Lower extremity muscle size and strength and aerobic capacity decrease with caloric restriction but not with exercise-induced weight loss

Edward P Weiss, Susan B Racette, Dennis T Villareal, Luigi Fontana, Karen Steger-May, Kenneth B Schechtman, Samuel Klein, Ali A Ehsani, John O Holloszy, Washington University School of Medicine CALERIE Group, Edward P Weiss, Susan B Racette, Dennis T Villareal, Luigi Fontana, Karen Steger-May, Kenneth B Schechtman, Samuel Klein, Ali A Ehsani, John O Holloszy, Washington University School of Medicine CALERIE Group

Abstract

Caloric restriction (CR) results in fat loss; however, it may also result in loss of muscle and thereby reduce strength and aerobic capacity (VO2 max). These effects may not occur with exercise-induced weight loss (EX) because of the anabolic effects of exercise on heart and skeletal muscle. We tested the hypothesis that CR reduces muscle size and strength and VO2 max, whereas EX preserves or improves these parameters. Healthy 50- to 60-yr-old men and women (body mass index of 23.5-29.9 kg/m2) were studied before and after 12 mo of weight loss by CR (n = 18) or EX (n = 16). Lean mass was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, thigh muscle volume by MRI, isometric and isokinetic knee flexor strength by dynamometry, and treadmill VO2 max by indirect calorimetry. Both interventions caused significant decreases in body weight (CR: -10.7 +/- 1.4%, EX: -9.5 +/- 1.5%) and lean mass (CR: -3.5 +/- 0.7%, EX: -2.2 +/- 0.8%), with no significant differences between groups. Significant decreases in thigh muscle volume (-6.9 +/- 0.8%) and composite knee flexion strength (-7.2 +/- 3%) occurred in the CR group only. Absolute VO2 max decreased significantly in the CR group (-6.8 +/- 2.3%), whereas the EX group had significant increases in both absolute (+15.5 +/- 2.4%) and relative (+28.3 +/- 3.0%) VO2 max. These data provide evidence that muscle mass and absolute physical work capacity decrease in response to 12 mo of CR but not in response to a similar weight loss induced by exercise. These findings suggest that, during EX, the body adapts to maintain or even enhance physical performance capacity.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Relationship (Pearson correlations) between the magnitude of weight loss and the magnitude of change in thigh muscle volume (sum of right and left thighs) in the caloric restriction group (CR) and the exercise group (EX).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Changes in absolute muscle strength (A), strength relative to body weight (B), and muscle-specific torque (C) for the knee flexor muscles. Data are least-squares means ± SE after adjustment for baseline values and percent change in body weight. Muscle-specific torque was calculated as absolute torque divided by muscle volume and was based on strength and muscle volume data from the right leg only. *P ≤ 0.05 within group by ANCOVA with Tukey’s adjustment for multiple comparisons.

Source: PubMed

Kommende kliniske studier

Innstillinger for informasjonskapsler

Vi bruker informasjonskapsler for å sikre at vi gir deg den beste opplevelsen på nettstedet vårt. For mer informasjon, les nøye vår Retningslinjer for personvern og informasjonskapsler. ...>>>Du kan når som helst endre preferansene dine eller trekke tilbake samtykket ditt ved å slette informasjonskapslene fra nettstedet ditt eller datamaskinen som beskrevet i policyen. Godta det og velg dine preferanser ved å krysse av i de tilhørende rutene i delen "Administrer innstillinger" nedenfor. Les nøye gjennom servicevilkårene før du fortsetter å bruke noen del av dette nettstedet.
«Administrer innstillinger