CarboMedics Top Hat vs St. Jude Medical Regent Valve Comparing Sizing and Hemodynamics
A Randomized Study to Compare Sizing, Implant Techniques, & Hemodynamic Performance Between the CarboMedics Supra-annular Top Hat Valve and the St. Jude Medical Regent Valve in the Aortic Position.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
- Johns Hopkins Hospital
-
-
Tennessee
-
Kingsport, Tennessee, United States, 37660
- Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who are indicated for implant with a mechanical valve prosthesis in the aortic position according to the current practice for valve selection at the center.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients < 18 years of age
- Emergency surgery
- Pre-existing valve prosthesis
- Aortic root replacement
- Active endocarditis
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: 1
CarboMedics Supra-annular Top Hat Valve
|
Implant of CarboMedics Top Hat mechanical valve.
|
|
Active Comparator: 2
St. Jude Medical Regent Valve
|
Implant of the St. Jude Medical Regent mechanical valve
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Effective Orifice Area (EOA)
Time Frame: 6 month evaluation
|
Effective Orifice Area of the prosthetic valve measured via echocardiography to determine physiological area of blood flow through the valve.
|
6 month evaluation
|
|
Aortic Mean Gradient
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Mean gradient measured across the aortic prosthetic valve via echocardiography to determine mean pressure of blood flow across the valve.
|
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- RVSS-1H
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.