Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Physiological Effects of Different Preoxygenation Strategies (PREOXY II)

6 de maio de 2026 atualizado por: Simon Rauch, Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine

Physiological Effects of Different Preoxygenation Strategies in Adults and Children: A Comparative Study of NRM and BVM With and Without PEEP

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the performance and physiological effects of different preoxygenation devices in healthy adult and pediatric volunteers (children aged 5-12 years). The study aims to determine how these devices influence oxygen delivery, airway pressure, and cardiopulmonary physiology during preoxygenation.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • What fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂) is delivered by non-rebreather masks (NRM) compared to bag-valve masks (BVM) with and without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)?
  • How do these devices differ in terms of generated PEEP, inspiratory effort, and their effects on lung ventilation and cardiac function?

Researchers will compare NRM, BVM without PEEP, and BVM with PEEP (each with or without supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula) to evaluate differences in oxygenation and physiological effects.

Participants will:

  • Complete multiple 3-minute preoxygenation sessions using each device in randomized order
  • Breathe spontaneously through each device, with or without additional oxygen via nasal cannula
  • Undergo non-invasive monitoring of oxygen concentration (FiO₂), respiratory parameters, airway pressures, and ultrasound assessment of the lungs, diaphragm, and heart
  • Perform a brief breath-holding maneuver to assess airway pressure generation

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

Hypoxemia is a frequent and potentially life-threatening complication during advanced airway management, associated with adverse outcomes such as hypoxic brain injury, cardiovascular collapse, and death. Effective preoxygenation is essential to increase oxygen reserves and prolong safe apnea time during intubation. Although several devices are routinely used for preoxygenation, including non-rebreather masks (NRM) and bag-valve masks (BVM) with or without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), important uncertainties remain regarding their actual performance and physiological effects.

Current evidence suggests that techniques providing PEEP may improve oxygenation by increasing functional residual capacity, enhancing ventilation of dependent lung regions, and reducing ventilation-perfusion mismatch. However, the relative contribution of FiO₂ delivery versus PEEP, as well as the physiological effects on respiratory mechanics and cardiovascular function, are not fully understood. In addition, it remains unclear whether BVM devices without a dedicated PEEP valve can generate measurable PEEP, and whether patients can generate sufficient inspiratory effort to effectively operate BVM valves without assisted ventilation. Data in pediatric populations are particularly limited.

This randomized crossover study is designed to systematically evaluate the performance of commonly used preoxygenation devices under controlled conditions in healthy adult and pediatric volunteers. By comparing NRM, BVM without PEEP, and BVM with PEEP-with and without supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula-the study aims to characterize differences in oxygen delivery, airway pressure generation, inspiratory effort, and their physiological impact.

The study will focus on key physiological domains, including oxygenation (FiO₂), respiratory mechanics (tidal volume, airway pressures, and diaphragm activity), lung aeration (with particular attention to dependent lung regions), and cardiovascular responses (including right ventricular dimensions and function). Measurements will be obtained using non-invasive monitoring techniques, including gas analysis and ultrasound.

The crossover design allows within-subject comparisons across all study conditions, minimizing inter-individual variability and enabling precise assessment of device-related effects. The findings of this study are expected to improve understanding of the mechanisms and physiological consequences of preoxygenation strategies, with potential implications for optimizing airway management practices in both adult and pediatric populations.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

30

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Estude backup de contato

Locais de estudo

    • BZ
      • Bolzano, BZ, Itália, 39100
        • Recrutamento
        • Eurac research, Institute of mountain emergency medicine
        • Contato:
        • Contato:
        • Subinvestigador:
          • Ruth Martintoni
        • Investigador principal:
          • Simon Rauch, MD, PhD
        • Investigador principal:
          • Giulia Roveri, MD

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Filho
  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Sim

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score ≤ 2
  • Children aged 5 to 12 years with an ASA physical status score ≤ 2
  • Ability (or legal guardian ability) to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children aged < 5 years or 13 to 18 years
  • ASA physical status score > 2
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m²
  • Known airway pathology or anatomical abnormality that could affect mask fit, ventilation, or oxygenation
  • Presence of an active airway infection at the time of the study
  • Pregnancy
  • Refusal or inability to provide informed consent

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Prevenção
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição cruzada
  • Mascaramento: Solteiro

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Nasal Cannula (NC)
Preoxygenation over 3 minutes with a nasal cannula (NC) with supplemental oxygen delivered at 15 L/min, during spontaneous breathing.
Preoxygenation performed using a nasal cannula delivering supplemental oxygen at a flow rate of 15 L/min, without the use of an additional mask or ventilation device, during spontaneous breathing.
Experimental: Non-rebreather facemask (NRM)
Preoxygenation over 3 minutes with a Non-rebreather facemask (NRM) with supplemental oxygen delivered at 15 L/min, during spontaneous breathing.
Preoxygenation performed using a non-rebreather mask with reservoir, delivering oxygen at a flow rate of 15 L/min. The mask is fitted to ensure an optimal seal, and participants breathe spontaneously without assisted ventilation.
Experimental: Non-rebreather facemask (NRM) plus Nasal Cannula (NC)
Preoxygenation for 3 minutes using a non-rebreather mask (NRM) combined with a nasal cannula delivering supplemental oxygen at 15 L/min for each device, during spontaneous breathing.
Preoxygenation performed using a non-rebreather mask with reservoir, delivering oxygen at a flow rate of 15 L/min, combined with a nasal cannula delivering supplemental oxygen at 15 L/min. The mask is fitted to ensure an optimal seal, and participants breathe spontaneously without assisted ventilation.
Experimental: Bag valve mask (BVM)
Preoxygenation for 3 minutes using a bag-valve-mask (BVM) with supplemental oxygen delivered at 15 L/min, during spontaneous breathing.
Preoxygenation performed using a bag-valve mask without a PEEP valve, delivering oxygen at a flow rate of 15 L/min. The mask is held with a two-handed technique to ensure an airtight seal, without providing assisted ventilation, allowing spontaneous breathing.
Experimental: Bag valve mask (BVM) plus Nasal cannula (NC)
Preoxygenation for 3 minutes using a bag -valve-mask (BVM) combined with a nasal cannula delivering supplemental oxygen at 15 L/min for each device, during spontaneous breathing.
Preoxygenation performed using a bag-valve mask without a PEEP valve, delivering oxygen at a flow rate of 15 L/min, combined with a nasal cannula delivering supplemental oxygen at 15 L/min. The mask is held with a two-handed technique to ensure an airtight seal, without providing assisted ventilation, allowing spontaneous breathing.
Experimental: Bag valve mask (BVM) plus PEEP
Preoxygenation for 3 minutes using a bag-valve mask (BVM) with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) set at 10 cmH₂O and supplemental oxygen delivered at 15 L/min, during spontaneous breathing.
Preoxygenation performed using a bag-valve mask equipped with a PEEP valve set at 10 cmH₂O, delivering oxygen at a flow rate of 15 L/min. The mask is held with a two-handed technique to ensure an airtight seal, without assisted ventilation, during spontaneous breathing.
Experimental: Bag valve mask (BVM) plus PEEP plus Nasal Cannula (NC)
Preoxygenation for 3 minutes using a bag-valve mask (BVM) with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) set at 10 cmH₂O, combined with a nasal cannula delivering supplemental oxygen at 15 L/min for each device, during spontaneous breathing.
Preoxygenation performed using a bag-valve mask equipped with a PEEP valve set at 10 cmH₂O, delivering oxygen at a flow rate of 15 L/min, combined with a nasal cannula delivering supplemental oxygen at 15 L/min. The mask is held with a two-handed technique to ensure an airtight seal, without assisted ventilation, during spontaneous breathing.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Difference in fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂) between preoxygenation devices
Prazo: During each 3-minute preoxygenation session
Fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂) delivered during preoxygenation will be continuously measured at the airway opening using a gas analyzer. FiO₂ values will be recorded breath-by-breath during each 3-minute preoxygenation session under all study conditions. The primary outcome is the difference in mean FiO₂ achieved between the different preoxygenation devices (non-rebreather mask, bag-valve mask without PEEP, and bag-valve mask with PEEP), with and without supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula.
During each 3-minute preoxygenation session

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) generated during preoxygenation
Prazo: During each 3-minute preoxygenation session
Airway pressures will be continuously measured to quantify the presence and magnitude of PEEP generated during preoxygenation with bag-valve mask (BVM) with and without a dedicated PEEP valve, with and without nasal cannula oxygen supplementation.
During each 3-minute preoxygenation session
Inspiratory effort required to open the BVM valve
Prazo: During each 3-minute preoxygenation session
The negative pressure required to open the BVM valve will be measured using airway pressure monitoring, and diaphragm ultrasound parameters (thickening fraction and excursion) will be used as surrogate markers of inspiratory effort.
During each 3-minute preoxygenation session
Ventilation of dependent lung regions
Prazo: During each 3-minute preoxygenation session
Lung ultrasound will be used to assess regional ventilation of dependent lung areas, with findings quantified using a validated scoring system to compare the effects of preoxygenation with and without PEEP.
During each 3-minute preoxygenation session
Correlation between FiO₂ and tidal volume
Prazo: During each 3-minute preoxygenation session
The relationship between fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂) and tidal volume during preoxygenation will be assessed using continuous, breath-by-breath measurements.
During each 3-minute preoxygenation session
Cardiac output
Prazo: Baseline and at the end of each 3-minute preoxygenation session
Changes in cardiac output (l/min/m²) will be assessed using echocardiography before and after preoxygenation to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of different devices and PEEP.
Baseline and at the end of each 3-minute preoxygenation session
Changes in right ventricular dimensions
Prazo: Baseline and at the end of each 3-minute preoxygenation session
Changes in right ventricular dimensions (mm) will be assessed using echocardiography before and after preoxygenation to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of different devices and PEEP.
Baseline and at the end of each 3-minute preoxygenation session
Right ventricular strain
Prazo: Baseline and at the end of each 3-minute preoxygenation session
Changes in right ventricular strain (%) will be assessed using echocardiography before and after preoxygenation to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of different devices and PEEP.
Baseline and at the end of each 3-minute preoxygenation session

Outras medidas de resultado

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Airway pressure during breath-holding maneuver
Prazo: Immediately following the preoxygenation session with bag-valve mask (with or without PEEP)
Airway pressure generated during a brief voluntary breath-holding maneuver will be measured when oxygen is delivered via nasal cannula under a bag-valve mask (with or without PEEP), to assess potential continuous positive airway pressure generation.
Immediately following the preoxygenation session with bag-valve mask (with or without PEEP)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Simon Rauch, Eurac research, Institute of mountain emergency medicine

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Estimado)

23 de maio de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

30 de junho de 2026

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

30 de junho de 2026

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

26 de abril de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

26 de abril de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

4 de maio de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

8 de maio de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

6 de maio de 2026

Última verificação

1 de abril de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Ensaios clínicos em Nasal cannula (NC)

Se inscrever