A Comparison of Two Daily Disposable Contact Lenses
The Comparative Clinical Performance of the Etafilcon A Lens and the DAILIES AquaComfort Plus Lens
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Manchester, United Kingdom, M60 1QD
- Eurolens Research, The University of Manchester Dpt. of Optometry & Neuroscience
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- They are of legal age (18 years) and capacity to volunteer.
- They understand their rights as a research subject and are willing to sign a Statement of Informed Consent.
- They are willing and able to follow the protocol.
- They would be expected to attain at least 6/9 (20/30) in each eye with the study lenses.
- They are able to wear contact lenses with a back vertex power of -1.00 to -6.00DS.
- They have a maximum of 1.00D of refractive astigmatism (i.e. ≤ 1.00 DC).
- They have successfully worn contact lenses within six months of starting the study. -
Exclusion Criteria:
- They have an ocular disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
- They have a systemic disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
- They are using any topical medication such as eye drops or ointment.
- They are aphakic.
- They have had corneal refractive surgery.
- They have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid lens wear or has keratoconus.
- They are pregnant or lactating.
- They have grade 2 or greater of any of the following ocular surface signs: corneal oedema, corneal vascularisation, corneal staining, tarsal conjunctival changes or any other abnormality which would normally contraindicate contact lens wear.
- They have any infectious disease (e.g. hepatitis) or any immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV).
- They have diabetes.
- They have taken part in any other clinical trial or research, within two weeks prior to starting this study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: etafilcon A first nelfilcon A second
etafilcon A worn daily during week 1, nelfilcon A worn daily for week 2
|
contact lens worn daily for one week (first or second week depending on arm)
Other Names:
Contact lens worn daily for one week (first or second week depending on arm)
Other Names:
|
|
Other: nelfilcon A first, etafilcon A second
nelfilcon A worn daily during week 1, etafilcon A worn daily for week 2
|
contact lens worn daily for one week (first or second week depending on arm)
Other Names:
Contact lens worn daily for one week (first or second week depending on arm)
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Visual Acuity
Time Frame: 2-week
|
Measured using high contrast and low contrast vision charts without the use of spectacles (glasses) or refraction equipment (for contact lens wearers).
Values are on the logMar scale where lower values (< 0) refer to 'better' values of sight.
These scores are converted from a Snellen eye chart examination.
|
2-week
|
|
Subjective Lens Comfort
Time Frame: 2-week
|
Subjects were asked to rate lens performance on a scale of 0 to 100 point scale (0= "Extremely poor" or "Cannot use lenses" and 100= "Excellent" or "Highly impressed with these lenses overall").
The average score is reported.
A factor analysis was used to identify the questions pertaining to product performance, a factor loading of 0.4 or greater was used.
|
2-week
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Subject-reported Overall Product Performance
Time Frame: 2-week
|
Subjects were asked to rate lens performance on a scale of 0 to 100 point scale (0= "Extremely poor" or "Cannot use lenses" and 100= "Excellent" or "Highly impressed with these lenses overall").
The average score is reported.
A factor analysis was used to identify the questions pertaining to product performance, a factor loading of 0.4 or greater was used.
|
2-week
|
|
Optimum Lens Fit
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-week, 2-week
|
Number of subjects that measured as an optimum fit.
Lens fit will be assessed using the following evaluations: horizontal and vertical centration, corneal coverage and movement.
Normally, for an acceptable fit, centration and movement will fall within currently accepted clinical criteria [between -1 and +1 on a -2 to +2 grading scale.
|
Baseline, 1-week, 2-week
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CR-0729
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.