Safety of Daily Dose Esomeprazole for GERD for Pediatric and Adolescent Patients

November 18, 2010 updated by: AstraZeneca

A Phase III, Multicentre, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group Study to Evaluate the Safety of Once Daily Esomeprazole for the Treatment of Clinically Diagnosed Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients 12 to 17 Years of Age, Inclusive.

This study is a phase III, multi-centre, randomized, double-blind study to assess the safety and tolerability of once daily treatment with esomeprazole 20 or 40 mg in pediatric and adolescent patients 12 to 17 years of age, inclusive, with clinically diagnosed GERD. The treatment period will be up to 8 weeks.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
140

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Newfoundland and Labrador
      • Mount Pearl, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
        • Research Site
    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
        • Research Site
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
        • Research Site
      • Oakville, Ontario, Canada
        • Research Site
      • Scarborough, Ontario, Canada
        • Research Site
      • Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
        • Research Site
    • Prince Edward Island
      • Parkdale, Prince Edward Island, Canada
        • Research Site
  • France
      • Lille, France
        • Research Site
      • Paris, France
        • Research Site
      • Tours, France
        • Research Site
  • Italy
      • Roma, Italy
        • Research Site
    • GE
      • Genova, GE, Italy
        • Research Site
  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States
        • Research Site
    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
        • Research Site
    • Delaware
      • Wilmington, Delaware, United States
        • Research Site
    • Florida
      • Orlando, Florida, United States
        • Research Site
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States
        • Research Site
    • Illinois
      • Park Ridge, Illinois, United States
        • Research Site
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
        • Research Site
    • Iowa
      • Iowa City, Iowa, United States
        • Research Site
    • Louisiana
      • Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
        • Research Site
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States
        • Research Site
      • Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
        • Research Site
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States
        • Research Site
    • Minnesota
      • Plymouth, Minnesota, United States
        • Research Site
      • St Paul, Minnesota, United States
        • Research Site
    • Mississippi
      • Jackson, Mississippi, United States
        • Research Site
    • New York
      • Binghamton, New York, United States
        • Research Site
      • Bronx, New York, United States
        • Research Site
      • Brooklyn, New York, United States
        • Research Site
      • Buffalo, New York, United States
        • Research Site
      • Johnson City, New York, United States
        • Research Site
      • New Hyde Park, New York, United States
        • Research Site
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
        • Research Site
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States
        • Research Site
      • Dayton, Ohio, United States
        • Research Site
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
        • Research Site
    • Tennessee
      • Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States
        • Research Site
    • Vermont
      • Burlington, Vermont, United States
        • Research Site
    • Virginia
      • Norfolk, Virginia, United States
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 17 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Provision of signed written informed consent from the patient's parent/guardian, and assent from the patient prior to conducting of any study-related procedures.
  • Patients must be male or female between the age of 12 and 17 years, inclusive.
  • Patients must have a clinical diagnosis of GERD made by the investigator based on any of the following factors: history, physical examination, review of systems, laboratory test results, or information from diagnostic testing.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have used a PPI within 14 days prior to randomization, including over-the-counter Prilosec®.
  • Patients who have used any prescription or over-the-counter treatment for symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), such as Histamine 2 Receptor Antagonists (H2RA) or prokinetics, within 3 days prior to randomization. Antacids may be used, except for those containing bismuth.
  • Patients with a known hypersensitivity, allergy, or intolerance to any component of esomeprazole or omeprazole.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
To evaluate safety & how tolerable a once daily treatment with esomeprazole is in pediatric & adolescent patients
12 to 17 years of age, inclusive, with clinically diagnosed Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (G

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
To evaluate the clinical outcome of once daily treatment with esomeprazole in relieving gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-associated signs & symptoms in pediatric & adolescent patients 12 to 17 years of age
- Assessment of changes from baseline in daily patient symptom assessment as reported by the patient.
- Assessment of changes from baseline in Physician Global Assessment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
AstraZeneca

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2004

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2005

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 18, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 18, 2005

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 19, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 19, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 18, 2010

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • D9614C00098

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings