A Dose-Finding Study of Fentanyl (JNS020 QD) 1-Day Transdermal Patch in Participants With Cancer Pain

June 6, 2013 updated by: Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.

A Phase II/III Study of JNS020QD in Cancer Pain Patients - A Dose-Finding, Double-Blind Study of JNS020QD Compared With JNS005 in Patients Previously Untreated With Opioid Analgesics

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fentanyl 1-day application (JNS020QD) transdermal patch (patch containing a drug that is put on the skin so the drug can enter the body through the skin) and to assess the non-inferiority of fentanyl 1-day application transdermal patch to fentanyl 3-day application (JNS005) transdermal patch in participants with cancer pain.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a multi-center (conducted in more than one center) study, consisting of two periods: Period 1 is open-label (all people know the identity of the intervention), non-comparative dose titration phase and Period 2 is double blind (neither physician nor participant knows the treatment that the participant receives), positive control (fentanyl 3-day application transdermal patch is used as control drug) phase. In Period 1, fentanyl 1-day application transdermal patch 12.5 microgram per hour (mcg/hr) will be applied to chest, abdomen, upper arm or thigh and will be maintained for 2 days to ensure the safety of participants. Dose escalation or reduction will be allowed based on participant's condition from Day 3 to Day 11 and thereafter dose will be maintained from Day 11 to Day 13 with a maximum application dose of 100 mcg/hr. The total duration of Period 1 is 14 days (a total of 13 applications; including the day of final patch removal). Participants who met the predefined criteria at the end of dose titration phase will enter the double blind phase. In double blind phase, participants will receive either fentanyl 1-day application transdermal patch and placebo matched to fentanyl 3-day application transdermal patch or fentanyl 3-day application transdermal patch and placebo matched to fentanyl 1-day application transdermal patch at the same dose as used at the completion of Period 1. The duration of Period 2 is 10 days. Efficacy will primarily be evaluated by percentage of participants achieving dose titration success and change in mean visual analog scale (VAS) score. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
156

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Japan
      • Asahi, Japan
      • Asahikawa, Japan
      • Asahikawa N/A, Japan
      • Bunkyo, Japan
      • Chiba, Japan
      • Chikushino, Japan
      • Fukuoka, Japan
      • Fushimi, Japan
      • Higashi-Ibaraki, Japan
      • Higashi-Sonogi, Japan
      • Himeji, Japan
      • Hirosaki, Japan
      • Hiroshima, Japan
      • Hitachi, Japan
      • Hohfu, Japan
      • Ichinomiya, Japan
      • Ikeda, Japan
      • Iwakuni, Japan
      • Kawachi-Nagano, Japan
      • Kawasaki N/A, Japan
      • Kitakyushu, Japan
      • Kiyose N/A, Japan
      • Kobe, Japan
      • Kochi, Japan
      • Matsue, Japan
      • Matsuyama, Japan
      • Nishinomiya, Japan
      • Oita, Japan
      • Okayama, Japan
      • Osaka, Japan
      • Osaka N/A, Japan
      • Otake, Japan
      • Sakai, Japan
      • Sendai, Japan
      • Shigenobu N/A, Japan
      • Sunto, Japan
      • Tamaho N/A, Japan
      • Tokushima N/A, Japan
      • Tokyo, Japan
      • Toyohashi, Japan
      • Tsukuba, Japan
      • Utsunomiya, Japan
      • Wako, Japan
      • Yamaguchi, Japan
      • Yonago, Japan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with cancer pain who were previously not treated with opioid analgesics (drug used to control pain)
  • Participants with a pain score of greater than or equal to 35 millimeter (mm) on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS)
  • Participants who are considered to have "insufficient response" to non-opioid analgesics and require treatment with opioid analgesics by the physician
  • Participants who have an established diagnosis of cancer and are notified of the disease
  • Participants who can be hospitalized during Period 1 (dose-titration period)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with impaired respiratory function due to chronic lung disease or others
  • Participants with asthma (breathing disorder in which there is wheezing and difficulty in breathing)
  • Participants with bradyarrhythmia (slow, irregular heartbeats)
  • Participants with following measurements indicative of hepatic or renal impairment during the pre-treatment observation period: Aspartate transaminase (AST) greater than 5 times the upper limit of reference range, Alanine transaminase (ALT) greater than 5 times the upper limit of reference range, serum creatinine greater than 3 times the upper limit of reference range
  • Participants with any cerebral damage, such as brain tumor, accompanied by increased intracranial pressure, disturbance of consciousness, coma, or respiratory disturbance

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Fentanyl 1-day transdermal patch (Titration Phase)
Fentanyl 1-day application transdermal patch releasing the drug at the rate of 12.5 microgram per hour (mcg/hr) applied once daily, and maintained for 2 days. Dose escalation or reduction is done as per Investigator's discretion (maximum applied dose is 100 mcg/hr) up to Day 11 and then dose is fixed up to end of treatment period, that is Day 14. Participants who met the predefined criteria at the end of Titration Phase enter the Double Blind Phase.
Drug: Fentanyl 1-day transdermal patch (Titration Phase)
Fentanyl 1-day application transdermal patch releasing the drug at the rate of 12.5 mcg/hr applied once daily, and maintained for 2 days. Dose escalation or reduction is done as per Investigator's discretion (maximum applied dose is 100 mcg/hr) up to Day 11 and then dose is fixed up to end of treatment period, that is Day 14.
Other Names:
  • JNS020QD
Experimental: Fentanyl 1-day transdermal patch (Double Blind Phase)
Participants who meet the predefined criteria at the end of Titration Phase and enter the Double Blind Phase receive fentanyl 1-day application transdermal patch and placebo matched to fentanyl 3-day application (JNS005) transdermal patch applied once daily releasing the drug at the same dose as maintained at the end of Titration Phase with maximum applied dose of 100 mcg/hr for 10 days.
Drug: Fentanyl 1-day transdermal patch (Double Blind Phase)
Fentanyl 1-day application transdermal patch applied once daily releasing the drug at the same dose as maintained at the end of Titration Phase with maximum applied dose of 100 mcg/hr for 10 days.
Other Names:
  • JNS020QD
Drug: Placebo
Placebo matching to fentanyl 3-day application transdermal patch applied once daily releasing the drug at the same dose as maintained at the end of Titration Phase for 10 days.
Drug: Placebo
Placebo matching to fentanyl 1-day application transdermal patch applied once daily releasing the drug at the same dose as maintained at the end of Titration Phase for 10 days.
Active Comparator: Fentanyl 3-day transdermal patch (Double Blind Phase)
Participants who meet the predefined criteria at the end of Titration Phase and enter the Double Blind Phase receive fentanyl 3-day application transdermal patch and placebo matched to fentanyl 1-day application transdermal patch applied once daily releasing the drug at the same dose as maintained at the end of Titration Phase with maximum applied dose of 100 mcg/hr for 10 days.
Drug: Placebo
Placebo matching to fentanyl 3-day application transdermal patch applied once daily releasing the drug at the same dose as maintained at the end of Titration Phase for 10 days.
Drug: Placebo
Placebo matching to fentanyl 1-day application transdermal patch applied once daily releasing the drug at the same dose as maintained at the end of Titration Phase for 10 days.
Drug: Fentanyl 3-day transdermal patch (Double Blind Phase)
Fentanyl 3-day application transdermal patch applied once daily releasing the drug at the same dose as maintained at the end of Titration Phase with maximum applied dose of 100 mcg/hr for 10 days.
Other Names:
  • JNS005

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Achieving Dose Titration Success
Time Frame: Day 14 or early discontinuation (ED)
Participants achieving dose titration success included all participants who had a mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score of less than or equal to 34 millimeter (mm) and received not more than 2 rescue doses during the last 3 days before the completion or discontinuation of dose titration phase. Pain Intensity VAS measured severity of pain on a 100 mm scale ranging from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (severest pain conceivable) and rescue dose was defined as dose of a fast-acting oral morphine hydrochloride solution or morphine in water solution used in the case of breakthrough pain.
Day 14 or early discontinuation (ED)
Change From Dose Titration Phase in the Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Double Blind Phase
Time Frame: Dose Titration Phase (Day 12 to Day 14) and Double Blind Phase (Day 8 to Day 10)
The mean VAS score for the last 3 days before the completion or discontinuation of Double Blind Phase was compared with that for the last 3 days before the completion or discontinuation of Dose Titration Phase and the change from Dose Titration Phase in the mean VAS Score at Double Blind Phase was reported. Pain Intensity VAS measured severity of pain on a 100 mm scale ranging from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (severest pain conceivable).
Dose Titration Phase (Day 12 to Day 14) and Double Blind Phase (Day 8 to Day 10)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Response Based on Participant's Global Assessment Scale in Titration Phase
Time Frame: Day 1 pre-application (PA), Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10, Day 11, Day 12, Day 13 and Day 14 or ED
Participants were asked to assess their satisfaction with respect to the therapeutic efficacy (effectiveness) of the study drug to control pain on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 = extremely satisfied, 2 = satisfied, 3 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = dissatisfied and 5 = extremely dissatisfied.
Day 1 pre-application (PA), Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10, Day 11, Day 12, Day 13 and Day 14 or ED
Number of Participants With Response Based on Participant's Global Assessment Scale in Double Blind Phase
Time Frame: Day 14-End of Titration Phase (ETP), Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9 and Day 10 or ED
Participants were asked to assess their satisfaction with respect to the therapeutic efficacy of the study drug to control pain on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 = extremely satisfied, 2 = satisfied, 3 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = dissatisfied and 5 = extremely dissatisfied.
Day 14-End of Titration Phase (ETP), Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9 and Day 10 or ED
Pain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score in Titration Phase
Time Frame: Day 1 PA, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10, Day 11, Day 12, Day 13 and Day 14 or ED
Participants were asked to assess their resting pain intensity (severity of pain) on a 100-mm VAS with the left edge (0 mm) defined as "no pain" and the right edge (100 mm) defined as "severest pain conceivable".
Day 1 PA, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10, Day 11, Day 12, Day 13 and Day 14 or ED
Pain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score in Double Blind Phase
Time Frame: Day 14-End of Titration Phase (ETP), Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9 and Day 10 or ED
Participants were asked to assess their resting pain intensity (severity of pain) on a 100-mm VAS with the left edge (0 mm) defined as "no pain" and the right edge (100 mm) defined as "severest pain conceivable".
Day 14-End of Titration Phase (ETP), Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9 and Day 10 or ED
Percentage of Participants Achieving Pain Control in Double Blind Phase
Time Frame: Day 10 or ED
Pain control was assessed based on change in VAS and number of daily rescue doses during 3 days before completion of Double Blind Phase from 3 days before start of Double Blind Phase. For VAS score, difference of less than or equal to +15 mm and for rescue doses, difference of less than or equal to 1 was considered significant to achieve pain control. Pain Intensity VAS measured pain severity on a scale ranging from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (severest pain conceivable) and rescue dose was defined as dose of fast-acting oral morphine formulation used in case of breakthrough pain.
Day 10 or ED
Number of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for Pain in Titration Phase
Time Frame: Day 1 PA, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10, Day 11, Day 12, Day 13 and Day 14 or ED
Participants were asked to assess their resting pain intensity (severity of pain) on a 4-point categorical scale ranging from 0 to 3 where 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain and 3 = severe pain.
Day 1 PA, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10, Day 11, Day 12, Day 13 and Day 14 or ED
Number of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for Pain in Double Blind Phase
Time Frame: Day 14-End of Titration Phase (ETP), Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9 and Day 10 or ED
Participants were asked to assess their resting pain intensity (severity of pain) on a 4-point categorical scale ranging from 0 to 3 where 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain and 3 = severe pain.
Day 14-End of Titration Phase (ETP), Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9 and Day 10 or ED
Number of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per Day in Titration Phase
Time Frame: Day 1 PA, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10, Day 11, Day 12, Day 13 and Day 14 or ED
The participants assessed total painful time in 1 day on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4 where 0 = less than (<) 4 hours, 1 = greater than or equal to (>=) 4 hours to less than 8 hours, 2 = greater than or equal to 8 hours to less than 12 hours, 3 = greater than or equal to 12 hours and 4 = 24 hours (all day).
Day 1 PA, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10, Day 11, Day 12, Day 13 and Day 14 or ED
Number of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per Day in Double Blind Phase
Time Frame: Day 14-End of Titration Phase (ETP), Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9 and Day 10 or ED
The participants assessed total painful time in 1 day on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4 where 0 = less than (<) 4 hours, 1 = greater than or equal to (>=) 4 hours to less than 8 hours, 2 = greater than or equal to 8 hours to less than 12 hours, 3 = greater than or equal to 12 hours and 4 = 24 hours (all day).
Day 14-End of Titration Phase (ETP), Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9 and Day 10 or ED
Mean Number of Rescue Doses in Titration Phase
Time Frame: Day 1 PA, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10, Day 11, Day 12, Day 13 and Day 14 or ED
Rescue dose was defined as dose of a fast-acting oral morphine hydrochloride solution or morphine in water solution used in the case of breakthrough pain or lack of analgesic effect.
Day 1 PA, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10, Day 11, Day 12, Day 13 and Day 14 or ED
Mean Number of Rescue Doses in Double Blind Phase
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9 and Day 10 or ED
Rescue dose was defined as dose of a fast-acting oral morphine hydrochloride solution or morphine in water solution used in the case of breakthrough pain or lack of analgesic effect.
Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9 and Day 10 or ED
Number of Participants With Response Based on Physician's Global Assessment Scale in Titration Phase
Time Frame: Day 14
The treating physician assessed the therapeutic efficacy of the study drug to control pain on a 2-point scale of effective and ineffective. Number of participants with effective and ineffective therapeutic efficacy with respect to the study drug were reported.
Day 14
Number of Participants With Response Based on Physician's Global Assessment Scale in Double Blind Phase
Time Frame: Day 10
The treating physician assessed the therapeutic efficacy of the study drug to control pain on a 2-point scale of effective and ineffective. Number of participants with effective and ineffective therapeutic efficacy with respect to the study drug were reported.
Day 10

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 24, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 24, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 27, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 13, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 6, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CR014899
  • JNS020QD-JPN-C02

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings