Ta strona została przetłumaczona automatycznie i dokładność tłumaczenia nie jest gwarantowana. Proszę odnieść się do angielska wersja za tekst źródłowy.

REstoration of SYNChronous Cardiac Function Due to Physiologic cArdiac Pacing Modalities With Clinical Endpoints (RESYNC-PACE)

8 lipca 2026 zaktualizowane przez: Peter Ezer, University of Pecs

REstoration of SYNChronous Cardiac Function Due to Physiologic cArdiac Pacing Modalities With Clinical Endpoints RESYNC-PACE

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of physiologic cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using conduction system pacing strategies compared with conventional biventricular CRT in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and electrical dyssynchrony.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does physiologic CRT (including left bundle branch area pacing [LBBAP] and LBBAP-optimized CRT) reduce the combined risk of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization compared with conventional biventricular CRT?
  • Does physiologic CRT improve cardiac function and reverse ventricular remodeling more effectively than conventional CRT?

Participants receiving physiologic CRT as part of routine clinical care will undergo standard follow-up evaluations, including electrocardiography, echocardiography, laboratory testing, and device interrogation. Clinical outcomes will be collected prospectively for 24 months and compared with a historical cohort of patients treated with conventional biventricular CRT.

The study will assess clinical outcomes, echocardiographic response, electrical resynchronization parameters, and device-related safety in a real-world heart failure population.

Przegląd badań

Status

Jeszcze nie rekrutacja

Warunki

Interwencja / Leczenie

Szczegółowy opis

Background

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and healthcare utilization despite continuous advances in guideline-directed medical therapy. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has become an established treatment for patients with symptomatic HFrEF and electrical dyssynchrony. Conventional biventricular pacing improves ventricular synchrony and clinical outcomes; however, approximately one-third of treated patients do not achieve a satisfactory response.

Conduction system pacing (CSP), particularly left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), has emerged as a physiological pacing strategy capable of directly engaging the native His-Purkinje conduction system. Compared with conventional biventricular pacing, CSP may produce more physiological ventricular activation, narrower paced QRS complexes, improved electrical synchrony, and greater reverse ventricular remodeling. Nevertheless, evidence regarding its long-term effectiveness in routine clinical practice remains limited, particularly in heterogeneous populations with different conduction abnormalities.

Study Rationale

The RESYNC-PACE study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of individualized physiologic cardiac resynchronization strategies in a real-world population of patients with HFrEF requiring CRT.

The study investigates two complementary physiologic CRT approaches according to the underlying conduction disturbance. In patients with typical left bundle branch block (LBBB), left ventricular lead implantation is guided by the qLV ratio to achieve optimal electrical resynchronization through individualized coronary sinus lead positioning. In patients with intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD), a conduction system pacing strategy is applied using left bundle branch area pacing. When conduction system pacing alone results in incomplete electrical correction, defined by a paced QRS duration greater than 130 ms, an additional coronary sinus left ventricular lead is implanted to establish Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (LOT-CRT).

This individualized treatment algorithm reflects contemporary physiological concepts of ventricular resynchronization rather than a single implantation strategy and represents the principal scientific concept investigated in the study.

Scientific Objectives

The study aims to determine whether physiologic CRT strategies provide superior long-term clinical outcomes compared with conventional biventricular CRT when implemented in routine clinical practice.

In addition to evaluating clinical outcomes, the study investigates the relationship between electrical resynchronization, ventricular reverse remodeling, myocardial scar characteristics assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and long-term prognosis. Particular emphasis is placed on identifying imaging-, electrocardiographic-, and device-derived predictors of CRT response that may facilitate patient selection and optimization of resynchronization therapy.

Study Methodology

RESYNC-PACE is a single-center, ambispective observational cohort study performed at the University of Pécs Clinical Centre Heart Institute. Consecutive patients undergoing physiologic CRT constitute the prospective cohort, while a historical cohort of patients treated with conventional biventricular CRT serves as the comparator.

All therapeutic procedures are performed as part of routine clinical care using commercially available CE-marked cardiac implantable electronic devices according to their approved indications and current international guideline recommendations. The study does not introduce experimental devices or procedures beyond standard clinical practice but prospectively evaluates the clinical performance of an individualized physiological CRT algorithm.

The comprehensive study database integrates demographic, clinical, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, procedural, device-derived, and long-term follow-up data. This integrated approach enables detailed evaluation of the mechanisms underlying CRT response and supports the development of patient-specific resynchronization strategies.

Expected Clinical Significance

The RESYNC-PACE study is expected to generate real-world evidence regarding the effectiveness of conduction system pacing-guided CRT strategies and individualized resynchronization algorithms. The findings may improve patient selection, optimize implantation strategies for different conduction disorders, and contribute to the growing evidence supporting physiologic cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure.

Typ studiów

Obserwacyjny

Zapisy (Szacowany)

50

Kontakty i lokalizacje

Ta sekcja zawiera dane kontaktowe osób prowadzących badanie oraz informacje o tym, gdzie badanie jest przeprowadzane.

Kontakt w sprawie studiów

  • Nazwa: Peter Ezer MD PhD, assistant professor
  • Numer telefonu: +36305468840
  • E-mail: ezerpeti@gmail.com

Lokalizacje studiów

    • Baranya
      • Pécs, Baranya, Węgry, 7621
        • Heart Institute , University of Pécs

Kryteria uczestnictwa

Badacze szukają osób, które pasują do określonego opisu, zwanego kryteriami kwalifikacyjnymi. Niektóre przykłady tych kryteriów to ogólny stan zdrowia danej osoby lub wcześniejsze leczenie.

Kryteria kwalifikacji

Wiek uprawniający do nauki

  • Dorosły
  • Starszy dorosły

Akceptuje zdrowych ochotników

Nie

Metoda próbkowania

Próbka bez prawdopodobieństwa

Badana populacja

The study population consists of adult patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who are treated at the University of Pécs Clinical Centre Heart Institute and meet contemporary guideline indications for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Eligible participants have symptomatic heart failure despite guideline-directed medical therapy, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and evidence of electrical dyssynchrony manifested by left bundle branch block (LBBB) or intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD). The prospective cohort includes patients undergoing conduction system pacing-based CRT as part of routine clinical care, while the historical control cohort includes patients previously treated with conventional biventricular CRT at the same institution. The study population represents a real-world heart failure population routinely referred for CRT implantation in tertiary cardiovascular care.

Opis

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years.
  • Symptomatic heart failure despite guideline-directed medical therapy.
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%.
  • Indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy according to contemporary ESC guideline recommendations.
  • QRS duration ≥150 ms with either:

Left bundle branch block (LBBB), or Intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD).

  • Planned implantation of a CRT system
  • Ability to provide written informed consent
  • Expected survival greater than 24 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 years and Age 100 < years
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent.
  • Life expectancy <12 months due to non-cardiac comorbidities.
  • Active systemic infection or infection involving a cardiac implantable electronic device.
  • Reversible causes of heart failure expected to improve without CRT.
  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial that may affect study outcomes.
  • Inability to comply with follow-up requirements.
  • Missing essential baseline or follow-up data (retrospective cohort).
  • Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigators, would make participation inappropriate or interfere with study assessments.

Plan studiów

Ta sekcja zawiera szczegółowe informacje na temat planu badania, w tym sposób zaprojektowania badania i jego pomiary.

Jak projektuje się badanie?

Szczegóły projektu

Kohorty i interwencje

Grupa / Kohorta
Interwencja / Leczenie
Left bundle branch block patients

LBBB Cohort (qLV-guided Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy)

Patients in this cohort have symptomatic heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and complete left bundle branch block (LBBB) according to contemporary guideline criteria. Cardiac resynchronization therapy is performed using a personalized implantation strategy guided by the qLV ratio, defined as the interval between QRS onset and local left ventricular activation divided by the intrinsic QRS duration. The left ventricular lead is positioned at the site with the longest achievable electrical delay to maximize resynchronization benefit. Patients receive either conventional biventricular CRT or LOT- CRT according to clinical decision-making and anatomical feasibility. The cohort is followed longitudinally to evaluate the relationship between qLV-guided lead placement, electrical resynchronization, reverse ventricular remodeling, heart failure hospitalization, and all-cause mortality.

Conduction System Pacing-Guided Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy is an individualized resynchronization strategy used in patients with heart failure, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, and electrical dyssynchrony. The intervention is based on direct recruitment of the native cardiac conduction system through left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP). During implantation, electrical resynchronization is assessed using electrocardiographic and device-derived parameters. In patients with intraventricular conduction delay or incomplete electrical correction, additional left ventricular pacing may be provided using a coronary sinus lead, resulting in Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (LOT-CRT). The intervention aims to achieve more physiological ventricular activation than conventional biventricular pacing, improve electrical synchrony, promote reverse ventricular remodeling, and reduce heart failure-related adverse events.
Inne nazwy:
  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy using left bundle branch area pacing with or without LV lead optimization.
  • Cardiac resynchronization guided by conduction system pacing to improve ventricular synchrony.
Intraventricular conduction delay patients

IVCD Cohort (Conduction System Pacing-Guided Resynchronization Strategy)

Patients in this cohort have symptomatic heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD) without typical left bundle branch block morphology. The resynchronization strategy is guided by the degree of electrical correction achieved with conduction system pacing. During implantation, left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is attempted and paced QRS duration is assessed. If conduction system pacing alone results in a paced QRS duration greater than 130 ms, a Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (LOT-CRT) system is implanted by adding a left ventricular lead to further improve ventricular synchrony. The cohort is followed longitudinally to evaluate the association between electrical resynchronization, reverse ventricular remodeling, heart failure hospitalization, and all-cause mortality.

Conduction System Pacing-Guided Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy is an individualized resynchronization strategy used in patients with heart failure, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, and electrical dyssynchrony. The intervention is based on direct recruitment of the native cardiac conduction system through left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP). During implantation, electrical resynchronization is assessed using electrocardiographic and device-derived parameters. In patients with intraventricular conduction delay or incomplete electrical correction, additional left ventricular pacing may be provided using a coronary sinus lead, resulting in Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (LOT-CRT). The intervention aims to achieve more physiological ventricular activation than conventional biventricular pacing, improve electrical synchrony, promote reverse ventricular remodeling, and reduce heart failure-related adverse events.
Inne nazwy:
  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy using left bundle branch area pacing with or without LV lead optimization.
  • Cardiac resynchronization guided by conduction system pacing to improve ventricular synchrony.

Co mierzy badanie?

Podstawowe miary wyniku

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Composite of All-Cause Mortality and Heart Failure Hospitalization
Ramy czasowe: 24 months
Time to first occurrence of the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or hospitalization due to worsening heart failure during the 24-month follow-up period.
24 months

Miary wyników drugorzędnych

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Ramy czasowe: Baseline to 24 months

Change in left ventricular ejection fraction measured by transthoracic echocardiography between baseline and 24-month follow-up.

Ejection fraction is measured in percentage (%). Improvement in ejection fraction is detected as increase in percentage-value.

Baseline to 24 months
Change in Left Ventricular End-Systolic Volume ( LV ESV)
Ramy czasowe: Baseline to 24 months

Change in left ventricular end-systolic volumen measured by echocardiography between baseline and 24-month follow-up.

Left ventricular end-systolic volume in measured in mililiters ( ml) , decrease in LV ESV is a sign of clinical response on therapy.

Baseline to 24 months
Change in paced QRS Duration
Ramy czasowe: Baseline to 24 months

Reduction in QRS duration following cardiac resynchronization therapy compared with baseline electrocardiographic measurements.

Paced QRS duration is measured in miliseconds (ms). Decrease in paced QRS duration compared to preoperative QRS duration is marked as a good signal in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Baseline to 24 months
New York Heart Association Heart Failure Functional Status
Ramy czasowe: Baseline to 24 months

Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class from baseline to follow-up. Stage I-IV.

NYHA improvement is detected as decrease in NYHA stage grade.

Baseline to 24 months

Inne miary wyników

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Device-Related and Procedure-Related Complications
Ramy czasowe: 24 months
Incidence of device-related and procedure-related adverse events, including lead dislodgement, infection, pneumothorax, pocket hematoma, and system revision.
24 months

Współpracownicy i badacze

Tutaj znajdziesz osoby i organizacje zaangażowane w to badanie.

Sponsor

Współpracownicy

Publikacje i pomocne linki

Osoba odpowiedzialna za wprowadzenie informacji o badaniu dobrowolnie udostępnia te publikacje. Mogą one dotyczyć wszystkiego, co jest związane z badaniem.

Daty zapisu na studia

Daty te śledzą postęp w przesyłaniu rekordów badań i podsumowań wyników do ClinicalTrials.gov. Zapisy badań i zgłoszone wyniki są przeglądane przez National Library of Medicine (NLM), aby upewnić się, że spełniają określone standardy kontroli jakości, zanim zostaną opublikowane na publicznej stronie internetowej.

Główne daty studiów

Rozpoczęcie studiów (Szacowany)

29 czerwca 2026

Zakończenie podstawowe (Szacowany)

29 czerwca 2030

Ukończenie studiów (Szacowany)

29 czerwca 2031

Daty rejestracji na studia

Pierwszy przesłany

28 czerwca 2026

Pierwszy przesłany, który spełnia kryteria kontroli jakości

28 czerwca 2026

Pierwszy wysłany (Rzeczywisty)

6 lipca 2026

Aktualizacje rekordów badań

Ostatnia wysłana aktualizacja (Rzeczywisty)

10 lipca 2026

Ostatnia przesłana aktualizacja, która spełniała kryteria kontroli jakości

8 lipca 2026

Ostatnia weryfikacja

1 lipca 2026

Więcej informacji

Terminy związane z tym badaniem

Inne numery identyfikacyjne badania

  • FF107 RESYNC-PACE ver1.0
  • Biotronik Research Grant FF107 (Inny numer grantu/finansowania: BIOTRONIK SE & Co. KG Woermannkehre 1 12359 Berlin)

Plan dla danych uczestnika indywidualnego (IPD)

Planujesz udostępniać dane poszczególnych uczestników (IPD)?

NIEZDECYDOWANY

Opis planu IPD

ndividual participant data will be shared only in a de-identified form and in accordance with applicable data protection regulations, institutional policies, and informed consent provisions. Data sharing may be limited where participant privacy, ethical considerations, or legal requirements prevent full disclosure of individual-level data.

Informacje o lekach i urządzeniach, dokumenty badawcze

Bada produkt leczniczy regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Nie

Bada produkt urządzenia regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Tak

produkt wyprodukowany i wyeksportowany z USA

Nie

Te informacje zostały pobrane bezpośrednio ze strony internetowej clinicaltrials.gov bez żadnych zmian. Jeśli chcesz zmienić, usunąć lub zaktualizować dane swojego badania, skontaktuj się z register@clinicaltrials.gov. Gdy tylko zmiana zostanie wprowadzona na stronie clinicaltrials.gov, zostanie ona automatycznie zaktualizowana również na naszej stronie internetowej .