Dose-Finding Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Latanoprost to a Novel Treatment for Glaucoma

September 10, 2020 updated by: Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

A Phase 2, 28 Day Parallel-Group, Double-Masked, Dose-Finding Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of PF-03187207 to Latanoprost

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of PF 03187207.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
176

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Artesia, California, United States, 90701
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Newport Beach, California, United States, 92663
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Petaluma, California, United States, 94954
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Poway, California, United States, 92064
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Connecticut
      • Danbury, Connecticut, United States, 06810-4004
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32204
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Ormond Beach, Florida, United States, 32174
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30342
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30339
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Indiana
      • Evansville, Indiana, United States, 47710
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40217
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14618
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28210
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • High Point, North Carolina, United States, 27262
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Oklahoma
      • Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States, 74104
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Pennsylvania
      • Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania, United States, 16066
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15238
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38119
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78705
        • Pfizer Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

-Diagnosis of primary open angle glaucoma (including pigmentary or pseudoexfoliative) or ocular hypertension in one or both eyes

Exclusion Criteria:

-Closed or barely open anterior chamber angle or a history of acute angle closure in either eye

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: PF-03187207 and Latanoprost Vehicle
One drop of each, once daily in study eye for 28 days
Drug: PF-03187207 and Latanoprost Vehicle
Active Comparator: Latanoprost 0.005% and PF-03187207 Vehicle
One drop of each, once daily in study eye for 28 days
Drug: Latanoprost 0.005% and PF-03187207 Vehicle

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye on Day 28
Time Frame: Baseline, 28 days
Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured using a Goldmann applanation tonometer. Diurnal IOP, defined as the mean IOP over the day based on values obtained at 8 AM, 10 AM, 1 PM, and 4 PM, was calculated for each visit. Both eyes were tested, with the right eye preceding the left eye. The operator initially set the dial at 10 mmHg, then looked through the slit lamp and adjusted the dial to take the reading, and then recorded the results. The procedure was repeated on the same eye twice consecutively. If the measurements were within 2 mmHg or less of each other, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. If the 2 readings were more than 2 mmHg of each other, a third (consecutive) reading was taken and the median (middle) IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point.
Baseline, 28 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Mean Intraocular Pressure IOP at the Day 7, 14, and 21 Visits
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 7, Day 14, and Day 21
Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured using a Goldmann applanation tonometer. gBoth eyes were tested, with the right eye preceding the left eye. The operator initially set the dial at 10 mmHg, then looked through the slit lamp and adjusted the dial to take the reading, and then recorded the results. The procedure was repeated on the same eye twice consecutively. If the measurements were within 2 mmHg or less of each other, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. If the 2 readings were more than 2 mmHg of each other, a third (consecutive) reading was taken and the median (middle) IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point.
Baseline, Day 7, Day 14, and Day 21
Percentage of Participants With Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Less Than or Equal to 18 mmHg at Any Visit Through Day 28
Time Frame: 28 days
Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured using a Goldmann applanation tonometer. Both eyes were tested, with the right eye preceding the left eye. The operator initially set the dial at 10 mmHg, then looked through the slit lamp and adjusted the dial to take the reading, and then recorded the results. The procedure was repeated on the same eye twice consecutively. If the measurements were within 2 mmHg or less of each other, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. If the 2 readings were more than 2 mmHg of each other, a third (consecutive) reading was taken and the median (middle) IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point.
28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
NicOx Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Kenneth Harper, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 27, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 27, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 1, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 10, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • A9441001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings