The Safety and Efficacy of Supraglottic Airway Use in Children
Studieoversikt
Status
Status
Forhold
Forhold
Intervensjon / Behandling
Intervensjon / Behandling
Detaljert beskrivelse
This study aims to understand the efficacy of supraglottic airway (SGA) use in children in a tertiary care Children's Hospital.
Observational data regarding the type of SGA, experience level of practitioner, placement technique, number of placement attempts or placement failure, device failure, and cause of any related peri-operative complications will be prospectively collected.
The data collected in this study will allow the investigators to assess the overall safety and efficacy of SGA use in various medical and surgical procedures performed under general anesthesia in children.
Studietype
Studietype
Registrering (Forventet)
Registrering
Kontakter og plasseringer
Studiekontakt
Studiekontakt
- Navn: Narasimhan Jagannathan, MD
- Telefonnummer: 3122275170
- E-post: njagannathan@luriechildrens.org
Studiesteder
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, Forente stater, 60611
- Rekruttering
- Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
-
Ta kontakt med:
- Narasimhan Jagannathan, MD
- E-post: simjag2000@yahoo.com
-
Hovedetterforsker:
- Narasimhan Jagannathan, MD
-
-
Deltakelseskriterier
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
Tar imot friske frivillige
Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier
Prøvetakingsmetode
Studiepopulasjon
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children undergoing anesthesia with use of a supraglottic airway device as a primary means of oxygenation & ventilation
Exclusion Criteria:
- N/A
Studieplan
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
Antall grupper / kohorter
Kohorter og intervensjoner
Gruppe / KohortGruppe / Kohort |
Intervensjon / BehandlingIntervensjon / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Supraglottic Airway Device
Patients will receive a supraglottic airway device as a primary means of ventilation.
The following devices may be used: LMA Unique, LMA ProSeal, LMA Supreme, LMA Flexible, Ambu Aura-I, Ambu Aura Once, Air-Q, I-Gel, or other supraglottic airway device.
Choice of the device will be clinician dependent and based on the patients body weight per manufacturer guidelines
|
Andre navn:
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Supraglottic Airway Device Failure
Tidsramme: participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
Occurrence and reason for supraglottic airway device failure (ie inadequate ventilation, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, etc) will be recorded in addition to conversion to tracheal intubation
|
participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Ease of Placement of Supraglottic Airway Device
Tidsramme: participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
Ease of placement of supraglottic airway device ranging from 1 (easy) to 4 (difficult)
|
participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
|
Multiple Attempts to Place Supraglottic Airway Device
Tidsramme: participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
change in device, placement method, and provider will be recorded
|
participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
|
Airway Maneuvers/interventions
Tidsramme: participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
the number and type of airway maneuvers performed after device placement and during maintenance will be recorded
|
participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
|
Occurrence of Inadequate Ventilation
Tidsramme: participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
cause and solution for inadequate ventilation will be recorded
|
participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
|
Intraoperative Complications
Tidsramme: participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
Time period of complication (ie during device placement, maintenance, or removal) and cause of complication (ie.
dental injury, light anesthesia, regurgitation, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, aspiration, etc.) will be recorded
|
participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
|
Postoperative Complications
Tidsramme: participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and 24 hours postoperatively
|
Complications noted postoperatively relating to reflex activation of the airway, sore throat, or hoarseness
|
participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and 24 hours postoperatively
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Sponsor
Sponsor
Etterforskere
Etterforskere
- Hovedetterforsker: Narasimhan Jagannathan, MD, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago / Stanley Manne Research Institute
Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker
Generelle publikasjoner
- Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Alvarez M. Safety and efficacy of the laryngeal mask airway. A prospective survey of 1400 children. Anaesthesia. 1996 Oct;51(10):969-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb14968.x.
- Mathis MR, Haydar B, Taylor EL, Morris M, Malviya SV, Christensen RE, Ramachandran SK, Kheterpal S. Failure of the Laryngeal Mask Airway Unique and Classic in the pediatric surgical patient: a study of clinical predictors and outcomes. Anesthesiology. 2013 Dec;119(6):1284-95. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000015.
- Jagannathan N, Sequera-Ramos L, Sohn L, Wallis B, Shertzer A, Schaldenbrand K. Elective use of supraglottic airway devices for primary airway management in children with difficult airways. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Apr;112(4):742-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet411. Epub 2013 Dec 8.
- Asai T. Is it safe to use supraglottic airway in children with difficult airways? Br J Anaesth. 2014 Apr;112(4):620-2. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu005. Epub 2014 Feb 20. No abstract available.
- Bordet F, Allaouchiche B, Lansiaux S, Combet S, Pouyau A, Taylor P, Bonnard C, Chassard D. Risk factors for airway complications during general anaesthesia in paediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth. 2002 Nov;12(9):762-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.00987.x.
- Lalwani K, Richins S, Aliason I, Milczuk H, Fu R. The laryngeal mask airway for pediatric adenotonsillectomy: predictors of failure and complications. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Jan;77(1):25-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.09.021. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
Studierekorddatoer
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart
Studiestart
Primær fullføring (Forventet)
Primær fullføring
Studiet fullført (Forventet)
Studiet fullført
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
Først innsendt
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Først lagt ut (Anslag)
Først lagt ut
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Anslag)
Sist oppdatering lagt ut
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Sist bekreftet
Sist bekreftet
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Nøkkelord
Andre studie-ID-numre
Andre studie-ID-numre
- 2014-15832
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .