Intermittent Preventive Treatment With Antimalarials in Kenyan Infants

September 26, 2012 updated by: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Efficacy and Safety of Pediatric Immunization-linked Preventive Intermittent Treatment With Antimalarials in Decreasing Anemia and Malaria Morbidity in Rural Western Kenya

The purpose of the study is to see whether antimalarial drugs administered at the time of routine infant vaccinations prevents malaria and anemia in the first year of life.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Approximately three quarters of preschool children in eastern Africa suffer from anemia, defined as a hemoglobin (Hb) concentration below 11 g/dL. For children < 5 years of age, the overall incidence of severe malarial anemia (Hb < 5 g/dl) is estimated at 15-60 cases per 1,000 children per year. Other studies have confirmed that the burden of malaria-related anemia falls primarily on infants and young children. In 2000, Schellenberg and colleagues, working in an area of Tanzania with a low to moderate level of Plasmodium falciparum transmission and a low level of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) resistance, demonstrated that by linking intermittent prophylaxis to routine immunization visits through the national Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI), SP could be administered to children at 2,3, and 9 months of age, resulting in a 59% reduction in rates of clinical malaria and a 50% reduction in the rate of severe anemia (Hb<8 g/dl) compared to those receiving placebo. This randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial is being conducted to estimate the efficacy of Intermittent Preventive Treatment for Infants (IPTi) with SP + three doses of artesunate (AS) (SP/AS3) given in combination with iron supplementation from 2-6 months of age at routine EPI visits on the prevention of clinical malaria, moderate anemia, and severe anemia in the first 18 months of life in an area with intense malaria transmission and near universal ownership of insecticide treated nets (ITNs). The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of iron supplementation and IPTi with one of 3 antimalarial regimens (SP/AS3, chlorproguanil-dapsone (Lapdap), or AQ/AS3) given at routine EPI visits with iron supplementation alone (+ placebo) on the prevention of clinical malaria in the first year of life. Specific secondary objectives are: 1) Compare the efficacy of iron supplementation plus IPTi with one of 3 antimalarial regimens (SP/AS3, Lapdap [chlorproguanil-dapsone], or AQ/AS3) given at routine EPI visits with iron supplementation alone (+ placebo) on the prevention of moderate and severe anemia in the first year of life; 2) Assess the impact of IPTi with the aforementioned regimens on serologic responses to EPI vaccines (Polio, Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis, Hepatitis B, Hemophilus Influenzae type B, and Measles; 3) Assess the impact of IPTi with the aforementioned regimens (particularly SP/AS3) on the nasal carriage rates of Haemophilus influenza type b; and 4) Compare the efficacy of iron supplementation and IPTi with one of 3 antimalarial regimens (SP/AS3, Lapdap [chlorproguanil-dapsone], or AQ/AS3) given at routine EPI visits with iron supplementation alone (+ placebo) on the prevention of all-cause hospitalization in the first year of life. This trial will generate important public health information on the efficacy of IPTi in preventing anemia and clinical malaria among infants in an area with intense malaria transmission and ongoing prevention efforts through the use of insecticide treated nets. This trial will contribute towards understanding IPTi's mechanism of action (i.e. through intermittent clearance of parasites vs. a chemoprophylactic effect afforded through the use of an antimalarial with a long half-life). The information gained will be useful to determine the safety of IPTi, and to decide what sort of antimalarials are appropriate for IPTi, and ultimately will help to direct child survival and malaria control policy in African countries. If alternative drug regimes to SP prove effective, that information will be valuable to policymakers as levels of P. falciparum resistance to SP rise with increased usage in east Africa.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1516

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Kenya
    • Nyanza Province
      • Asembo (Rarieda Division), Nyanza Province, Kenya
        • Lwak, Abidha, Ongielo and Saradidi clinics

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

1 month to 3 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Presenting for Pentavalent 1 immunization
  • Age 5 weeks to 16 weeks
  • Parent or guardian currently resident in study catchment area
  • Parent or guardian has given permission for their child to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy to any of the study drugs
  • Current Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis
  • Concomitant disease requiring hospitalization or transfusion
  • Plans to be away from the study area for more than 6 months during the next year

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Double

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Clinical malaria in the first year of life

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Moderate and severe anemia in the first year of life
Serologic responses to Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) vaccines (Polio, Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis, Hepatitis B, Hemophilus Influenzae type B, and Measles)
Nasal carriage rates of Haemophilus influenza type b
All cause hospitalization in the first year of life

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Kenya Medical Research Institute

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Robert D Newman, MD, MPH, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Principal Investigator: Laurence Slutsker, MD, MPH, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 17, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 17, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 18, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 27, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 26, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CDC-NCID-3606
  • SSC 701

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings