A Dose-finding Study of Dalotuzumab in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors (MK-0646-002)

February 26, 2018 updated by: Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

An Open-Label, Dose Escalation Phase I Trial of MK-0646 Given as a One to Two Hour Every Other Week Infusion in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Locally Advanced or Metastatic Cancers

The study determined the recommended Phase 2 loading and maintenance doses and dose schedules for administering dalotuzumab using dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) observed during the entire treatment period (Up to 18 months). The primary hypothesis of the study was that administration of dalotuzumab as an every other week infusion in participants with relapsed or refractory locally advanced or metastatic cancers associated with a high frequency of insulin-like growth factor receptor type 1(IGF-1R) overexpression will be generally safe and well tolerated to permit further study and achieve a constant clearance and a minimum trough concentration of 3 µg/mL.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The study consisted of 3 parts. In Part 1 the loading dose was escalated while the maintenance dose was kept constant. In Part 2 the loading dose was kept constant while the maintenance dose was escalated. In Part 3 the recommended phase 2 loading and maintenance doses and schedule were administered to an expanded cohort to explore safety and efficacy of dalotuzumab.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males and females with advanced solid tumors who have failed to respond to standard therapy, ages 18 years and older, with adequate organ function

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant is using growth hormones or growth hormone inhibitors
  • Participant is known to be allergic to components of the drug or similar drugs (e.g. monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab or biological therapies such as immunoglobulin G
  • Participant has had chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or biological therapy within 4-6 weeks of entering the study or has not recovered from previous therapy
  • Participant is taking part in or has taken part in a study of an investigational compound or device within 30 days of their first dose of study drug
  • Participant has an active Central Nervous System metastases and/or carcinomatous meningitis. However, a participant who has completed a course of therapy and is clinically stable may be able to participate
  • Participant is pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Participant is human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive
  • Participant has a history of Hepatitis B or C
  • Participant has symptomatic ascites or pleural effusion. However, if the participant has received treatment and is stable, they may be able to participate
  • Female participant plans to become pregnant or a male participant who plans to impregnate their partner during the time the study is ongoing

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: dalotuzumab 2.5/2.5 mg/kg
Participants received a loading dose of dalotuzumab 2.5 mg/kg administered by intravenous (IV) infusion. Two weeks following completion of the loading dose, participants received a maintenance dose of dalotuzumab 2.5 mg/kg administered by IV infusion every two weeks for up to 18 months.
Drug: dalotuzumab
Administered as an IV infusion over one to two hours
Other Names:
  • MK-0646
Experimental: dalotuzumab 5.0/5.0 mg/kg
Participants received a loading dose of dalotuzumab 5.0 mg/kg administered by IV infusion. Two weeks following completion of the loading dose, participants received a maintenance dose of dalotuzumab 5.0 mg/kg administered by IV infusion every two weeks for up to 18 months.
Drug: dalotuzumab
Administered as an IV infusion over one to two hours
Other Names:
  • MK-0646
Experimental: dalotuzumab 10.0/5.0 mg/kg
Participants received a loading dose of dalotuzumab 10.0 mg/kg administered by IV infusion. Two weeks following completion of the loading dose, participants received a maintenance dose of dalotuzumab 5.0 mg/kg administered by IV infusion every two weeks for up to 18 months.
Drug: dalotuzumab
Administered as an IV infusion over one to two hours
Other Names:
  • MK-0646
Experimental: dalotuzumab 15.0/5.0mg/kg
Participants received a loading dose of dalotuzumab 15.0 mg/kg administered by IV infusion. Two weeks following completion of the loading dose, participants received a maintenance dose of dalotuzumab 5.0 mg/kg administered by IV infusion every two weeks for up to 18 months.
Drug: dalotuzumab
Administered as an IV infusion over one to two hours
Other Names:
  • MK-0646
Experimental: dalotuzumab 20.0/5.0 mg/kg
Participants received a loading dose of dalotuzumab 20.0 mg/kg administered by IV infusion. Two weeks following completion of the loading dose, participants received a maintenance dose of dalotuzumab 5.0 mg/kg administered by IV infusion every two weeks for up to 18 months.
Drug: dalotuzumab
Administered as an IV infusion over one to two hours
Other Names:
  • MK-0646
Experimental: dalotuzumab 15.0/10.0 mg/kg
Participants received a loading dose of dalotuzumab 15.0 mg/kg administered by IV infusion. Two weeks following completion of the loading dose, participants received a maintenance dose of dalotuzumab 10.0 mg/kg administered by IV infusion every two weeks for up to 18 months.
Drug: dalotuzumab
Administered as an IV infusion over one to two hours
Other Names:
  • MK-0646
Experimental: dalotuzumab 15.0/15.0 mg/kg
Participants received a loading dose of dalotuzumab 15.0 mg/kg administered by IV infusion. Two weeks following completion of the loading dose, participants received a maintenance dose of dalotuzumab 15.0 mg/kg administered by IV infusion every two weeks for up to 18 months.
Drug: dalotuzumab
Administered as an IV infusion over one to two hours
Other Names:
  • MK-0646

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Steady-state Serum Concentration of Dalotuzumab at 336 Hours (C336) After the First Maintenance Dose
Time Frame: 2 weeks post first maintenance dose of study drug (3 weeks post loading dose of study drug)
Blood samples were obtained for analysis of steady-state serum concentration of dalotuzumab at 336 hours (C336) after the first maintenance dose of dalotuzumab. The C336 of dalotuzumab after intravenous administration is presented.
2 weeks post first maintenance dose of study drug (3 weeks post loading dose of study drug)
Number of Participants Who Experience One or More Dose- Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
Time Frame: The entire treatment period (Up to 18 months)
Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were assessed and graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). A DLT was defined as the occurrence of any of the following events, that were judged by the study investigator, to be related to the study medication: Grade 4 neutropenia; Grade 3 neutropenia with fever >38.5 degrees Celsius; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia; Grade 3 or Grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity (except alopecia and inadequately treated diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting, and hyperglycemia lasting less than 5 days; and Grade 3 or greater hyperglycemia lasting for more than 5 days in spite of optimal medical management.
The entire treatment period (Up to 18 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Who Experienced a Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)
Time Frame: Up to 18 months post first dose of study drug
Complete Response (disappearance of all target lesions) or Partial Response (at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters) using Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Tumor response was assessed prior to first dose and every 8 weeks beginning pre-dose of Week 9 for up to 18 months. The best response out of all measurements for each participant was used for determining CR and PR.
Up to 18 months post first dose of study drug
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Insulin-like Growth Factor Receptor Type 1 (IGF-1R) Protein Level at Week 1
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 1
IGF-1R expression was measured in pre- and post-dose biopsy samples using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assays. Results were expressed as a percent change from baseline in IG1-FR expression for participants pooled across all dose arms in the study and calculated by study week. A post-dose decrease in IGF-1R expression was an indication of target engagement by dalotuzumab. A larger percent change correlated with a greater target engagement.
Baseline and Week 1
Number of Participants With a Positive Human-anti-humanized-antibody (HAHA) Titer
Time Frame: Prior to second and subsequent doses of study drug (Up to 1 year post-first dose)
The formation of HAHAs may block efficacy by prematurely clearing dalotuzumab and limit the possibility of future dalotuzumab therapy. Blood samples for the measurement of serum levels of HAHAs were obtained prior to treatment with dalotuzumab, and pre-dose Week 3, Week 5, pre-dose every 8 subsequent weeks, and end of treatment (post-study: 4 weeks after last dose of study drug). Positive HAHA status for a participant is defined as testing positive on both the screening and immunodepletion assays at one or more visits.
Prior to second and subsequent doses of study drug (Up to 1 year post-first dose)
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum IGF-1R Protein Level at Week 5
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 5
IGF-1R expression was measured in pre- and post-dose biopsy samples using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assays. Results were expressed as a percent change from baseline in IG1-FR expression for participants pooled across all dose arms in the study and calculated by study week. A post-dose decrease in IGF-1R expression was an indication of target engagement by dalotuzumab. A larger percent change correlated with a greater target engagement.
Baseline and Week 5
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum IGF-1R Protein Level at Week 9
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 9
IGF-1R expression was measured in pre- and post-dose biopsy samples using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assays. Results were expressed as a percent change from baseline in IG1-FR expression for participants pooled across all dose arms in the study and calculated by study week. A post-dose decrease in IGF-1R expression was an indication of target engagement by dalotuzumab. A larger percent change correlated with a greater target engagement.
Baseline and Week 9
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum IGF-1R Protein Level at Week 13
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 13
IGF-1R expression was measured in pre- and post-dose biopsy samples using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assays. Results were expressed as a percent change from baseline in IG1-FR expression for participants pooled across all dose arms in the study and calculated by study week. A post-dose decrease in IGF-1R expression was an indication of target engagement by dalotuzumab. A larger percent change correlated with a greater target engagement.
Baseline and Week 13
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum IGF-1R Protein Level at Week 17
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 17
IGF-1R expression was measured in pre- and post-dose biopsy samples using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assays. Results were expressed as a percent change from baseline in IG1-FR expression for participants pooled across all dose arms in the study and calculated by study week. A post-dose decrease in IGF-1R expression was an indication of target engagement by dalotuzumab. A larger percent change correlated with a greater target engagement.
Baseline and Week 17
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum IGF-1R Protein Level at Week 21
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 21
IGF-1R expression was measured in pre- and post-dose biopsy samples using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assays. Results were expressed as a percent change from baseline in IG1-FR expression for participants pooled across all dose arms in the study and calculated by study week. A post-dose decrease in IGF-1R expression was an indication of target engagement by dalotuzumab. A larger percent change correlated with a greater target engagement.
Baseline and Week 21
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum IGF-1R Protein Level at Week 25
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 25
IGF-1R expression was measured in pre- and post-dose biopsy samples using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assays. Results were expressed as a percent change from baseline in IG1-FR expression for participants pooled across all dose arms in the study and calculated by study week. A post-dose decrease in IGF-1R expression was an indication of target engagement by dalotuzumab. A larger percent change correlated with a greater target engagement.
Baseline and Week 25
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum IGF-1R Protein Level at Week 29
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 29
IGF-1R expression was measured in pre- and post-dose biopsy samples using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assays. Results were expressed as a percent change from baseline in IG1-FR expression for participants pooled across all dose arms in the study and calculated by study week. A post-dose decrease in IGF-1R expression was an indication of target engagement by dalotuzumab. A larger percent change correlated with a greater target engagement.
Baseline and Week 29
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum IGF-1R Protein Level at Week 33
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 33
IGF-1R expression was measured in pre- and post-dose biopsy samples using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assays. Results were expressed as a percent change from baseline in IG1-FR expression for participants pooled across all dose arms in the study and calculated by study week. A post-dose decrease in IGF-1R expression was an indication of target engagement by dalotuzumab. A larger percent change correlated with a greater target engagement.
Baseline and Week 33
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum IGF-1R Protein Level at Week 37
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 37
IGF-1R expression was measured in pre- and post-dose biopsy samples using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assays. Results were expressed as a percent change from baseline in IG1-FR expression for participants pooled across all dose arms in the study and calculated by study week. A post-dose decrease in IGF-1R expression was an indication of target engagement by dalotuzumab. A larger percent change correlated with a greater target engagement.
Baseline and Week 37
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum IGF-1R Protein Level at Week 41
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 41
IGF-1R expression was measured in pre- and post-dose biopsy samples using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assays. Results were expressed as a percent change from baseline in IG1-FR expression for participants pooled across all dose arms in the study and calculated by study week. A post-dose decrease in IGF-1R expression was an indication of target engagement by dalotuzumab. A larger percent change correlated with a greater target engagement.
Baseline and Week 41
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum IGF-1R Protein Level at Week 45
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 45
IGF-1R expression was measured in pre- and post-dose biopsy samples using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assays. Results were expressed as a percent change from baseline in IG1-FR expression for participants pooled across all dose arms in the study and calculated by study week. A post-dose decrease in IGF-1R expression was an indication of target engagement by dalotuzumab. A larger percent change correlated with a greater target engagement.
Baseline and Week 45
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum IGF-1R Protein Level at Week 49
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 49
IGF-1R expression was measured in pre- and post-dose biopsy samples using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assays. Results were expressed as a percent change from baseline in IG1-FR expression for participants pooled across all dose arms in the study and calculated by study week. A post-dose decrease in IGF-1R expression was an indication of target engagement by dalotuzumab. A larger percent change correlated with a greater target engagement.
Baseline and Week 49
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum IGF-1R Protein Level at Week 53
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 53
IGF-1R expression was measured in pre- and post-dose biopsy samples using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assays. Results were expressed as a percent change from baseline in IG1-FR expression for participants pooled across all dose arms in the study and calculated by study week. A post-dose decrease in IGF-1R expression was an indication of target engagement by dalotuzumab. A larger percent change correlated with a greater target engagement.
Baseline and Week 53

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 7, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 5, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 5, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 29, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 7, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 14, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 9, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 26, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 0646-002
  • MK-0646-002 (Other Identifier: Merck Protocol Number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings