The Safety and Efficacy of the Buprenorphine Transdermal Delivery System in Subjects With Chronic Back Pain.

May 1, 2006 updated by: Purdue Pharma LP

A Double-Blind Comparative Study of Buprenorphine Transdermal System (BTDS) and Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Tablets in Patients With Chronic Back Pain

The objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the buprenorphine transdermal system (5, 10, and 20 mg) in comparison to placebo transdermal system and hydrocodone/acetaminophen in subjects with chronic back pain. The double-blind treatment intervention duration is 56 days during which time supplemental analgesic medication (ibuprofen) will be provided to all subjects in addition to study drug.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Buprenorphine is a synthetic opioid analgesic with over twenty-five years of international clinical experience indicating it to be safe and effective in a variety of therapeutic situations for the relief of moderate to severe pain. Transdermal systems may offer advantages over currently indicated oral products including ease and convenience of use, improved compliance, possible reduction in patient care, and prolonged and consistent delivery of drug.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
250

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Huntsville, Alabama, United States, 35801
        • Rheumatology Associates of North Alabama
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85023
        • Arizona Research Center
    • Connecticut
      • Waterbury, Connecticut, United States, 06708
        • Arthritis Center of Connecticut
    • Florida
      • Deland, Florida, United States, 32720
        • University Clinical Research
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32605
        • Gainesville Clinical Research Center
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33173
        • Miami Research Associates
      • Sarasota, Florida, United States, 34239
        • Sarasota Arthritis Center
      • South Daytona Beach, Florida, United States, 32119
        • Coastal Medical Research
      • West Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33409
        • Palm Beach Research Center
      • Weston, Florida, United States, 33331
        • Private practice
    • Indiana
      • Terre Haute, Indiana, United States, 47807
        • Pain Management & Rehabilitation
    • Kansas
      • Overland Park, Kansas, United States, 66209
        • Mid-America Rheumatology Consultants
    • Kentucky
      • Crestview Hills, Kentucky, United States, 41017
        • Riverhills Healthcare
    • Mississippi
      • Jackson, Mississippi, United States, 39216
        • Arthritis & Osteoporosis Treatment & Research Center
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64114
        • Center for Pharmaceutical Research
    • Nevada
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89128
        • PrecisionMed, Inc.
    • North Carolina
      • High Point, North Carolina, United States, 27262
        • Cornerstone Research Care
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45219
        • Consultants for Clinical Research
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78758
        • Center for Clinical Research
    • Virginia
      • Arlington, Virginia, United States, 22206
        • The Arthritis Clinic of Northern Virginia
    • Washington
      • Edmonds, Washington, United States, 98026
        • Evergreen Clinical Research
    • Wisconsin
      • Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, United States, 53226
        • Private practice

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • clinical evidence of chronic back pain related to intervertebral disc disease, nerve root entrapment, spondylolithesis, osteoarthritis, or other, similar nonmalignant conditions.
  • back pain treated with an opioid-containing analgesic at a dose equal to or less than the equivalent of 90 mg of oral morphine per day or 12 or fewer capsules or tablets of an opioid combination analgesic per day.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • receiving opioids at an average daily dose of greater than 90 mg of oral morphine equivalents or patients receiving more than 12 tablets per day of short-acting opioid-containing products.
  • scheduled to have surgery (including dental) during the study period that involved the use of pre- and/or postoperative analgesics or anesthetics.

Other protocol-specific exclusion/inclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Patient Satisfaction With Medication for Pain and Average Pain Intensity scores on days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56 and, if applicable, at early termination.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Average Pain Intensity and Patient Satisfaction With Medication for Pain scores (Patient Global Efficacy Rating)
incidence of and time to early discontinuation due to lack of efficacy
investigator's assessment of therapeutic response
dose level at the end of titration

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Purdue Pharma LP

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 1999

Study Completion

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 1999

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 18, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 18, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 19, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 3, 2006

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 1, 2006

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2006

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • BP98-1201

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings