Intravenous Golimumab in Patients with Polyarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Juvenile Psoriatic Arthritis and Subcutaneous Ustekinumab in Patients with Juvenile Psoriatic Arthritis: Extrapolation of Data from Studies in Adults and Adjacent Pediatric Populations

Jocelyn H Leu, Natalie J Shiff, Michael Clark, Karen Bensley, Kathleen G Lomax, Katherine Berezny, Robert M Nelson, Honghui Zhou, Zhenhua Xu, Jocelyn H Leu, Natalie J Shiff, Michael Clark, Karen Bensley, Kathleen G Lomax, Katherine Berezny, Robert M Nelson, Honghui Zhou, Zhenhua Xu

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the extrapolation approaches used to support intravenous (IV) golimumab for polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA) and juvenile psoriatic arthritis (jPsA) and subcutaneous (SC) ustekinumab for jPsA.

Methods: Pharmacokinetic, clinical response, and safety data from trials of IV golimumab and SC ustekinumab in polyarticular-course JIA (pc-JIA) (GO-VIVA) or pediatric psoriasis (PsO) (CADMUS and CADMUS Jr) and data from pivotal, phase 3 trials of these agents in adults with similar diseases were used to support extrapolation in pJIA and jPsA. In the phase 3 GO-VIVA trial, patients with pc-JIA aged 2 to < 18 years received IV golimumab 80 mg/m2 at weeks 0, 4, then every 8 weeks (Q8W). In the phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled CADMUS trial, patients with PsO aged ≥ 12 to < 18 years received ustekinumab at weeks 0, 4, then Q12W. In the phase 3 CADMUS Jr trial, patients with PsO aged ≥ 6 to < 12 years received ustekinumab at weeks 0, 4, then Q12W. The ustekinumab analyses used data only from patients who received the standard ustekinumab dosing regimen (≤ 60 kg: 0.75 mg/kg; > 60 to ≤ 100 kg: 45 mg; > 100 kg: 90 mg).

Results: In the 127 patients with pc-JIA treated with IV golimumab (GO-VIVA), pharmacokinetic and exposure-response results were similar to those in adults with rheumatoid arthritis treated with IV golimumab. Additionally, pharmacokinetic and clinical response data from five patients with jPsA in GO-VIVA were comparable to those in adults with PsA treated with IV golimumab. No new safety signals were observed in GO-VIVA. Pharmacokinetic and clinical response data observed in the four pediatric patients with PsO and jPsA treated with ustekinumab in CADMUS and CADMUS Jr were similar to those in the 91 pediatric patients with PsO without jPsA in these trials and to those in adults with PsA treated with ustekinumab. Safety was extrapolated from CADMUS or CADMUS Jr; no new signals were observed.

Conclusions: These three sets of analyses corroborate similar exposure and efficacy of IV golimumab in pediatric patients with pc-JIA or jPsA and SC ustekinumab in patients with jPsA to support extrapolation of established adult efficacy. The overall safety profiles of IV golimumab in pediatric patients with pc-JIA or jPsA and SC ustekinumab in pediatric patients with PsO with or without jPsA were consistent with the safety profiles of these agents in the context of their clinical programs and cumulative use. Based on these analyses, the US Food and Drug Administration approved IV golimumab for polyarticular JIA and active PsA in patients 2 years and older and SC ustekinumab for pediatric PsA in patients 6 years and older, highlighting how use of an extrapolation approach can help streamline drug development for pediatric patient populations in whom larger clinical trials are not feasible.

Clinical trial registration: GO-VIVA (NCT02277444) was registered at clinicaltrials.gov on 29 October 2014; CADMUS (NCT01090427) was registered on 22 March 2010; and CADMUS Jr (NCT02698475) was registered on 3 March 2016.

Conflict of interest statement

Jocelyn H. Leu, Michael Clark, Karen Bensley, Kathleen G. Lomax, Katherine Berezny, and Zhenhua Xu are employees of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, and may own stock in Johnson & Johnson. Honghui Zhou was an employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, at the time the work was conducted and may own stock in Johnson & Johnson; Dr. Zhou is currently an employee at Elevar Therapeutics, Inc, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Natalie J. Shiff is an employee of Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson; received salary support from the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance within the past 3 years; and owns or has owned stock in AbbVie, Gilead, Iovance, Johnson & Johnson, Novo-Nordisc, and Pfizer within the past 3 years. Robert M. Nelson is an employee of Johnson & Johnson and owns stock in Johnson & Johnson.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Relationships among polyarticular JIA, adult RA, adult and juvenile PsA, and adult and pediatric PsO. Vertical purple arrows and solid lines indicate similarity of the pediatric and adult forms of each disease; blue solid and dotted boxes and arrows indicate adjacent pediatric (polyarticular JIA and jPsA) and adult (RA and PsA) diseases; green solid and dotted boxes and arrows indicate adjacent pediatric (jPsA and pediatric PsO) and adult (PsA and PsO) diseases. JIA juvenile idiopathic arthritis, jPsA, juvenile psoriatic arthritis, PsA psoriatic arthritis, PsO psoriasis, RA rheumatoid arthritis
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comparisons among a adult RA, pc-JIA, adult PsA, and jPsA clinical trial populations to support extrapolation of IV golimumab data for polyarticular JIA and jPsA and b adolescent PsO, pediatric PsO, adult PsO, adult PsA, and jPsA clinical trial populations to support extrapolation of ustekinumab data for jPsA. *Data from GO-LIVE were used only for comparison of ER analyses. Filled boxes indicate clinical trial(s) dedicated to the patient population indicated. Boxes with black outline indicate clinical trial(s) where the patient population was a subset of the trial(s). The overall GO-VIVA population was used to support IV golimumab for polyarticular JIA. Solid lines and arrows indicate direct comparisons of data. ER exposure-response, IV intravenous, JIA juvenile idiopathic arthritis, jPsA juvenile psoriatic arthritis, pc-JIA polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis, PK pharmacokinetics, PsA psoriatic arthritis, PsO psoriasis, RA rheumatoid arthritis, yrs years
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Exposure matching for IV golimumab for polyarticular JIA a observed Ctrough,ss golimumab concentrations in patients with pc-JIA (GO-VIVA) at week 28 and adults with RA (GO-FURTHER) at weeks 20 and 36, and b model-predicted serum golimumab AUCss over an 8-week dosing interval at week 28 in patients with pc-JIA (GO-VIVA) and adults with RA (GO-FURTHER). Horizontal line within box = median; lower edge of box = first quartile; upper edge of box = third quartile; ends of whiskers represent ± 1.5 × IQR. AUCss steady-state area under the concentration-time curve, Ctrough,ss steady-state trough concentration, IQR interquartile range, IV intravenous, JIA juvenile idiopathic arthritis, pc-JIA polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis, RA rheumatoid arthritis
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Efficacy responses by golimumab steady-state trough concentration quartiles in adults with RA from GO-FURTHER (week 20) and GO-LIVE (week 24) and pediatric patients with pc-JIA from GO-VIVA (week 20) a ACR20 and JIA ACR30 response rates, and percent change from baseline in b tender joint count, c swollen joint count, d patient assessment of disease activity, e physician assessment of disease activity, and f patient assessment of physical function. Circle within box = median; lower edge of box = first quartile; upper edge of box = third quartile; ends of whiskers represent ± 1.5 × IQR. ACR20 ≥ 20% improvement from baseline in tender and swollen joint counts and ≥ 20% improvement in three of the five other core set measures. JIA ACR30 = ≥ 30% improvement from baseline in three components, without worsening of ≥ 30% in > one of the remaining JIA core measures. Patients missing data for all components of the composite endpoint were considered nonresponders. Last observation carried forward was used to impute the composite endpoint when ≥ one of the component values was missing. ACR American College of Rheumatology, Ctrough,ss steady-state trough concentration, JIA juvenile idiopathic arthritis, pc-JIA polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis, Q quartile, RA rheumatoid arthritis
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Exposure matching for IV golimumab for jPsA. a Observed steady-state serum trough golimumab concentrations in patients from GO-VIVA with jPsA, pc-JIA (excluding jPsA), and pc-JIA (overall) at weeks 28 and 52, and b observed steady-state serum trough golimumab concentrations in patients with jPsA (GO-VIVA) and adults with PsA (GO-VIBRANT) at weeks 28 (jPsA), 36 (adult PsA), and 52 (both populations). *pc-JIA population excluding patients with jPsA. †Week 28 for jPsA and week 36 for adult PsA. Horizontal line within box = median; lower edge of box = first quartile; upper edge of box = third quartile; whiskers represent fifth and 95th percentiles. Ctrough,ss steady-state trough concentration, IV intravenous, jPsA juvenile psoriatic arthritis, pc-JIA polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis, PsA psoriatic arthritis, W week
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Clinical response rates among patients with jPsA (GO-VIVA) and adults with PsA (GO-VIBRANT) through week 52 a JIA ACR30 versus ACR20, b JIA ACR50 versus ACR50, c JIA ACR70 versus ACR70, and d JIA ACR90 versus ACR90. Adult PsA population included only adults with baseline methotrexate use. Proportions of JIA ACR and ACR responders are based on imputed data using last observation carried forward and nonresponder imputation. ACR20/50/70/90 = ≥ 20%/50%/70%/90% improvement from baseline in ACR criteria. JIA ACR30/50/70/90 = ≥ 30%/50%/70%/90% improvement from baseline in three components, without worsening of ≥ 30%/50%/70%/90% in > one of the remaining JIA core measures. ACR American College of Rheumatology, JIA juvenile idiopathic arthritis, jPsA juvenile psoriatic arthritis, PsA psoriatic arthritis
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Observed serum ustekinumab Ctrough,ss through week 52 in a adults with PsO (PSTELLAR) or PsA (PSUMMIT-1) and b adults with PsA (PSUMMIT-1) and pediatric patients with PsO with or without jPsA (CADMUS and CADMUS Jr). Horizontal line within box = median; diamond = mean; lower edge of box = first quartile; upper edge of box = third quartile; ends of whiskers represent ±1.5 × IQR. Adult PsO and PsA populations included only adults who received the ustekinumab 45 mg dose regimen. Pediatric PsO with or without jPsA populations included only pediatric patients assigned to the standard dose treatment group and who received the standard dose regimen at 0.75 mg/kg or 45 mg. Ctrough,ss steady-state trough concentration, jPsA juvenile psoriatic arthritis, PsA psoriatic arthritis, PsO psoriasis, w/o without
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
PASI75 response rates through week 52 in pediatric patients with PsO and jPsA (CADMUS and CADMUS Jr) and in adults with PsA (PSUMMIT-1). Pediatric patients with PsO and jPsA (CADMUS and CADMUS Jr) included patients in the randomized set (CADMUS) or full analysis set (CADMUS Jr) assigned to the standard dose regimen (0.75 mg/kg or 45 mg). Data for this population were imputed using last observation carried forward or nonresponder imputation after treatment failure rules were applied. Adults with PsA (PSUMMIT-1) included patients in the randomized set as per study protocol who received ustekinumab 45 mg. In this population, PASI response was evaluated only in patients with ≥ 3% of body surface area affected by PsO at baseline, and data were imputed using nonresponder imputation on PASI response parameters after treatment failure rules were applied. Treatment failure rules for all studies were initiation of therapies not allowed per protocol or discontinuation of study drugs due to inadequate efficacy or adverse event of worsening disease. PASI75 = ≥ 75% improvement from baseline in PASI score. jPsA juvenile psoriatic arthritis, NE not evaluated, PASI Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, PsA psoriatic arthritis, PsO psoriasis

References

    1. Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA). 2003:Pub L No. 108-55.
    1. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH E11A: Pediatric extrapolation. April 4, 2022. Available at: . Accessed 6 Apr 2022.
    1. Petty RE, Southwood TR, Manners P, Baum J, Glass DN, Goldenberg J, He X, Maldonado-Cocco J, Orozco-Alcala J, Prieur AM, Suarez-Almazor ME, Woo P, International League of Associations for Rheumatology International League of Associations for Rheumatology classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: second revision, Edmonton, 2001. J Rheumatol. 2004;31:390–392.
    1. Ringold S, Angeles-Han ST, Beukelman T, Lovell DJ, Cuello CA, Becker ML, Colbert RA, Feldman BM, Ferguson PJ, Gewanter HL, Guzman J, Horonjeff J, Nigrovic PA, Ombrello M, Passo M, Stoll ML, Rabinovich CE, Schneider R, Halyabar O, Hays K, Shah AA, Sullivan N, Szymanski AM, Turgunbaev M, Turner A, Reston J. 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation Guideline for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: therapeutic approaches for non-systemic polyarthritis, sacroiliitis, and enthesitis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71:846–863. doi: 10.1002/art.40884.
    1. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on clinical investigation of medicinal products for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. EMA/CHMP/239770/2014 Rev 2. November 19, 2015. . Accessed 29 Mar 2022.
    1. Prakken B, Albani S, Martini A. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Lancet. 2011;377:2138–2149. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60244-4.
    1. Thierry S, Fautrel B, Lemelle I, Guillemin F. Prevalence and incidence of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review. Jt Bone Spine. 2014;81:112–117. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2013.09.003.
    1. Brunner HI, Schanberg LE, Kimura Y, Dennos A, Co DO, Colbert RA, Fuhlbrigge R, Goldmuntz E, Kingsbury DJ, Patty-Resk C, Mintz S, Onel K, Rider LG, Schneider R, Watts A, von Scheven E, Lovell DJ, Beukelman T, PRCSG Advisory Council and the CARRA Registry Investigators New medications are needed for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020;72:1945–1951. doi: 10.1002/art.41390.
    1. Aggarwal R, Ringold S, Khanna D, Neogi T, Johnson SR, Miller A, Brunner HI, Ogawa R, Felson D, Ogdie A, Aletaha D, Feldman BM. Distinctions between diagnostic and classification criteria? Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015;67:891–897. doi: 10.1002/acr.22583.
    1. Nigrovic PA, Colbert RA, Holers VM, Ozen S, Ruperto N, Thompson SD, Wedderburn LR, Yeung RSM, Martini A. Biological classification of childhood arthritis: roadmap to a molecular nomenclature. Nat Rev. 2021;17:257–269.
    1. Martini A, Ravelli A, Avcin T, Beresford MW, Burgos-Vargas R, Cuttica R, Ilowite NT, Khubchandani R, Laxer RM, Lovell DJ, Petty RE, Wallace CA, Wulffraat NM, Pistorio A, Ruperto N, for the Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization (PRINTO) Toward new classification criteria for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: first steps, pediatric rheumatology international trials organization international consensus. J Rheumatol. 2019;46:190–197. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.180168.
    1. Stefanska AM, Distlerová D, Musaus J, Olski TM, Dunder K, Salmonson T, Mentzer D, Müller-Berghaus J, Hemmings R, Veselý R. Extrapolation in the development of paediatric medicines: examples from approvals for biological treatments for paediatric chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Arch Dis Child. 2017;102:952–957. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-312259.
    1. Stoll ML, Punaro M. Psoriatic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a tale of two subgroups. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2011;23:437–443. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e328348b278.
    1. Zisman D, Stoll ML, Butbul Aviel Y, Mellins ED. Juvenile psoriatic arthritis: a report from the GRAPPA 2017 annual meeting. J Rheumatol Suppl. 2018;94:11–16. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.180131.
    1. United States Food and Drug Administration. Accelerating drug development for polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA). October 2, 2019. . Accessed 16 Mar 2022.
    1. Singh R, Ivaturi VD, Penzenstadler J, Liu T, Chen J, Marathe A, Ji P, Glaser R, Nikolov N, Sahajwalla C. Response similarity assessment between polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis and adult rheumatoid arthritis for biologics. Clin Pharm Ther. 2021;110:98–107. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2218.
    1. Ruperto N, Brunner HI, Lovell DJ, Martini A, for the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) and the Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group (PRCSG) Extrapolation or controlled trials in paediatrics: the current dilemma. Arch Dis Child. 2017;102:949–951. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-312994.
    1. United States Food and Drug Administration. NDA/BLA multi-disciplinary review and evaluation, BLA 25433, Supplement 30, IV golimumab (Simponi Aria) for pJIA. October 12, 2018. . Accessed 18 July 2022.
    1. Ruperto N, Brunner HI, Pacheco-Tena C, Louw I, Vega-Cornejo G, Spindler AJ, Kingsbury DJ, Schmeling H, Borzutzky A, Cuttica R, Inman CJ, Malievskiy V, Scott C, Keltsev V, Terreri MT, Viola DO, Xavier RM, Pedrosa Fernandes TA, del Rocío Maldonado Velázquez M, Henrickson M, Clark MB, Bensley KA, Li X, Lo KH, Leu JH, Hsu C-H, Hsia EC, Xu Z, Martini A, Lovell DJ, for the Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group (PRCSG) and the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) Open-label phase 3 study of intravenous golimumab in patients with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatology. 2021;60:4495–4507. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab021.
    1. Weinblatt ME, Bingham CO, III, Mendelsohn AM, Kim L, Mack M, Lu J, Baker D, Westhovens R. Intravenous golimumab is effective in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy with responses as early as week 2: results of the phase 3, randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled GO-FURTHER trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:381–389. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201411.
    1. Kremer J, Ritchlin C, Mendelsohn A, Baker D, Kim L, Xu Z, Han J, Taylor P. Golimumab, a new human anti-tumor necrosis factor α antibody, administered intravenously in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: forty-eight-week efficacy and safety results of a phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:917–928. doi: 10.1002/art.27348.
    1. Kavanaugh A, Husni ME, Harrison DD, Kim L, Lo KH, Leu JH, Hsia EC. Safety and efficacy of intravenous golimumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69:2151–2161. doi: 10.1002/art.40226.
    1. Landells I, Marano C, Hsu M-C, Li S, Zhu Y, Eichenfield LF, Hoeger PH, Menter A, Paller AS, Taieb A, Philipp S, Szapary P, Randazzo B. Ustekinumab in adolescent patients age 12 to 17 years with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: results of the randomized phase 3 CADMUS study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73:594–603. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.07.002.
    1. Philipp S, Menter A, Nikkels AF, Barber K, Landells I, Eichenfield LF, Song M, Randazzo B, Li S, Hsu M-C, Zhu Y, DePrimo S, Paller AS. Ustekinumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in paediatric patients (≥6 to <12 years of age): efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetic and biomarker results from the open-label CADMUS Jr study. Br J Dermatol. 2020;183:664–672. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19018.
    1. McInnes IB, Kavanaugh A, Gottlieb AB, Puig L, Rahman P, Ritchlin C, Brodmerkel C, Li S, Wang Y, Mendelsohn AM, Doyle MK, on behalf of the PSUMMIT 1 Study Group Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: 1 year results of the phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled PSUMMIT 1 trial. Lancet. 2013;382:780–789. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60594-2.
    1. Ritchlin C, Rahman P, Kavanaugh A, McInnes IB, Puig L, Li S, Wang Y, Shen Y-K, Doyle MK, Mendelsohn AM, Gottlieb AB, on behalf of the PSUMMIT 2 Study Group Efficacy and safety of the anti-IL-12/23 p40 monoclonal antibody, ustekinumab, in patients with active psoriatic arthritis despite conventional non-biological and biological anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy: 6-month and 1-year results of the phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised PSUMMIT 2 trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:990–999. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204655.
    1. Blauvelt A, Ferris LK, Yamauchi PS, Qureshi A, Leonardi CL, Farahi K, Fakharzadeh S, Hsu MC, Li S, Chevrier M, Smith K, Goyal K, Chen Y, Muñoz-Elías EJ, Callis DK. Extension of ustekinumab maintenance dosing interval in moderate-to-severe psoriasis: results of a phase IIIb, randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled, multicentre study (PSTELLAR) Br J Dermatol. 2017;177:1552–1561. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15722.
    1. World Medical Association World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Am Med Assoc. 2013;310:2191–2194. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
    1. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Integrated addendum to ICH E6(R1): guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6(R2). 2016. Available at: . Accessed 16 Mar 2022.
    1. Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Boers M, Bombardier C, Furst D, Goldsmith C, Katz LM, Lightfoot R, Jr, Paulus H, Strand V, Tugwell P, Weinblatt M, Williams HJ, Wolfe F, Kieszak S. American College of Rheumatology preliminary definition of improvement in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38(6):727–735. doi: 10.1002/art.1780380602.
    1. Giannini EH, Ruperto N, Ravelli A, Lovell DJ, Felson DT, Martini A. Preliminary definition of improvement in juvenile arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 1997;40:1202–1209. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199707)40:7<1202::AID-ART3>;2-R.
    1. Oliveira-Ramos F, Eusébio M, Martins FM, Mourão AF, Furtado C, Campanilho-Marques R, Cordeiro I, Ferreira J, Cerqueira M, Figueira R, Brito I, Canhão H, Santos MJ, Melo-Gomes JA, Fonseca JE. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis in adulthood: fulfilment of classification criteria for adult rheumatic diseases, long-term outcomes and predictors of inactive disease, functional status and damage. RMD Open. 2016;2(2):e000304. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2016-000304.
    1. Simponi Aria (golimumab injection, for intravenous use). Package insert. Horsham: Janssen Biotech, Inc.; 2021.
    1. Simponi (golimumab for injection). Package insert. Horsham: Janssen Biotech, Inc.; 2019.
    1. Deodhar A, Reveille JD, Harrison DD, Kim L, Lo KH, Leu JH, Hsia EC. Safety and efficacy of golimumab administered intravenously in adults with ankylosing spondylitis: results through week 28 of the GO-ALIVE study. J Rheumatol. 2018;45:341–348. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.170487.
    1. Brunner HI, Ruperto N, Tzaribachev N, Horneff G, Chasnyk VG, Panaviene V, Abud-Mendoza C, Reiff A, Alexeeva E, Rubio-Pérez N, Keltsev V, Kingsbury DJ, del Rocio Maldonado Velázquez M, Nikishina I, Silverman ED, Joos R, Smolewska E, Bandeira M, Minden K, van Royen-Kerkhof A, Emminger W, Foeldvari I, Lauwerys BR, Sztajnbok F, Gilmer KE, Xu Z, Leu JH, Kim L, Lamberth SL, Loza MJ, Lovell DJ, Martini A. Subcutaneous golimumab for children with active polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis: results of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised-withdrawal trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:21–29. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210456.
    1. Fredriksson T, Pettersson U. Severe psoriasis—oral therapy with a new retinoid. Dermatologica. 1978;157:238–244. doi: 10.1159/000250839.
    1. Stelara (ustekinumab). Package insert. Horsham: Janssen Biotech, Inc.; 2020.
    1. Rosh JR, Turner D, Griffiths A, Cohen SA, Jacobstein D, Adedokun OJ, Padgett L, Terry NA, O’Brien C, Hyams JS. Ustekinumab in paediatric patients with moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease: pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy results from UniStar, a phase 1 study. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2021;15:1931–1942. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab089.
    1. Humira (adalimumab). Package insert. North Chicago: AbbVie Inc.; 2021.
    1. Enbrel (etanercept). Package insert. Thousand Oaks: Immunex Corporation; 2021.
    1. Remicade (infliximab). Package insert. Horsham: Janssen Biotech, Inc.; 2021.
    1. Cimzia (certolizumab pegol). Package insert. Smyrna: UCB, Inc.; 2019.
    1. Daly KA, Giebink GS. Clinical epidemiology of otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000;19:S31–S36. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200005001-00006.
    1. De Wit MAS, Koopmans MPG, Kortbeek LM, Wannet WJ, Vinjé J, van Leusden F, Bartelds AIM, van Duynhoven YTHP. Sensor, a population-based cohort study on gastroenteritis in the Netherlands: incidence and etiology. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;154:666–674. doi: 10.1093/aje/154.7.666.
    1. Windfuhr JP, Toepfner N, Steffen G, Walsfahrer F, Berner R. Clinical practice guideline: tonsillitis I. Diagnostics and nonsurgical management. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273:973–987. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3872-6.
    1. Leonardi CL, Kimball AB, Papp KA, Yeilding N, Guzzo C, Wang Y, Li S, Dooley LT, Gordon KB, PHOENIX 1 study investigators Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, a human interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriasis: 76-week results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (PHOENIX 1) Lancet. 2008;371:1665–1674. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60725-4.
    1. Papp KA, Langley RG, Lebwohl M, Krueger GG, Szapary P, Yeilding N, Guzzo C, Hsu M-C, Wang Y, Li S, Dooley LT, Reich K, PHOENIX 2 Study Investigators Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, a human interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriasis: 52-week results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (PHOENIX 2) Lancet. 2008;371:1675–1684. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60726-6.
    1. Xu Z, Marciniak SJ, Frederick B, Kim L, Zhuang Y, Davis HM, Zhou H. Pharmacokinetic bridging approach for developing biologics-delivery devices: a case study with a golimumab autoinjector. Clin Ther. 2015;37:427–438. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.09.012.
    1. Gill KL, Machavaram KK, Rose RH, Chetty M. Potential sources of inter-subject variability in monoclonal antibody pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016;55:789–805. doi: 10.1007/s40262-015-0361-4.
    1. Xu Z, Davis HM, Zhou H. Rational development and utilization of antibody-based therapeutic proteins in pediatrics. Pharmacol Ther. 2013;137:225–247. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.10.005.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren