Visibility of Lesion Characteristics With Phase Contrast Mammography
Lesion Characteristics' Visibility With Phase Contrast Mammography in Comparison to X-Ray Mammography for Women Undergoing X-Ray Diagnostic Mammography
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The ability to detect lesions in mammography before they can be felt is the benefit of using this imaging modality for screening of breast cancer. Screening mammography has been proven to decrease mortality from breast cancer. Radiologists identify abnormal breast tissue in the form of microcalcifications, masses, architectural distortion, and asymmetric density by careful assessment of the characteristics of these types of lesions using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Diagnostic System (BIRADS). BIRADS was developed to provide standardization of reporting of mammographic exams. In screening mammography, while it is possible to detect lesions, often more detailed diagnostic imaging is necessary to improve the visibility of margins and edges of lesions through magnification and compression views of the lesion of interest due to spatial resolution limitations which causes geometric blurring of edges in x-ray mammography.
If the ability to clearly see margins and edges of lesions is possible at screening mammography, this would potentially decrease the overall radiation exposure currently needed to allow radiologists to be confident of their characterizations for the majority of patients using x-ray mammography. Digital mammography was developed to improve the visibility of lesions primarily in dense breasts. The reasoning was that the improved contrast range would allow for wider range of gray level differentiation but with digital mammography comes a spatial resolution limitation that blurred edges of lesions. Phase contrast mammography (PCM) was developed to improve digital mammography by providing improvement in sharpness of edges utilizing the x-ray properties of refraction.
Comparison: Phase Contrast Mammography to X-Ray Mammography for Lesion Visibility of Diagnostic Population
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
North Carolina
-
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
- Carolina Center for Clinical Trials, University of North Carolina
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- At least 40 years old
- Female
- Scheduled for diagnostic work-up including compression/magnification views of screening detected breast lesion
Exclusion Criteria:
- < age 40
- Male
- No screening detected findings
- Breast implants
- Any women who is pregnant or has reason to believe she is pregnant or lactating
- Women with breasts larger than the 24 x 30 cm receptor
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 1
Phase Contrast Mammography Exam
|
Standard and magnification views
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Measure: Lesion Visibility Comparison of Phase Contrast Mammography with X-Ray Mammography.
Time Frame: 12 months
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Etta D Pisano, MD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Tabar L, Yen MF, Vitak B, Chen HH, Smith RA, Duffy SW. Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening. Lancet. 2003 Apr 26;361(9367):1405-10. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13143-1.
- Tanaka T, Honda C, Matsuo S, Noma K, Oohara H, Nitta N, Ota S, Tsuchiya K, Sakashita Y, Yamada A, Yamasaki M, Furukawa A, Takahashi M, Murata K. The first trial of phase contrast imaging for digital full-field mammography using a practical molybdenum x-ray tube. Invest Radiol. 2005 Jul;40(7):385-96. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000165575.43381.48.
- Pisano ED, Cole EB, Major S, Zong S, Hemminger BM, Muller KE, Johnston RE, Walsh R, Conant E, Fajardo LL, Feig SA, Nishikawa RM, Yaffe MJ, Williams MB, Aylward SR. Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display. The International Digital Mammography Development Group. Radiology. 2000 Sep;216(3):820-30. doi: 10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00se48820.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- LCCC0702
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.