此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

促进健康的夏季青年就业计划

2026年6月29日 更新者:University of Houston

利用暑期青年就业计划预防青少年肥胖

本概念验证研究的目的是评估青少年暑期就业项目(SYEP)对青少年中研究不足的肥胖相关指标的初步有效性信号。 这项小规模研究对于在扩展到更大规模、资源更密集的随机试验之前识别早期成功并完善干预措施至关重要。 具体而言,这项单组前后测试研究将:

目标1(主要):评估为期6周的SYEP是否能在夏季期间提供有效性(维持或降低zBMI)的初步信号。

假设1:参与SYEP的青少年在夏季期间将维持或降低其BMI。

目标2(次要):评估夏季期间致肥胖行为(身体活动、睡眠、久坐行为和饮食)的变化。

假设2:参与SYEP的青少年在夏季期间将增加身体活动、减少久坐行为,并改善睡眠和饮食质量。

目标3(次要):评估SYEP作为肥胖预防干预措施的可行性,为干预措施的可扩展性提供依据。

假设3:SYEP项目将是在夏季期间预防青少年肥胖的可行且可接受的干预策略。

研究概览

详细说明

初步证据表明,暑期就业可能是一种适合年龄的结构化干预措施,能够预防青少年肥胖相关行为的不良变化。 虽然这些发现令人鼓舞,但现有研究均未测量夏季期间BMI的变化,也未对肥胖相关行为(包括饮食、久坐行为、睡眠和身体活动)进行综合评估。 为弥补这些不足,本研究提出开展一项小型概念验证研究,以评估在青少年中较少研究的肥胖相关指标上的初步有效性信号。

SYEP项目是运行超过60年的成熟持续计划,在学业提升、职业发展和犯罪预防方面已证实其效益,同时也可能作为肥胖预防策略。 与其创建新的干预措施,不如投资并扩大SYEP项目的覆盖范围——这些项目需求旺盛但容量有限(每年夏季仅约28%的申请者获得工作匹配,大多数申请人处于候补名单)——可为青少年肥胖预防提供切实可行的解决方案。

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

15

阶段

  • 第一阶段早期

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Texas
      • Houston、Texas、美国、77204
        • University of Houston

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 孩子

接受健康志愿者

是的

描述

纳入标准:

  • 根据德克萨斯州童工法规定,注册时年龄为14-17岁
  • 愿意在夏令营连续工作六周
  • 能够通过就业录用程序(工作面试)
  • 能够获得家长同意并提供参与研究的 assent

排除标准:

  • 当前怀孕或计划怀孕,因体力活动限制及可能影响研究结果的体重变化
  • 确诊存在需要特殊就业规定或干预策略的智力/身体残疾
  • 过去六个月内曾参与健康促进干预项目

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:预防
  • 分配:不适用
  • 介入模型:单组作业
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:夏季青年就业计划
参与者将在休斯顿大学夏令营担任初级夏令营辅导员,每周工作时间不超过24小时,周一至周四上午8:30至下午3:30(含中午12点-1点午休时间),工作周期为六周,从六月中旬持续至七月底。 参与者将协助高级辅导员开展室内外活动,包括游戏、素质拓展和学业辅导。 每周五上午10点至12点,参与者将参加职业发展研讨会,内容涵盖沟通技巧、团队协作、简历撰写及求职技能等主题。 中午12点至下午2:30期间,本科生工作人员将组织社交活动并提供学业指导。
该干预措施旨在夏季期间为青少年提供为期六周的带薪岗位,让他们置身于类似学年期间的、有组织、有规律且由成人监督的环境中。

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change in Age- and Sex-Specific Body Mass Index (BMI)-For-Age Z-Score (zBMI) From Baseline to Week 6
大体时间:Baseline and Week 6 (post)
Height and weight will be directly measured by trained staff. Each measurement will be taken twice, and the average will be used for analysis. Body mass index (BMI) will be calculated and expressed as Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) age- and sex-specific BMI-for-age z-scores (zBMI). The outcome will represent the change in zBMI from baseline to Week 6. A positive change score will indicate an increase (gain) in zBMI from baseline to Week 6, which will be considered a less favorable outcome. A negative change score will indicate a decrease in zBMI, which will be considered a favorable outcome. A change score of 0 will indicate no change in zBMI (maintenance), which will also be considered a favorable outcome for this intervention because preventing excess BMI gain during summer is a primary goal.
Baseline and Week 6 (post)

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change in Sedentary Behavior From Baseline to Week 6
大体时间:Baseline and Week 6 (post)
Sedentary behavior will be measured in minutes per day using a wrist-worn ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer on the non-dominant wrist over 8 consecutive days, including at least 2 valid weekdays and 1 valid weekend day. Activity intensities will be classified using cut points published by Hildebrand et al. The reported outcome will be the change in average daily sedentary behavior (minutes/day) from baseline to Week 6. A positive change score will indicate an increase in sedentary behavior, which will be considered an unfavorable outcome. A negative change score will indicate a decrease in sedentary behavior, which will be considered a favorable outcome. A change score of 0 will indicate no change in sedentary behavior (maintenance).
Baseline and Week 6 (post)
Change in Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) From Baseline to Week 6
大体时间:Baseline and Week 6 (post)
Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) will be measured in minutes per day using a wrist-worn ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer on the non-dominant wrist over 8 consecutive days, including at least 2 valid weekdays and 1 valid weekend day. Activity intensities will be classified using cut points published by Hildebrand et al. The reported outcome will be the change in average daily MVPA (minutes/day) from baseline to Week 6. A positive change score will indicate an increase in MVPA, which will be considered a favorable outcome. A negative change score will indicate a decrease in MVPA, which will be considered an unfavorable outcome. A change score of 0 will indicate no change in MVPA (maintenance), which will also be considered a favorable outcome.
Baseline and Week 6 (post)
Change in Sleep Duration From Baseline to Week 6
大体时间:Baseline and Week 6 (post)
Sleep duration will be measured in minutes per day using a wrist-worn ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer on the non-dominant wrist over 8 consecutive days, including at least 2 valid weekdays and 1 valid weekend day. Sleep duration will be estimated using the heuristic algorithm looking at the distribution of change in Z-Angle (HDCZA). The reported outcome will be the change in average daily sleep duration (minutes/day) from baseline to Week 6. A positive change score will indicate an increase in sleep duration, which will be considered a favorable outcome. A negative change score will indicate a decrease in sleep duration, which will be considered an unfavorable outcome. A change score of 0 will indicate no change in sleep duration (maintenance), which will also be considered a favorable outcome.
Baseline and Week 6 (post)
Change in Screen Time From Baseline to Week 6
大体时间:Baseline and Week 6 (post)
Screen time in hours and minutes (e.g., television, computer, video games, smart phones, tablets) will assessed via self-report during each 8-day behavioral assessment period. Screen time will be calculated as the average daily duration (minutes/day) by summing total reported screen time across completed daily logbooks and dividing by the number of valid diary days within each assessment period. The reported outcome will be the change in average daily screen time (minutes/day) from baseline to Week 6. A positive change score will indicate an increase in screen time, which will be considered an unfavorable outcome. A negative change score will indicate a decrease in screen time, which will be considered a favorable outcome. A change score of 0 will indicate no change in screen time (maintenance), which will also be considered a favorable outcome.
Baseline and Week 6 (post)
Change in Unhealthy Food Intake From Baseline to Week 6
大体时间:Baseline and Week 6 (post)
Dietary intake will be assessed using the NHANES 23-item Dietary Screener Questionnaire. Adolescents will self-report consumption of food and beverage items over the past day. For this outcome, unhealthy food items will include desserts, sugar-sweetened beverages, salty snacks, and fast food items. Responses will be used to estimate daily intake frequency (times/day) of unhealthy food consumption. The reported outcome will be the change in average daily frequency of unhealthy food intake (times/day) from baseline to Week 6. A positive change score will indicate an increase in unhealthy food intake, which will be considered an unfavorable outcome. A negative change score will indicate a decrease in unhealthy food intake, which will be considered a favorable outcome. A change score of 0 will indicate no change in unhealthy food intake (maintenance), which will also be considered a favorable outcome.
Baseline and Week 6 (post)
Recruitment Capacity (Percentage Meeting Recruitment Goal)
大体时间:Baseline
Recruitment capacity is the percentage meeting the recruitment goal.
Baseline
Retention
大体时间:Baseline and Week 6 (post)
Retention will be calculated as the percentage of enrolled participants who complete both baseline and post-intervention assessments for the primary outcome measures.
Baseline and Week 6 (post)
Fidelity
大体时间:Weekly during intervention (Weeks 1-6)
Fidelity will be assessed through weekly unannounced direct observations using a structured checklist developed by the research team specifically for the intervention. The checklist will assess key components of intervention implementation, including adherence, dose delivered, quality of delivery, and participant engagement. Each item will be rated using either binary scoring (0 = not implemented, 1 = implemented) or a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree), depending on the construct. All domain scores will be standardized and converted to a percentage scale. Each intervention session will be independently rated by two trained researcher, and ratings will be averaged. Session-level fidelity scores will then be averaged across all observation weeks to produce a single fidelity score. The fidelity score will be expressed as a percentage, with higher scores indicating greater fidelity to the intervention protocol and lower scores indicating reduced fidelity.
Weekly during intervention (Weeks 1-6)
Attendance
大体时间:Weekly during intervention (Weeks 1-6)
Attendance will be calculated as the average number of days attended across total offered workdays, using employer time sheets.
Weekly during intervention (Weeks 1-6)
Acceptability
大体时间:Week 7 (Follow-up)
Acceptability will be assessed using a quantitative satisfaction measure administered to adolescents following intervention participation. Participants will be asked to rate their likelihood of returning as a paid counselor the following summer on a scale ranging from 1 (not at all likely) to 10 (extremely likely). Individual responses will be averaged to generate a single acceptability score. The total score will range from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability and willingness to participate again, and lower scores indicating lower acceptability. Scores closer to 10 will represent high acceptability, while scores closer to 1 will represent low acceptability of the intervention experience.
Week 7 (Follow-up)
Change in Healthy Food Intake From Baseline to Week 6
大体时间:Baseline and Week 6 (post)
Dietary intake will be assessed using the NHANES 23-item Dietary Screener Questionnaire. Adolescents will self-report consumption of food and beverage items over the past day. For this outcome, healthy food items will include fruits, vegetables, 100% fruit juice, and milk items. Responses will be used to estimate daily intake frequency (times/day) of healthy food consumption. The reported outcome will be the change in average daily frequency of healthy food intake (times/day) from baseline to Week 6. A positive change score will indicate an increase in healthy food intake, which will be considered a favorable outcome. A negative change score will indicate a decrease in healthy food intake, which will be considered an unfavorable outcome. A change score of 0 will indicate no change in healthy food intake (maintenance), which will also be considered a favorable outcome.
Baseline and Week 6 (post)

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2025年3月31日

初级完成 (实际的)

2025年7月7日

研究完成 (实际的)

2025年7月29日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2025年8月4日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2025年11月10日

首次发布 (实际的)

2025年11月12日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年7月27日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年6月29日

最后验证

2025年10月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • STUDY00005180
  • U54MD015946 (美国 NIH 拨款/合同)

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅