. . European physiotherapy guideline for Parkinson’s disease. The Netherlands: ParkinsonNet; 2014.
    1. Schenkman M, Moore CG, Kohrt WM, et al. . Effect of high-intensity treadmill exercise on motor symptoms in patients with de novo Parkinson disease: a phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75:219–226.
    1. Conradsson D, Lofgren N, Nero H, et al. . The effects of highly challenging balance training in elderly with Parkinson's disease: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29:827–836.
    1. Mak MK, Wong-Yu IS, Shen X, Chung CL. Long-term effects of exercise and physical therapy in people with Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017;13:689–703.
    1. Capato TTC, de Vries NM, IntHout J, Barbosa ER, Nonnekes J, Bloem BR. Multimodal balance training supported by rhythmical auditory stimuli in Parkinson's disease: a randomized clinical trial. J Parkinsons Dis. 2020;10:333–346.
    1. Nonnekes J, Nieuwboer A. Towards personalized rehabilitation for gait impairments in Parkinson's disease. J Parkinsons Dis. 2018;8:S101–S106.
    1. Ginis P, Heremans E, Ferrari A, Bekkers EMJ, Canning CG, Nieuwboer A. External input for gait in people with Parkinson's disease with and without freezing of gait: one size does not fit all. J Neurol. 2017;264:1488–1496.
    1. Strouwen C, Molenaar E, Munks L, et al. . Training dual tasks together or apart in Parkinson's disease: results from the DUALITY trial. Move Disord. 2017;32:1201–1210.
    1. Arias P, Cudeiro J. Effect of rhythmic auditory stimulation on gait in Parkinsonian patients with and without freezing of gait. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9675.
    1. Bekkers EMJ, Mirelman A, Alcock L, et al. . Do patients with Parkinson's disease with freezing of gait respond differently than those without to treadmill training augmented by virtual reality? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2020;34:440–449.
    1. Capato T, Tornai J, Avila P, Barbosa ER, Piemonte ME. Randomized controlled trial protocol: balance training with rhythmical cues to improve and maintain balance control in Parkinson's disease. BMC Neurol. 2015;15:162.
    1. Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992;55:181–184.
    1. Hoehn MM, Yahr MD. Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality. Neurology. 1967;17:427–442.
    1. Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ. The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40:922–935.
    1. Nieuwboer A, Rochester L, Herman T, et al. . Reliability of the new freezing of gait questionnaire: agreement between patients with Parkinson's disease and their carers. Gait Posture. 2009;30:459–463.
    1. Snijders AH, Haaxma CA, Hagen YJ, Munneke M, Bloem BR. Freezer or non-freezer: clinical assessment of freezing of gait. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012;18:149–154.
    1. Capato TTC, Domingos JMM, de Almeida LRS. Versão em Português da Diretriz Europeia de Fisioterapia para a Doença de Parkinson. 1st ed. São Paulo, Brazil: Omni Farma; 2015.
    1. Versão em Português da Diretriz Europeia de Fisioterapia para a Doença de Parkinson. Informações para pessoas com doença de Parkinson [press release]. São Paulo, Brazil: Omni Farma; 2016.
    1. Franchignoni F, Horak F, Godi M, Nardone A, Giordano A. Using psychometric techniques to improve the balance evaluation systems test: the mini-BESTest. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42:323–331.
    1. King L, Horak F. On the mini-BESTest: scoring and the reporting of total scores. Phys Ther. 2013;93:571–575.
    1. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The Timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39:142–148.
    1. Lim I, van Wegen E, de Goede C, et al. . Effects of external rhythmical cueing on gait in patients with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:695–713.
    1. Nieuwboer A, Kwakkel G, Rochester L, et al. . Cueing training in the home improves gait-related mobility in Parkinson's disease: the RESCUE trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78:134–140.
    1. Mancini M, Bloem BR, Horak FB, Lewis SJG, Nieuwboer A, Nonnekes J. Clinical and methodological challenges for assessing freezing of gait: future perspectives. Move Disord. 2019;34:783-790.
    1. Hulzinga F, Nieuwboer A, Dijkstra BW, et al. . The new freezing of gait questionnaire: unsuitable as an outcome in clinical trials? Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2020;7:199–205.
    1. Huang SL, Hsieh CL, Wu RM, Tai CH, Lin CH, Lu WS. Minimal detectable change of the Timed “Up & Go” test and the dynamic gait index in people with Parkinson disease. Phys Ther. 2011;91:114–121.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren