Study Evaluating Pantoprazole Sodium Enteric-Coated Spheroid Suspension In Infants With Presumed GERD

April 19, 2010 updated by: Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer

A Multicenter, Randomized, Open Label, Single and Multiple Dose Study of the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of 2 Dose Levels of Pantoprazole Sodium Enteric-Coated Spheroid Suspension in Infants Aged 1 Through 11 Months With Presumed GERD

The purpose of this study is to characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles to determine the safety and tolerability of single and multiple doses of pantoprazole in infants aged 1 through 11 months.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
67

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Australia
      • Brisbane, Australia
  • Belgium
      • Antwerpen, Belgium, B-2020
      • Brussels, Belgium, B-1090
      • Gent, Belgium, B-9000
  • France
      • Paris, France, 75674
  • Germany
      • Aachen, Germany, D-52074
      • Osnabruck, Germany, D-49074
  • Italy
      • Brescia, Italy, 25123
      • Naples, Italy, 80131
      • Roma, Italy, 00161
  • Poland
      • Krakow, Poland, 30-663
      • Lodz, Poland, 91-738
      • Lublin, Poland
      • Warszaw, Poland, 04-730
  • Switzerland
      • Zurich, Switzerland, 8032
  • United States
    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72205
    • California
      • Loma Linda, California, United States, 92351
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92103
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33101
      • Pensacola, Florida, United States, 32504
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60614
      • Park Ridge, Illinois, United States, 60068
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
    • Louisiana
      • Shreveport, Louisiana, United States, 71130
    • Mississippi
      • Jackson, Mississippi, United States, 39216
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64108
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
    • Texas
      • Temple, Texas, United States, 76508

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

1 month to 11 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Greater than 44 weeks beyond neonatal period but less than 12 months
  • Presumptive diagnosis of GERD
  • Weight greater than 2.5 kg but less than 15 kg

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, ie, unrepaired tracheal esophageal fistula, GI malabsorption
  • Clinically significant medical or surgical abnormalities

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: High dose
Drug: pantoprazole sodium enteric-coated spheroid suspension
pediatric suspension taken daily x 7 days
Active Comparator: Low dose
Drug: pantoprazole sodium enteric-coated spheroid suspension
pediatric suspension taken daily x 7 days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Peak Concentration (Cmax)
Time Frame: 1 day
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, including peak plasma concentration, were determined following a single oral dose of pantoprazole
1 day
Time to Peak Concentration (Tmax) Profile
Time Frame: 1 day
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, including time to peak plasma concentration, were determined following a single oral dose of pantoprazole.
1 day
Disposition Half-life
Time Frame: 1 day
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, including the terminal-phase disposition half-life, were determined following a single oral dose of pantoprazole. Half-life is the time required for half the quantity of absorbed drug to be metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes.
1 day
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC)
Time Frame: 1 day
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, including AUC, were determined following a single oral dose of pantoprazole. AUC is a measure of the plasma concentration of the drug over time. It is used to characterize drug absorption.
1 day
Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F)
Time Frame: 1 day
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, including apparent oral clearance, were determined following a single oral dose of pantoprazole. Clearance of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. Clearance obtained after oral dose (apparent oral clearance) is influenced by the fraction of the dose absorbed.
1 day
Pantoprazole Plasma Concentration After Multiple-Dose Oral Administration
Time Frame: 7 days
Plasma concentration of pantoprazole after multiple doses was measured to see if there was any accumulation of the drug.
7 days
Intragastric pH
Time Frame: 7 days
Intragastric pH is a method for evaluating gastric acidity scaled 0-9. A lower pH means more acidity. A longer duration of esophageal mucosa exposure to a gastric refluxate with a pH <4.0 correlates with more severe mucosal injury in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
7 days
Median Intragastric pH
Time Frame: 7 days
Intragastric pH is a method for evaluating gastric acidity scaled 0-9. A lower pH means more acidity. A longer duration of esophageal mucosa exposure to a gastric refluxate with a pH <4.0 correlates with more severe mucosal injury in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
7 days
Percentage of Time Intragastric pH Was >4
Time Frame: 7 days
Intragastric pH is a method for evaluating gastric acidity. A lower pH means more acidity. A longer duration of esophageal mucosa exposure to a gastric refluxate with a pH <4.0 correlates with more severe mucosal injury in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
7 days
Mean Intraesophageal pH
Time Frame: 7 days
Intraesophagel pH is a method for evaluating acidity of gastric refluxate scaled 0-9. A lower pH means more acidity. A longer duration of esophageal mucosa exposure to a gastric refluxate with a pH <4.0 correlates with more severe mucosal injury in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
7 days
Median Intraesophageal pH
Time Frame: 7 days
Intraesophagel pH is a method for evaluating acidity of gastric refluxate scaled 0-9. A lower pH means more acidity. A longer duration of esophageal mucosa exposure to a gastric refluxate with a pH <4.0 correlates with more severe mucosal injury in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
7 days
Percentage of Time That Intraesophageal pH Was <4
Time Frame: 7 days
Intraesophagel pH is a method for evaluating acidity of gastric refluxate. A lower pH means more acidity. A longer duration of esophageal mucosa exposure to a gastric refluxate with a pH <4.0 correlates with more severe mucosal injury in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
7 days
Normalized Area of Gastric Hydrogen Ion Activity Over Time
Time Frame: 7 days
Normalized Area of Gastric Hydrogen Ion Activity Over Time is a measure of the area under the curve of the gastric hydrogen ion activity over time, which is normalized for a 24-hour period.
7 days
Normalized Area of Esophageal Hydrogen Ion Activity Over Time
Time Frame: 7 days
Normalized Area of Esophageal Hydrogen Ion Activity Over Time is a measure of the area under the curve of the esophageal hydrogen ion activity over time, which is normalized for a 24-hour period.
7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Nycomed

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Trial Manager, For Australia, medinfo@wyeth.com
  • Principal Investigator: Trial Manager, For Poland, WPWZMED@wyeth.com
  • Principal Investigator: Trial Manager, For Switzerland, med@wyeth.com

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 23, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 23, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 28, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 7, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 19, 2010

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 3001B3-333, 3001B3-335

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings