Everolimus and Imatinib Mesylate in Treating Patients With Metastatic or Unresectable Kidney Cancer

September 25, 2017 updated by: Christopher Ryan, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute

A Phase II Study of the Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) Inhibitor RAD001 in Combination With Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Renal Carcinoma

RATIONALE: Everolimus and imatinib mesylate may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Everolimus may also block blood flow to the tumor. Giving everolimus together with imatinib mesylate may kill more tumor cells.

PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well giving everolimus together with imatinib mesylate works in treating patients with metastatic or unresectable kidney cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Estimate the proportion of patients with previously treated metastatic or unresectable clear cell carcinoma of the kidney who are progression free (complete response [CR], partial response [PR], or stable disease [SD]) at 3 months after treatment with everolimus and imatinib mesylate.

Secondary

  • Estimate median time to progression in patients treated with this regimen.
  • Determine the proportion of patients whose best overall response are CR, PR, SD, or progressive disease.
  • Evaluate the mean and range of the maximum percent reduction in tumor size.
  • Describe the toxicities of this regimen in these patients.

OUTLINE: This is an open-label, multicenter study.

Patients receive oral imatinib mesylate and oral everolimus once daily beginning on day 1 and continuing in the absence of disease progression.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 43 patients will be accrued for this study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
23

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239-3098
        • OHSU Knight Cancer Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically confirmed clear cell kidney cancer, meeting 1 of the following criteria:

    • Measurable metastatic disease
    • Locally unresectable disease
  • No history of known brain metastases that have not been adequately treated with radiotherapy and/or surgery
  • Must have received ≥ 1 prior systemic therapy for metastatic or unresectable renal cell carcinoma

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2
  • Absolute neutrophil count > 1,500/mm³
  • Platelet count > 100,000/mm³
  • Hemoglobin > 8 g/dL
  • Bilirubin < 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase(SGOT) and Serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase(SGPT) < 2.5 times ULN
  • Creatinine < 1.5 times ULN
  • No New York Heat Association grade III-IV cardiac disease
  • No other malignancy within the past 5 years except basal cell skin cancer, cervical carcinoma in situ, or insignificant or inactive disease
  • No chronic liver disease (i.e., chronic active hepatitis or cirrhosis)
  • No severe or uncontrolled medical disease
  • No gastrointestinal disease or impairment that would hinder the absorption of everolimus
  • No uncontrolled diabetes
  • No chronic renal disease
  • No active uncontrolled infection
  • No congestive heart failure
  • No myocardial infarction within the past 6 months

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • More than 2 weeks since prior major surgery
  • More than 4 weeks since prior chemotherapy (6 weeks for nitrosourea or mitomycin C)
  • More than 4 weeks since prior immunotherapy
  • More than 4 weeks since other prior investigational agents
  • No prior radiotherapy to > 25% of bone marrow
  • No prior treatment with an mammalian target of rapamycin(mTOR) inhibitor
  • No concurrent therapeutic warfarin

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Everolimus and Imatinib Mesylate
Everolimus: 2.5 mg daily by mouth Imatinib Mesylate: 600 mg daily by mouth
Drug: Everolimus
2.5 mg by mouth daily
Other Names:
  • Afinitor
  • Certican
  • RAD001
Drug: imatinib mesylate
600 mg by mouth daily
Other Names:
  • Gleevec
  • STI-571

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Progression-free Survival at 3 Months
Time Frame: 3 months post 1st dose
3 months post 1st dose
Overall Number of Participants Who Achieve a Response Rate (Complete Response, Partial Response, and Stable Disease) at 3 Months
Time Frame: Up to 4 years
Up to 4 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Median Time to Progression
Time Frame: Time to progression
Time to progression
Number of Subjects That Demonstrated a Reduction in Tumor Measurements.
Time Frame: Up to 4 years
Number of subjects that received at least one post-baseline scan that demonstrated a reduction in sum target lesions per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria.
Up to 4 years
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: Duration of study, Up to 4 years

Toxicity assessments will be obtained as follows:

Cycle 1: Weeks 1,2,3 Cycle 2: Weeks 6,9 Cycle 3: Weeks 12, 15 Cycle 4: Weeks 18, 21 Cycle 5: Weeks 24, 27 Cycle 6+: Every visit during these cycles

Safety assessments will consist of evaluating adverse events and serious adverse events.
Duration of study, Up to 4 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
OHSU Knight Cancer Institute

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Christopher W. Ryan, MD, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 30, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 30, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 31, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 26, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 25, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB00001754
  • OHSU-SOL-05108-LM (Other Identifier: OHSU Knight Cancer Institute)
  • FWA00000161 (Other Identifier: OHSU IRB)
  • OHSU-1754 (Other Identifier: OHSU IRB)
  • CDR0000479150 (Other Identifier: NCI PDQ)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings