Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Prior Uterine Artery Cauterization From the Origin Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

15. mai 2026 oppdatert av: Hadeer Ali Alashry Mohamed, Kafrelsheikh University
The main goal of this study is to compare between total Laparoscopic hysterectomy proceeded by Uterine artery cauterization at its origin and conventional total Laparoscopic hysterectomy regarding: bleeding , operative time , intra operative time and follow up post operative.

Studieoversikt

Status

Har ikke rekruttert ennå

Forhold

Intervensjon / Behandling

Detaljert beskrivelse

The most common non-pregnancy-related gynecological procedure performed for women is a hysterectomy. (Uwais et al,. 2024 )In Germany, the incidence of hysterectomy ranges from 2.13 to 3.62/1000, while in the United States, it is 5.4/1000. In the US, about 600,000 hysterectomy surgeries are carried out each year. (Harvey et al ,. 2022 ) Fibroids, adenomyosis, endometriosis, dysfunctional uterine bleeding, uterine prolapse, and premalignant and malignant lesions are among the many indications for a hysterectomy. (Singh et al ,. 2024 ) Traditionally , hysterectomy has been done abdominally or by vaginal route . In the present era , Laparoscopic hysterectomy has recently received a considerable respect as a favourable hysterectomy technique . ( Bartels et al ,. 2020 ) Laparoscopic hysterectomy is a safe , workable technique , provides minimal post operative discomfort, shorter hospital stay , rapid convalescence , early return to daily activities. ( Pepin , K. et al ., 2020 ).

Selection of route of hysterectomy can be influenced by size , shape of the vagina and uterus, accessibility of the uterus, extent of extra uterine disease , surgeon experience, available hospital support, whether the case is emergent or scheduled and preference of the informed patient . ( Panda et al ,. 2022 )

.As Laparoscopic surgery becomes more advanced and widely applied, the absolute contraindications to laparoscopy are diminishing . Patient limitations to Laparoscopic surgery can be both anatomical and physiological .

Adverse anatomical limitations include difficult access to the abdomen , obliteration of the peritoneal space , organomegaly , intestinal distension and the potential for cancer dissemination.

The major physiological obstacles to safe Laparoscopy include increased intracranial pressure, abnormalities in cardiac output and gas exchange in the lung , chronic liver disease and coagulopathy . These anatomical and physiological conditions were formerly considered absolute contraindications to laparoscopy, they are now considered only relative contraindications.( Madhok et al ,. 2022 )

. The uterus receives the majority of its blood supply from the uterine artery, a branch of the internal iliac artery. In order to reach the uterine cervix, the uterine artery is first found 2.5 cm lateral and superior to the ureter before crossing it anteriorly to its medial side .( Selcuk I et al ,. 2018).

The ureter is more susceptible to injury during oophorectomy and hysterectomy because of its close relationship to the ovary, where it lies beneath the insertion of the infundibulopelvic ligament at the pelvic brim, and its relationship to the uterine artery, where it passes inferior to the uterine artery.( Lescay et al ,. 2024 )

Although total Laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH ) is generally safe .There is a potential risk of complications may occur . Excessive blood loss during TLH is still an issue which need blood transfusion especially in case of large uteri . ( Saad _ Naguib M et al , .2022) .

During TLH, the uterine arteries (UAs) must be closed effectively.Closing UAs at the uterine level or at the origin from the internal iliac artery are the two main options . The decision is solely based on the preferences and opinions of the surgeon.( Uccella et al ,. 2021) .

There is a shortage in data that compare two techniques , therefore , Current study will be conducted to compare feasibility, duration of the surgery , estimated blood loss , post operative complications during conventional Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus early Uterine artery cauterization at its origin .

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Antatt)

44

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiekontakt

Studer Kontakt Backup

  • Navn: Mustafa Farag Ellakany, Lecturer
  • Telefonnummer: +2 01016083210

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

  • Voksen

Tar imot friske frivillige

Nei

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria: Age of the patient is more than 35 y . Non malignant pathologies including fibroids, endometrial hyperplasia, Dysfunctional Uterine bleeding not responding to medical treatment.

Good general condition of the patient ( American society of Anesthesiologists "ASA" score 1 , 2 , 3 ( Horvath et al ,. 2021) .

Uterine size is less than 20 weeks by fundal level . -

Exclusion Criteria:Age of the patient is less than 35 y . Gynecological malignancies . Contraindications for laparoscopy as any medical condition worsens by peumo peritoneum or Trendelenburg position as severely compromised cardiopulmonary status .

Patients with American society of Anesthesiologists score 4 or more . ( Horvath et al ,. 2021) Uterine size is more than 20 weeks by fundal level .

-

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Ingen (Open Label)

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Eksperimentell: Total Laparoscopic hysterectomy with prior uterine artery cauterization from the origin
Total Laparoscopic hysterectomy with prior Uterine artery cauterization from the origin take less time and cause less bleeding
Total Laparoscopic hysterectomy with prior Uterine artery cauterization from the origin to arm 1
Eksperimentell: Conventional Total Laparoscopic hysterectomy
Conventional Total Laparoscopic hysterectomy may cause more blood loss and take more time
Conventional Laparoscopic hysterectomy
Total Laparoscopic hysterectomy with ligation of uterine artery beside uterus is considered conventional and may cause more blood loss and take more time

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Is to compare peri operative blood loss by counting amount of blood in ml drained by suction , operation time between Conventional TLH and TLH with prior occlusion to UAs at its origin
Tidsramme: 24 hours after surgery
Is to compare peri operative blood loss by counting amount of blood in ml drained by suction , operation time between Conventional TLH and TLH with prior occlusion to UAs at its origin
24 hours after surgery
Is to compare peri operative blood loss , operation time between Conventional TLH and TLH with prior occlusion to UAs at its origin
Tidsramme: One week after surgery
Is to compare peri operative blood loss , operation time between conventional TLH and TLH with prior Uterine artery occlusion
One week after surgery

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Post operative pain , difference in Hemoglobin level in mg /dl pre and post operative, frequency of post operative hematoma in cm detected by us at vaginal vault and ureteric complications
Tidsramme: 24 hours postoperative
Post operative pain , difference in Hemoglobin level in mg / dl pre and post operative, frequency of post operative hematoma in cm detected by us at vaginal vault and ureteric complications
24 hours postoperative

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Sponsor

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Antatt)

15. mai 2026

Primær fullføring (Antatt)

15. mai 2027

Studiet fullført (Antatt)

15. juni 2027

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

9. juli 2025

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

15. mai 2026

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

22. mai 2026

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

22. mai 2026

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

15. mai 2026

Sist bekreftet

1. mai 2026

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Andre studie-ID-numre

  • Total Laparoscopic hysterectom

Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)

Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?

NEI

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .