Visibility of Lesion Characteristics With Phase Contrast Mammography

Lesion Characteristics' Visibility With Phase Contrast Mammography in Comparison to X-Ray Mammography for Women Undergoing X-Ray Diagnostic Mammography

To determine if diagnostic phase contrast mammography (PCM) will provide improved image detail in assessing lesion characteristics when compared to diagnostic x-ray mammography (XM).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The ability to detect lesions in mammography before they can be felt is the benefit of using this imaging modality for screening of breast cancer. Screening mammography has been proven to decrease mortality from breast cancer. Radiologists identify abnormal breast tissue in the form of microcalcifications, masses, architectural distortion, and asymmetric density by careful assessment of the characteristics of these types of lesions using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Diagnostic System (BIRADS). BIRADS was developed to provide standardization of reporting of mammographic exams. In screening mammography, while it is possible to detect lesions, often more detailed diagnostic imaging is necessary to improve the visibility of margins and edges of lesions through magnification and compression views of the lesion of interest due to spatial resolution limitations which causes geometric blurring of edges in x-ray mammography.

If the ability to clearly see margins and edges of lesions is possible at screening mammography, this would potentially decrease the overall radiation exposure currently needed to allow radiologists to be confident of their characterizations for the majority of patients using x-ray mammography. Digital mammography was developed to improve the visibility of lesions primarily in dense breasts. The reasoning was that the improved contrast range would allow for wider range of gray level differentiation but with digital mammography comes a spatial resolution limitation that blurred edges of lesions. Phase contrast mammography (PCM) was developed to improve digital mammography by providing improvement in sharpness of edges utilizing the x-ray properties of refraction.

Comparison: Phase Contrast Mammography to X-Ray Mammography for Lesion Visibility of Diagnostic Population

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

53

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
        • Carolina Center for Clinical Trials, University of North Carolina

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 40 years old
  • Female
  • Scheduled for diagnostic work-up including compression/magnification views of screening detected breast lesion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • < age 40
  • Male
  • No screening detected findings
  • Breast implants
  • Any women who is pregnant or has reason to believe she is pregnant or lactating
  • Women with breasts larger than the 24 x 30 cm receptor

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
Phase Contrast Mammography Exam
Standard and magnification views

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Measure: Lesion Visibility Comparison of Phase Contrast Mammography with X-Ray Mammography.
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Etta D Pisano, MD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

May 1, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 1, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2012

Last Verified

April 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Phase Contrast Mammography

Subscribe