此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Impact of an Emergency Advanced Practice Nurse on Complications After Home Discharge of Oxygen-Dependent Patients Managed in the Emergency Department: A Quantitative and Qualitative Study (OXYURG-IPA)

2026年8月19日 更新者:University Hospital, Strasbourg, France

Impact of the Advanced Practice Nurse (Emergency Care Specialty) on Complications Related to the Home Discharge of Patients on Oxygen Therapy After Management in the Emergency Department: A Quantitative and Qualitative Study

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, discharging patients home on low-flow oxygen therapy has proven to be a safe and effective alternative to hospitalization, helping to relieve overcrowded hospitals while ensuring continuity of care. At the investigating emergency department, a dedicated care pathway ("Oxy-Urg") already allows selected oxygen-dependent patients to return home with a home-care provider, regardless of the cause of their breathlessness, once their condition is stable.

This study evaluates whether managing these patients with a team combining an emergency advanced practice nurse (APN) and an emergency physician, rather than a physician alone, improves the organization of care and reduces complications after home discharge.

Adult oxygen-dependent patients eligible for the Oxy-Urg pathway are randomly assigned (1:1) to management by an APN-physician team (intervention group) or by a physician alone (control group). Both groups then receive the usual Oxy-Urg pathway (home oxygen therapy, provider tele-monitoring, community nurse and general practitioner follow-up).

The main goal is to compare the number of organizational adverse events occurring between inclusion and Day 28 between the two groups. The study also assesses clinical deterioration after discharge, the time professionals spend setting up the pathway, and, through interviews and a focus group, the experience of patients and professionals. The hypothesis is that the APN-physician team allows a more efficient organization and improves the patient experience, supporting the sustainability and wider use of this pathway.

研究概览

地位

尚未招聘

条件

干预/治疗

研究类型

介入性

注册 (估计的)

170

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

学习地点

    • Grand Est
      • Strasbourg、Grand Est、法国、67000

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

不

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patient (>= 18 years)
  • Affiliated to a social health insurance scheme
  • Able to understand the objectives and risks of the research and to give dated, signed informed consent
  • Oxygen-dependent patient eligible for the Oxy-Urg pathway, meeting all of the following:

    • Stable for more than 12 hours on oxygen therapy in the emergency department
    • Oxygen requirement <= 2 L/min (no upward change for 12 hours)
    • Not socially isolated (relatives able to readily help the patient, living geographically close)
    • Residing within the provider's geographical area (Bas-Rhin department)
    • No known pregnancy at inclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical condition requiring hospitalization (decided by the senior physician, per standard of care)
  • Patient's refusal to enter the pathway
  • Patient managed outside the emergency APN's working hours
  • End-of-life patient
  • Unable to give informed consent (including insufficient understanding of French)
  • Subject in an exclusion period
  • Subject under legal protection
  • Subject under guardianship or curatorship

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:卫生服务研究
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Advanced practice nurse-physician team
Organizational intervention: the emergency advanced practice nurse and the emergency physician jointly manage the inclusion of the patient in the Oxy-Urg pathway and the organization of the home discharge on oxygen.
有源比较器:Emergency physician alone (usual care)
Usual care

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Proportion of patients with at least one organizational adverse event related to home discharge on oxygen
大体时间:From inclusion (Day 0) to Day 28
At least one of the following organizational adverse events: (1) total pathway inclusion time greater than 20 minutes; (2) administrative error or omission regarding prescriptions, the liaison file or handover; (3) time to home oxygen availability exceeding the protocol target; (4) initial technical difficulty of the equipment requiring corrective action by the provider; (5) non-compliance with instructions given to home caregivers, evidenced by a documented non-conformity; (6) nurse visit not compliant with the prescription, observed and recorded.
From inclusion (Day 0) to Day 28

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

赞助

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (估计的)

2026年10月30日

初级完成 (估计的)

2028年10月1日

研究完成 (估计的)

2028年10月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年8月19日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年8月19日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年8月24日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年8月24日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年8月19日

最后验证

2026年8月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • RC25_0056

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.