Effect of Risk Factors Likely to Influence Immuno of Combined Hepatitis A & B Vacc vs Monovalent Hepatitis A & B Vacc

October 29, 2019 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline

Evaluate the Effect of Several Risk Factors That Are Likely to Influence the Immunogenicity of GSK Biologicals' Combined Hepatitis A & B Vaccine, vs Separately Administered Monovalent Hepatitis A and Hepatitis B Vaccines

The focus of this study is to evaluate how risk factors like age, gender, body mass index, smoking, alcohol consumption, etc. can influence immune response when subjects are vaccinated with GSK Biologicals' combined hepatitis A/hepatitis B vaccine or monovalent hepatitis A and B vaccines (from GSK Biologicals' or different manufacturers). The Protocol Posting has been updated in order to comply with the FDA Amendment Act, Sep 2007.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The study will also evaluate the persistence of hepatitis A and hepatitis B antibodies at months 12, 24 and 36 after the first dose of primary vaccination course.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
596

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Belgium
      • Wilrijk, Belgium, 2610
        • GSK Investigational Site
  • Czechia
      • Hradec Kralove, Czechia, 500 01
        • GSK Investigational Site
  • Germany
    • Brandenburg
      • Finsterwalde, Brandenburg, Germany, 03238
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Sachsen
      • Dresden, Sachsen, Germany, 01129
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Geringswalde, Sachsen, Germany, 09326
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Pirna, Sachsen, Germany, 01796
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Schleswig-Holstein
      • Bad Bramstedt, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, 24576
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Bad Segeberg, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, 23795
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Elmshorn, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, 25335
        • GSK Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

41 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Subjects who the investigator believes that they can and will comply with the requirements of the protocol should be enrolled in the study.
  • Healthy and non-healthy male or female aged 41 years or older at the time of the first vaccination.
  • Written informed consent obtained from the subject.
  • No serological signs of hepatitis A or B infection at screening.
  • If the subject is female, she must be of non-childbearing potential or, if of childbearing potential, she must be abstinent or have used adequate contraceptive precautions for 30 days prior to vaccination, have a negative pregnancy test and must agree to continue such precautions for two months after completion of the vaccination series.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Use of any investigational or non-registered product (drug or vaccine) other than the study vaccines within 30 days preceding the first dose of study vaccine, or planned use during the study period.
  • History of any hepatitis A or hepatitis B vaccination or infection, since the primary vaccination study 100382.
  • History of allergic disease or reactions likely to be exacerbated by any component of the vaccine.
  • Acute disease at the time of enrolment. .
  • Pregnant or lactating female.
  • Female planning to become pregnant or planning to discontinue contraceptive precautions during the primary vaccination period.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Twinrix Group
Healthy and non-healthy male or female subjects, aged 41 years or older, who received combined Twinrix™ (720/20) vaccine, administered intramuscularly in the left deltoid region, according to a 0, 1 and 6 month schedule.
Biological: TWINRIX™
Intramuscular injection, 3 doses
Active Comparator: Engerix-B+Havrix Group
Healthy and non-healthy male or female subjects, aged 41 years or older, who received separate administrations of Engerix™-B (20 μg) vaccine, administered intramuscularly in the left deltoid region, according to a 0, 1 and 6 month schedule and Havrix™ (1440 EL.U) vaccine, administered intramuscularly in the right deltoid region, according to a 0 and 6 month schedule.
Biological: Engerix™-B
Intramuscular injection, 3 doses
Biological: HAVRIX™
Intramuscular injection, 2 doses
Active Comparator: HB VAX PRO+Vaqta Group
Healthy and non-healthy male or female subjects, aged 41 years or older, who received separate administrations of HB VAX PRO™ (10 μg) vaccine, administered intramuscularly in the left deltoid region, according to a 0, 1 and 6 month schedule and Vaqta™ (50 IU) vaccine, administered intramuscularly in the right deltoid region, according to a 0 and 6 month schedule.
Biological: HB VAX PRO™
Intramuscular injection, 3 doses
Biological: Vaqta™
Intramuscular injection, 2 doses

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Antibody Concentrations for Anti-hepatitis A Virus (Anti-HAV) and Anti-hepatitis B Surface (Anti-HBs) Antigens
Time Frame: At Month 7 after Twinrix vaccination
Anti-HAV and anti-HBs antibody concentrations are presented as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), expressed in milli International Units per milliliter (mIU/mL). The reference seropositivity cut-off values for anti-HAV and anti-HBs antibodies were equal to or above (≥) 15 mIU/mL and ≥ 3.3 mIU/mL, respectively.
At Month 7 after Twinrix vaccination
Number of Subjects With Anti-HAV and Anti-HBs Antibody Concentrations Above the Cut-off Value
Time Frame: At Month 7
Seropositivity for anti-HAV antibodies was defined as anti-HAV antibody concentration ≥ 15mIU/mL; seropositivity for anti-HBs antibodies was defined as anti-HBs antibody concentration ≥ 3.3 mIU/mL.
At Month 7
Number of Seroprotected Subjects Against Hepatitis B Surface (HBs) Antigen
Time Frame: At Month 7
A seroprotected subject was defined as a vaccinated subject with a serum anti-HBs antibody concentration equal to or above (≥) 10 mIU/mL.
At Month 7

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anti-HAV and Anti-HBs Antibody Concentrations
Time Frame: At Month 7
Anti-HAV and anti-HBs antibody concentrations are presented as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), expressed in milli International Units per milliliter (mIU/mL). The reference seropositivity cut-off values for anti-HAV and anti-HBs antibodies were equal to or above (≥) 15 mIU/mL and ≥ 3.3 mIU/mL, respectively.
At Month 7
Number of Subjects With Anti-HAV and Anti-HBs Antibody Concentrations Above the Cut-off Value, by Gender
Time Frame: At Month 7
Seropositivity for anti-HAV antibodies was defined as anti-HAV antibody concentration equal to or above (≥) 15 mIU/mL and anti-HBs seropositivity was defined as anti-HBs antibody concentrations ≥ 3.3 mIU/mL. The seropositivity rates were stratified by gender (females and males).
At Month 7
Number of Subjects With Anti-HAV and Anti-HBs Antibody Concentrations Above the Cut-off Value, by Age
Time Frame: At Month 7
Seropositivity for anti-HAV antibodies was defined as anti-HAV antibody concentration equal to or above (≥) 15 mIU/mL and anti-HBs seropositivity was defined as anti-HBs antibody concentrations ≥ 3.3 mIU/mL. The seropositivity rates were stratified by age as follows: ≤ 50 years of age (YOA), 51-60 YOA and ≥ 61 YOA.
At Month 7
Number of Subjects With Anti-HAV and Anti-HBs Antibody Concentrations Above the Cut-off Value, by Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: At Month 7
Seropositivity for anti-HAV antibodies was defined as anti-HAV antibody concentration equal to or above (≥) 15 mIU/mL and anti-HBs seropositivity was defined as anti-HBs antibody concentrations ≥ 3.3 mIU/mL. The seropositivity rates were stratified by BMI as follows: healthy, overweight and obese.
At Month 7
Number of Subjects With Anti-HAV and Anti-HBs Antibody Concentrations Above the Cut-off Value, by Smoking Status
Time Frame: At Month 7
Seropositivity for anti-HAV antibodies was defined as anti-HAV antibody concentration equal to or above (≥) 15 mIU/mL and anti-HBs seropositivity was defined as anti-HBs antibody concentrations ≥ 3.3 mIU/mL. The seropositivity rates were stratified by smoking status (smokers and non-smokers).
At Month 7
Number of Subjects With Anti-HAV and Anti-HBs Antibody Concentrations Above the Cut-off Value, by Alcohol Consumption
Time Frame: At Month 7
Seropositivity for anti-HAV antibodies was defined as anti-HAV antibody concentration equal to or above (≥) 15 mIU/mL and anti-HBs seropositivity was defined as anti-HBs antibody concentrations ≥ 3.3 mIU/mL. The seropositivity rates were stratified by alcohol consumption as follows: None or Mild, Moderate and Heavy.
At Month 7
Number of Subjects With Anti-HAV and Anti-HBs Antibody Concentrations Above the Cut-off Value, by Concomitant Medication
Time Frame: At Month 7
Seropositivity for anti-HAV antibodies was defined as anti-HAV antibody concentration equal to or above (≥) 15 mIU/mL and anti-HBs seropositivity was defined as anti-HBs antibody concentrations ≥ 3.3 mIU/mL. The seropositivity rates were stratified by concomitant medication (concomitant medication and no concomitant medication).
At Month 7
Number of Subjects With Anti-HAV and Anti-HBs Antibody Concentrations Above the Cut-off Value, by Medical Condition
Time Frame: At Month 7
Seropositivity for anti-HAV antibodies was defined as anti-HAV antibody concentration equal to or above (≥) 15 mIU/mL and anti-HBs seropositivity was defined as anti-HBs antibody concentrations ≥ 3.3 mIU/mL. The seropositivity rates were stratified by medical condition as follows: no medical condition, past medical condition and current medical condition.
At Month 7
Number of Seroprotected Subjects Against HBs Antigen, by Gender
Time Frame: At Month 7
A seroprotected subject was defined as a vaccinated subject with a serum anti-HBs antibody concentration equal to or above (≥) 10 mIU/mL. The seroprotection rates were stratified by gender (females and males).
At Month 7
Number of Seroprotected Subjects Against HBs Antigen, by Age
Time Frame: At Month 7
A seroprotected subject was defined as a vaccinated subject with a serum anti-HBs antibody concentration equal to or above (≥) 10 mIU/mL. The seroprotection rates were stratified by age as follows: ≤ 50 years of age (YOA), 51-60 YOA and ≥ 61 YOA.
At Month 7
Number of Seroprotected Subjects Against HBs Antigen, by BMI
Time Frame: At Month 7
A seroprotected subject was defined as a vaccinated subject with a serum anti-HBs antibody concentration equal to or above (≥) 10 mIU/mL. The seroprotection rates were stratified by BMI as follows: healthy, overweight and obese.
At Month 7
Number of Seroprotected Subjects Against HBs Antigen, by Smoking Status
Time Frame: At Month 7
A seroprotected subject was defined as a vaccinated subject with a serum anti-HBs antibody concentration equal to or above (≥) 10 mIU/mL. The seroprotection rates were stratified by smoking status (smokers and non-smokers).
At Month 7
Number of Seroprotected Subjects Against HBs Antigen, by Alcohol Consumption
Time Frame: At Month 7
A seroprotected subject was defined as a vaccinated subject with a serum anti-HBs antibody concentration equal to or above (≥) 10 mIU/mL. The seroprotection rates were stratified by alcohol consumption as follows: none or mild, moderate and heavy.
At Month 7
Number of Seroprotected Subjects Against HBs Antigen, by Concomitant Medication
Time Frame: At Month 7
A seroprotected subject was defined as a vaccinated subject with a serum anti-HBs antibody concentration equal to or above (≥) 10 mIU/mL. The seroprotection rates were stratified by concomitant medication (concomitant medication and no concomitant medication).
At Month 7
Number of Seroprotected Subjects Against HBs Antigen, by Medical Condition
Time Frame: At Month 7
A seroprotected subject was defined as a vaccinated subject with a serum anti-HBs antibody concentration equal to or above (≥) 10 mIU/mL. The seroprotection rates were stratified by medical condition as follows: no medical condition, past medical condition and current medical condition.
At Month 7
Anti-HAV and Anti-HBs Antibody Concentrations, by Gender
Time Frame: At Month 7
Anti-HAV and anti-HBs antibody concentrations are presented as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), expressed in milli International Units per milliliter (mIU/mL). The reference seropositivity cut-off values for anti-HAV and anti-HBs antibodies were equal to or above (≥) 15 mIU/mL and ≥ 3.3 mIU/mL, respectively. The antibody concentrations were stratified by gender (females and males).
At Month 7
Anti-HAV and Anti-HBs Antibody Concentrations, by Age
Time Frame: At Month 7
Anti-HAV and anti-HBs antibody concentrations are presented as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), expressed in milli International Units per milliliter (mIU/mL). The reference seropositivity cut-off values for anti-HAV and anti-HBs antibodies were equal to or above (≥) 15 mIU/mL and ≥ 3.3 mIU/mL, respectively. The antibody concentrations were stratified by age as follows: ≤ 50 years of age (YOA), 51-60 YOA and ≥ 61 YOA.
At Month 7
Anti-HAV and Anti-HBs Antibody Concentrations, by BMI
Time Frame: At Month 7
Anti-HAV and anti-HBs antibody concentrations are presented as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), expressed in milli International Units per milliliter (mIU/mL). The reference seropositivity cut-off values for anti-HAV and anti-HBs antibodies were equal to or above (≥) 15 mIU/mL and ≥ 3.3 mIU/mL, respectively. The antibody concentrations were stratified by BMI as follows: healthy, overweight and obese.
At Month 7
Anti-HAV and Anti-HBs Antibody Concentrations, by Smoking Status
Time Frame: At Month 7
Anti-HAV and anti-HBs antibody concentrations are presented as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), expressed in milli International Units per milliliter (mIU/mL). The reference seropositivity cut-off values for anti-HAV and anti-HBs antibodies were equal to or above (≥) 15 mIU/mL and ≥ 3.3 mIU/mL, respectively. The antibody concentrations were stratified by smoking status (smokers and non-smokers).
At Month 7
Anti-HAV and Anti-HBs Antibody Concentrations, by Alcohol Consumption
Time Frame: At Month 7
Anti-HAV and anti-HBs antibody concentrations are presented as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), expressed in milli International Units per milliliter (mIU/mL). The reference seropositivity cut-off values for anti-HAV and anti-HBs antibodies were equal to or above (≥) 15 mIU/mL and ≥ 3.3 mIU/mL, respectively. The antibody concentrations were stratified by alcohol consumption as follows: none or mild, moderate and heavy.
At Month 7
Anti-HAV and Anti-HBs Antibody Concentrations, by Concomitant Medication
Time Frame: At Month 7
Anti-HAV and anti-HBs antibody concentrations are presented as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), expressed in milli International Units per milliliter (mIU/mL). The reference seropositivity cut-off values for anti-HAV and anti-HBs antibodies were equal to or above (≥) 15 mIU/mL and ≥ 3.3 mIU/mL, respectively. The antibody concentrations were stratified by concomitant medication (concomitant medication and no concomitant medication).
At Month 7
Anti-HAV and Anti-HBs Antibody Concentrations, by Medical Condition
Time Frame: At Month 7
Anti-HAV and anti-HBs antibody concentrations are presented as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), expressed in milli International Units per milliliter (mIU/mL). The reference seropositivity cut-off values for anti-HAV and anti-HBs antibodies were equal to or above (≥) 15 mIU/mL and ≥ 3.3 mIU/mL, respectively. The antibody concentrations were stratified by medical condition as follows: no medical condition, past medical condition and current medical condition.
At Month 7
Number of Subjects With Anti-HAV and Anti-HBs Antibody Concentrations Above the Cut-off Value
Time Frame: At Month 12 (M12), Month 24 (M24) and Month 36 (M36)
Seropositivity for anti-HAV antibodies was defined as anti-HAV antibody concentration equal to or above (≥) 15 mIU/mL and anti-HBs seropositivity was defined as anti-HBs antibody concentrations ≥ 3.3 mIU/mL. Anti-HBs AUSAB = anti-HBs antibody concentrations were tested with AUSAB EIA /Abbott assay; Anti-HBs in-house = anti-HBs antibody concentrations were tested with in-house assay (bridging).
At Month 12 (M12), Month 24 (M24) and Month 36 (M36)
Number of Seroprotected Subjects Against Hepatitis B Surface (HBs) Antigen
Time Frame: At Month 12 (M12), Month 24 (M24) and Month 36 (M36)
A seroprotected subject was defined as a vaccinated subject with a serum anti-HBs antibody concentration equal to or above (≥) 10 mIU/mL. Anti-HBs AUSAB = anti-HBs antibody concentrations were tested with AUSAB EIA /Abbott assay; Anti-HBs in-house = anti-HBs antibody concentrations were tested with in-house assay (bridging).
At Month 12 (M12), Month 24 (M24) and Month 36 (M36)
Anti-HAV and Anti-HBs Antibody Concentrations
Time Frame: At Month 12 (M12), Month 24 (M24) and Month 36 (M36)
Anti-HAV and anti-HBs antibody concentrations are presented as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), expressed in milli International Units per milliliter (mIU/mL). The reference seropositivity cut-off values for anti-HAV and anti-HBs antibodies were equal to or above (≥) 15 mIU/mL and ≥ 3.3 mIU/mL, respectively. Anti-HBs AUSAB = anti-HBs antibody concentrations were tested with AUSAB EIA /Abbott assay; Anti-HBs in-house = anti-HBs antibody concentrations were tested with in-house assay (bridging).
At Month 12 (M12), Month 24 (M24) and Month 36 (M36)
Number of Subjects With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: From Day 0 up to Month 7
SAEs assessed include medical occurrences that result in death, are life-threatening, require hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or result in disability/incapacity. Note: 3 subjects reported SAEs prior to administration of the first dose of vaccination.
From Day 0 up to Month 7
Number of Subjects With SAEs
Time Frame: At Month 12 (M12), Month 24 (M24) and Month 36 (M36)
SAEs assessed include medical occurrences that result in death, are life-threatening, require hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or result in disability/incapacity. Note: 3 subjects reported SAEs prior to administration of the first dose of vaccination.
At Month 12 (M12), Month 24 (M24) and Month 36 (M36)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
GlaxoSmithKline

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 24, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 21, 2004

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 21, 2004

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 9, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 9, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 10, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 15, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 29, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 100382
  • 100383 (Other Identifier: GSK)
  • 100384 (Other Identifier: GSK)
  • 100385 (Other Identifier: GSK)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

IPD is available via the Clinical Study Data Request site (click on the link provided below)

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access is provided after a research proposal is submitted and has received approval from the Independent Review Panel and after a Data Sharing Agreement is in place. Access is provided for an initial period of 12 months but an extension can be granted, when justified, for up to another 12 months.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Study Data/Documents

  1. Statistical Analysis Plan
    Information identifier: 100382
    Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
  2. Dataset Specification
    Information identifier: 100382
    Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
  3. Individual Participant Data Set
    Information identifier: 100382
    Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register. The results of this study 100382 are summarised with studies 100383, 100384, and 100385 on the GSK Clinical Study Register.
  4. Clinical Study Report
    Information identifier: 100382
    Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
  5. Study Protocol
    Information identifier: 100382
    Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
  6. Informed Consent Form
    Information identifier: 100382
    Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings