Efficacy-safety Study of Sublingual Immunotherapy With Depigmented-polymerized Pollen Extracts to Treat Rhinoconjunctivitis (GPIT)

July 12, 2011 updated by: Laboratorios Leti, S.L.

A Randomised Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sublingual Immunotherapy With a Depigmented and Polymerized Grass Pollen Extracts in Patients Suffering From Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis.

As the principal objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the treatment measuring the changes in a symptom score, the patient will be asked to fill in a patient diary. This diary will evaluate the week before the patient comes back to receive the treatment. Nose (sneeze, blockage and running), eye (itching, redness and swelling) and chest (breathlessness, wheeze, chest tightness), are scored on a scale from The patient will be instructed to daily assess each one of the symptoms, recording them on an individual symptoms follow-up diary.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study drug is a sublingual immunotherapy (vaccine) with allergenic extract of grass pollen (Lolium perenne (50%) + Cynodon dactylon (50%)). Sublingual immunotherapy has been available on the European market to treat patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (itching, sneezing, stuffy nose, runny nose) for many years. In this study it will be used as drops under the tongue. At the beginning of the study, you will be given a card that documents that you are taking part. Please carry this with you at all times, in case treatment is necessary at another location. The drops will be given at two doses. The drops are held under the tongue for 2 minutes prior to swallowing.Sublingual Immunotherapy has been shown to be safe and effective in reducing the symptoms of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (nasal allergy and allergy of the eyes).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

90

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Cape Town
      • Mowbray, Cape Town, South Africa, 7700
        • Allergy Unit, UCT Lung Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical history of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and/or asthma due to hypersensitivity to grass mix Lolium perenne and Cynodon dactylon.
  • Male or female subjects between 18 and 50 years old
  • Positive skin tests to Lolium perenne and Cynodon dactylon: the wheal produced by the skin test by means of the prick-test technique must be equal or superior to the wheal produced by the positive control of prick test (histamine 10 mg/ml).
  • Presence of specific IgE to Lolium perenne and Cynodon dactylon (CAP greater than 17.5K u/L).
  • Female subjects must not be sexually active or must be following a medially accepted contraceptive method.
  • Pregnancy test negative

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment with ß-blocking agents
  • Patients suffering from some pathology in which the adrenaline is contraindicated (hyperthyroidism, HTA, cardiopathy, etc.)
  • Autoimmune disease (thyroiditis, lupus, etc.)
  • Conditions in which the patient can not offer full co-operation, compliance or those with significant psychiatric disturbance.
  • Intolerance to aspirin.
  • Pregnant women or with pregnancy risk and breast-feeding women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
Sublingual. 2 drops/daily 1000 DPP/ml 2 years
Sublingual. 2 drops/daily 10000 DPP/ml 2 years
Placebo Comparator: 3
Sublingual. 2 drops/daily 2 years
Experimental: 2
10* concentration of arm 1
Sublingual. 2 drops/daily 1000 DPP/ml 2 years
Sublingual. 2 drops/daily 10000 DPP/ml 2 years

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
AUC for Symptom Score and Mean Symptom Score in the pollen period.
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Symptom Score, Immunological evaluation,Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ), Adverse events
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paul Potter, PhD, Prof., UCT Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

October 30, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 13, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2011

Last Verified

July 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis

3
Subscribe