Efficacy-safety Study of Sublingual Immunotherapy With Depigmented-polymerized Pollen Extracts to Treat Rhinoconjunctivitis (GPIT)

July 12, 2011 updated by: Laboratorios Leti, S.L.

A Randomised Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sublingual Immunotherapy With a Depigmented and Polymerized Grass Pollen Extracts in Patients Suffering From Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis.

As the principal objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the treatment measuring the changes in a symptom score, the patient will be asked to fill in a patient diary. This diary will evaluate the week before the patient comes back to receive the treatment. Nose (sneeze, blockage and running), eye (itching, redness and swelling) and chest (breathlessness, wheeze, chest tightness), are scored on a scale from The patient will be instructed to daily assess each one of the symptoms, recording them on an individual symptoms follow-up diary.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The study drug is a sublingual immunotherapy (vaccine) with allergenic extract of grass pollen (Lolium perenne (50%) + Cynodon dactylon (50%)). Sublingual immunotherapy has been available on the European market to treat patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (itching, sneezing, stuffy nose, runny nose) for many years. In this study it will be used as drops under the tongue. At the beginning of the study, you will be given a card that documents that you are taking part. Please carry this with you at all times, in case treatment is necessary at another location. The drops will be given at two doses. The drops are held under the tongue for 2 minutes prior to swallowing.Sublingual Immunotherapy has been shown to be safe and effective in reducing the symptoms of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (nasal allergy and allergy of the eyes).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
90

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • South Africa
    • Cape Town
      • Mowbray, Cape Town, South Africa, 7700
        • Allergy Unit, UCT Lung Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical history of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and/or asthma due to hypersensitivity to grass mix Lolium perenne and Cynodon dactylon.
  • Male or female subjects between 18 and 50 years old
  • Positive skin tests to Lolium perenne and Cynodon dactylon: the wheal produced by the skin test by means of the prick-test technique must be equal or superior to the wheal produced by the positive control of prick test (histamine 10 mg/ml).
  • Presence of specific IgE to Lolium perenne and Cynodon dactylon (CAP greater than 17.5K u/L).
  • Female subjects must not be sexually active or must be following a medially accepted contraceptive method.
  • Pregnancy test negative

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment with ß-blocking agents
  • Patients suffering from some pathology in which the adrenaline is contraindicated (hyperthyroidism, HTA, cardiopathy, etc.)
  • Autoimmune disease (thyroiditis, lupus, etc.)
  • Conditions in which the patient can not offer full co-operation, compliance or those with significant psychiatric disturbance.
  • Intolerance to aspirin.
  • Pregnant women or with pregnancy risk and breast-feeding women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: 1
Biological: Grass pollen allergenic extract (L. perenne-C. dactylon )
Sublingual. 2 drops/daily 1000 DPP/ml 2 years
Biological: Grass pollen allergenic extract (L. perenne-C. dactylon )
Sublingual. 2 drops/daily 10000 DPP/ml 2 years
Placebo Comparator: 3
Biological: placebo
Sublingual. 2 drops/daily 2 years
Experimental: 2
10* concentration of arm 1
Biological: Grass pollen allergenic extract (L. perenne-C. dactylon )
Sublingual. 2 drops/daily 1000 DPP/ml 2 years
Biological: Grass pollen allergenic extract (L. perenne-C. dactylon )
Sublingual. 2 drops/daily 10000 DPP/ml 2 years

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
AUC for Symptom Score and Mean Symptom Score in the pollen period.
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Symptom Score, Immunological evaluation,Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ), Adverse events
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Laboratorios Leti, S.L.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Paul Potter, PhD, Prof., UCT Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 22, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 29, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 30, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 13, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 12, 2011

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 6078-PG-OSL-137

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings