Multicentre 2x2 Factorial Randomised Study Comparing Tirofiban Versus Abciximab and SES Versus BMS in AMI
Multicentre 2x2 Factorial Randomised Study Comparing Tirofiban Administered With the Single High-Dose Bolus Versus Abciximab and Sirolimus Eluting Stent Versus Bare Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction - MULTI-STRATEGY Trial
研究概览
地位
条件
详细说明
The combination abciximab plus bare metal stent (BMS) is currently considered the standard therapy for AMI. The use of sirolimus eluting stent (SES) is related to a reduction of the need for urgent target vessel revascularization (TVR). With current acquisition prices for abciximab and SES, replacing abciximab with tirofiban, administered as a single high-dose bolus (SHDB) regimen, is a promising strategy that would preserve financial resources. In a recent study the combination tirofiban and SES resulted to be associated to an overall lower major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) rate with respect to the abciximab plus BMS. However, since no conclusion can be drawn yet regarding the relative contribution of a specific GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor or a stent type with respect to the other, the combination of abciximab and SES may be associated to an even lower event rate with respect to SHDB tirofiban and SES, thus offsetting the higher initial cost.
Comparison(s): four strategies (SHDB tirofiban + BMS, SHDB tirofiban + SES, abciximab + BMS, abciximab + SES) are compared to determine the possible gold standard treatment for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in terms of efficacy and cost-efficacy.
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 第四阶段
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
-
Ferrara、意大利、44100
- Cattedra di Cardiologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Ferrara
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- ST segment elevation myocardial infarction
- Schedule for primary percutaneous coronary intervention
- Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Administration of fibrinolytic or any GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors for the treatment of current acute myocardial infarction or within 1 month before it
- History of bleeding diathesis or allergy to the studies drug
- Major surgery within 30 days
- Limited life expectancy, e.g. neoplasms, others
- Pregnancy
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:治疗
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:阶乘赋值
- 屏蔽:无(打开标签)
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
---|---|
有源比较器:1
Patients will receive abciximab infusion at standard regimen prior undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI followed by BMS implantation in the culprit lesion
|
Patients will receive infusion of abciximab at standard regimen before undergoing intervention for STEMI and then bare metal stent implantation in the culprit lesion
其他名称:
|
实验性的:2
Abciximab followed by implantation of sirolimus-eluting stent in the culprit lesion
|
Patients will receive abciximab infusion at standard regimen followed by implantation of sirolimus-eluting stent in the culprit lesion
其他名称:
|
实验性的:3
tirofiban infusion followed by bare metal stent implantation
|
Patients will receive tirofiban infusion at high loading dose followed by standard infusion for 18-24 hours and subsequently they will be treated with bare metal stent implantation
其他名称:
|
实验性的:4
tirofiban and sirolimus-eluting stent
|
Patients will receive tirofiban infusion at high loading dose followed by standard infusion for 18-24 hours and subsequently they will be treated with sirolimus-eluting stent implantation
其他名称:
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
大体时间 |
---|---|
The evaluation of the degree of ST-segment resolution after the mechanical intervention.
大体时间:90 minutes after last balloon inflation
|
90 minutes after last balloon inflation
|
The cumulative rate of death for any cause, reinfarction and target vessel revascularisation
大体时间:8 months
|
8 months
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
大体时间 |
---|---|
Death, recurrent acute myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization and target lesion revascularisation, considered separately or in combination.
大体时间:at any time during follow-up
|
at any time during follow-up
|
The evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of the involved experimental treatments.
大体时间:8 months, 1,3 and 5 years
|
8 months, 1,3 and 5 years
|
stent thrombosis according to the ARC classification
大体时间:any time during follow-up
|
any time during follow-up
|
the degree of cumulative or single lead ST segment resolution at time frames different from the primary endpoint. the degree of residual ST segment elevation.
大体时间:immediately after intervention, at 90 minutes and at discharge
|
immediately after intervention, at 90 minutes and at discharge
|
bleeding rate defined according to different classifications including TIMI, Acuity, GUSTO and Steeple.
大体时间:at 30 days, 1 year, 3 and 5 years
|
at 30 days, 1 year, 3 and 5 years
|
合作者和调查者
调查人员
- 学习椅:Roberto Ferrari, Professor、Cattedra di Cardiologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Ferrara, Italy
出版物和有用的链接
一般刊物
- Valgimigli M, Percoco G, Malagutti P, Campo G, Ferrari F, Barbieri D, Cicchitelli G, McFadden EP, Merlini F, Ansani L, Guardigli G, Bettini A, Parrinello G, Boersma E, Ferrari R; STRATEGY Investigators. Tirofiban and sirolimus-eluting stent vs abciximab and bare-metal stent for acute myocardial infarction: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2005 May 4;293(17):2109-17. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.17.2109.
- Garg S, Sarno G, Serruys PW, Rodriguez AE, Bolognese L, Anselmi M, De Cesare N, Colangelo S, Moreno R, Gambetti S, Monti M, Bristot L, Bressers M, Garcia-Garcia HM, Parrinello G, Campo G, Valgimigli M; STRATEGY and MULTISTRATEGY Investigators. Prediction of 1-year clinical outcomes using the SYNTAX score in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a substudy of the STRATEGY (Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Abciximab and Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction) and MULTISTRATEGY (Multicenter Evaluation of Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban Versus Abciximab With Sirolimus-Eluting Stent or Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Study) trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jan;4(1):66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.09.017.
- Valgimigli M, Campo G, Percoco G, Bolognese L, Vassanelli C, Colangelo S, de Cesare N, Rodriguez AE, Ferrario M, Moreno R, Piva T, Sheiban I, Pasquetto G, Prati F, Nazzaro MS, Parrinello G, Ferrari R; Multicentre Evaluation of Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban vs Abciximab With Sirolimus-Eluting Stent or Bare Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Study (MULTISTRATEGY) Investigators. Comparison of angioplasty with infusion of tirofiban or abciximab and with implantation of sirolimus-eluting or uncoated stents for acute myocardial infarction: the MULTISTRATEGY randomized trial. JAMA. 2008 Apr 16;299(15):1788-99. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.15.joc80026. Epub 2008 Mar 30.
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (预期的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (估计)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (估计)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.