Chronic, Low Dose Erythropoetin Beta in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (EPOHeart)

August 3, 2009 updated by: Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Pilot Study to Assess the Effect of Low Dose Epoetin Beta Administered for Six Month in Patients With Ischemic Heart Failure Subjected to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)

The study is testing the hypothesis, that the application of low dose erythropoetin beta (35 I.E./kg BW/week) for 6 months following successful coronary revascularization by PCI improves left ventricular remodeling as assessed by cardiac MRI.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Several effects known to be exerted by erythropoetin (EPO) directly in the heart independent of hemoglobin levels could be of value immediately after revascularization procedures in ischemic cardiac remodeling: the generation of new capillaries is enhanced by the mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells from the bone marrow. EPO is neuron- and cardio-protective after ischemia/reperfusion. Administration of EPO enhances neuronal progenitors to differentiate into functional neurons; this observation may also be valid for the cardiac compartment. The concept of organ-specific effects of EPO independent of hemoglobin levels is supported by the analysis of EPO analogues lacking hematopoietic activity. In humans, currently this concept can only be tested by the use of EPO-doses that do not affect hemoglobin levels. The concept is valid as clinical trials have been performed showing that doses as low as 5000 I.U. EPO once weekly increase the levels of endothelial progenitor cells in blood. On the other hand, recent clinical trials have also shown neutral or even deleterious effects of high dose EPO treatment raising hemoglobin levels to above 12mg/dl in pre-dialysis patients concerning cardiovascular endpoints. Therefore, the chronic, hemoglobin-neutral administration of low doses of EPO might be a successful approach concerning ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Study outline:

This investigator initiated, double-blind, placebo-controlled study is testing the hypothesis, that low doses of erythropoietin beta (35 I.U./kg body weight) started within 14 days after a successful percutaneous coronary intervention enhance left ventricular remodeling as determined by comparison of two cardiac MRI´s over a course of 6 months. Secondary endpoints include changes in diastolic dysfunction as measured by echocardiography, VO2 measured by spiroergometry and serum brain natriuretic peptide levels.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
28

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Berlin, Germany, 13353
        • Charite Campus Virchow
      • Berlin, Germany, 13125
        • Charite Campus Buch

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • successful coronary intervention < 14 days
  • regional contraction deficit of the left ventricle as detected either by echocardiography or cardiacMRI
  • globally reduced ejection fraction (cardiac MRI or echocardiography: < 60%)
  • willing and able to cooperate
  • voluntary participation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • contraindication for cardiac MRI (i.e. pacemaker, ICD current or within the next 6 months, other metal implants)
  • cardiogenic shock at time of inclusion
  • uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure > 180mmHg)
  • hemoglobin > 16mg/dl
  • thrombocytosis
  • malignant tumor
  • missing informed consent
  • renal failure (creatinine > 300 mg/dl)
  • liver failure
  • other prognosis limiting, severe diseases (i.e. dementia)
  • indication for open label erythropoietin treatment
  • allergy towards solvents of the EPO preparation
  • woman of childbearing potential
  • other clinical study within the preceding 30days
  • known alcohol or drug abuse
  • neurologic or psychiatry disorders
  • previous organ transplantation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: 1
35 I.E. erythropoetin beta given by subcutaneous injection once per week for 6 months. The drug is self-administered.
Drug: erythropoetin beta
35 I.E. kg body weight subcutaneous once per week for 6 months
Other Names:
  • NeoRecormom 10.000 I.E. Patronen Zul.Nr. EU/1/97/031/021-022
Placebo Comparator: 2
Placebo to erythropoetin beta.
Drug: placebo
35 I.E. kg body weight placebo to erythropoetin beta
Other Names:
  • Placebo to NeoRecormon 10.000 patron

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in global left ventricular ejection fraction between initial examination at study entry and the 6 months follow up examination employing cardiac MRI
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The application of 35 I.E./kg body weight erythropoetin beta s.c. once per week for 6 months is well tolerated and safe in patients after PCI.
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
35 I.E. kg/KG erythropoetin beta s.c. once per week for 6 months improves left ventricular regional wall motion as assessed by cardiac MRI.
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
35 I.E. kg/KG erythropoetin beta s.c. once per week for 6 months reduces serum levels of brain natriuretic peptide as a measure of heart failure.
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
35 I.E. kg/KG erythropoetin beta s.c. once per week for 6 months improves peak VO2 as measured by spiroergometry
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
35 I.E. kg/KG erythropoetin beta s.c. once per week for 6 months improves measures or cardiac diastolic dysfunction as assessed by echocardiography
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
35 I.E. kg/KG erythropoetin beta s.c. once per week for 6 months improves cardiac tissue texture aqs assessed by contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Martin W Bergmann, MD, Charité Camous Buch, University Medicine Berlin, Germany

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 5, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 5, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 6, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 4, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 3, 2009

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2009

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 8514077463
  • EudraCT number 2004-002646-35
  • EK 6 EA 3/015/05
  • KP-3910-4030711

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Clinical Trials on erythropoetin beta

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings